Pain assessment and management among adult patients in a gynecology ward: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to improve compliance with evidence-based practice in pain assessment and management in a gynecology ward. INTRODUCTION: Effective pain control is important to prevent the negative consequences of pain that is poorly managed. However, it remains undervalued and inadequately treated. Applying evidence-based practices to correctly evaluate and manage pain is essential to improve pain relief. METHODS: This project followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. A baseline audit of 41 women admitted to the gynecology ward was conducted and measured against 5 best practice criteria, along with a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Targeted strategies were then implemented and a follow-up audit was conducted using the same criteria, methods, and sample size as the baseline audit. RESULTS: The baseline audit revealed gaps between current and best practice. Barriers to implementation were identified and strategies to resolve the barriers were designed and implemented (nurse education, informative materials, electronic patient records system improvements). Comprehensive pain assessment, including dynamic and static pain assessment, use of a validated tool, and education provided to patients and carers, improved in the follow-up audit. There was no change in patient satisfaction levels; however, the discrepancy between pain measured by nurses and pain measured by patients was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The JBI methodology was useful in improving compliance with evidence-based practice criteria. It also facilitated adaptation to new barriers, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Improving nurses' knowledge of pain assessment can lead to more accurate assessment. Inadequate records systems also made it difficult to record the care that was provided. Subsequent audits will assess sustainability and the project will be escalated to other wards.

Delirium risk screening and assessment among older patients in general wards and the emergency department: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this project was to improve compliance with evidence-based criteria regarding risk of delirium and the assessment of delirium among older patients in the general hospitalization wards and the emergency department. INTRODUCTION: More than 50% of older hospitalized patients experience delirium. Some studies have highlighted the need to implement an orientation protocol in the emergency department and to continue this in the general wards, with the aim of decreasing the delirium rate among older patients admitted to hospital. METHODS: The project followed the JBI evidence implementation framework. We conducted a baseline audit, a half-way audit, and final audit of 50 patients at risk of delirium admitted to the emergency department and the general wards, respectively. The audits measured compliance with eight criteria informed by the available evidence. RESULTS: In the final audit, three of the eight criteria achieved more than 50% compliance in the general wards: pressure injury screening (96%); monitoring changes (74%); and performing interventions (76%). In the emergency department, worse results were reported because of the service conditions. The exception was the criterion on the training of nurses on the topic, with 98%. The integration of a tool to screen for delirium in older patients in the hospital's electronic clinical history records increased the percentage of compliance with audit criteria regarding the use of the scale and delirium detection (rising from 0% to 32% in the final audit in the general wards). CONCLUSION: Through the implementation of this project, validated and evidence-based evaluation will ensure that nurses are supported through appropriate measures to reduce patient confusion and aggression resulting from delirium.

Experiencia en la generación de estrategias de monitorización y evaluación en la implantación de Guías de Práctica Clínica en España / Experience Generating Evaluation and Monitoring Strategies in the Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Spain / Experiência na geração de estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação na implementação de manuais de prática clínica na Espanha

Introducción. La monitorización de la utilización del conocimiento y la evaluación de resultados permiten conocer la aplicación de la evidencia, cambios en los conocimientos y actitudes, el impacto en resultados de salud y la integración y el mantenimiento de las prácticas adoptadas. Existen debilidades relacionadas con la falta de sistematización, limitaciones de los registros y calidad del proceso. El objetivo de este artículo es describir la experiencia en la generación de estrategias de monitorización y evaluación de resultados de implantación de Guías de Buenas Prácticas en España. División de temas tratados. En primer lugar, se revisan los procesos de medición de resultados en la implantación de Guías, en el marco del Programa Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®, cuya herramienta para liderar el cambio incluye la monitorización y evaluación como una de las seis fases del ciclo de acción. En segundo lugar, se analizan las estrategias de monitorización y evaluación propuestas en la literatura, destacando la Asociación Profesional de Enfermeras de Ontario. Finalmente, se analizan las estrategias de monitorización y evaluación generadas por dos instituciones españolas participantes en el programa, centradas en adecuación de registros, explotación y análisis de indicadores, desarrollo de herramientas, procedimientos de evaluación y mecanismos de difusión y retroalimentación. Conclusiones. La definición de estrategias de monitorización y evaluación planificada de forma temprana contribuye a la viabilidad de la evaluación de la implantación y su sostenibilidad. Es necesario adaptarlas al contexto, con estrategias transversales que alcancen a toda la institución, facilitadas por la institución. Palabras clave: Ciencia de la Implementación; Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia; Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud; Mecanismos de Evaluación de la Atención de Salud; Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud

