Management Strategies for Hypertensive Crisis: A Systematic Review.

A hypertensive crisis is defined as a sudden and significant rise in blood pressure. The blood pressure reading is 180/120 mmHg or higher. A hypertensive crisis is a medical emergency. It can lead to a heart attack, stroke, or other life-threatening medical problems. Investigating the management of the hypertensive crisis was the goal of this study. English-language articles were collected from 2010 to 2024 demonstrating the management of the hypertensive crisis. Overall, there were 15 articles. Surveys and analyses of national databases were the most widely used methods (n=15). The scientific studies documented (1) all investigative studies or reports that included a hypertensive crisis diagnosis, (2) data integrity and reproducibility, and (3) management studies. Other studies show that acute severe hypertension in the hospital is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity, particularly with new or worsening end-organ damage. The problem is linked to poor medical adherence, but alarmingly low follow-up rates are likely to contribute to a high recurrence rate. The treatment of acute severe hypertension varies according to the hospital unit (medical ward or intensive care unit), medication, and blood pressure targets or thresholds. Because of a lack of evidence-based guidance, arbitrary blood pressure control targets are used, or blood pressure targets are crudely extrapolated from guidelines intended primarily for outpatient management. Patients with acute aortic dissection need to be administered intravenous esmolol within 5 to 10 minutes in order to lower their blood pressure right away. The goal is to maintain a systolic reading of less than 120 mm Hg. Vasodilators such as nitroglycerin or nitroprusside may be administered if the blood pressure persists following beta blocking. Intravenous administration of clevidipine, nicardipine, or phentolamine is required; the initial dose is 5 mg, with subsequent doses given every 10 minutes as necessary to achieve the desired reduction in blood pressure.

The Management of Esophageal Perforation: A Systematic Review.

Esophageal perforation, a rare and serious condition, has seen a reduction in mortality from 30% to 15% over the last three decades due to advancements such as gastrointestinal stents, minimally invasive surgeries, and improved interventional radiology techniques. This review analyzes management strategies for esophageal perforation based on 14 English-language articles published from 2009 to 2024, primarily utilizing surveys and national database analyses. The management of esophageal perforation is complex, with challenges in diagnosis and treatment strategy. Despite surgery being the traditional treatment, the role of less invasive methods is growing. Effective management of esophageal perforation involves advanced imaging for diagnosis, hemodynamic stabilization, and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment, including surgical and non-surgical interventions. The evidence for different treatment outcomes remains limited, highlighting the need for comprehensive care involving thoracic surgery, interventional radiology, gastroenterology, and critical care in an intensive care unit setting.