Prevalence of Diabetes, Ketosis, and Ketoacidosis and Their Correlation With Mortality in Critical COVID-19 Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Aim We aimed to find out the prevalence of diabetes, ketosis, and ketoacidosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) critically ill patients and to explore the clinical impact of the development of ketosis and ketoacidosis on the outcome of COVID-19 critically ill patients and identify them as potential risk factors for these patients. Methods We collected data on COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) retrospectively. The study population will be classified into two groups based on the presence of diabetes or ketosis. Results The study comprises data on 253 ICU patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia. Two hundred patients (79.05%) had diabetes or prediabetes on admission. Seventy-six patients (30%) presented with ketosis. Nine patients had progressed to diabetic ketoacidosis during their ICU stay. Concerning the outcome, among 150 patients who died (59.3%), there was significantly higher mortality among the ketotic patients (69.7%) compared to nonketotic patients (54.8%) with a P-value < 0.027. We noted that the peak blood glucose level during ICU stay was statistically significantly higher in nonsurvivors (mean 345 mg/dl) compared to survivors (mean 298 mg/dl) with a P-value of 0.006. Our data showed that peak serum levels of lactate, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein, white blood cells (WBC), D dimer, and lactate dehydrogenase strongly positively correlated to the length of ICU stay. We used the ROC curve (receiver operating characteristic curve) to assess the relation between many laboratories and mortality. We noted that uncontrolled hyperglycemia and other laboratory variables are significant predictors of mortality of COVID-19 patients (e.g., peak blood glucose (P = 0.004), PCT (P = 0.047), and P < 0.001 of other laboratories (e.g. lactate, PH, WBC, D dimer, ferritin). Conclusion We reported a high prevalence of diabetes and ketosis among COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. Ketosis is associated with an increased mortality risk. Uncontrolled hyperglycemia is a significant predictor of mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Multiple inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in a 33-year-old male with a fatal case of COVID-19.

The host genetic inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) have been shown to contribute to susceptibility to life-threatening coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as it had been associated previously with other viral infections. Most genetic association studies have described IEIs as a monogenic defect, while there have been no reports of patients with multiple inherited immune deficiencies. This is a complex case of IEIs predisposing to severe viral infections in an unvaccinated 33-year-old male patient. The patient was admitted with no respiratory symptoms, showed a SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive test on the second day of admission, started developing progressive lung consolidation within three days of hospitalization, and was moved from non-invasive to mechanical ventilation within 12 days of hospitalization. Impaired production of type I IFN was detected in patient PBMCs treated with poly(I:C), at both mRNA and protein levels. Whole exome sequencing revealed three mutations across type I IFN production pathway, which were predicted to be loss-of-function (pLOF). The three mutations were predicted to predispose to severe viral infections: monoallelic R488X TLR3, monoallelic His684Arg TLR3, and biallelic Val363Met IRF3. Functional analysis confirmed that all these mutations dysregulated the type I IFN pathway. Evaluation of TLR3 and IRF3 IFN-ß1 luciferase reporter activity showed a hypomorphic suppression of function. TOPO TA cloning was used to ascertain the positioning of both TLR3 variants, indicating that both variants were on the same allele. We have described a unique complex IEI patient with multiple mutations, particularly along type I IFN production pathway.

Risk factors and early preventive measures for long COVID in non-hospitalized patients: analysis of a large cohort in the United Arab Emirates.

OBJECTIVES: Long COVID is characterized by persistent symptoms lasting for 4 weeks or more following the acute infection with SARS-CoV-2. Risk factors for long COVID and the impact of pre-COVID vaccination and treatment during acute COVID-19 remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate patient-specific factors associated with long COVID in a large cohort of non-hospitalized adult patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 in Dubai. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: The study included 28,375 non-hospitalized adult patients diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 between January 1, 2021, and September 31, 2022, in Dubai, who were followed up for 90 days. The presence of long COVID symptoms was documented by physicians during patient visits to the family medicine department. Furthermore, long COVID-related risk factors were collected and analyzed, including patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-COVID vaccination status, and the COVID-related treatments received during the acute phase of the illness. Cox proportional hazard models were applied for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Among the cohort, 2.8% of patients experienced long COVID symptoms during the 90-day follow-up. Patients with long COVID tended to be younger, female, and of Caucasian race. Common symptoms included fatigue, muscle pain, respiratory symptoms, abdominal and neurological symptoms, allergic reactions, skin rashes, and hair loss. Risk factors for long COVID were identified as diabetes mellitus, asthma, and Vitamin D deficiency. Females and Caucasians had a higher risk of long COVID during the pre-Omicron period compared to the Omicron period. Pre-COVID vaccination was associated with a reduced risk of long COVID in all patient subgroups. Treatment with favipiravir or sotrovimab during the acute phase of COVID-19 was linked to a decreased risk of long COVID, although favipiravir showed limited effectiveness in the high-risk group. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the existing knowledge by identifying risk factors for long COVID among non-hospitalized patients and emphasizing the potential benefits of pre-COVID vaccination and timely treatment.

Salivary autoantibodies to type I IFNs: Mirror plasma levels, predispose to severe COVID-19, and enhance feasibility for clinical screening.

BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies have been demonstrated to dampen the interferon (IFN) response in viral infections. Elevated levels of these preexisting autoantibodies (aAbs) decrease basal interferon levels, increasing susceptibility to severe infections. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of type I IFN aAbs in both plasma and saliva from COVID-19 patients, analyze their neutralizing activity, and examine their associations with clinical outcomes, including the need for mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: Prospective analyses of patients admitted to intensive care units in three UAE hospitals from June 2020 to March 2021 were performed to measure aAbs using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), assess aAbs activity via neutralization assays, and correlate aAbs with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Type I IFN aAbs (α2 and/or ω) were measured in plasma samples from 213 ICU patients, and positive results were obtained for 20 % (n = 42) of the patients, with half exhibiting neutralizing activity. Saliva samples from a subgroup of 24 patients reflected plasma levels. In multivariate regression analyses, presence of type I IFN aAbs was associated with a higher need for mechanical ventilation (OR 2.58; 95 % CI 1.07-6.22) and greater in-hospital mortality (OR 2.40; 95 % CI 1.13 - 5.07; P = 0.022). Similarly, positive neutralizing aAbs (naAbs) were associated with a greater need for mechanical ventilation (OR 4.96; 95 % CI 1.12-22.07; P = 0.035) and greater odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.87; 95 % CI 1.05-7.89; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Type I IFN autoantibodies can be detected in noninvasive saliva samples, alongside conventional plasma samples, from COVID-19 patients and are associated with worse outcomes, such as greater mechanical ventilation needs and in-hospital mortality.

Clinical pharmacist interventions in an intensive care unit reduces ICU mortality at a tertiary hospital in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Background: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are prevalent in critical care settings and can be life-threatening. Involving clinical pharmacists (CP) within the critical care team is recommended to optimize therapy and improve patient survival. Objective: To classify DRPs identified by a CP in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and to assess the impact of CP interventions accepted by physicians on the length of ICU stay and in-hospital survival. Methods: This study was conducted prospectively at the Medical ICU of Rashid Hospital, a tertiary hospital in Dubai, over a 16-month period from September 2021 to December 2022. The study included patients admitted to ICU during the study period. CP interventions were documented, and DRPs were classified using the modified Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe V.9.1. Results: During the study period, 1004 interventions were recommended for 200 patients. The majority of these interventions, 92% (n = 922), received physician acceptance, and 82% (n = 820) were fully implemented by the physician. In total, 1033 drug-related problems (DRPs) were identified, with a median of 3 DRPs per patient. The most common DRPs was drug selection (61%), followed by dose selection (22%). There were 337 DRPs related to antimicrobial agents. Interestingly, we noted that when we adjusted for patients' demographic data and the Glasgow Coma Scale severity score, patients who received >4 implemented interventions exhibited lower cumulative hazard of death within 90 days of their ICU stay in comparison to their counterparts (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 0.10, 95% CI of 0.02-0.41; P = 0.027). Conclusion: The study emphasizes the critical role of CP in the ICU, addressing DRPs, and enhancing overall patient care. Furthermore, it highlights the potential impact of pharmacist interventions in improving patient survival outcomes. This underscores the importance of implementing CP services in ICUs across the UAE.

Rhino orbital cerebral mucormycosis: A life-threatening complication of coronavirus diseases 2019 in an uncontrolled diabetic patient.