Introduction. Monitoring the usage of knowledge and evaluating results permits one to know the application of the evidence, knowledge, and attitude changes, the impact on health results, integration, and maintenance of the adopted practices. There exist weaknesses related to lack of systematization, limitation of the records, and quality of the process. This article's objective is to describe the experience generating monitoring strategies and evaluation of the results regarding the implementation of good practice guides in Spain. Topics for Reflection. In the first place, the measurement process of the results regarding the implementation of guides are reviewed, in the Best Practice Spotlight Organizations® program frame, whose tool to lead the change includes monitoring and evaluation as one of the sixth phases of the action cycle. In the second place, monitoring and evaluation strategies proposed in the literature are analyzed, highlighting the Professional Nurses Association of Ontario. Finally, the monitoring and evaluation strategies are analyzed by two Spanish institutions participating in the program, focused on the adequation of records, exploitation and indicator analysis, tools development, evaluation procedures, dissemination, and feedback mechanisms. Conclusions: The definition of monitoring and evaluation strategies planned in advance contributes to the viability of the evaluation regarding the implementation and its sustainability. Is necessary to adapt them to the context, with transversal strategies that reach the whole institution, facilitated by the institution. Keywords: Implementation Science; Evidence-Based Practice; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms; Quality Indicators, Health Care

Introdução. Monitorizar a utilização do conhecimento e avaliar os resultados permite-nos conhecer a aplicação das evidências, as mudanças nos conhecimentos e atitudes, o impacto nos resultados de saúde e a integração e manutenção das práticas adotadas. Existem fragilidades relacionadas à falta de sistematização, limitações de registros e qualidade do processo. O objetivo deste artigo é descrever a experiência na geração de estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação dos resultados da implementação de Manuais de Boas Práticas na Espanha. Divisão dos temas abordados. Em primeiro lugar, são revistos os processos de medição de resultados na implementação dos Manuais, no âmbito do Programa Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®, cuja ferramenta para liderar a mudança inclui a monitorização e avaliação como uma das seis fases do ciclo de ação. Em segundo lugar, são analisadas as estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação propostas na literatura, com destaque para a Associação Profissional de Enfermeiros de Ontário. Por fim, são analisadas as estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação geradas por duas instituições espanholas participantes do programa, focadas na adaptação de registros, exploração e análise de indicadores, desenvolvimento de ferramentas, procedimentos de avaliação e mecanismos de divulgação e feedback. Conclusões. A definição de estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação planeadas antecipadamente contribui para a viabilidade da avaliação da implementação e para a sua sustentabilidade. É necessário adaptá-los ao contexto, com estratégias transversais que alcancem toda a instituição, facilitadas pela instituição. Palavras-chave: Ciência da Implementação; Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências; Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde; Mecanismos de Avaliação da Assistência à Saúde; Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde

Facilitation as a component of evidence implementation: a multinational perspective.

BACKGROUND: Facilitation is a key component of JBI's approach to evidence implementation along with context analysis and evaluation of process and outcomes. Although the role of facilitation is recognized as a critical component of evidence implementation, what constitutes effective facilitation is poorly understood. AIM: This article presents a descriptive exploration of facilitation as it occurs in evidence implementation initiatives conducted in various healthcare and geographical contexts. All projects used the JBI approach to evidence implementation. METHODS: To provide a multinational perspective on how facilitation was operationalized to promote positive changes in clinical practice and health outcomes, five case studies of evidence implementation projects are presented. RESULTS: The cases highlighted that facilitation is a multifaceted process that can be met through a variety of roles that address aspects of education and capacity building, partnerships, action planning, problem solving and evaluation. Facilitation in all cases appeared to be collaborative, with multiple 'players' within and outside of the health organization being involved in the process. Although there are similarities in activities, facilitation involved some level of local contextualization where there were unique or additional activities performed to accommodate the local needs and requirements of the health organization involved in each case. Numerous contextual factors influenced the success of the implementation initiative. CONCLUSION: The cases emphasized the complex nature of facilitation as a strategy for evidence implementation, indicating that contextual attributes and features define the range of knowledge, skills, and activities that should take place in order for facilitation to be effective. Although there appears to be some core components, tailoring and adaptation of the facilitation process (or roles) is required.

Prevalence of falls in noninstitutionalized people aged 65-80 and associations with sex and functional tests: A multicenter observational study.

