Elevated IL-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of peripheral cytokine levels on the prognosis and treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) myocarditis has not been well studied. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify cytokines that can prognosticate and direct the treatment of ICI myocarditis. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with ICI myocarditis who had available peripheral cytokine levels between January 2011 and May 2022. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of heart failure with/without cardiogenic shock, arterial thrombosis, life-threatening arrhythmias, pulmonary embolism, and sudden cardiac death. RESULTS: In total, 65 patients with ICI myocarditis had cytokine data available. Patients were mostly males (70%), with a mean age of 67.8 ± 12.7 years. Interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were the most common cytokines to be elevated with 48/65 (74%) of patients having a peak IL-6 above normal limits (>5 pg/mL) and 44/65 (68%) of patients with peak TNF-α above normal limits (>22 pg/mL). Patients with elevated peak IL-6 had similar 90-day mortality and MACE outcomes compared to those without (10.4% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.878 and 8.8% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.366, respectively). Similarly, those with elevated peak TNF-α had similar 90-day mortality and MACEs compared to those without (29.6% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.182 and 13.6% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.413, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also showed that there was not a significant difference between MACE-free survival when comparing elevated and normal IL-6 and TNF-α levels (p = 0.182 and p = 0.118, respectively). MACEs and overall survival outcomes were similar between those who received infliximab and those who did not among all patients and those with elevated TNF-α (p-value 0.70 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSION: Peripheral blood levels of IL-6 and TNF-α are the most commonly elevated cytokines in patients with ICI myocarditis. However, their role in the prognostication and guidance of immunomodulatory treatment is currently limited.

Prevalence, mortality, cost, and disparities in transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement in cancer patients: Artificial intelligence and propensity score national 5-year analysis of 7495 procedures.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted the first comprehensive evaluation of the therapeutic value and safety profile of transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair (TEER) and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) in individuals concurrently afflicted with cancer. METHODS: Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset, we analyzed all adult hospitalizations between 2016 and 2020 (n = 148,755,036). The inclusion criteria for this retrospectively analyzed prospective cohort study were all adult hospitalizations (age 18 years and older). Regression and machine learning analyses in addition to model optimization were conducted using ML-PSr (Machine Learning-augmented Propensity Score adjusted multivariable regression) and BAyesian Machine learning-augmented Propensity Score (BAM-PS) multivariable regression. RESULTS: Of all adult hospitalizations, there were 5790 (0.004%) TMVRs and 1705 (0.001%) TEERs. Of the total TMVRs, 160 (2.76%) were done in active cancer. Of the total TEERs, 30 (1.76%) were done in active cancer. After the comparable rates of TEER/TMVR in active cancer in 2016, the prevalence of TEER/TMVR was significantly less in active cancer from 2017 to 2020 (2.61% versus 7.28% p < 0.001). From 2017 to 2020, active cancer significantly decreased the odds of receiving TEER or TMVR (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.13-0.68, p = 0.008). In patients with active cancer who underwent TMVR/TEER, there were no significant differences in socio-economic disparities, mortality or total hospitalization costs. CONCLUSION: The presence of malignancy does not contribute to increased mortality, length of stay or procedural costs in TMVR or TEER. Whereas the prevalence of TMVR has increased in patients with active cancer, the utilization of TEER in the context of active cancer is declining despite a growing patient population.

Navigating P2Y12 inhibition in the labyrinth of cardio-oncology care: cangrelor bridging in patients with cancer.

Cangrelor, a potent intravenous P2Y12 platelet inhibitor, has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing ischemic events without a corresponding increase in severe bleeding during percutaneous coronary intervention, as evidenced by the CHAMPION-PHOENIX trial. Its off-label role as a bridging antiplatelet agent for patients facing high thrombotic risks who must temporarily stop oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy further underscores its clinical utility. This is the first case series to shed light on the application of cangrelor in cancer patients needing to pause dual antiplatelet therapy for a range of medical interventions, marking it as a pioneering effort in this domain. The inclusion of patients with a variety of cancer types and cardiovascular conditions in this series underlines the adaptability and critical role of cangrelor in managing the dual challenges of bleeding risk and the need for uninterrupted antiplatelet protection. By offering a bridge for high-risk cancer patients who have recently undergone percutaneous coronary intervention and need to halt oral P2Y12 inhibitors temporarily, cangrelor presents a practical solution. Early findings indicate it can be discontinued safely 2-4 h before medical procedures, allowing for the effective reintroduction of oral P2Y12 inhibitors without adverse effects. This evidence calls for expanded research to validate and extend these preliminary observations, emphasizing the importance of further investigation into cangrelor's applications in complex patient care scenarios.

Evaluation of Midodrine Utilization in Patients with Cancer and Heart Failure.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and cardiovascular outcomes as well as overall survival of cancer patients with concomitant heart failure (HF) treated with midodrine for hypotension. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with cancer and HF who were treated with midodrine at a tertiary cancer center from 03/2013 to 08/2021 were identified. Demographic and clinical parameters were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were included with a median age of 68 years (IQR: 60, 74; 33% female and 85% White). Of those, 31% had HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%), 42% HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF; EF 41-49%), and 27% HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%). The most common indication for midodrine use was orthostatic hypotension (49%). Midodrine was continued for at least one month in 57% of the patients. Supine hypertension was the only side effect reported in 6% of patients. No statistically significant changes in NYHA class, guideline-directed medical therapy, cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP or troponin T), echocardiographic findings or cardiovascular hospitalizations were observed between patients who continued treatment with midodrine compared to those who stopped using midodrine over a median follow-up of 38 months. In the multivariable cox regression analysis, continuation of midodrine, compared to discontinuation, and use of midodrine for orthostatic hypotension, as opposed to other causes of hypotension, were not associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.69, p < .0001; HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.64, p < .001, respectively). In contrast, elevated creatinine (> 1.3 for males and > 1.1 for females) was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.07-3.14). LVEF was not significantly associated with lower or higher risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, midodrine use in patients with cancer and HF was not associated with significant adverse effects, worse cardiovascular outcomes, or increased risk of mortality. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.