Mucormycosis is a progressive and life-threatening disease that has been increasingly reported in patients infected by coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19). We describe a case of rhino-orbital mucormycosis with central nervous system involvement resulting in bilateral blindness and intracranial extension in a patient with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) and mild COVID-19 infection. A 35-year-old obese male, recently diagnosed with DM, presented to the emergency department suffering from dizziness, headache, speech difficulty, and facial weakness. His glycosylated hemoglobin was 10.4% and his reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test came positive for COVID-19. Ocular examination revealed left eye proptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and lid edema with no ocular movement. Imaging studies showed pansinusitis and periorbital and orbital cellulitis with intracranial involvement. Histopathology and biopsy examination confirmed mucormycosis. Medical management included glucose control and liposomal amphotericin B therapy. Septoplasty and functional endoscopic sinus surgery was performed as emergency procedures. The patient survived with bilateral blindness. In this case, we described the importance of considering mucormycosis in COVID-19 patients with uncontrolled diabetes, particularly those presenting with sinusitis, headache, and orbital edema symptoms. Despite intensive antifungal therapy and surgical intervention, it is a serious opportunistic fungal infection associated with long-term complications.

Assessment of Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitudes During the Global Mpox Outbreak in June 2022: A Cross-Sectional Study From the United Arab Emirates.

Objectives: To examine knowledge, worry, anxiety, and vaccine acceptance for mpox among UAE adults. Methods: An online survey, advertised on academic and social media platform in June 2022 collected data from 959 participants (aged 18 and above) on mpox beliefs, risks, knowledge, worry, anxiety, COVID-19 infection, vaccination, and willingness to receive the mpox vaccine. Bivariate and logistic regression analysis identified associations and predictors between variables. Results: 56% had optimal knowledge of mpox transmission and symptoms. 54% were worried, and 27% experienced anxiety related to the outbreak. Knowledge scores were higher among women, healthcare workers, and those with reliable information sources. High perceived infection risk, changes in precautionary measures, and belief in difficult treatment predicted more worry and anxiety. Higher worry and two or more doses of the COVID-19 vaccine predicted higher likelihood of taking the mpox vaccine. Conclusion: The UAE population showed low knowledge and high worry and anxiety during the global mpox outbreak. Increasing public awareness through targeted educational campaigns is vital. Promoting better understanding of infectious diseases, addressing concerns, and encouraging vaccine uptake can prepare for future outbreaks.

Increased blood immune regulatory cells in severe COVID-19 with autoantibodies to type I interferons.

The hallmark of severe COVID-19 is an uncontrolled inflammatory response, resulting from poorly understood immunological dysfunction. While regulatory T (Treg) and B (Breg) cells, as the main elements of immune homeostasis, contribute to the control of hyperinflammation during COVID-19 infection, we hypothesized change in their levels in relation to disease severity and the presence of autoantibodies (auto-Abs) to type I IFNs. Cytometric analysis of blood of 62 COVID-19 patients with different severities revealed an increased proportion of conventional (cTreg; CD25+FoxP3+) and unconventional (uTreg; CD25-FoxP3+) Tregs, as well as the LAG3+ immune suppressive form of cTreg/uTreg, in the blood of severe COVID-19 cases compared to the milder, non-hospitalized cases. The increase in blood levels of cTreg/uTreg, but not LAG3+ cTreg/uTreg subtypes, was even higher among patients with severe COVID-19 and auto-Abs to type I IFNs. Regarding Bregs, compared to the milder, non-hospitalized cases, the proportion of IL-35+ and IL-10+ Bregs was elevated in the blood of severe COVID-19 patients, and to a higher extent in those with auto-Abs to type I IFNs. Moreover, blood levels of cTreg, LAG3+ cTreg/uTreg, and IL-35+ and IL-10+ Breg subtypes were associated with lower blood levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-17, TNFα, and IL-1ß. Interestingly, patients who were treated with either tocilizumab and/or a high dose of Vitamin D had higher blood levels of these regulatory cells and better control of the proinflammatory cytokines. These observations suggest that perturbations in the levels of immunomodulatory Tregs and Bregs occur in COVID-19, especially in the presence of auto-Abs to type I IFNs.

Saliva metabolomic profile of COVID-19 patients associates with disease severity.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is strongly linked to dysregulation of various molecular, cellular, and physiological processes that change abundance of different biomolecules including metabolites that may be ultimately used as biomarkers for disease progression and severity. It is important at early stage to readily distinguish those patients that are likely to progress to moderate and severe stages. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the utility of saliva and plasma metabolomic profiles as a potential parameter for risk stratifying COVID-19 patients. METHOD: LC-MS/MS-based untargeted metabolomics were used to profile the changes in saliva and plasma metabolomic profiles of COVID-19 patients with different severities. RESULTS: Saliva and plasma metabolites were screened in 62 COVID-19 patients and 18 non-infected controls. The COVID-19 group included 16 severe, 15 moderate, 16 mild, and 15 asymptomatic cases. Thirty-six differential metabolites were detected in COVID-19 versus control comparisons. SARS-CoV-2 induced metabolic derangement differed with infection severity. The metabolic changes were identified in saliva and plasma, however, saliva showed higher intensity of metabolic changes. Levels of saliva metabolites such as sphingosine and kynurenine were significantly different between COVID-19 infected and non-infected individuals; while linoleic acid and Alpha-ketoisovaleric acid were specifically increased in severe compared to non-severe patients. As expected, the two prognostic biomarkers of C-reactive protein and D-dimer were negatively correlated with sphingosine and 5-Aminolevulinic acid, and positively correlated with L-Tryptophan and L-Kynurenine. CONCLUSION: Saliva disease-specific and severity-specific metabolite could be employed as potential COVID-19 diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Vitamin D enhances type I IFN signaling in COVID-19 patients.

The ability of Vitamin D (VitD) to modulate antiviral responses through induction of antimicrobial peptide is well established. However, the effect of VitD on host responses to SARS-CoV-2 is not well investigated. We here report the ability of VitD to enhance host IFN-alpha/beta (a/ß) signaling both in vitro and among severe COVID-19 patients treated with VitD. Blood and saliva specimens were obtained from severe COVID-19 patients treated (43 patients), or not (37 patients), with vitD, during their stay in intensive care unit. Patients were followed up to 29 days following admission, and patient survival outcomes were collected. Higher activity levels of RIG-1/MDA-5 and JAK-STAT signaling pathways were observed with significantly higher gene and protein levels of antiviral interferon stimulating genes (ISGs) such as MX-1 and ISG-15; both in vitro, following treatment of PBMCs with vitD, and in whole blood and saliva specimens of VitD treated patients. Moreover, VitD treated patients had lower risk of all-cause mortality by day 29 compared to untreated patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37, 95% confidence interval of 0.14-0.94; P = 0.038). The herein uncovered regulatory role of VitD on type I IFNs suggests the importance of insuring a normal level of VitD for the prevention and probably treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additional mechanistic studies, however, are needed to fully elucidate the antiviral effects of VitD particularly in the setting of COVID-19 infection.

Interleukin-17, a salivary biomarker for COVID-19 severity.

OBJECTIVES: T-helper 17 cell-mediated response and their effector IL-17 cytokine induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is a major cause of COVID-19 disease severity and death. Therefore, the study aimed to determine if IL-17 level in saliva mirrors its circulatory level and hence can be used as a non-invasive biomarker for disease severity. METHODS: Interleukin-17 (IL-17) level was evaluated by ELISA in saliva and blood of 201 adult COVID-19 patients with different levels of severity. The IL-17 saliva level was also associated with COVID-19 disease severity, and need for mechanical ventilation and/or death within 29 days after admission of severe COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: We found that IL-17 level in saliva of COVID-19 patients reflected its circulatory level. High IL-17 level in saliva was associated with COVID-19 severity (P<0.001), need for mechanical ventilation (P = 0.002), and/or death by 29 days (P = 0.002), after adjusting for patients' demographics, comorbidity, and COVID-19 serum severity markers such as D-Dimer, C-reactive protein, and ferritin. CONCLUSION: We propose that saliva IL-17 level could be used as a biomarker to identify patients at risk of developing severe COVID-19.

Upregulation of interleukin-19 in saliva of patients with COVID-19.