Falls have a considerable impact on the functional prognosis of older adults. The main focus of this multicenter, retrospective, observational study was to examine the prevalence of falls in Spanish people aged 65-80 years still living at home. The secondary aims included examining the overall sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with a history of falls and then stratifying these findings by sex. We also aimed to determine the differences between sexes with regard to the history and consequences of falls and to evaluate associations between fall history and functional performance tests. The 747 older adults had all participated in the otago exercise program, which is a progressive home program of strength, balance, and endurance exercises. They were recruited by nurses in 21 primary care centers in 10 Spanish provinces between September 2017 to December 2018. The participants' mean age was 72.2 (SD: 4.3) years, and 67% were women. We recorded sociodemographic and clinical variables, functional performance test results, and any falls and/or injuries in the last 12 months. We found that 32% had fallen, 36% of those had fallen more than once, and 48% had sustained injuries when they fell. The bivariate analysis showed that women had more than twice the odds of falling than men and that living alone and being obese or overweight increased the odds of a fall, although living alone was not associated with falls in the multivariable analysis. Our results could guide the development of risk-specific fall prevention programs to prevent disabilities in older people.

JBI series paper 3: The importance of people, process, evidence, and technology in pragmatic, healthcare provider-led evidence implementation.

In this paper, we describe and discuss evidence implementation as a venture in global human collaboration within the framework of "people, process, evidence, and technology" as a roadmap for navigating implementation. At its core implementation is not a technological, or theoretical process, it is a human process. That health professionals central to implementation activities may not have had formal training in implementation, highlights the need for processes and programs that can be integrated within healthcare organization structures. Audit with feedback is an accessible implementation approach that includes the capacity to embed theory, frameworks, and bottom-up change processes to improve the quality of care. In this third paper in the JBI series, we discuss how four overarching principals necessary for sustainability (Culture, Capacity, Communication, and Collaboration) are combined with evidence, technology, and resources for evidence-based practice change. This approach has been successfully used across hundreds of evidence implementation projects around the globe for over 15 years. We present healthcare practitioner-led evidence-based practice improvement as sustainable and achievable in collaborative environments such as the global JBI network as a primary interest of the practicing professions and provide an overview of the JBI approach to evidence implementation.

Cost-Effectiveness of an Exercise Programme That Provided Group or Individual Training to Reduce the Fall Risk in Healthy Community-Dwelling People Aged 65-80: A Secondary Data Analysis.

Research has demonstrated that some exercise programs are effective for reducing fall rates in community-dwelling older people; however, the literature is limited in providing clear recommendations of individual or group training as a result of economic evaluation. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Program (OEP) for reducing the fall risk in healthy, non-institutionalized older people. An economic evaluation of a multicenter, blinded, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial was performed on 498 patients aged over 65 in primary care. Participants were randomly allocated to the treatment or control arms, and group or individual training. The program was delivered in primary healthcare settings and comprised five initial sessions, ongoing encouragement and support to exercise at home, and a reinforcement session after six months. Our hypothesis was that the patients who received the intervention would achieve better health outcomes and therefore need lower healthcare resources during the follow-up, thus, lower healthcare costs. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which used the timed up and go test results as an effective measure for preventing falls. The secondary outcomes included differently validated tools that assessed the fall risk. The cost per patient was USD 51.28 lower for the group than the individual sessions in the control group, and the fall risk was 10% lower when exercises had a group delivery. The OEP program delivered in a group manner was superior to the individual method. We observed slight differences in the incremental cost estimations when using different tools to assess the risk of fall, but all of them indicated the dominance of the intervention group. The OEP group sessions were more cost-effective than the individual sessions, and the fall risk was 10% lower.

Impact of the implementation of best practice guidelines on nurse's evidence-based practice and on nurses' work environment: Research protocol.

AIM: To determine the impact of the Best Practice Spotlight Organization® initiative on nurses' perception of their work environment and their attitudes to evidence-based practice. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, multicentre study. The intervention is the participation in Best Prectice Spotilight Organizations to implement Best Practice Guidelines. METHODS: The study will include seven centres in the interventional group and 10 in the non-equivalent control group, all of them belonging to the Spanish national health system. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, and the Health Sciences Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire will be administered to a sample of 1,572 nurses at the beginning of the programme and at 1 year. This 3-year study started in April 2018 and will continue until December 2021. Statistical analyses will be carried out using the SPSS 25.0. This project was approved by the Drug Research Ethics Committee of the Parc de Salut Mar and registered in Clinical Trials. DISCUSSION: The study findings will show the current state of nurses' perception of their work environment and attitudes to evidence-based practice, and possible changes in these parameters due to the programme. IMPACT: The findings could provide a strong argument for health policymakers to scale up the Best Practice Spotlight Organization® initiative in the Spanish national health system.

[Nursing mothers satisfaction with the promotion of breastfeeding and professionals adherence to the recommendations. Multi-center study.] / Satisfacción de madres lactantes con la promoción de la lactancia materna y adherencia de los profesionales a las recomendaciones. Estudio multicéntrico.

OBJECTIVE: The Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative or clinical practice guideline implementation programs have a positive impact on the promotion of breastfeeding (BF). There are knowledge gaps regarding the perceptions of new mothers towards these initiatives, and their degree of satisfaction. Our objective was to describe the satisfaction of BF mothers and adherence to the recommendations of the "Breastfeeding" guide from the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO). METHODS: Between 2018-2019, in 9 Spanish hospitals that implemented the guide, 2,397 nursing mothers were surveyed who met inclusion criteria. A self-administered survey was designed with sociodemographic data, mother-child, BF promotion interventions carried out and degree of satisfaction. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: The recommendations for skin-to-skin contact, help in breastfeeding, observation of a breastfeeding session and resolution of doubts presented adhesions >84%. Information about support groups, rooming-in and recognize signs of baby satisfaction obtained adhesions <40%. The exclusive BF rate at discharge was 77.5%. The mean satisfaction with skin-to-skin contact and the percentage of satisfaction at discharge were 5.8 and 96.8% respectively. The differences were significant between the degree of satisfaction and the educational level, age, work situation, type of delivery and type of hospital (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to puerperal women, adherence to the recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guide is good for most interventions and the degree of satisfaction is high.

OBJETIVO: La Iniciativa para la Humanización de la Asistencia al Nacimiento y la Lactancia (IHAN) o programas de implantación de Guías de Práctica Clínica tienen impacto positivo en la promoción de la lactancia materna (LM). Existen lagunas respecto a percepciones de las puérperas hacia estas iniciativas y el grado de satisfacción. Nuestro objetivo fue describir la satisfacción de las madres lactantes y la adherencia a las recomendaciones de la guía "Lactancia Materna" de la Registered Nurses´Association of Ontario (RNAO). METODOS: Entre 2018-2019, en 9 hospitales españoles que implantaban la guía se encuestaron 2.397 madres lactantes que cumplieron criterios de inclusión. Se diseñó una encuesta autoadministrada con datos sociodemográficos madre-hijo, intervenciones de promoción de LM realizadas y grado de satisfacción. Se realizó análisis descriptivo y bivariado. RESULTADOS: Las recomendaciones de contacto piel-con-piel, ayuda en el amamantamiento, observación de la toma y resolución de dudas presentaron adherencias >84%. La información sobre grupos de apoyo, alojamiento conjunto y reconocer signos de satisfacción del bebé obtuvieron adherencias <40%. La tasa de LM exclusiva al alta fue 77,5%. La satisfacción media con el contacto piel con piel y el porcentaje de satisfacción al alta fueron 5,8 y 96,8% respectivamente. Las diferencias fueron significativas entre el grado de satisfacción y el nivel de estudios, la edad, la situación laboral, tipo de parto y tipo de hospital (p<0,05). CONCLUSIONES: Según las puérperas, la adherencia a las recomendaciones de la Guía de Práctica Clínica es buena para la mayoría de intervenciones y el grado de satisfacción elevado.

Evaluation of implementation strategies of the Best Practices Spotlight Organisations (BPSO) Project in Spain. / Evaluación de estrategias de implantación del Proyecto Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados en España.

OBJECTIVE: To identify favourable elements and barriers to implementation in the Program of Best Practice Spotlight Organization® that establish clinical practice guidelines of the Registered Nurse' Association of Ontario, so that future experiences could benefit from the assessments presented here. METHOD: Evaluation research study of the process of implementing guidelines in institutions that make up the first two cohorts of the programme in Spain, through analysis of contents of implantation reports and inductive process, reading, interpretation, coding and categorized according to SWOT structure: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. RESULTS: Reports from 18 centres in 12 Autonomous Communities have been analyzed, including 22 different guidelines. As weaknesses, problems related to information systems and their exploitation stand out for frequency and intensity. Other elements related to dissemination of results, to professionals, care and factors related to the institution are presented. Standing out as threats are the instability of staff and continued changes in Senior Management or corporate policies. Among the strengths, the exclusive dedication of personnel to the project and its link to institutional objectives are distinguished. As opportunities, the possibility of standardized comparison of own results with others, as well as the dissemination of results are highlighted. CONCLUSION: A useful pattern is set up to approach implementation in other scenarios, where changes in professional culture, training, communication and leadership, as well as aligning interests of managers and politicians, facilitate ideal conditions for Evidence-Based Practice.

