Breast cancers with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2.0 or greater and an average HER2 copy number of less than 4.0 per cell: frequency, immunohistochemical correlation, and clinicopathological features.

The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines classified breast cancers with a fluorescence in situ hybridization dual-probe HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2 or greater as "amplified," inclusive of cases with a HER2 copy number less than 4. The 2018 ASCO/CAP update assigns HER2/neu status for the latter group in a fashion that is highly dependent on the associated immunohistochemical findings. Herein, the authors define the frequency, immunohistochemical correlates, and other clinicopathological features of breast cancers with HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2 or greater and HER2/neu copy number less than 4 (group A), based on an analysis of an institutional cohort assessed for HER2/neu status by both florescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry and scored using 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. Group A cases were compared with a group B of HER2/neu-amplified breast cancers with a HER2/neu copy number of 4 or greater regarding a variety of clinicopathological features. One hundred sixty-nine (14%) of 1201 cases were HER2/neu amplified, 18 (10.7%) in group A and 151 (89.3%) in group B. By immunohistochemistry, 61.1% of group A cases were HER2/neu negative, 7 (38.9%) were equivocal, and none were positive. In contrast, 66.9% of group B cases were HER2 positive (3+). We could not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding standard clinicopathological variables. In summary, our group A cases account for 1.5% of breast cancers, and 10.7% of all HER2/neu-amplified cancers classified as such based on 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. They are predominantly HER2/neu negative by immunohistochemistry, which suggests that they are biologically different from classically HER2/neu-amplified cases and which validates the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline against automatically classifying such cases as HER2/neu amplified.

Comparative Pathologic Analysis of Breast Cancers Classified as HER2/neu-Amplified by FISH Using a Standard HER2/CEP17 Dual Probe and an Alternative Chromosome 17 Control Probe.

At our institution, breast cancer cases that generate an equivocal HER2/neu (HER2) result by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using the dual HER2/chromosome enumeration probe (CEP17) are reflexed to an assay that utilizes an alternative control probe (lissencephaly gene1 [LIS1] [17p13.3]/retinoic acid receptor α [RARA] [17q21.2]). This study examines whether cancers that are classified as HER2-amplified with an alternate probe are clinicopathologically similar to those that are classified as such using the HER2/CEP17 probe. Reports for 1201 breast cancers were reviewed, and clinicopathologic findings were compared between HER2/CEP17-equivocal cases that became HER2-amplified using the alternate probe (group A: n=48), HER2-amplified cases using the HER2/CEP17 probe (group B: n=169), and HER2-nonamplified cases using the HER2/CEP17 probe (group C: n=910). Of 1201 cases tested using the HER2/CEP17 probe, 169 (14%) were HER2-amplified, 122 (10%) were equivocal, and 910 (76%) were nonamplified. Additional testing with the alternative probe on the 122 equivocal cases reclassified 48 (39%) of them to HER2-amplified, and such cases comprised 22% of all HER2-amplified tumors. A higher proportion of tumors with HER2 copy number between 5.0 and 5.9 became positive upon additional testing when compared with those with a priori HER2 copy numbers between 4.0 and 4.9 (P=0.0362). Group A cases, compared with group B cases, were more frequently positive for estrogen receptor (97.91% vs. 72.18%, P<0.0001) and progesterone receptor (85.41% vs. 59.17%, P=0.0009). Most group A cases (71%) were HER2 equivocal (score 2+) by immunohistochemistry, whereas most group B cases (60%) were positive (score 3+). Groups A and B showed no significant differences regarding patient age, lymph node status, tumor grade, histotype, and stage distribution. In summary, among our HER2-amplified cohort of breast cancers, alternative probe-detected cases were more frequently estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive than HER2/CEP17-detected cases, and were more frequently discordant with HER2 immunohistochemistry results. These findings raise the possibility of underlying biologic differences between these 2 groups, which warrants further study. However, the tumors were largely comparable regarding all other clinicopathologic variables. As it is unknown whether HER2-targeted therapy is truly beneficial in this subgroup of patients, future clinical trials should specifically evaluate this subset.