MYB expression by immunohistochemistry is highly specific and sensitive for detection of solid variant of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast among all triple-negative breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Adenoid cystic carcinoma is a rare subtype of triple-negative breast carcinoma. These low-grade tumours, which are treated by simple mastectomy and have an excellent prognosis compared to other triple-negative breast carcinomas. Solid-variant adenoid cystic carcinomas have basaloid features and are difficult to distinguish morphologically from other triple-negative breast cancers. Breast adenoid cystic carcinoma exhibits MYB protein overexpression, which can be detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). AIM: We compared the IHC expression of MYB in solid-variant adenoid cystic carcinoma with that in other triple-negative breast cancers. METHODS: We conducted IHC staining of 210 samples of triple-negative breast cancers, including solid-variant adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 17), metaplastic breast carcinoma (n = 44), basaloid triple-negative breast cancer (n = 21), and other triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 128). We classified nuclear staining of MYB as diffuse/strong (3+), focal moderate (2+), focal weak (1+), or none (0). RESULTS: All 17 solid/basaloid adenoid cystic carcinoma cases exhibited 3+ MYB expression. Of the 21 solid/basaloid triple-negative breast cancers, one (5%) had 2+ expression, seven (33%) 1+ expression, and 13 (62%) 0 expression. Of the 44 metaplastic carcinoma cases, 39 cases (89%) had no (0) staining, and the other five cases had focal weak (1+) or moderate (2+) staining. Among the 128 triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma cases, 92 cases (72%) had no (0) staining, 36 cases (28%) exhibited focal weak (1+) or moderate (2+) staining. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed diffuse/strong MYB staining (3+) only in solid/basaloid adenoid cystic carcinomas. Thus, we recommend routine MYB IHC staining in triple-negative breast carcinoma with solid/basaloid morphology to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Immunohistochemical assessment of HER2 low breast cancer: interobserver reproducibility and correlation with digital image analysis.

PURPOSE: The recent findings from the DESTINY-Breast04 trial highlighted the clinical importance of distinguishing between HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores 0 and 1 + in metastatic breast cancer (BC). However, pathologist interpretation of HER2 IHC scoring is subjective, and standardized methodology is needed. We evaluated the consistency of HER2 IHC scoring among pathologists and the accuracy of digital image analysis (DIA) in interpreting HER2 IHC staining in cases of HER2-low BC. METHODS: Fifty whole-slide biopsies of BC with HER2 IHC staining were evaluated, comprising 25 cases originally reported as IHC score 0 and 25 as 1 +. These slides were digitally scanned. Six pathologists with breast expertise independently reviewed and scored the scanned images, and DIA was applied. Agreement among pathologists and concordance between pathologist scores and DIA results were statistically analyzed using Kendall coefficient of concordance (W) tests. RESULTS: Substantial agreement among at least five of the six pathologists was found for 18 of the score 0 cases (72%) and 15 of the score 1 + cases (60%), indicating excellent interobserver agreement (W = 0.828). DIA scores were highly concordant with pathologist scores in 96% of cases (47/49), indicating excellent concordance (W = 0.959). CONCLUSION: Although breast subspecialty pathologists were relatively consistent in evaluating BC with HER2 IHC scores of 0 and 1 +, DIA may be a reliable supplementary tool to enhance the standardization and quantification of HER2 IHC assessment, especially in challenging cases where results may be ambiguous (i.e., scores 0-1 +). These findings hold promise for improving the accuracy and consistency of HER2 testing.

A Comparative Evaluation of TRPS1 and GATA3 in adenoid cystic, secretory, and acinic cell carcinomas of the breast and salivary gland.