Implementation results of the assessment and management of pain guideline within Best Practice Spotlight Organisations (BPSO®). / Resultados de la implantación de la Guía de valoración y manejo del dolor en Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados (CCEC®) en España.

AIM: to analyse the progress of implementing the process recommendations of the RNAO Assessment and Management of Pain guideline and health outcomes. METHOD: An observational, longitudinal, retrospective study conducted in 3tertiary-level hospitals in Spain. All patients discharged over the last 5 days of each month from the units selected in the implementation process were included. We evaluated structural data, mean hospital stay, implementation strategy and degree of implementation of the process recommendations of the RNAO guideline over the first 3 years of implementation, and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was performed by calculating means and absolute and relative frequencies in periods: baseline (T0), annual, over the 3first years of implementation (T1, T2 and T3 respectively), and inferential. RESULTS: 8128 patients were included in the study. Hypotheses were contrasted between the different periods. The initial pain assessment in the first 24h following admission or post-surgery increased after the baseline period in all the hospitals, especially those that did not meet the guidelines from the outset. It continued to rise progressively up to 3 years following implementation (reaching 94.6% in hospital 2). By contrast, implementation of the care plan did not exceed 37.5% and 38.5% in hospitals 1 and 3 respectively. With regard to the outcome indicators, the prevalence of pain at 24hours and intense pain generally decreased in the 3hospitals from T0 or T1 to T3, however no conclusive statistically significant differences were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the process recommendations improved from the outset, as did patient outcomes. A decrease in the prevalence and intensity of pain was achieved, although no conclusive data were obtained; all of which leads to better nursing practice with more recording, continuity of care and improved pain management for patients.

Implementation experience of a guideline on fall prevention in Centres Committed to Excellence in Care®. / Experiencia en la implantación de la Guía de prevención de caídas en Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados®.

AIM: To describe the progress of implementing the «Preventing falls¼ Guideline of the Best Practice Spotlight Organization (BPSO®) Programme and fall outcomes in Centres Committed to Excellence in Care (CCEC®). METHOD: A Quasi-experimental study pre-post test from a multicentric approach carried out between 2012-2018. The study is focused on patients aged 65 or older, discharged from guideline implementation units, analysing sociodemographic variables (sex, age, hospitalization days; fall risk assessment on admission and patient in risk; fall prevention plan; incidence of falls. Data was compared from CCEC® programme indicators measured over the periods: baseline (T1), candidate during the first three years (T2), and sustainability (T3). Descriptive and inferential analysis was performed. RESULTS: 31,486 patients were evaluated in 7 centres (T1=465; T2=14,255; T3=16,766). Of the patients, 51.87% were men and average age was 79.06 years. Hospitalization was 8.15 days. Fall risk assessment on admission was performed in 81.96% of patients (T1=44.30%, T2=81.11%, T3=83.73%) and 52.31% patients had high risk. A prevention falls plan was registered in 47.75% of patients (T1=24.73%, T2=42.43%, T3=52.90%). Four hundred and twenty-three falls were recorded, 62.17% without injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the differences between hospitals, such as structural characteristics, strategies, assessment tools and data progression pace; adherence to recommendations is proving successful, improving widely. Guideline implementation has allowed fall problems to be addressed, producing positive changes in the process and encouraging the implementation and sustainability of evidence-based nursing practice.

Implementation of the assessment and care of adults at risk for suicidal ideation and behaviour: A guideline of the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO). / Implantación de la valoración y el cuidado de los adultos en riesgo de ideación y comportamiento suicida: una Guía de la Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO).

