Management of hyperkalemia: Expert consensus from Kuwait - a Modified Delphi Approach.

Introduction: Hyperkalemia is common in heart failure (HF) patients on renin angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi), in chronic kidney disease (CKD), and in hemodialysis, and it negatively impacts their management. New potassium binders, such as sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), are effective in management of acute and chronic hyperkalemia. However, guidelines inconsistencies and lack of standardized treatment protocols are hindering proper and wider use of such agents. Therefore, an expert panel from Kuwait developed a consensus statement to address hyperkalemia management in acute settings, in HF, in CKD, and in hemodialysis. Methods: A three-step modified Delphi method was adopted to develop the present consensus, which consisted of two rounds of voting and in-between a virtual meeting. Twelve experts from Kuwait participated in this consensus. Statements were developed and shared with experts for voting. A meeting was held to discuss statements that did not reach consensus at the first round and then the remaining statements were shared for final voting. Results: The consensus consists of 44 statements involving an introduction to and the management of hyperkalemia in acute settings, HF, CKD, and hemodialysis. Thirty-six statements approved unanimously in the first vote. In the second vote, four statements were removed and four were approved after editing. Conclusion: Hyperkalemia management lacks standardized definitions, treatment thresholds and consistent guidelines and laboratory practices. This consensus is in response to lack of standardized treatment in the Arabian Gulf, and it aims to establish guidance on hyperkalemia management for healthcare practitioners in Kuwait and highlight future needs.

Influenza B presenting as cardiogenic shock and progressing to multiorgan failure: A case report.

Influenza induced cardiogenic shock is rare and the majority of reported cases are a result of Influenza A myocarditis. We describe a patient with Influenza B who developed myocarditis and cardiogenic shock, with no known pre-existing heart disease. The patient's disease progressed to include rhabdomyolysis, compartment syndrome, renal failure, and pneumonia. He was successfully managed with Oseltamivir, renal replacement therapy, antimicrobials and intubation. This case is notable due to the rarity of influenza B induced cardiogenic shock and reinforces the importance of recognition and treatment.

The effect of revascularization on mortality and risk of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that patients with prior myocardial infarction and a reduced ejection fraction benefit from implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). It is unclear whether this benefit is altered by whether or not revascularization is performed prior to ICD implantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study following patients who underwent ICD implantation from 2002 to 2014. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and either primary or secondary prevention ICDs were selected for inclusion. Using the electronic medical record, cardiac catheterization data, revascularization status (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery) were recorded. The outcomes were mortality and ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: There were 606 patients included in the analysis. The mean age was 66.3 ± 10.1 years, 11.9% were women, and the mean LVEF was 30.5 ± 12.0, 58.9% had a primary indication for ICD, 82.0% of the cohort had undergone coronary catheterization prior to ICD implantation. In the overall cohort, there were fewer mortality and ventricular arrhythmia events in patients who had undergone prior revascularization. In patients who had an ICD for secondary prevention, revascularization was associated with a decrease in mortality (HR 0.46, 95% CI (0.24, 0.85) p = 0.015), and a trend towards fewer ventricular arrhythmia (HR 0.62, 95% CI (0.38, 1.00) p = 0.051). There was no association between death or ventricular arrhythmia with revascularization in patients with primary prevention ICDs. CONCLUSION: Revascularization may be beneficial in preventing recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, and should be considered as adjunctive therapy to ICD implantation to improve cardiovascular outcomes.