Risk factors, surgical complications and graft survival in liver transplant recipients with early allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is a severe complication after liver transplantation. The associated risk factors and complications have re-gained recent interest. This study investigated risk factors, survival and complications associated with EAD in a large liver transplant center in Latin America. METHODS: Retrospective, unicenter, cohort, based on data from adult patients undergoing first deceased-donor liver transplant from January 2009 to December 2013. EAD was defined by one or more of the following: (i) bilirubin ≥10 mg/dL on postoperative day 7; (ii) international normalized ratio ≥1.6 on postoperative day 7, and (iii) alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >2000 IU/L within the first seven days after transplant. RESULTS: A total of 602 patients were included; of these 34.2% developed EAD. Donor risk factors were male (P = 0.007), age between 50 and 59 years (P = 0.034), overweight (P = 0.028) or grade I obesity (P = 0.012), sodium >157 mmol/L (P = 0.002) and grade IV ischemia/reperfusion injury (P = 0.002). Cold ischemia time ≥10 h (P = 0.008) and warm ischemia time ≥40 min (P = 0.013) were the surgical factors. Male (P <0.001) was the only recipient protective factor. Compared with the non-EAD group, patients with EAD were submitted to more reoperations (24.3% vs. 13.4%, P = 0.001) and had higher graft loss rates (37.9% vs. 21.2%, P <0.001), with similar patient survival rates (P = 0.238). CONCLUSIONS: EAD risk factors are related to donor, surgical procedure and recipient. Donor risk factors for EAD were male, age between 50 and 59 years, donor overweight or grade I obesity, sodium >157 mmol/L and grade IV ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cold ischemia time ≥10 h and warm ischemia time ≥40 min were the surgical risk factors. Male was the only recipient protective factor. Patients with EAD had higher reoperations and graft loss rates.

Assessment and enrolment process for liver transplantation: nursing management through quality indicators.

Objective To establish, measure and analyze quality indicators in the evaluation and enrolment process of patients in a liver transplant program. Methods A quantitative and non-experimental research, with data collected from the database of a liver transplant program, from September 2012 to September 2014. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quality indicators identified. Results We analyzed 1,311 visits in the transplant outpatient clinic, most males (66.7%), white (65.1%), mean age of 53 (±12.5) years, from the Southeastern Region (91.2%), and from the State of São Paulo (80.8%). The indicators measured were efficiency of patient admission process (54.8%), efficiency of evaluation of transplant indication (39.9%), efficacy of treatment of patients seen in the program (21.8%), and waiting time to inclusion in the waiting list, median of 84 days (36-142). Conclusion The quality indicators analyzed in this study enabled a quantitative view of the process, facilitating management of results and benchmarking with other transplant centers. Continuous monitoring can optimize resource allocation and planning of services in patient's admission process.

Assessment and enrolment process for liver transplantation: nursing management through quality indicators / Processo de admissão e inscrição para transplante hepático: gerenciamento de enfermagem por meio de indicadores de qualidade

ABSTRACT Objective To establish, measure and analyze quality indicators in the evaluation and enrolment process of patients in a liver transplant program. Methods A quantitative and non-experimental research, with data collected from the database of a liver transplant program, from September 2012 to September 2014. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quality indicators identified. Results We analyzed 1,311 visits in the transplant outpatient clinic, most males (66.7%), white (65.1%), mean age of 53 (±12.5) years, from the Southeastern Region (91.2%), and from the State of São Paulo (80.8%). The indicators measured were efficiency of patient admission process (54.8%), efficiency of evaluation of transplant indication (39.9%), efficacy of treatment of patients seen in the program (21.8%), and waiting time to inclusion in the waiting list, median of 84 days (36-142). Conclusion The quality indicators analyzed in this study enabled a quantitative view of the process, facilitating management of results and benchmarking with other transplant centers. Continuous monitoring can optimize resource allocation and planning of services in patient's admission process.