OBJECTIVE: To establish the evolution of the care process after the implementation of the Best Practices Guideline «Assessment and Care of Adults at Risk for Suicidal Ideation and Behaviour¼. METHOD: A descriptive longitudinal study was carried out at the Mental Health Hospitalization Unit in Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada. All patients admitted to the Unit between 2016 and 2018, 1471 in total, were included. Compliance of care process indicators and suicidal risk were evaluated; in addition, suicide rates per 100,000 inhabitants were obtained. Absolute and relative frequencies of the indicators were calculated, as well as the change during the study period by the chi-square Pearson test, for P<.05. RESULTS: We observed a statistically significant increase in the entire care process. The percentage of patients with suicidal risk assessment improved from 16% in 2016 to 45.25% in 2018. The application of safety measures grew reaching 100% in 2018, and community services referral went from 70.31% to 90.50%. The percentage of patients at risk of suicidal ideation remains stable. Suicide rates per 100,000 inhabitants in Granada decreased by 24.50%. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in the care process and the decrease in the suicide rate in Granada since the implementation of the guideline are consistent with the results of other research and offer a hopeful vision. Comprehensive strategies for suicide prevention must be promoted, and the evaluation of initiatives undertaken must continue.

The implementation of Best practice guidelines in Spain through the Programme of the Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®. / Implantación de Guías de buenas prácticas en España a través del Programa de Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados®.

The implementation of Best practice guidelines is effective in improving clinical practice and reducing clinical variability. The Best Practice Guidelines of the Ontario Nurses Association have been implemented in Spain since 2012 following the principles of the Canadian programme of the Best Practice Spotlight Organisations® (BPSO®). The Nursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii) coordinates this programme in Spain, having been nominated BPSO Host by the Ontario Nurses Association. Four strategies were followed: translation of the Best Practice Guidelines, dissemination of same and of the programme, implementation of the Best Practice Guidelines and assessment of the results in competitively selected centres, and, finally, the development of sustainability mechanisms. Implementation is based on the theoretical Knowledge to Action model, which establishes a cycle of 6 phases: identification of the problem and training of selected BPSO®; adaptation to the local context; assessment of facilitators and barriers; adaptation and implementation of interventions; monitoring and evaluation of results, and sustainability. Each of these phases incorporate evidence-based elements that promote the effectiveness of implementation, such as the competitive selection of candidates to participate in the programme, selection by the institution of the guidelines to be implemented, leadership by nurses with a multi-professional approach, planning of the process from work structures that are non-vertical but with the support of the institution, the simultaneous use of multiple strategies, ongoing assessment and feedback of results. All of which is mentored and supported by the BPSO Host. There are currently 27 institutions in Spain of different characteristics that implement a total of 20 clinical guidelines. The scope and structure of the programme has recently been extended with regional BPSO Host coordinating centres, which has brought the number of institutions to 36 and the number of implemented clinical guidelines to 22. The programme has had a positive impact on organisations and the system, on care processes and on patient health. This is evidenced by enriched evidence-based professional practice, the promotion of collaborative networking and by improved patient health outcomes and the quality of care provided.

Getting guidelines into practice: lessons learned as Best Practice Spotlight Organization host.

BACKGROUND: The Spanish Best Practice Guidelines (BPG) Implementation Project is part of the Best Practice Spotlight Organizations international program, coordinated by the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO). AIMS: To influence the uptake of nursing BPG across healthcare organizations, to enable practice excellence and positive client outcomes. METHODS: After translating the RNAO's BPG into Spanish, the Host Organization published a formal call for proposals to select healthcare settings in Spain to implement the RNAO's BPG and evaluate the results. The approach is nursing-led and multidisciplinary; context specific; and involving a wide range of stakeholders. The implementation of BPG Toolkit guides the process: cascade training, selection of recommendations to be implemented, 3 years of planned implementation activities, monitoring of process and outcome results for patients discharged 60 days every year. The Host Organization supports healthcare settings selected. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The first call was launched in 2012. Eight healthcare settings (11 sites), serving 1.3 million people, were selected (hospitals and primary healthcare centers). They chose 10 BPG, according to their needs. In 2015 and 2018, 16 more healthcare settings have joined the program with a total of 263 sites. And in 2019, three complete regions will join the program as a regional host. Currently, more than 3200 nurses and 40 other healthcare professionals have been trained, evidence-based protocols have been developed or updated, patient education has been promoted, and international Best Practice Spotlight Organizations indicators have been evaluated in an electronic platform. CONCLUSION: The results obtained acknowledge that the RNAO implementation method could be replicated with success internationally. The strategies based on local context have worked and we have consolidated a network that shares knowledge and strategies and promotes evidence-based culture among Spanish healthcare settings and evidence-based care to patients.

Falls prevention strategies for patients over 65 years in a neurology ward: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this project was to promote evidence-based practice with regard to fall prevention and management, by implementing the recommendations from the best available evidence to reduce fall rates. INTRODUCTION: Falls are a main cause of disability in older people and the most common adverse event in all hospital patients. It is essential to implement the recommendations from evidence-based interventions to reduce these events. METHODS: A pre and post implementation audit method was used in a neurology ward, which employed the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI PACES) and Getting Research Into Practice (GRiP) module. The 15-month project evaluated between 20-30 patients from a sample at each audit (baseline in April 2016 and during three follow-up cycles in December 2016, March 2017 and June 2017). The data were inputted into an informatics system from nursing records and audited according to evidence-based processes and outcomes criteria. RESULTS: The baseline outcomes identified five barriers: incomplete fall registration, lack of an established fall prevention protocol for at-risk patients, limited knowledge about the fall prevention protocol, lack of a fall risk assessment scale and lack of multifactorial individual plans for fall prevention. Strategies were carried out and implemented following GRiP and all the criteria improved from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The project successfully increased evidence-based practice on falls and provided mechanisms for sustaining evidence-based practice changes. Further audits are needed to improve some outcomes.

Efficacy of the Otago Exercise Programme to reduce falls in community-dwelling adults aged 65-80 years old when delivered as group or individual training.

AIM: This study will compare how falls can be reduced in non-institutionalized older Spanish adults aged 65-80 years by providing group or individual exercise sessions using the Otago Exercise Programme. BACKGROUND: The Otago Exercise Programme is a progressive home-based exercise programme, where trained health professionals help people engage in strength, balance and endurance exercises. Its format is based on the evidence from four clinical trials. The benefits of the Otago Exercise Programme are the same for people who have and have not suffered falls and it can also be used for visually impaired people. DESIGN: A multicentre, simply blinded, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial, with two arms-group training and individual training-that started in January 2017 and will continue until December 2019. METHODS: Each study group has 364 subjects, who will take part in four individual or group sessions delivered mainly by nurses over an 8-week period, with a reinforcement session 6 months later. Data will be collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. The fall percentage will be the most relevant clinical variable and we will also consider safety, viability, compliance, economic analysis and therapeutic value. Approval and funding was granted in December 2016 for this 3-year study by the Spanish Health Research Fund (PI16CIII/00031). DISCUSSION: Older people from 65-80 years old tend to be more isolated and tackling worries about falls can improve social activities and independence. It has been shown that group training provides better adherence to exercise than individual training and this study will test that hypothesis for the Otago Exercise Programme.

Falls assessment and interventions among older patients in two medical and one surgical hospital wards in Spain: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVE: The current project aimed to improve fall prevention and management through clinical audits and the implementation of a quality-improvement cycle at the local level. INTRODUCTION: Falls are one of the most common adverse events reported in hospitals; evidence-based fall prevention interventions aim to reduce the number of people who fall. METHODS: A one-year clinical audit was conducted using a pre-post implementation audit method, namely the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and the getting research into practice audit and feedback tool. Two medical wards and a surgical ward in a Spanish hospital participated. The subjects were evaluated at baseline and at a follow-up at six months after key strategies had been implemented. RESULTS: Compliance rates for the evidence-based criteria were low in the baseline audit. Five barriers were identified in relation to fall assessment and management and, based on getting research into practice, strategies were designed, developed and implemented to overcome these barriers. After implementation, most of the fall-risk-assessment criteria showed an overall improvement, but there was no effect on care plan recording. Awareness of the assessment and management of fall risks were increased among professionals and patients on all three study wards. CONCLUSIONS: The current project may improve compliance with regard to promoting evidence-based fall prevention and management interventions. Further audits are necessary to evaluate any improvements achieved, in particular, care plans.

Implantación de guías de buenas prácticas en España: programa de centros comprometidos con la excelencia en cuidados / Implementação de manuais sobre boas práticas na Espanha: programa dos centros comprometidos com a excelência no atendimento / Best practice guidelines implementation in Spain: best practice spotlight Organizations