GATA3 is the most used marker to determine tumors' breast origin, but its diagnostic value in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is limited. The newly identified TRPS1 is highly sensitive and specific for breast carcinoma, especially TNBC. Here, we compared the utility of TRPS1 and GATA3 expression in a subset of salivary gland-type breast tumors (including adenoid cystic, acinic cell, and secretory carcinomas [AdCC, ACC, and SC, respectively]), and we compared TRPS1 and GATA3 expression of such tumors with head and neck (H&N) and AdCC of upper respiratory tumors. TRPS1 was strongly expressed in basaloid TNBC and AdCCs with solid components, including 100 % of mixed and solid breast AdCCs. However, TRPS1 was positive in only 50 % cribriform AdCCs. Expression patterns of TRPS1 in H&N and upper respiratory AdCC were similar. TRPS1 was positive in 30 % of H&N cribriform AdCCs but was strongly expressed in mixed AdCC (67 %) and solid AdCC (100 %). In the upper respiratory AdCCs, TRPS1 was positive in 58.4 % of cribriform AdCCs and positive in 100 % of AdCCs with solid components. On the contrary, GATA3 was negative in predominant AdCCs of the breast, H&N, and upper respiratory tract. These data show that GATA3 and TRPS1 expression varies AdCCs. In addition, TRPS1 and GATA3 expression patterns were similar SC and ACC of breast and H&N. Both markers were positive in SC and negative in ACC. Therefore, TRPS1 and GATA3 cannot be used to differentiate salivary gland-type carcinomas of breast origin from those of upper respiratory or H&N origin.

Discordance of Oncotype DX scores in synchronous bilateral and unilateral multifocal breast cancers.

PURPOSE: Oncotype DX, a 21-gene expression profiling test, has become standard of care in the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. In multifocal tumors, it is unclear whether testing of the different foci is necessary. We evaluated the concordance of Oncotype DX recurrence scores (RS) between 2 tumor foci in synchronous bilateral or unilateral multifocal tumors and characterized pathological predictors of discordance. METHODS: We reviewed 713 ER+, HER2- primary invasive breast cancer patients with Oncotype RS and identified 17 bilateral synchronous patients (34 tumors) and 13 unilateral multifocal patients (26 tumors) with available Oncotype RS on all foci. Discordance in Oncotype RS between synchronous tumors was recorded and associations with clinicopathologic features including tumor size, histology, Nottingham histologic grade, progesterone receptor staining, and Ki67 index were analyzed. RESULTS: Bilateral synchronous tumors were present in older patients (median age 59 years) and had larger tumor (median size 17 mm) and more discordant histology (10/17, 59%) as compared to unilateral multifocal tumors (median age 49 years, p < 0.01; median tumor size 12 mm, p = 0.01; discordant histology 2/13, 15%, p = 0.03). Oncotype RS were discordant in 47% (8/17) of bilateral and 54% (7/13) of unilateral multifocal tumors. Concordant Oncotype RS was associated with similar histologic grade and Ki67 index in 78% (7/9) of bilateral and 100% (6/6) of multifocal tumors. In contrast, only 25% (2/8) of bilateral (p = 0.06) and 14% (1/7) of unilateral multifocal (p < 0.01) cases with discordant Oncotype RS had concordant histology grades and Ki67 levels. In synchronous tumors with discordant Oncotype RS and Ki67 index, all (4/4) foci with higher RS had higher Ki67 index. CONCLUSION: Discordance of Oncotype RS is common in both bilateral and unilateral multifocal breast cancer and is likely associated with discordant histologic grade or Ki67.

Chimeric RNAs reveal putative neoantigen peptides for developing tumor vaccines for breast cancer.

Introduction: We present here a strategy to identify immunogenic neoantigen candidates from unique amino acid sequences at the junctions of fusion proteins which can serve as targets in the development of tumor vaccines for the treatment of breastcancer. Method: We mined the sequence reads of breast tumor tissue that are usually discarded as discordant paired-end reads and discovered cancer specific fusion transcripts using tissue from cancer free controls as reference. Binding affinity predictions of novel peptide sequences crossing the fusion junction were analyzed by the MHC Class I binding predictor, MHCnuggets. CD8+ T cell responses against the 15 peptides were assessed through in vitro Enzyme Linked Immunospot (ELISpot). Results: We uncovered 20 novel fusion transcripts from 75 breast tumors of 3 subtypes: TNBC, HER2+, and HR+. Of these, the NSFP1-LRRC37A2 fusion transcript was selected for further study. The 3833 bp chimeric RNA predicted by the consensus fusion junction sequence is consistent with a read-through transcription of the 5'-gene NSFP1-Pseudo gene NSFP1 (NSFtruncation at exon 12/13) followed by trans-splicing to connect withLRRC37A2 located immediately 3' through exon 1/2. A total of 15 different 8-mer neoantigen peptides discovered from the NSFP1 and LRRC37A2 truncations were predicted to bind to a total of 35 unique MHC class I alleles with a binding affinity of IC50<500nM.); 1 of which elicited a robust immune response. Conclusion: Our data provides a framework to identify immunogenic neoantigen candidates from fusion transcripts and suggests a potential vaccine strategy to target the immunogenic neopeptides in patients with tumors carrying the NSFP1-LRRC37A2 fusion.