RESUMO Objetivo Estabelecer, mensurar e analisar indicadores de qualidade no processo de avaliação e admissão dos pacientes em um programa de transplante hepático. Métodos Pesquisa de abordagem quantitativa não experimental, com dados coletados a partir do banco de dados da gestão de um programa de transplante hepático entre setembro de 2012 e setembro de 2014. Estatística descritiva foi utilizada para analisar os indicadores de qualidade identificados. Resultados Foram analisados 1.311 atendimentos no ambulatório de transplante, a maioria do sexo masculino (66,7%), branca (65,1%), com média de idade de 53 (±12,5) anos, da Região Sudeste (91,2%) e do Estado de São Paulo (80,8%). Os indicadores mensurados foram eficiência do processo de admissão dos pacientes (54,8%), eficiência da avaliação de indicação ao transplante (39,9%), eficácia do tratamento dos pacientes atendidos no programa (21,8%), e tempo de inclusão na lista de espera, com mediana em 84 dias (36-142). Conclusão Os indicadores de qualidade analisados neste estudo possibilitaram uma visão quantitativa do processo, facilitando o gerenciamento de resultados e o benchmarking entre instituições transplantadoras. O monitoramento contínuo pode otimizar a alocação de recursos e o planejamento de serviços relacionados ao processo de admissão do paciente.

Predictors of renal function recovery among patients undergoing renal replacement therapy following orthotopic liver transplantation.

Renal dysfunction frequently occurs during the periods preceding and following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), and in many cases, renal replacement therapy (RRT) is required. Information regarding the duration of RRT and the rate of kidney function recovery after OLT is crucial for transplant program management. We evaluated a sample of 155 stable patients undergoing post-intensive care hemodialysis (HD) from a patient population of 908 adults who underwent OLT. We investigated the average time to renal function recovery (duration of RRT required) and determined the risk factors for remaining on dialysis > 90 days after OLT. Log-rank tests were used for univariate analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with the risk of remaining on HD. The results of our analysis showed that of the 155 patients, 28% had pre-OLT diabetes mellitus, 21% had pre-OLT hypertension, and 40% had viral hepatitis. Among the patients, the median MELD (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease) score was 27 (interquartile range [IQR] 22-35). When they were listed for liver transplantation, 32% of the patients had serum creatinine (Scr) levels > 1.5 mg/dL or were on HD, and 50% had serum creatinine (Scr) levels > 1.5 mg/dL or were on HD at the time of OLT. Of the transplanted patients, 25% underwent pre-OLT intermittent HD, and 14% and 41% underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) pre-OLT and post-OLT, respectively. At 90 days post-OLT, 118 (76%) patients had been taken off dialysis, and 16 (10%) patients had died while undergoing HD. The median recovery time of these post-OLT patients was 33 (IQR 27-39) days. In the multivariate analysis, fulminant hepatic failure as the cause of liver disease (p<0.001), the absence of pre-OLT hypertension (p = 0.016), a lower intraoperative fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion volume (p = 0.019) and not undergoing pre-OLT intermittent HD (p = 0.032) were associated with performing RRT for less than 90 days. Therefore, a high proportion of OLT patients showed improved renal function after OLT, and those who were diagnosed with fulminant hepatic failure, had no pre-OLT hypertension, received a lower transfused volume of intraoperative FFP and did not undergo pre-OLT intermittent HD had a higher probability of recovery.

Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation.

Intestinal transplantation has shown exceptional growth over the past 10 years. At the end of the 1990's, intestinal transplantation moved out of the experimental realm to become a routine practice in treating patients with severe complications related to total parenteral nutrition and intestinal failure. In the last years, several centers reported an increasing improvement in survival outcomes (about 80%), during the first 12 months after surgery, but long-term survival is still a challenge. Several advances led to clinical application of transplants. Immunosuppression involved in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation was the biggest gain for this procedure in the past decade due to tacrolimus, and new inducing drugs, mono- and polyclonal anti-lymphocyte antibodies. Despite the advancement of rigid immunosuppression protocols, rejection is still very frequent in the first 12 months, and can result in long-term graft loss. The future of intestinal transplantation and multivisceral transplantation appears promising. The major challenge is early recognition of acute rejection in order to prevent graft loss, opportunistic infections associated to complications, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and graft versus host disease; and consequently, improve results in the long run.

Liver transplantation: history, outcomes and perspectives.

