Lack of Follow-Up for Celiac Disease During Childhood Not Associated With Poor Health Outcomes: A Regional Swedish Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to examine the association between the lack of follow-up for celiac disease (CD) during childhood and dietary adherence, disease remission, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: We invited 243 randomly selected children diagnosed with CD in 2013-2018 in Gothenburg, Sweden, and 162 consented to participate (67%). We retrieved information on clinical follow-up and current wellbeing using medical and laboratory records data, as well as validated questionnaires on symptoms of CD, dietary adherence, and HRQoL. We analyzed tissue-transglutaminase antibodies (tTGA) as a measure of disease remission. We defined lack of follow-up as no CD-related physician/dietician-led visit or measurement of tTGA over the past 24 months of study enrollment. RESULTS: The mean age at study enrolment was 12.7 (range 7.8-18.2) years. Out of 162 children with an average disease duration of 5.3 (range 2.3-8.8) years, 23 (14%) lacked follow-up. tTGA had normalized in 94% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 71%-100%] of children without follow-up versus 91% (95% CI: 85%-95%) of children with continued follow-up. Of children without follow-up, 65% (95% CI: 38%-86%) reported a dietary adherence score indicating very good adherence, versus 72% (95% CI: 63%-80%) of those with continued follow-up. Also, lack of follow-up was not significantly associated with growth, symptom scores, or HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: In this regional cohort study of mostly older children and adolescents, lack of follow-up for CD was not significantly linked to dietary adherence, disease remission, or HRQoL. How these results hold in larger, unselected samples with longer follow-up, including transition to adult care, warrants further study.

Regional Swedish study found that one in seven coeliac patients experienced loss of follow up during childhood.

AIM: To examine the clinical follow up of paediatric coeliac disease and the rate of loss of follow up during childhood, for which data are scarce. METHODS: In a cohort of coeliac children diagnosed in 2013-2018 in Gothenburg, Sweden, we retrospectively explored the follow-up practice of paediatric coeliac disease until June 2021. We used medical records from hospital-based paediatric gastroenterology and general paediatric outpatient clinics, laboratory records, and questionnaires. Loss of follow up was defined no coeliac disease-related follow up or tissue transglutaminase test over the past 2 years of study enrolment. RESULTS: We included 162 children (58% girls) aged 7.8-18.2 years (average 12.7). Most participants (76%) were followed at general paediatric outpatient clinics rather than hospital-based clinics. After 2.3-8.8 (average 5.3) years since diagnosis, 23 patients (14%; 95% confidence interval, 9%-21%) had been lost to follow up. Patients with loss of follow up were more often boys (61% versus 39%, p = 0.08), with a somewhat longer average disease duration of 5.8 versus 5.2 years (p = 0.11). There were no between-group differences in socio-economic characteristics and patient-reported experience measures of coeliac disease care. CONCLUSION: One in seven coeliac patients may experience loss of follow up during childhood.

Celiac disease screening at a pediatric outpatient clinic: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: Celiac disease (CD) is a common yet largely underdiagnosed disease. This study aimed to test the feasibility of incorporating a non-targeted CD screening in a pediatric outpatient setting and evaluate its short-term impact on children with serological evidence of disease. METHODS: Over five months, 500 children (aged 2-17 years) attending a general pediatric outpatient clinic in Gothenburg, Sweden, were enrolled and surveyed for current symptoms, quality of life, and background characteristics; 481 children were screened for tissue-transglutaminase antibodies (tTGA); repeated tTGA-positivity was defined as CD autoimmunity (CDA). Children with CDA were investigated for CD and for one year monitored for changes in symptoms, and quality of life. RESULTS: Eleven of 481 (2.3%) screened children had CDA. Children with CDA were younger (median 3.8 years) than those without CDA (8.8 years). No other major between-group differences were reported in background characteristics, symptoms, or quality of life. The screening was well-accepted by the families/participants. During 1-year follow-up, 8 of 11 children with CDA were diagnosed with CD. Children with screening-detected CD reported no significant changes in symptoms and quality of life and the dietary adherence rate was good. CONCLUSIONS: Non-targeted screening for CD was feasible in a general pediatric outpatient setting. While hampered by small sample size, our results are in line with previous screening studies indicating that symptoms do not differentiate CDA from non-CDA children. Also, among an overall minimal-symptomatic group of children, diagnosing CD and installation of treatment did not significantly change their well-being during 1-year follow-up.

Characteristics of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Persons with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections.

Background: Although guidelines advocate similar continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) targets for insulin-treated persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), it is unclear how these persons differ with respect to hypoglycemia, glucose variability, and other CGM metrics in clinical practice. Methods: We used data from 2 multicenter randomized-controlled trials (GOLD and MDI-Liraglutide) where 161 persons with T1D and 124 persons with T2D treated with multiple daily injections were included and monitored with masked CGM. Results: Persons from both cohorts had similar mean glucose levels, 10.9 mmol/L (196 mg/dL) in persons with T1D and 10.8 mmol/L (194 mg/dL) in persons with T2D. Time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]) was 5.1% and 1.0% for persons with T1D and T2D, respectively (P < 0.001). Corresponding estimates for the standard deviations of mean glucose levels were 4.4 mmol/L (79 mg/dL) versus 3.0 (54 mg/dL) (P < 0.001), for coefficient of variation 41% versus 28% (P < 0.001), and for time in range 38.2% versus 45.3%, respectively (P = 0.004). Mean C-peptide levels were 0.05 nmol/L and 0.67 nmol/L (P < 0.001) for persons with T1D and T2D, respectively. Conclusions: Persons with T1D compared with persons with T2D treated with multiple daily insulin injections spend considerably more time in hypoglycemia, have higher glucose variability, and less "time in range." This needs to be taken into account in daily clinical care and in recommended targets for CGM metrics.

Variables associated with insulin production in persons with type 2 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections.

From the MDI-liraglutide study, we evaluated variables associated with endogenous insulin production in persons with multiple daily insulin injections-treated type 2 diabetes by relating C-peptide, proinsulin and proinsulin/C-peptide ratio at baseline to baseline variables. Lower insulin production was related to longer diabetes duration, shorter abdominal sagittal diameter and more glycaemic variability.

Sustained Intensive Treatment and Long-term Effects on HbA1c Reduction (SILVER Study) by CGM in People With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With MDI.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) reduces HbA1c and time spent in hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) when evaluated over shorter time periods. It is unclear to what extent CGM improves and helps to maintain glucose control, treatment satisfaction, diabetes distress, hypoglycemic concerns, and overall well-being over longer periods of time. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The GOLD trial was a randomized crossover trial performed over 16 months of CGM treatment in people with T1D treated with MDI. People completing the trial (n = 141) were invited to participate in the current SILVER extension study in which 107 patients continued CGM treatment over 1 year along with the support of a diabetes nurse every 3 months. RESULTS: The primary end point of the change in HbA1c over 1.0-1.5 years of CGM use compared with previous self-monitoring of blood glucose during GOLD showed a decrease in HbA1c of 0.35% (95% CI 0.19-0.50, P < 0.001). Time spent in hypoglycemia <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and <4.0 mmol/L (72 mg/dL) decreased from 2.1% to 0.6% (P < 0.001) and from 5.4% to 2.9% (P < 0.001), respectively. Overall well-being (World Health Organization 5-item well-being index, P = 0.009), treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, P < 0.001), and hypoglycemic confidence (P < 0.001) increased, while hypoglycemic fear (Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-Worry, P = 0.016) decreased and diabetes distress tended to decrease (Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale, P = 0.06). From randomization and screening in GOLD, HbA1c was lowered by 0.45% (P < 0.001) and 0.68% (P < 0.001) after 2.3 and 2.5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SILVER study supports beneficial long-term effects from CGM on HbA1c, hypoglycemia, treatment satisfaction, well-being, and hypoglycemic confidence in people with T1D managed with MDI.