Nuclear staining for pan-Trk by immunohistochemistry is highly specific for secretory carcinoma of breast: pan-Trk in various subtypes of breast carcinoma.

AIMS: Secretory carcinoma of breast (SCB) typically harbours ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry analysis (IHC) has been shown to be sensitive for SCB diagnosis. However, weak focal pan-Trk nuclear staining was previously found in 10% of non-secretory breast carcinomas. To further examine pan-Trk IHC specificity, we evaluated pan-Trk staining in various breast carcinoma subtypes. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 346 invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs), including 8 SCBs and 48 triple-negative histological mimickers (36 metaplastic carcinomas, including 12 matrix-producing carcinomas; 5 adenoid cystic carcinomas; 5 apocrine carcinomas; 2 acinic cell carcinomas), 101 triple-negative IBCs of no special type, 101 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative IBCs and 88 HER2-positive IBCs. Six salivary gland secretory carcinomas were also included. Pan-Trk IHC was performed on tumours using a rabbit monoclonal pan-Trk antibody. Any nuclear staining in the invasive carcinoma cells was considered positive. RESULTS: All 14 secretory carcinomas from breast and salivary gland exhibited moderate to strong pan-Trk nuclear staining. In contrast, no pan-Trk nuclear staining was identified in any of the 338 non-secretory IBCs. Focal cytoplasmic pan-Trk staining was observed in nine non-secretory IBCs (2.7%), and was considered nonspecific and negative. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that pan-Trk nuclear staining is highly specific for SCB. In low-grade to intermediate-grade IBCs that share histological features with SCB, adding pan-Trk to a routing panel of estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/HER2 is highly diagnostic. Our results also support using pan-Trk IHC to differentiate SCB from its triple-negative histological mimickers, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, matrix-producing carcinoma, apocrine carcinoma and acinic cell carcinoma.

Clinical outcome and therapeutic impact on neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a national cancer database study.

PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast are rare and not well-studied. NEN are subcategorized as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The objectives of the current study were to review the clinicopathologic features of NENs, therapeutic efficacy of current systemic therapy and clinical outcomes of NEN of the breast. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2015, 420 NET, 205 NEC, 146 Adenocarcinoma with NE differentiation (ACNED) and 1,479,520 of invasive carcinoma, not otherwise specified (IC-NOS) of the breast were identified in the National Caner Database. Overall survival was compared among groups using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: After adjusting for other prognostic factors, both NET and NEC of the breast showed significantly worse OS than IC-NOS (HR (95% CI) = 1.41 (1.17, 1.72), p = 0.005 and HR (95% CI) = 2.11 (1.67, 2.67), p < 0.001, respectively). Both NET and NEC benefited from endocrine therapy if the tumors were hormonal receptor positive (median OS for treated with vs without: 125 vs 57 months in NET, not reached vs 29 months in NEC). NEC also benefited from chemotherapy (median OS for treated with vs without: 42 vs 34 months), but not NET. CONCLUSION: NEN is a unique pathologic and clinical entity, which has worse clinical outcome compared to IC-NOS of the breast. Current therapeutics used in the treatment of IC-NOS improve, but do not fully mitigate, the poorer prognosis of NEN patients. More effective therapy for patients with this unique tumor type are needed.

Breast Cancer With a HER2 FISH Group 2 Result: Should HER2 Tests be Repeated?

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) group 2 pattern (HER2 <4 and HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2, a subset of monosomy CEP17) was historically considered HER2-positive, but mostly HER2-negative according to updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines unless 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Therapeutic relevance of this group remained elusive, therefore we assessed if repeat IHC and FISH can assist final HER2 classification. PATIENT AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed HER2 FISH performed at our institution from 2014 to 2018 and identified 23 of 3554 (0.6%) breast cancer cases with at least one-time measurement of HER2 FISH categorized as group 2. Repeat HER2 tests were performed for cases with available alternative tumor samples and compared with initial testing following 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. RESULTS: Only 1 of 23 group 2 cases was HER2-positive, 0/18 in primary and 1/5 in metastatic/recurrent tumors. Of 13 primary tumors with repeat HER2 results; 10 (77%) remained HER2-negative; 3 (23%) changed from HER2-negative (group 2 and IHC 2+) to HER2-positive (group 1 and IHC 2+). Among 8 of these 13 patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy containing anti-HER2 agent, 3 (38%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). Two of 3 pCR cases were HER2-positive converters on repeat testing. Three pCR cases were ER-negative or -low positive and Ki67 ≥40%, while 5 partial responders were ER-positive and Ki67 <40% (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer with HER2 FISH group 2 result may represent heterogeneous populations of tumor cells being originated de novo or preferentially selected secondary to therapy. Repeat HER2 tests on alternative samples may be considered to guide anti-HER2 therapy.

Immunohistochemical expression of TRPS1 in mammary Paget disease, extramammary Paget disease, and their close histopathologic mimics.

BACKGROUND: Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TPRS1) expression has been found to be highly sensitive and specific for breast carcinomas. The frequency of TRPS1 expression in cutaneous neoplasms such as mammary Paget disease (MPD) and extramammary PD (EMPD) is currently unknown. We assessed the utility of TRPS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the evaluation of MPD, EMPD, and their histopathologic mimics, squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS) and melanoma in situ (MIS). METHODS: Twenty-four MPDs, 19 EMPDs, 13 SCCISs, and 9 MISs were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis using anti-TRPS1 antibody. The intensity (none, 0; weak, 1+ ; moderate, 2+ ; strong, 3+ ) and proportion (<1%, absent; 1%-25%, focal; 26%-75%, patchy; >75%, diffuse) of TRPS1 expression were recorded. Relevant clinical data were documented. RESULTS: TPRS1 expression was present in 100% (24/24) of MPDs, with 88% (21/24) of MPDs exhibiting strong, diffuse immunoreactivity. Sixty-eight percent (13/19) of EMPDs showed TRPS1 expression. Intriguingly, EMPDs lacking TRPS1 expression were consistently of perianal origin. TRPS1 expression was seen in 92% (12/13) of SCCISs but was absent in all MISs. CONCLUSIONS: TRPS1 may be useful to distinguish MPDs/EMPDs from MISs, but its utility is limited in distinguishing them from other pagetoid intraepidermal neoplasms such as SCCISs.

Intragenic EGFR::EGFR.E1E8 Fusion (EGFRvIII) in 4331 Solid Tumors.

Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII, the deletion of exons 2-7) is a recurrent intragenic EGFR::EGFR.E1E8 fusion that occurs in high-grade gliomas. The presence of EGFRvIII in other solid tumors has not been well characterized. We retrospectively reviewed advanced malignant solid tumor cases tested by a custom hybrid capture 610-gene next-generation sequencing platform from 2021 to 2022. EGFRvIII was identified in 17 of 4331 (0.4%) cases, including 16 of 238 (7%) brain tumors and 1/301 (0.3%) breast tumors. EGFRvIII-positive brain tumors were all glioblastoma IDH-wildtype, most with concurrent TERT promoter mutation (14 of 16), EGFR amplification (13 of 16), and EGFR mutation (8 of 16). The only EGFRvIII-positive breast lesion was a sarcomatoid neoplasm in a young female patient. A separate breast case tested outside our institution with reported EGFRvIII was noted in a young female patient with a malignant phyllodes tumor with stromal overgrowth. Microscopically, both EGFRvIII-positive breast tumors showed high-grade sarcomatoid morphology with brisk mitotic activity. In summary, EGFRvIII is rare, occurring primarily in glioblastoma and rarely in breast sarcomatoid neoplasm, with no instances identified in other tumor types in our series. This select group of patients may benefit from chemotherapy and/or targeted anti-EGFR therapy.

Metastatic nonhematopoietic neoplasms to the breast: a study of 238 cases.

The aim of this study was to review the clinicopathologic characteristics of metastatic nonhematopoietic malignancies to the breast, in order to identify salient features for practicing pathologists that are useful in distinguishing metastatic lesions from primary breast neoplasms. A total of 238 cases were identified during the period from January 2005 to January 2015. Clinicopathologic features of these cases were retrospectively reviewed. Primary tumors included melanoma (99, 42%), serous carcinoma (35, 15%), neuroendocrine neoplasm (32, 13%), sarcoma (23, 10%), and adenocarcinoma from various organs (47, 20%), and 2 others. Most metastases were unilateral (223, 94%) and unifocal (206, 87%) and were detected radiographically (167, 70%). Concurrent ipsilateral axillary metastasis occurred in 33 (14%) patients. Among 238 cases, 41 had metastatic disease to the breast concurrently or preceding the primary cancer diagnosis. Notably, in 39 (16%) cases, breast metastasis was the first clinical presentation of disease, and 16 (41%) of these cases were initially misdiagnosed as breast primaries. In contrast, with a known history of nonmammary primary tumors, only 4 of 197 (2%) cases were misdiagnosed (p < 0.0001). Metastatic tumors share many overlapping features with breast primary carcinomas. However, cases with a well-circumscribed tumor, lack of in situ component, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity, and unusual morphologic features should raise the consideration of metastatic disease. While clinical history is paramount for correct diagnosis, metastasis to the breast as the first clinical presentation is not uncommon.

TRPS1, GATA3, and SOX10 expression in triple-negative breast carcinoma.

A diagnostic dilemma can be encountered when primary triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) without an in situ component or metastatic TNBCs lose the currently used organ-specific marker such as GATA3, raising concerns about metastatic carcinoma from other sites. In the current study, we compared the newly identified breast marker TRPS1 with currently used breast markers GATA3 and SOX10 in whole-tissue sections from 315 cases of various subtypes of TNBC. TRPS1 was highly expressed in 100% of triple-negative primary and metastatic invasive lobular carcinomas, 99% of triple-negative primary and metastatic invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST), and 95% of metaplastic breast carcinomas. In contrast, GATA3 and SOX10 were expressed in 94% and 0% of invasive lobular carcinomas, 63% and 74% of IBC-NST, and 50% and 49% of metaplastic breast carcinomas, respectively. For special-type TNBCs, both TRPS1 and GATA3 were negative in acinic cell carcinomas, most cribriform adenoid cystic carcinomas, and neuroendocrine carcinomas, but positive in secretory carcinomas. Triple-negative apocrine carcinoma was the only subtype of TNBC with positive GATA3 but negative TRPS1. These data indicate that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive marker for TNBCs with positivity not only in GATA3/SOX10-positive TNBCs but also in almost all GATA3/SOX10-negative TNBCs.

Expression of TRPS1 in phyllodes tumor and sarcoma of the breast.

When a sarcomatous neoplasm is identified in the breast, distinguishing metaplastic carcinoma, malignant phyllodes tumor (MPT), and primary sarcoma is a diagnostic challenge, especially on small biopsies, as all these tumors may have overlapping morphological features, thoroughly grossing with histological examination and immunohistochemical staining being the standard approach to aid in classifying these lesions. Recently, we identified a highly sensitive and specific breast carcinoma marker TRPS1 with high expression in metaplastic breast carcinoma. In the current study, we tested TRPS1 in MPTs and primary sarcoma of the breast. We found TRPS1 was highly expressed (95%) within spindle cell, chondro-osseous, and/or liposarcomatous components of MPTs, in all breast primary chondrosarcomas and extraskeletal osteosarcomas, but not in other sarcomas of the breast. In extramammary sarcomas, TRPS1 was expressed in 28% of conventional chondrosarcomas and 56% of osteosarcomas of bone, but rarely in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPSs), liposarcomas, and angiosarcomas. In summary, MPTs may share similar genetic background with metaplastic carcinoma exhibiting TRPS1 expression, and TRPS1 may play a role in chondro-osseous differentiation because of its expression in chondro-osseous sarcomas from both breast and extramammary sites. Our findings suggest TRPS1 may be clinically useful in distinguishing MPT and metaplastic carcinoma from primary breast sarcoma except for tumors with chondro-osseous differentiation.

Risk of Breast Cancer in Selected Women With Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Who do not Undergo Surgical Excision.

OBJECTIVE: To review breast cancer incidence in women with ADH diagnosed by CNB and managed nonoperatively. BACKGROUND: ADH found on CNB is associated with an upgrade to carcinoma in 10%-50% of women, thus surgical excision remains the standard of care. Safety of nonoperative management is unknown. METHODS: ADH patients diagnosed between January 2004 and October 2018 were identified. Subsequent breast cancer events were compared between those who were excised and those who met predetermined criteria of low risk and were thus observed. Subsequent breast cancer events were classified as index site event if identified in the same quadrant as prior ADH. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess potential predictors of subsequent breast cancer events. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-eight women with 483 ADH lesions were identified; 309 were observed and 174 underwent excision. Median follow-up was 5.2 years. Prior breast cancer history was the only factor associated with subsequent breast cancer risk (odds ratio 2.25, 95% confidence interval 1.04-4.87). After excluding patients with a breast cancer history, there was no association of age, race, chemoprevention, or surgical excision of ADH with future cancer risk. 21/387 patients without a breast cancer history developed a subsequent cancer; 10 (7.3%) in the surgical group and 11 (4.4%) in the observed ( P = 0.2). Two cancers were identified at the index site in the surgery group (2/137, 1.5%) and three in those observed (3/250, 1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Observation, rather than surgical excision, is safe in select women with ADH. National guidelines should consider observation for this select group of patients.

