Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1394652, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835790

RESUMO

Introduction: Interprofessional education (IPE) is essential in pharmacy training, providing students with vital collaborative skills for real-world healthcare. Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) is integral to IPE, allowing students to apply their knowledge in diverse healthcare settings. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare education and raised concerns about its impact on IPE during APPE rotations. Our study investigates the pandemic's influence on pharmacy students' interprofessional interactions and APPE performance. Objective: To assess the interprofessional experiences of fourth-year pharmacy students before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of APPE. Methods: This retrospective observational study examined the experiences of P4 pharmacy students in the United States during APPEs before and during the pandemic. We employed electronic surveys with 21 questions to gauge interactions and interprofessional team effectiveness, employing Likert scale response options. We compared responses between the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 APPE rotations using statistical tests. Results: Our study encompassed 83 and 86 students for the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 APPE rotations, respectively, achieving a 100% response rate. Amid the pandemic, written communications between pharmacy students and healthcare providers in general medicine rotations increased, while in-person engagement decreased. Pre-COVID, students reported higher colleague referrals and greater interprofessional utilization during ambulatory care rotations. Conclusion: COVID-19 shifted interactions from in-person to written communication between pharmacy students and healthcare providers. Students reported decreased satisfaction with their interprofessional experiences. This research offers insights into the changing landscape of pharmacy education, helping students prepare for evolving challenges in healthcare delivery and education.

2.
Cancer Control ; 31: 10732748241263013, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870396

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients' quality of life (QoL) significantly influences treatment response and mortality rates. Understanding QoL domains among patients with cancer and what affects it can help create interventions that improve QoL and ease patients' experience. This study measures the OoL among patients with cancer and influencing factors. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional questionnaire-based study included cancer patients aged >18 currently receiving treatment. The questionnaire collected social and economic data, followed by the validated Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30). Means and standard deviations for described numeric variables and frequencies and percentages described categorical variables. Analysis of variance, F-tests, and P-values were reported. RESULTS: Among 182 cancer patients, 60% were female. Younger patients exhibited higher QoL in physical and role functioning (P = .016 and .03) and experienced more significant financial impact (P = .0144). Females reported more adverse effects from cancer symptoms, including fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and pain (36.7% vs 25.5%, P = .005; 20.6% vs 11.5%, P = .0186; 34.7% vs 25.1%, P = .0281). Single patients had superior QoL in physical functioning compared to others (P = .0127). Patients traveling long distances were more likely to face adverse financial consequences (P = .007). Asthmatic patients exhibited lower QoL in physical, role, and cognitive functioning (72.3 vs 37.8, P = .0147; 76.4 vs 22.2, P = .0024; 84.7 vs 44.4, P = .0038) and reported increased dyspnea and appetite loss (16 vs 55.6 and 26.1 vs 66.7, both P < .05). CONCLUSION: Factors influencing QoL in Saudi cancer patients include age, marital status, gender, hospital distance, and chronic conditions. Thus emphasizing the necessity for personalized care strategies to enhance outcomes and alleviate the overall burden of cancer care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Feminino , Neoplasias/psicologia , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Idoso
3.
Saudi Pharm J ; 32(5): 102027, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525265

RESUMO

Introduction: Self-medication during pregnancy remains a prevalent global phenomenon, with pregnant women often relying on their own judgment to manage symptoms. Objective: This study aimed to assess community pharmacist practice regarding self-medication requests for acne treatment in pregnant women within Saudi Arabia. Methods: A descriptive, observational cross-sectional study was conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Community pharmacists completed a questionnaire after interacting with a simulated customer (SC) seeking doxycycline for a pregnant woman. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: One hundred community pharmacists participated in the study. The majority were between 25 and 35 years old (56 %) and worked in chain pharmacies (81 %). Notably, 71 % requested a prescription before dispensing any medication. While 66 % advised the SC to consult a physician or dermatologist, only 15 % inquired about the pregnancy and related information of the SC's sister. Conclusion: This study suggests a positive trend in community pharmacy practice regarding self-medication requests during pregnancy. However, further improvement is needed, particularly in terms of in-depth inquiry about pregnancy status and potential risks associated with specific medications. Collaborative efforts between the Ministry of Health (MOH), Saudi Food and Drug Administration (SFDA), and pharmacy education programs are crucial to minimize inappropriate dispensing practices and ensure optimal patient safety.

4.
J Infect Chemother ; 2024 Mar 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data comparing the clinical outcomes of novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitors given in combination versus monotherapy for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa infections are lacking. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included patients who received novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination for the treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa infections. The study was conducted between 2017 and 2022 in 6 tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, clinical cure, and acute kidney injury (AKI) were compared between recipients of monotherapy versus combination using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULT: 118 patients and 82 patients were included in monotherapy and combination therapy arms, respectively. The cohort represented an ill population with 56% in the intensive care unit and 37% in septic shock. A total of 19% of patients presented with bacteremia. Compared to monotherapy, combination therapy did not significantly differ in clinical cure (57% vs. 68%; P = 0.313; OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.36-1.14) in-hospital mortality (45% vs. 37%; P = 0.267; OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.78-2.45), or 30-day mortality (27% vs. 24%; P = 0.619; OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.62-1.25). However, AKI (32% vs. 12%; P = 0.0006; OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.67-7.13) was significantly more common in patients who received combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitors when used in combination with other antibiotics did not add clinical benefit compared to their use as monotherapy in the treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa infections. A Combination regimen was associated with an increased risk of nephrotoxicity.

