The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a valuable diagnostic tool but often requires sedation to complete, especially in children. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an a2 agonist, for which there are experimental findings that support its potential neuroprotective effects. Given the potential risks of anesthetic drugs, we ran this study to examine DEX's effectiveness and cardiopulmonary safety as a sedative drug for children undergoing MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systematic research was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published between 2010 and 6th/2022 and involving children undergoing MRI who received DEX as sedative medication. The records which met the including criteria, after indexing via the PRISMA chart and assessing for bias, were processed, and a meta-analysis was carried out with the random effects method. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. Out of 6204 measurements obtained, in 4626, it was planned for the participants to only receive DEX (measure group) as an anesthetic drug throughout the procedure. The participants' mean age was 57 months (Ι2 = 4%, τ2 = 0.5317, p = 0.40). A total of 5.6% (95% CI: 0.6-14.1%, I2 = 98%, p < 0.01) of the patients needed a second dose of DEX. In total, 6% (95% CI: 1-15%, I2 = 93%, τ2 = 0.0454, p < 0.01) required the administration of another drug, besides DEX, to complete the imaging (sedation failure). The effectiveness of the only-DEX method was 99% (95% CI: 97.5-100%, I2 = 81%, τ2 = 0.0107, p < 0.01). The whole rate of adverse events was 15% (95% CI: 9.3-21.5%, I2 = 92%, p < 0.01). Hypotension was reported in 8.7% of the cases (95% CI: 3.1-16.4%, I2 = 84%, p < 0.01), hypertension in 1.1% (95% CI: 0-5.4%, I2 = 89%, p < 0.01), bradycardia in 10% (95% CI: 4-18%, I2 = 95%, p < 0.01) and desaturation in 1.2% (95% CI: 0-4%, I2 = 68%, p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant incidence in respiratory rate decrease (comparing the children who received DEX to their baseline). Five cases of vomiting and one of apnea were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Given that DEX seems to be an effective as well as respiratory and hemodynamically safe drug, it may be a future spotlight in (pediatric) sedation for imaging procedures such as MRI.

Evolution of epidemiological characteristics of infective endocarditis in Greece.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical profile, management and outcome of infective endocarditis (IE) may be influenced by socioeconomic issues. METHODS: A nationwide prospective study evaluated IE during the era of deep economic crisis in Greece. Epidemiological data and factors associated with 60-day mortality were analyzed through descriptive statistics, logistic and Cox-regression models. RESULTS: Among 224 patients (male 72.3%, mean age 62.4 years), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 62; methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) 33.8%) predominated in the young without impact on mortality (p = 0.593), whilst Enterococci (n = 36) predominated in the elderly. Complications of IE were associated with mortality: heart failure [OR 2.415 (95% CI: 1.159-5.029), p = 0.019], stroke [OR 3.206 (95% CI: 1.190-8.632), p = 0.018] and acute kidney injury [OR 2.283 (95% CI: 1.085-4.805), p = 0.029]. A 60-day survival benefit was solely related to cardiac surgery for IE during hospitalization [HR 0.386 (95% CI: 0.165-0.903), p = 0.028] and compliance with antimicrobial treatment guidelines [HR 0.487 (95% CI: 0.259-0.916), p = 0.026]. Compared with a previous country cohort study, history of rheumatic fever and native valve predisposition had declined, whilst underlying renal disease and right-sided IE had increased (p < 0.0001); HIV infection had emerged (p = 0.002). No difference in rates of surgery and outcome was assessed. CONCLUSIONS: A country-wide survey of IE highlighted emergence of HIV, right-sided IE and predominance of MRSA in the youth during a severe socioeconomic crisis. Compliance with treatment guidelines promoted survival.

Procalcitonin to Reduce Long-Term Infection-associated Adverse Events in Sepsis. A Randomized Trial.

Rationale: Although early antimicrobial discontinuation guided by procalcitonin (PCT) has shown decreased antibiotic consumption in lower respiratory tract infections, the outcomes in long-term sepsis sequelae remain unclear.Objectives: To investigate if PCT guidance may reduce the incidence of long-term infection-associated adverse events in sepsis.Methods: In this multicenter trial, 266 patients with sepsis (by Sepsis-3 definitions) with lower respiratory tract infections, acute pyelonephritis, or primary bloodstream infection were randomized (1:1) to receive either PCT-guided discontinuation of antimicrobials or standard of care. The discontinuation criterion was ≥80% reduction in PCT levels or any PCT ≤0.5 µg/L at Day 5 or later. The primary outcome was the rate of infection-associated adverse events at Day 180, a composite of the incidence of any new infection by Clostridioides difficile or multidrug-resistant organisms, or any death attributed to baseline C. difficile or multidrug-resistant organism infection. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, length of antibiotic therapy, and cost of hospitalization.Measurements and Main Results: The rate of infection-associated adverse events was 7.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-13.1%; 9/125) versus 15.3% (95% CI, 10.1-22.4%; 20/131) (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20-0.98; P = 0.045); 28-day mortality 15.2% (95% CI, 10-22.5%; 19/125) versus 28.2% (95% CI, 21.2-36.5%; 37/131) (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.89; P = 0.02); and median length of antibiotic therapy 5 (range, 5-7) versus 10 (range, 7-15) days (P < 0.001) in the PCT and standard-of-care arms, respectively. The cost of hospitalization was also reduced in the PCT arm.Conclusions: In sepsis, PCT guidance was effective in reducing infection-associated adverse events, 28-day mortality, and cost of hospitalization.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03333304).

Survival benefit associated with clarithromycin in severe community-acquired pneumonia: A matched comparator study.

Although analysis of retrospective studies has documented survival benefit from the addition of a macrolide to the treatment regimen for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), no data are available to determine if there is differential efficacy between members of the macrolide family. In order to investigate this, an analysis was undertaken of data from 1174 patients with CAP who met the new Sepsis-3 definitions and were enrolled prospectively in the data registry of the Hellenic Sepsis Study Group. Four well-matched treatment groups were identified with 130 patients per group: clarithromycin and ß-lactam; azithromycin and ß-lactam; respiratory fluoroquinolone and ß-lactam monotherapy. The primary endpoint was comparison of the effects of clarithromycin with ß-lactam monotherapy on 28-day mortality. The secondary endpoint was resolution of CAP. Mortality rates for the clarithromycin, azithromycin, respiratory fluoroquinolone and ß-lactam groups were 20.8%, 33.8% (P=0.026 vs clarithromycin), 32.3% (P=0.049 vs clarithromycin) and 36.2% (P=0.009 vs clarithromycin), respectively. After stepwise Cox regression analysis among all groups, clarithromycin was the only treatment modality associated with a favourable outcome (hazard ratio 0.61; P=0.021). CAP resolved in 73.1%, 65.9% (P=0.226 vs clarithromycin), 58.5% (P=0.009 vs clarithromycin) and 61.5% (P=0.046 vs clarithromycin) of patients, respectively. It is concluded that the addition of clarithromycin to the treatment regimen of patients with severe CAP leads to better survival rates.

Massive ovarian oedema: a misleading clinical entity.

BACKGROUND: Massive ovarian oedema is a rare non-neoplastic clinicopathologic entity has a higher incidence in women during their second and third life decade. The oedema can be presented in one or both ovaries as a result of partial intermittent torsion of the ovarian pedicle that interferes to the venal and lymphatic drainage of the ovary. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a clinical case of a 16 year old with massive ovarian oedema and we performed a review of the literature. The pathophysiology of this entity is very complex. We tried to perform a complete review of the literature and focus on the complexity of this entity as far as its pathophysiological backround is concerned and as far as its clinical presentation is concerned. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, massive ovarian oedema is a rare, multi disease mimicking clinical entity, with an acute or progressive clinical presentation. It has also to be a part of our differential diagnosis in cases of acute abdominal pain and we have to try to treat her conservatively, in order to preserve fertility.