Targeting Replicative Stress and DNA Repair by Combining PARP and Wee1 Kinase Inhibitors Is Synergistic in Triple Negative Breast Cancers with Cyclin E or BRCA1 Alteration.

The identification of biomarker-driven targeted therapies for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a major clinical challenge, due to a lack of specific targets. Here, we show that cyclin E, a major regulator of G1 to S transition, is deregulated in TNBC and is associated with mutations in DNA repair genes (e.g., BRCA1/2). Breast cancers with high levels of cyclin E not only have a higher prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations, but also are associated with the worst outcomes. Using several in vitro and in vivo model systems, we show that TNBCs that harbor either mutations in BRCA1/2 or overexpression of cyclin E are very sensitive to the growth inhibitory effects of AZD-1775 (Wee 1 kinase inhibitor) when used in combination with MK-4837 (PARP inhibitor). Combination treatment of TNBC cell lines with these two agents results in synergistic cell killing due to induction of replicative stress, downregulation of DNA repair and cytokinesis failure that results in increased apoptosis. These findings highlight the potential clinical application of using cyclin E and BRCA mutations as biomarkers to select only those patients with the highest replicative stress properties that may benefit from combination treatment with Wee 1 kinase and PARP inhibitors.

HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines.

PURPOSE: HER2 overexpression and gene amplification are routinely tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), respectively. In addition, HER2 mRNA expression is also tested by the Oncotype DX assay. Discordance between laboratories among the different assays remains a problem. To improve the routine HER2 reporting, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) updated their guidelines in 2018. Our study will compare concordance of HER2 status by IHC and FISH using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines with Oncotype DX. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 657 estrogen receptor positive primary breast cancer cases with available Oncotype DX tests between 2011 and 2018. Medical records were reviewed for HER2 results by IHC, FISH, and Oncotype DX. The HER2 results by different assays and between 2013 and 2018 guidelines were compared. RESULTS: Of the 657 cases, 280 were tested by IHC, FISH, and Oncotype DX. HER2-equivocal cases by IHC 2013 guidelines were all negative (67/67, 100%) by FISH 2018 guidelines and by Oncotype DX. HER2-equivocal cases by FISH 2013 guidelines were all negative (16/16, 100%) by FISH 2018 guidelines, while 15/16 (93.8%) negative and 1/16 (6.2%) equivocal by Oncotype DX. The HER2-equivocal and HER2-negative groups were similar in age, gender, histology, grade, and Ki67 score. CONCLUSIONS: HER2 concordance was highest between Oncotype DX (99.6%) and FISH per 2018 guidelines. This suggests that the ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines improved the accurate stratification of HER2-equivocal cases.

Efficacy of fluvastatin and aspirin for prevention of hormonally insensitive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Primary prevention of hormonally insensitive breast cancers remains an important clinical need and repurposing existing low-toxicity drugs represents a low-cost, efficient strategy for meeting this goal. This study targeted the cholesterol pathway using fluvastatin, a cholesterol-lowering drug, and aspirin, an AMPK activator that acts as a brake in the cholesterol pathway, in a transgenic mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: Using SV40C3 TAg mice, the efficacy and mechanism of fluvastatin, aspirin, or both in combination were compared with vehicle alone. RESULTS: Sixteen-weeks of fluvastatin treatment resulted in significant delay in onset of tumors (20 weeks vs. 16.8 weeks in vehicle treatment, p = 0.01) and inhibited tumor incidence and tumor multiplicity by 50% relative to the vehicle control. In animals that developed tumors, fluvastatin treatment inhibited tumor weight by 75% relative to vehicle control. Aspirin alone did not significantly affect tumor latency, tumor incidence or tumor burden compared to vehicle control. Fluvastatin and aspirin in combination delayed the onset of tumors but failed to inhibit tumor incidence and tumor multiplicity. The growth-inhibitory effects of fluvastatin were mediated through increased FAS/FASL mediated apoptotic cell death that was characterized by increased cleaved PARP and driven in part by depletion of an isoprenoid, geranyl geranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). CONCLUSIONS: In line with NCI's emphasis to repurpose low-toxicity drugs for prevention of cancer, fluvastatin was effective for prevention of TNBC and warrants further clinical testing. Aspirin did not provide chemopreventive benefit.