In 1958 Francis Moore described the orthotopic liver transplantation technique in dogs. In 1963, Starzl et al. performed the first liver transplantation. In the first five liver transplantations no patient survived more than 23 days. In 1967, stimulated by Calne who used antilymphocytic serum, Starzl began a successful series of liver transplantation. Until 1977, 200 liver transplantations were performed in the world. In that period, technical problems were overcome. Roy Calne, in 1979, used the first time cyclosporine in two patients who had undergone liver transplantation. In 1989, Starzl et al. reported a series of 1,179 consecutives patients who underwent liver transplantation and reported a survival rate between one and five years of 73% and 64%, respectively. Finally, in 1990, Starzl et al. reported successful use of tacrolimus in patents undergoing liver transplantation and who had rejection despite receiving conventional immunosuppressive treatment. Liver Transplantation Program was initiated at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein in 1990 and so far over 1,400 transplants have been done. In 2013, 102 deceased donors liver transplantations were performed. The main indications for transplantation were hepatocellular carcinoma (38%), hepatitis C virus (33.3%) and alcohol liver cirrhosis (19.6%). Of these, 36% of patients who underwent transplantation showed biological MELD score > 30. Patient and graft survival in the first year was, 82.4% and 74.8%, respectively. A major challenge in liver transplantation field is the insufficient number of donors compared with the growing demand of transplant candidates. Thus, we emphasize that appropriated donor/receptor selection, allocation and organ preservation topics should contribute to improve the number and outcomes in liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation: history, outcomes and perspectives / Transplante de fígado: história, resultados e perspectivas

In 1958 Francis Moore described the orthotopic liver transplantation technique in dogs. In 1963, Starzl et al. performed the first liver transplantation. In the first five liver transplantations no patient survived more than 23 days. In 1967, stimulated by Calne who used antilymphocytic serum, Starzl began a successful series of liver transplantation. Until 1977, 200 liver transplantations were performed in the world. In that period, technical problems were overcome. Roy Calne, in 1979, used the first time cyclosporine in two patients who had undergone liver transplantation. In 1989, Starzl et al. reported a series of 1,179 consecutives patients who underwent liver transplantation and reported a survival rate between one and five years of 73% and 64%, respectively. Finally, in 1990, Starzl et al. reported successful use of tacrolimus in patents undergoing liver transplantation and who had rejection despite receiving conventional immunosuppressive treatment. Liver Transplantation Program was initiated at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein in 1990 and so far over 1,400 transplants have been done. In 2013, 102 deceased donors liver transplantations were performed. The main indications for transplantation were hepatocellular carcinoma (38%), hepatitis C virus (33.3%) and alcohol liver cirrhosis (19.6%). Of these, 36% of patients who underwent transplantation showed biological MELD score > 30. Patient and graft survival in the first year was, 82.4% and 74.8%, respectively. A major challenge in liver transplantation field is the insufficient number of donors compared with the growing demand of transplant candidates. Thus, we emphasize that appropriated donor/receptor selection, allocation and organ preservation topics should contribute to improve the number and outcomes in liver transplantation.

Em 1958, Francis Moore descreveu a técnica do transplante de fígado em cães. Em 1963, Starzl e sua equipe realizaram o primeiro transplante de fígado. Nos primeiros cinco transplante de fígado, nenhum paciente sobreviveu mais que 23 dias. Até 1977, aproximadamente 200 transplante de fígado tinham sido realizados no mundo. Neste período, foi estabelecida a solução de problemas técnicos do transplante de fígado. Calne, em 1979, utilizou, pela primeira vez, a ciclosporina em dois pacientes submetidos ao transplante de fígado. Starzl e seus colaboradores relataram, já em 1989, que a sobrevida de 1.179 pacientes submetidos ao transplante de fígado em 1 e 5 anos foi, respectivamente, de 73 e 64%. Finalmente, em 1990, Starzl relatou o primeiro uso do novo imunossupressor tacrolimo em pacientes de transplante de fígado que apresentavam rejeição mesmo com o tratamento imunossupressor convencional. O transplante de fígado iniciou-se no Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein em 1990 e já foram realizados mais de 1.400 transplantes. Em 2013, foram realizados 102 transplantes de fígado de doadores falecidos. As principais indicações para o transplante foram carcinoma hepatocelular (38%), cirrose hepática secundária ao vírus C (33,3%) e cirrose alcoólica (19,6%). Destes, 36% dos transplantes apresentavam MELD biológico superior a 30. As sobrevidas do paciente e do enxerto no primeiro ano foram, respectivamente, 82,4 e 74,8%. Um dos maiores desafios da área do transplante de fígado é o número insuficiente de doadores para uma demanda crescente de candidatos ao procedimento. Dessa forma, destacamos que tópicos relacionados à seleção de doadores/receptores, alocação e preservação de órgãos devem contribuir para o aumento e a melhora dos resultados do transplante de fígado.

Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation / Transplante intestinal e multivisceral

Intestinal transplantation has shown exceptional growth over the past 10 years. At the end of the 1990’s, intestinal transplantation moved out of the experimental realm to become a routine practice in treating patients with severe complications related to total parenteral nutrition and intestinal failure. In the last years, several centers reported an increasing improvement in survival outcomes (about 80%), during the first 12 months after surgery, but long-term survival is still a challenge. Several advances led to clinical application of transplants. Immunosuppression involved in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation was the biggest gain for this procedure in the past decade due to tacrolimus, and new inducing drugs, mono- and polyclonal anti-lymphocyte antibodies. Despite the advancement of rigid immunosuppression protocols, rejection is still very frequent in the first 12 months, and can result in long-term graft loss. The future of intestinal transplantation and multivisceral transplantation appears promising. The major challenge is early recognition of acute rejection in order to prevent graft loss, opportunistic infections associated to complications, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and graft versus host disease; and consequently, improve results in the long run.

O transplante de intestino, ao redor do mundo, tem crescido de maneira sólida e consistente nos últimos 10 anos. No final da década de 1990, passou de um modelo experimental para uma prática clínica rotineira no tratamento dos pacientes com complicação severa da nutrição parenteral total com falência intestinal. Nos últimos anos, vários centros têm relatado uma crescente melhora nos resultados de sobrevida do transplante no primeiro ano (ao redor de 80%), porém, a longo prazo, ainda é desafiador. Diversos avanços permitiram sua aplicação clínica. O surgimento de novas drogas imunossupressoras, como o tacrolimus, além das drogas indutoras, os anticorpos antilinfocíticos mono e policlonal, nos últimos 10 anos, foi de suma importância para a melhora da sobrevida do transplante de intestino/multivisceral, mas, apesar dos protocolos bastante rígidos de imunossupressão, a rejeição é bastante frequente, podendo levar a altas taxas de perdas de enxerto a longo prazo. O futuro do transplante de intestino e multivisceral parece promissor. O grande desafio é reconhecer precocemente os casos de rejeição, prevenindo a perda do enxerto e melhorando os resultados a longo prazo, além das complicações causadas por infecções oportunistas, doenças linfoproliferativas pós-transplante e a doença do enxerto contra hospedeiro.

Liver transplant outcome: a comparison between high and low MELD score recipients / Comparação da evolução do transplante hepático em receptores com MELD alto e baixo

Objective: To compare low and high MELD scores and investigate whether existing renal dysfunction has an effect on transplant outcome. Methods: Data was prospectively collected among 237 liver transplants (216 patients) between March 2003 and March 2009. Patients with cirrhotic disease submitted to transplantation were divided into three groups: MELD greater than or equal to 30, MELD < 30, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Renal failure was defined as a ± 25% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate as observed 1 week after the transplant. Median MELD scores were 35, 21, and 13 for groups MELD greater than or equal to 30, MELD < 30, and hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively. Results: Recipients with MELD greater than or equal to 30 had more days in Intensive Care Unit, longer hospital stay, and received more blood product transfusions. Moreover, their renal function improved after liver transplant. All other groups presented with impairment of renal function. Mortality was similar in all groups, but renal function was the most important variable associated with morbidity and length of hospital stay. Conclusion: High MELD score recipients had an improvement in the glomerular filtration rate after 1 week of liver transplantation.

Objetivo: Comparar MELDs altos e baixos, sua relação com a disfunção renal e o efeito no resultado do transplante. Métodos: Realizou-se coleta prospectiva de dados em 237 transplantes de fígado (216 pacientes) entre março de 2003 e março de 2009. Pacientes com cirrose submetidos a transplante foram divididos em três grupos: MELD maior ou igual a 30, MELD < 30, e carcinoma hepatocelular. Insuficiência renal foi definida como uma diminuição de ± 25% na taxa de filtração glomerular estimada, observada 1 semana após o transplante. As medianas do MELD foram 35, 21, e 13 para os grupos MELD maior ou igual a 30, MELD < 30, e de carcinoma hepatocelular, respectivamente. Resultados: Receptores com MELD maior ou igual a 30 tiveram mais dias na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva, maior período de internação, e receberam mais transfusões de sangue. Além disso, sua função renal melhorou após o transplante de fígado. Os demais grupos apresentaram diminuição da função renal. A mortalidade foi semelhante em todos os grupos, mas a função renal foi a variável mais importante associada com morbidade e tempo de internação hospitalar. Conclusão: Em receptores com escores MELD altos houve melhora da taxa de filtração glomerular 1 semana após o transplante de fígado.