Prescriptions of analgesics during chronic cancer disease trajectories: A complete national cohort study.

PURPOSE: Pain management principles vary considerably between chronic noncancer, acute and cancer pain. Cancer patients responding to oncological treatment may live with low tumor burden for years. Opioid treatment should reflect that the ratio between benefits and risks in these patients is different from patients with a rapidly progressive disease. Our study investigated the prescription patterns of analgesics in patients who died 6 to 9 years after cancer diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pharmaco-epidemiological study based on the Norwegian Prescription Database and Cancer Registry of Norway. The 1-year periodic prevalence of receiving different analgesics and of persistent opioid use were analyzed. Persistent opioid use was defined as >365 Defined Daily Doses or >9000 mg Oral Morphine Equivalents during 365 days with prescriptions in all quarters of the 365 days period. Data were reported for the first 7 years for patients who lived 8-9 years after cancer diagnosis (N = 1502), while for patients who lived 6-7 years (N = 3817) data was reported for the first 5 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: Compared to age- and gender adjusted general population, the 1-year periodic prevalence of opioid prescription was doubled the first year after diagnosis and remained raised with approximately 50%. The prevalence of persistent opioid use was threefold of the general population. Approximately 55% of patients with persistent opioid use 4 years after a cancer diagnosis were co-medicated with high doses of benzodiazepines and/or benzodiazepine-related hypnotics. CONCLUSION: The findings of increased opioid use raise concerns regarding whether the benefits outweigh risks and side effects in this population.

Restart of androgen deprivation therapy after goserelin induced pituitary apoplexy in a patient with disseminated prostate cancer a case report and five-years follow-up.

Pituitary apoplexy is a clinical syndrome caused by hemorrhage or infarction of a pituitary adenoma. There have been a few reports in the literature of rapid onset of pituitary apoplexy after goserelin injection. To the best of our knowledge, there is no publication in the literature reporting re-introducing goserelin therapy for patients with prostate cancer after the onset of pituitary apoplexy. In this case report, we present the onset and clinico-radiological course of pituitary apoplexy induced by the initiation of goserelin and during continuation of goserelin with up to five-years follow-up.

The NEOLETEXE trial: a neoadjuvant cross-over study exploring the lack of cross resistance between aromatase inhibitors.

The aromatase inhibitor letrozole (Femar®/Femara®) and the aromatase inactivator exemestane (Aromasin®) differ in their biochemical effect on the aromatase enzyme. Letrozole is a competitive aromatase inhibitor while exemestane binds irreversibly to the aromatase enzyme. This pharmacological difference is of clinical interest since a lack of cross-resistance has been documented. It has been demonstrated in several clinical trials that exemestane may cause a disease regression following resistance to nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The exact mechanism(s) behind this phenomenon is yet unknown. Here, we present the NEOLETEXE trial with the aim of exploring the individual mechanisms involved behind the observed lack of cross resistance. Clinical trial registration: The trial has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of South-East Norway (project number 2015/84).