Validation of prognostic significance of the proposed uniform classification framework in neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast.

PURPOSE: A uniform classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in all the organ systems has been recently proposed by an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert panel. Based on the new classification system, the NENs of the breast are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). This study is aimed to analysis the prognostic differences between NENs and invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (IDCs-NST). METHODS: The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database released on November 2018 was used for this study. Between 2003 and 2016, 361 NENs (NET = 239, NEC = 122) of the breast and 491,908 of IDCs-NST were identified. Survival analysis was performed for disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The 5-year DSS of NET, NEC, and IDC-NST was 63.39%, 46.00%, and 89.17%, respectively. And the 5-year OS of NET, NEC, and IDC-NST was 55.66%, 38.87%, and 83.17%, respectively. Within the same clinical stage or grade, NETs and NECs of the breast had worse DSS and OS than corresponding stage or grade IDCs-NST (all P < 0.050). In univariate and multivariate survival analysis, NENs of the breast had significantly worse DSS and OS than IDCs-NST (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The universal classification framework for NEN allowed us to further refine the breast carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation as a unique pathologic and clinical entity, which has worse clinical outcome compared to IDC-NST.

Imaging Features of Triple Negative Breast Cancer and the Effect of BRCA Mutations.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to review the mammographic and the ultrasound features of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients and to investigate the potential effect of BRCA mutations on the imaging features of these patients. METHODS: One hundred and seven patients with TNBC were enrolled in a retrospective study following IRB approval and approval of waiver of informed consent. BRCA mutations were assessed using genetic testing. Imaging features on mammography and ultrasound (US) as well as pathology and clinical information were retrospectively reviewed and characterized according to the BI-RADS lexicon (fifth edition). The relationships between BRCA mutations and the imaging findings were examined. RESULTS: TNBC commonly presented as an irregular mass with obscured margins on mammography and as an irregular hypoechoic mass with microlobulated or angular margins on US. Approximately two thirds of TNBC cases had a parallel orientation and approximately one third had posterior enhancement, features often associated with benign masses. There was no statistically significant difference in the mammographic and the US features of BRCA positive and BRCA negative triple negative tumors. CONCLUSION: TNBC may have a parallel orientation and posterior enhancement, which are features often seen with benign masses. BRCA mutations do not affect the imaging features of triple negative breast tumors.

TRPS1: a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinoma, especially for triple-negative breast cancer.

Currently there is no highly specific and sensitive marker to identify breast cancer-the most common malignancy in women. Breast cancer can be categorized as estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) types based on the expression of ER, PR, and HER2. Although GATA3 is the most widely used tumor marker at present to determine the breast origin, which has been shown to be an excellent marker for ER-positive and low-grade breast cancer, but it does not work well for TNBC with sensitivity as low as <20% in metaplastic breast carcinoma. In the current study, through TCGA data mining we identified trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) as a specific gene for breast carcinoma across 31 solid tumor types. Moreover, high mRNA level of TRPS1 was found in all four subtypes of breast carcinoma including ER/PR-positive luminal A and B types, HER2-positive type, and basal-type/TNBC. We then analyzed TRPS1 expression in 479 cases of various types of breast cancer using immunochemistry staining, and found that TRPS1 and GATA3 had comparable positive expression in ER-positive (98% vs. 95%) and HER2-positive (87% vs. 88%) breast carcinomas. However, TRPS1 which was highly expressed in TNBC, was significantly higher than GATA3 expression in metaplastic (86% vs. 21%) and nonmetaplastic (86% vs. 51%) TNBC. In addition, TRPS1 expression was evaluated in 1234 cases of solid tumor from different organs. In contrast to the high expression of GATA3 in urothelial carcinoma, TRPS1 showed no or little expression in urothelial carcinomas or in other tumor types including lung adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, colon and gastric adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and ovarian carcinoma. These findings suggest that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinoma and can be used as a great diagnostic tool, especially for TNBC.