El programa de implantación de Guías de Buenas Prácticas, denominado en España Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados®, se inició en 2010 tras un acuerdo de colaboración entre la Unidad de Investigación en Cuidados de Salud (Investén-isciii) de España, el Centro Colaborador Español del Instituto Joanna Briggs para los Cuidados de Salud basados en la Evidencia y la Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), siguiendo los mismos principios que el programa Best Practice Spotlight Organizations (BPSO®) iniciado por RNAO, en Canadá, en 1999. Objetivo: Describir la implantación de Guías de Buenas Prácticas de RNAO en el marco del programa de Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados® (Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®) en España. El programa tiene como objetivo fomentar, facilitar y apoyar la implantación, evaluación y mantenimiento de buenas prácticas en cuidados, para el periodo 2012-2014. Metodología y Resultados: se han seleccionado 8 instituciones de salud y una universidad que implantan las guías de buenas prácticas de RNAO en función de sus necesidades. Tras los 24 primeros meses de implantación se ha formado a los profesionales de salud, constituido grupos estables de trabajo, desarrollado o actualizado protocolos de cuidados y registros correspondientes, también se han evaluado de forma sistemática los resultados de proceso y de salud de los pacientes. También se han difundido activamente los principales logros del programa. Conclusiones: Los candidatos a Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados® están realizando un gran esfuerzo y los resultados empiezan a mostrar que son positivos, con una creciente cultura de cuidados basados en la evidencia, y el impulso de la investigación y el inicio de un trabajo colaborativo en red.

The Best Practice Guidelines Implementation Programme, called in Spain “Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados®”, started in 2010 thanks to the collaboration between the Nursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii), in Spain, the Spanish Collaborating Centre of the Joanna Briggs Institute for evidence based healthcare, and the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO), Canada. It is based on the same fundaments of Best Practice Spotlight Organizations (BPSO) Program, initiated by RNAO, in 1999, in Canada. Objective: To describe the implementation of Best Practice Guidelines developed by RNAO in the context of Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados Program. The program aims to promote, facilitate and support the implementation, evaluation and sustainability of nursing best practices, for the period 2012-2014. Methodology and Results: Eight healthcare institutions and one university were selected to implement RNAO Best Practice Guidelines aligned with their needs. Twenty-four months into the implementation Programme healthcare professionals have been trained, work teams have been established, nursing care protocols and records have been developed or updated, and process and patient results have been systematically evaluated. Also, all main achievements of the Programme have been actively disseminated. Conclusions: Candidates centers committed to excellence in cuidados® are working hard and the results are starting to show positive, with a growing culture of evidence-based care, and the promotion of research and the start of work collaborative networking.

O programa para implementar Manuais de Boas Práticas, chamados na Espanha de Centros Comprometidos com a Excelência no atendimento®, teve início em 2010 depois de um acordo de colaboração entre a Unidade de Investigação em Atendimento de Saúde (Investén-ISCIII), na Espanha, o Centro Colaborador espanhol do Instituto Joanna Briggs de Atenção à Saúde baseada em evidências e a Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), seguindo os mesmos princípios do programa de Best Practice Spotlight Organizations (BPSO®) iniciado por RNAO no Canadá em 1999. Objetivo: Descrever a implementação de manuais de boas práticas no âmbito do programa RNAO de Centros Comprometidos com a Excelência no Atendimento® (Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®) na Espanha. O programa tem como objetivo estimular, facilitar e apoiar a implementação, avaliação e manutenção de boas práticas nos cuidados no período de 2012-2014. Metodologia e Resultados: Foram selecionadas oito instituições de saúde e uma universidade que implementam as diretrizes de boas práticas RNAO de acordo com suas necessidades. Após os primeiros 24 meses de implantação, foram treinados profissionais de saúde, formados grupos estáveis de trabalho, desenvolvidos ou atualizados protocolos de atendimento e registros correspondentes, também foram avaliados sistematicamente os resultados do processo e de saúde dos pacientes. Também se difundiram amplamente as principais realizações do programa. Conclusões: Os candidatos aos Centros Comprometidos com a Excelência no Atendimento® têm feito um esforço e os resultados são positivos, com uma cultura crescente dos cuidados baseados em evidências, a promoção da investigação e do início do trabalho colaborativo em rede.

[Access to health information sources in Spain. how to combat "infoxication"]. / Acceso a fuentes de información sobre salud en España: cómo combatir la infoxicación.

Internet has become a priceless source for finding health information for both patients and healthcare professionals. However, the universality and the abundance of information can lead to unfounded conclusions about health issues that can confuse further than clarify the health information. This aspect causes intoxication of information: infoxication. The question lies in knowing how to filter the information that is useful, accurate and relevant for our purposes. In this regard, integrative portals, such as the Biblioteca Virtual de Salud, compile information at different levels (international, national and regional), different types of resources (databases, repositories, bibliographic sources, etc.), becoming a starting point for obtaining quality information.