5.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(16)2023 Aug 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37628464

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most common plasma cell tumor type. In late 2015, the FDA approved three new medications for MM. These medications were ixazomib, daratumumab, and elotuzumab. However, their utilization, reimbursement, and price in the Medicaid program have not been analyzed before. METHODS: A retrospective drug utilization study using the national Medicaid pharmacy claims data from 2016 to 2022 in the US. The primary metrics of analysis were utilization (number of prescriptions), reimbursement (total spending), and price (reimbursement per prescription). RESULTS: The overall Medicaid utilization of MM medications increased from 1671 prescriptions in 2016 to 34,583 prescriptions in 2022 (1970% increase). Moreover, the overall Medicaid reimbursement for the new MM medications increased from USD 9,250,000 in 2016 to over USD 214,449,000 in 2022 (2218% increase). Daratumumab had much higher utilization, reimbursement, and market shares than its competitors. Ixazomib was the most expensive medication compared to daratumumab and elotuzumab. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that CMS utilization and spending on MM medications have significantly grown since 2016. Daratumumab has by far the highest utilization, spending, and market share. The utilization of and spending on specific pharmaceuticals are clearly impacted by policy and clinical guideline recommendations.

6.
Qual Life Res ; 31(8): 2481-2491, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35064417

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a significant epidemiological problem with rising prevalence. Due to limited literature, the objective of this study is to examine the association between polypharmacy and health-related quality of life (QoL) in NAFLD adult patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational study design was conducted to analyze health data collected by Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN). Patients were classified as receiving a polypharmacy therapy with five or more medications in their first screening visit. QoL was measured using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) instrument. Each patient self-reported the SF-36 form during the screening visit was compared between polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy groups using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Multivariable generalized linear models and multinomial logistic regression were performed to examine each predictor and its effect on QoL. RESULTS: Data included 1067 NAFLD adult patients; 834 patients used polypharmacy. The mean age was 48.64 years, and most patients were female (62%). Comparing NAFLD patients without steatohepatitis, borderline NASH, and definite NASH, the non-polypharmacy group had a significantly higher QoL than the polypharmacy group in Physical Component Summary (PCS) (86.25 vs 66.88, 85 vs 67.5, and 79.375 vs 63.12, respectively, all p < 0.01) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (83.5 vs 73.38, 78.75 vs 67.62, and 78.75 vs 70.65, respectively, all p < 0.01). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Adults with NAFLD and polypharmacy have lower QoL than adults with NAFLD and non-polypharmacy. Number of medications had a significant negative impact on PCS, MCS, and all SF-36 domains except mental health, role physical limitation and role emotional limitation domains. Other factors that affect QoL negatively in NAFLD adult patients are female gender, obesity, diabetes, depression, and unemployment. Higher income had favorable effect on QoL.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 44(1): 172-179, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34564826

RESUMO

Background Obesity is a globally growing health problem, and its treatment has been challenging. The use of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) has been associated with severe adverse events (AEs). Several AOMs have been withdrawn from the market owing to documented AEs. Aim To describe, estimate and characterize the frequency of AEs attributable to the use of the AOMs, and investigate previously unreported potential AEs associated with AOMs. Method Using the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between January 2013 and June 2020, a retrospective, descriptive analysis was conducted to analyze all major reported AEs and outcomes including death, life-threatening, hospitalization, disability, and required intervention or congenital anomaly. The total numbers of AEs reports, cases, adverse reactions and outcomes were calculated for each medication. Results A total of 18,675 unique AEs reports associated with AOMs used for 15,143 patients. The mean age was 49.8 years [SD 1.83], while most patients were female adults (73.4%). The most frequently reported AEs were nausea and vomiting, followed by dizziness and headache, drug ineffectiveness, cardiovascular diseases, and kidney complications. There were 21,229 unique outcomes, including 1039 deaths (fatality ratio of 4.9% of all analyzed reports), 1613 (7.6%) life-threatening events, 7426 (35%) hospitalizations, and 1249 (5.9%) disability cases. Phentermine/topiramate fatal cases represent 6% of the overall medication's reported AEs. Cardiovascular AEs represented 31%, 23%, and 22% of phentermine, liraglutide, and phentermine/topiramate total AEs, respectively. Conclusion The analysis of FAERS database revealed numerous serious AEs associated with AOMs. These AEs can lead to serious cardiovascular and kidney complications. It is necessary to continue and systematically monitor safety of AOMs' to optimize patient anti-obesity therapy.


Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Adulto , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Fármacos Antiobesidade/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug Administration
8.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 61(4): 470-475.e2, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33722542

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In the United States, medication errors are considered to be the cause of 7000 deaths annually. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) is a management process that focuses on continually and systematically evaluating the organization's work process. In community pharmacy, CQI leads to enhanced patient safety through a reduction in medication errors and quality-related events (QREs). There is limited information about the variations in CQI regulations required by State Boards of Pharmacy (SBPs) for community pharmacy across the country. The objective of this study is to comprehensively describe CQI regulations required by SBPs for community pharmacy practice in the United States. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Information regarding SBPs community pharmacy CQI regulations was collected electronically by surveying a representative of each SBP. In addition, a review of State Pharmacy Laws published online complemented the survey data. The percentage of states with CQI regulations for community pharmacy was estimated. RESULTS: Of the 50 Boards, 16 require pharmacies to maintain CQI programs to monitor and prevent QREs in community pharmacy. The most common elements of CQI programs include the management of known, alleged, and suspected medication errors that reach the patient (73%) and regular reviews of the pharmacy's aggregate data of medication errors or incidents (73%). The North Dakota SBP regulation is the most comprehensive, followed by that of Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Montana. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation among SBP CQI regulations for community pharmacy practice. Standardization of CQI programs across Boards, including a national database for reporting medication errors and QREs would enhance patient safety.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia , Farmácias , Farmácia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estados Unidos
9.
J Ment Health Policy Econ ; 24(1): 3-11, 2021 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33739932

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: SSRIs and SNRIs are antidepressants that have largely substituted old antidepressants like Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) and Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs). They have been widely used since 1987 when the FDA approved the first SSRI Fluoxetine and the first SNRI Venlafaxine in 1993. Since then, several new SSRIs and SNRIs have been approved and entered the market. Utilization, pricing, and spending trends of SSRIs and SNRIs have not been analyzed yet in Medicaid. AIM: To assess the trends of drug expenditure, utilization, and price of SSRI and SNRI antidepressants in the US Medicaid program, and to highlight the market share of SSRIs and SNRIs and the effect of generic drug entry on Medicaid drug expenditure. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive data analysis was conducted for this study. National pharmacy summary data for study brand and generic drugs were retrieved from the Medicaid State Outpatient Drug Utilization Data. These data were collected by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The study period was between 1991 and 2018. Study drugs include 12 different SSRI and SNRI brands and their generics available in the market, such as citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, and levomilnacipran. Data were analyzed annually and categorized by total prescriptions (utilization), total reimbursement (spending), and cost per prescription as the proxy of the price for each drug. RESULTS: From 1991 to 2018, total prescriptions of SSRI and SNRI drugs rose by 3001%. Total Medicaid spending on SSRIs and SNRIs increased from USD 64.5 million to USD 2 billion in 2004, then decreased steadily until it reached USD 755 million in 2018. The SSRIs average utilization market share was 87% compared to 13% of the SNRIs utilization market share. About 72% of total Medicaid spending on the two groups goes to SSRIs, while the remaining 28% goes to SNRIs. Brand SSRIs and SNRIs prices increased over time. On the contrary, generic drugs prices steadily decreased over time. DISCUSSION: An increase in utilization and spending for both SSRI and SNRI drugs was observed. After each generic drug entered the market, utilization shifted from the brand name to the respective generic due to their lower price. These generic substitutions demonstrate a meaningful cost-containment policy for Medicaid programs. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Our findings show the overall view of Medicaid expenditure on one of the most commonly prescribed drug classes in the US. They also provide an important insight toward the antidepressant market and the importance of monitoring different drugs and their alternatives.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/economia , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Medicaid/economia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/economia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/economia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
10.
PLoS One ; 13(6): e0199289, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29928034

RESUMO

This study aimed to explore the health beliefs and patterns of dietary supplement usage among fitness center members. This cross-sectional study was conducted in four large indoor fitness centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This study involved male fitness center members aged ≥18 years with no speech or hearing disabilities. In-person interviews were conducted with fitness center members who agreed to participate using a newly developed questionnaire. Information on participants' sociodemographics (e.g., age and education), smoking status, health status, exercise frequency, average time spent exercising, different supplements used, used supplements sources, and health beliefs regarding dietary supplements were obtained. A total of 445 fitness center members agreed to participate, and 198 of them reported taking dietary supplements. Most participants were between the age of 18 and 25 years (66%), had a college degree (74%), non-smokers (77%), healthy (84%), and perform exercise at least thrice weekly (52%) for at least 1 hour (63%). The percentage of participants who had favorable health views on dietary supplements was significantly higher among the supplement users than among the non-users (P<0.0001). Proteins, multivitamins, amino acids, and omega 3 fatty acids were the most commonly reported supplements used. Almost 30% of the supplement users reported buying them overseas, 28% online, 25% from a pharmacy or supplement store, 19% from a medical clinic, and 17% from peddlers. Public health campaigns are needed to educate the public on the potential harmful effects of supplements if purchased from an unofficial seller or taken without seeking medical advice before using them.


Assuntos
Dieta , Suplementos Nutricionais , Substâncias para Melhoria do Desempenho/farmacologia , Aptidão Física , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Arábia Saudita , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA