Factors affecting the quality and reproducibility of MALDI-TOF MS identification for human Capnocytophaga species.

Reproducibility and quality of MALDI-TOF MS spectra are critical in the identification process, however, information on the factors affecting the identification scores are scarce. Here, we studied the influence of various factors during the identification process of human oral Capnocytophaga species. The influence of two incubation times, plate-spotting reproducibility of two examiners, extraction technique, storage period of plates, and different laser repetition rates on the quality of MALDI-TOF MS identification of 34 human Capnocytophaga strains (including C. gingivalis, C. granulosa, C. haemolytica, C. leadbetteri, C. ochracea, C. sputigena, and Capnocytophaga genospecies AHN8471) was examined. The identification rate did not show a significant difference (P = 0.05) between the two incubation times, except that C. haemolytica needed a longer incubation time to be recognized at the genus level. The reproducibility of spotting between two examiners was ensured by following the manufacturer's instructions. At the species level, formic acid extraction improved the identification of species with limited representation in the database, such as C. haemolytica and C. granulosa. The storage of plates for one week decreased the identification scores. No significant difference (P = 0.39) was observed between the 60 Hz and 120 Hz laser repetition rates for identifying Capnocytophaga species to the genus or species level. In conclusion, the MALDI TOF MS offers a reliable Capnocytophaga identification after following the universal protocol, while the formic acid extraction is restricted to species with a limited number of strains in the database.

Bioactive Glasses in Periodontal Regeneration: A Systematic Review.

Bioactive glasses (BAGs) are surface-active ceramic materials that can be used in bone regeneration due to their known osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. This systematic review aimed to study the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using BAGs in periodontal regeneration. The selected studies were collected from PubMed and Web of Science databases, and included clinical studies investigating the use of BAGs on periodontal bone defect augmentation between January 2000 and February 2022. The identified studies were screened using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 115 full-length peer-reviewed articles were identified. After excluding duplicate articles between the databases and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 studies were selected. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials was used to assess the selected studies. Five studies compared using BAGs with open flap debridement (OFD) without grafting materials. Two of the selected studies were performed to compare the use of BAGs with protein-rich fibrin, one of which also included an additional OFD group. Also, one study evaluated BAG with biphasic calcium phosphate and used a third OFD group. The remaining six studies compared BAG filler with hydroxyapatite, demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft, autogenous cortical bone graft, calcium sulfate ß-hemihydrate, enamel matrix derivatives, and guided tissue regeneration. This systematic review showed that using BAG to treat periodontal bone defects has beneficial effects on periodontal tissue regeneration. OSF Registration No.: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Y8UCR.