How face masks influence the sinonasal quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: To study different mask types' impact on a sinonasal quality of life. METHODS: For this observational cross-sectional study, a web-based survey was distributed via social media forums. We used the validated Hebrew version of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 followed by a questionnaire developed specifically for the present study, focusing on the time of the COVID-19 pandemic (Mask Sinonasal Outcome Test), and questions regarding general health issues. The participants' mask-wearing routine was also studied. RESULTS: Seventy percent of 351 participants had experienced a change in their breathing during the time of the pandemic. The median total Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 score was 13, and 10% of the participants reported a significantly impaired quality of life. According to multivariate analyses, the only subject-related variables significantly associated with the reduced sinonasal quality of life were female gender, younger age, a background of chronic rhinitis and sinusitis, and the mask-wearing average daily duration. The mask sinonasal outcome test convergent validity was confirmed. CONCLUSION: The majority of our survey's responders, predominantly female and younger participants, reported reduced sinonasal quality of life in the COVID-19 pandemic period. It can be attributed to mask-wearing, especially for a prolonged time, irrespective of the existing mask type. These findings should encourage medical companies to produce more "airway-minded" personal protection equipment.

Assessing the Different Oncologic Disease Distribution and Postoperative Complications of Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Head and Neck Oncology Patients.

PURPOSE: The admission rate of patients aged 80 years or older (oldest-old) with head and neck (HN) oncologic disease is on the rise. Our goal was to study the demographic characteristics, reasons for admission, types of surgical procedures, and postoperative complications of the oldest-old patients with HN malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all inpatients aged 80 years or older who were admitted to the department of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery or department of oral and maxillofacial surgery because of HN oncologic disease between 2009 and 2013. The control group was composed of a matched number of randomly selected patients aged 60 to 79 years. We compared the demographic characteristics, diagnoses, comorbidities, surgical interventions, and postoperative complications of the 2 age groups to characterize the oldest-old patients' admissions and determine whether age alone increases the risk of postoperative complications. RESULTS: The study included 109 oldest-old patients (median age, 83 years) and 107 patients in the control group (median age, 68 years). Although the oldest-old patients had significantly more underlying diseases (4.41 vs 2.86) and drugs prescribed (4.76 vs 3.21), similar rates of postoperative complications occurred in both groups. An important finding was that ischemic heart disease and chronic lung disease were the only significant risk factors for postoperative complications among the oldest-old patients (odds ratio on multivariate analysis of 5.5 and 4.5, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although comorbidities and prescribed drugs are more prevalent in the oldest-old patients, the rate of postoperative complications did not differ between the age groups, suggesting that age alone should not be a factor in the surgical treatment of HN malignancies.