RESUMO
A reativação da BCG pode ocorrer em diversos contextos: associada a quadros infecciosos, imunossupressão, autoimunidade e pós-vacinações. Além disso, especialmente em crianças abaixo de 5 anos de idade, deve ser valorizada como um achando presente em cerca de 50% dos casos de Doença de Kawasaki. Neste artigo, relatamos o primeiro caso publicado na literatura de uma paciente adulta jovem, a qual manifestou uma reativação de BCG após receber a primeira dose de vacina contra COVID-19 (AztraZeneca/Oxford/Biomanguinhos). Dentro das primeiras 24h após a administração da vacina, a paciente desenvolveu febre alta, sudorese, dor local, mialgia difusa e cefaleia. Após dois dias, iniciou eritema e enduração no local da cicatriz da vacina BCG. Ela tem como comorbidade a urticária crônica espontânea, porém estava assintomática sem crises há mais de 1 ano. Tem como antecedente familiar relevante o óbito materno por síndrome complexa de sobreposição de autoimunidade (lúpus eritematoso sistêmico, síndrome de Sjögren e síndrome do anticorpo antifosfolípide). Após ser medicada com anti-inflamatórios não esteroides (AINE) e corticoterapia tópica de moderada potência por 3 dias, houve resolução completa da reativação da BCG. A paciente, após 3 meses, recebeu a segunda dose da vacina e não manifestou nenhum sintoma. Acredita-se que a reativação da BCG ocorra devido a um mecanismo de reação cruzada entre HSP do indivíduo, elicitadas como mediadores da imunidade inata frente à inflamação vacinal, com alguns epítopos do M. bovis. Recomendase que seja investigada alguma condição imunossupressora ou autoimune nos pacientes que manifestem reativação da BCG, principalmente em adultos, na qual a doença de Kawasaki é bastante rara. As vacinas, incluindo as contra COVID-19, também podem desencadear o surgimento deste fenômeno imunológico ainda pouco compreendido.
BCG reactivation can occur in different contexts: associated with infectious conditions, immunosuppression, autoimmunity and post-vaccinations. Also, especially in children below of 5 years of age, should be valued as a finding present in about 50% of cases of Kawasaki disease. In this article, we report the first case published in the literature of a young adult patient, who manifested a reactivation of BCG after receiving the first dose of vaccine against COVID-19 (AztraZeneca/Oxford/Biomanguinhos). Within the first 24 hours after the administration of the vaccine, the patient developed high fever, sweating, local pain, diffuse myalgia and headache. After 2 days, erythema and induration at the site of the BCG vaccine scar began. she has how comorbidity to chronic spontaneous urticaria, but she was asymptomatic without crises for more than 1 year. The relevant family history is maternal death due to the complex syndrome of autoimmunity overlap (systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögrens syndrome, and anti-phospholipid antibody). After being medicated with NSAID and moderate topical corticosteroid therapy potency for 3 days, there was complete resolution of BCG reactivation. The patient, after 3 months, received the 2nd dose of the vaccine and had no symptoms. It is believed that the reactivation of BCG occurs due to a cross-reaction mechanism between the individuals HSP, elicited as mediators of innate immunity against vaccine inflammation, with some epitopes of M. bovis. It is recommended that any immunosuppressive or autoimmune condition be investigated in patients that manifest BCG reactivation, especially in adults, in which Kawasaki disease is quite rare. Vaccines, including those against COVID-19, can also trigger of this immunological phenomenon still poorly understood.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Vacina BCG , Autoimunidade , Cicatriz , COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Dor , Sinais e Sintomas , Síndrome de Sjogren , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica , Corticosteroides , Eritema , Febre , Urticária Crônica , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Cefaleia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos , Mycobacterium bovisRESUMO
The skin prick test is used to diagnose patients' sensitization to antigens through a mediated IgE response. It is a practical and quick exam, but its diagnosis depends on instruments for measuring the allergic response and observer's interpretation. The conventional method for inferring about the allergic reaction is performed from the dimensions of the wheals, which are measured using a ruler or a caliper. To make this diagnosis less dependent on human interpretation, the present study proposes two alternative methods to infer about the allergic reaction: computational determination of the wheal area and a study of the temperature variation of the patient's skin in the puncture region. For this purpose, prick test using histamine was performed on 20 patients randomly selected. The areas were determined by the conventional method using the dimensions of the wheals measured with a digital caliper 30â¯min after the puncture. The wheal areas were also determined by a Python algorithm using photographs of the puncture region obtained with a smartphone. A variable named circularity deviation was also determined for each analyzed wheal. The temperature variation was monitored using an infrared temperature sensor, which collected temperature data for 30â¯min. All results were statistically compared or correlated. The results showed that the computational method to infer the wheal areas did not differ significantly from the areas determined by the conventional method (p-valueâ¯=â¯0.07585). Temperature monitoring revealed that there was a consistent temperature increase in the first minutes after the puncture, followed by stabilization, so that the data could be adjusted by a logistic equation (R2â¯=â¯0.96). This adjustment showed that the optimal time to measure the temperature is 800â¯s after the puncture, when the temperature stabilization occurs. The results have also shown that this temperature stabilization has a significant positive correlation with wheal area (p-valueâ¯=â¯0.0015). Thus, we concluded that the proposed computational method is more accurate to infer the wheal area when compared to the traditional method, and that the temperature may be used as an alternative parameter to infer about the allergic reaction.