Cytokines are major players in orchestrating inflammation, disease pathogenesis and severity during COVID-19 disease. However, the role of IL-19 in COVID-19 pathogenesis remains elusive. Herein, through the analysis of transcriptomic datasets of SARS-CoV-2 infected lung cells, nasopharyngeal swabs, and lung autopsies of COVID-19 patients, we report that expression levels of IL-19 and its receptor, IL-20R2, were upregulated following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of 202 adult COVID-19 patients, IL-19 protein level was significantly higher in blood and saliva of asymptomatic patients compared to healthy controls when adjusted for patients' demographics (P < 0.001). Interestingly, high saliva IL-19 level was also associated with COVID-19 severity (P < 0.0001), need for mechanical ventilation (P = 0.002), and/or death (P = 0.010) within 29 days of admission, after adjusting for patients' demographics, diabetes mellitus comorbidity, and COVID-19 serum markers of severity such as D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and ferritin. Moreover, patients who received interferon beta during their hospital stay had lower plasma IL-19 concentrations (24 pg mL-1) than those who received tocilizumab (39.2 pg mL-1) or corticosteroids (42.5 pg mL-1). Our findings indicate that high saliva IL-19 level was associated with COVID-19 infectivity and disease severity.

Vitamin D modulates systemic inflammation in patients with severe COVID-19.

AIMS: The ability of vitamin D (VitD) to modulate immune responses in the clinical setting of COVID-19 infection is not well investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of VitD to attenuate inflammatory responses in patients with severe COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples and nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained from patients with severe COVID-19 who had been treated (20 patients), or not (25 patients), with VitD, during their stay in the intensive care unit. Western blotting was used to evaluate the expressions of STAT3, JNK and AKT signaling pathways and ELISA was used to measure levels of IL-6, IL-17, and IL-1ß in blood of these patients. KEY FINDINGS: Reduced levels of STAT3, JNK and AKT pathways and lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-17, and IL-1ß were observed in VitD treated patients (50,000 IU of cholecalciferol weekly for 3 weeks), and in vitro following treatment of poly I:C stimulated PBMCs with VitD (50 nM of calcitriol). Moreover, lower circulatory levels of these proinflammatory cytokines following treatment with VitD were associated with lower serum levels of COVID-19-related severity markers such as D-dimer and C-reactive proteins (P < 0.001) which in overall resulted in shorter length of ICU stay for VitD treated compared to untreated patients (18 days for VitD treated vs. 28 days for VitD untreated; P = 0.01). SIGNIFICANCE: This study reveals that VitD plays immunomodulatory role during COVID-19 infection, which further emphasizes the importance of maintaining a normal level of this vitamin for the prevention of hyperinflammatory conditions associated with COVID-19.

Sotrovimab Lowers the Risk of COVID-19 Related Hospitalization or Death in a Large Population Cohort in the United Arab Emirates.

Sotrovimab, an anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 monoclonal antibody is being utilized to prevent progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Therefore, to understand its benefits, we have conducted a retrospective analysis of all non-hospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 who received a single infusion of sotrovimab and/or oral favipiravir at any Dubai COVID-19 related healthcare center between July 1, 2021, and October 31, 2021. The main outcome was to evaluate the risk of hospitalization for patients with COVID-19 or all-cause death within 28 days of treatment initiation. In this analysis, which included 10,882 patients (1,135 in the sotrovimab group, 2,653 in the sotrovimab/favipiravir group, and 7,094 in the favipiravir group), sotrovimab or sotrovimab/favipiravir reduced the risk of hospitalization (13 patients (1.5%) in the sotrovimab group and 71 patients (2.9%) in the sotrovimab/favipiravir group vs. 251 patients (4%) in the favipiravir group; hazard ratio (HR) for sotrovimab: 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.28, P < 0.001; and for sotrovimab/favipiravir, HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.32-0.56, P < 0.001), or death by day 28 from the start of treatment (no death in the sotrovimab group and 2 deaths in the the sotrovimab/favipiravir group vs. 10 deaths in the favipiravir group; odds ratio: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.81, P = 026). Safety was assessed in all the 3,788 patients in the sotrovimab and sotrovimab/favipiravir groups, and the reported adverse events were by 34 patients (<1%). In conclusion, sotrovimab was found to reduce the risk of progression of COVID-19 when administrated early to non-hospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19. No safety concern was detected.

Determinants of healthcare workers perceptions, acceptance and choice of COVID-19 vaccines: a cross-sectional study from the United Arab Emirates.

Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among health-care workers (HCWs) is crucial for controlling the pandemic and ensuring HCW and patient safety. Information on the acceptance of different COVID-19 vaccines is lacking. Despite the United Arab Emirates (UAE) having vaccinated most of its population, vaccine acceptance still raises concerns. This study explores COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, vaccine choice, and associated factors among HCWs in the UAE. An online national cross-sectional study was conducted among 517 HCWs. Acceptance and choice of COVID-19 vaccines were assessed, and logistic regression analysis identified predictors for vaccine acceptance. More than half (58%) of HCWs were willing to take the vaccine and give it to their family. Reasons for taking the vaccine were concerns for families contracting COVID-19 (67%) and social responsibility (64%). Reasons for refusals included concerns with side-effects (61%). Most HCWs knew of the Pfizer (79%) and Sinopharm (57%) vaccines; however, acceptance was higher for Pfizer (35%) and AstraZeneca (21%) vaccines. Being male and being influenza vaccinated predicted willingness to take the vaccine (aOR: 2.34; 95% CI:1.34-4.08; p ≤ 0.001) and (aOR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.29-3.51; p ≤ 0.001), respectively. HCWs who expressed concerns with inadequate safety data were less likely to take the vaccine (aOR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.10-0.30; p ≤ 0.001). Additionally, side effects, perception of risk, and level of trust of company and country of manufacture predicted acceptance and choice of vaccines. Effective vaccine policy campaigns to improve acceptance should target HCW's knowledge and awareness of perceived risks of COVID-19, safety data, social responsibility, and individual preferences for vaccine choice.

Early administration of remdesivir to COVID-19 patients associates with higher recovery rate and lower need for ICU admission: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Remdesivir is one of the most widely recommended and used medications for COVID-19 treatment. However, different outcomes have been reported for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir. Specifically, the effect of the timing of remdesivir initiation (from patient's symptom onset) on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients has not been investigated. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and treated with or without remdisivir. The primary outcome was patient's recovery rate, defined as clinical improvement and patient's discharge by day 14 of symptom onset. The secondary outcome was the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality within 28 days of patient's symptom onset. RESULTS: Out of 323 hospitalized adults with COVID-19, 107 (33.1%) received no remdesivir during their hospital stay, 107 (33.1%) received remdesivir early within 7 days of the symptom onset, and 109 (33.7%) received it at 8 days or later of symptom onset. At day 14 following symptom onset, higher proportion of patients recovered in the early remdesivir compared to the late remdesivir cohort, or patients who did not receive remdesivir (adjusted odds ratio, aOR, 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31 to 5.35). Moreover, early administration of remdesivir was associated with lower admission to intensive care unit (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.64), less need for mechanical ventilation (aHR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.51), and lower mortality at 28 days (aHR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.53), as compared to the late remdesivir cohort or patients who did not receive remdesivir. CONCLUSION: Early administration of remdesivir within 7 days of symptom onset is associated with less need for mechanical ventilation and lower 28-days mortality.

Upregulation of oxidative stress gene markers during SARS-COV-2 viral infection.

Severe viral infections, including SARS-COV-2, could trigger disruption of the balance between pro-oxidant and antioxidant mediators; the magnitude of which could reflect the severity of infection and lung injury. Using publicly available COVID-19 transcriptomic datasets, we conducted an in-silico analyses to evaluate the expression levels of 125 oxidative stress genes, including 37 pro-oxidant genes, 32 oxidative-responsive genes, and 56 antioxidant genes. Seven oxidative stress genes were found to be upregulated in whole blood and lung autopsies (MPO, S100A8, S100A9, SRXN1, GCLM, SESN2, and TXN); these genes were higher in severe versus non-severe COVID-19 leucocytes. Oxidative genes were upregulated in inflammatory cells comprising macrophages and CD8+ T cells isolated from bronchioalveolar fluid (BALF), and neutrophils isolated from peripheral blood. MPO, S100A8, and S100A9 were top most upregulated oxidative markers within COVID-19's lung autopsies, whole blood, leucocytes, BALF derived macrophages and circulating neutrophils. The calprotectin's, S100A8 and S100A9 were upregulated in SARS-COV-2 infected human lung epithelium. To validate our in-silico analysis, we conducted qRT-PCR to measure MPO and calprotectin's levels in blood and saliva samples. Relative to uninfected donor controls, MPO, S100A8 and S100A9 were significantly higher in blood and saliva of severe versus asymptomatic COVID-19 patients. Compared to other different viral respiratory infections, coronavirus infection showed a prominent upregulation in oxidative stress genes with MPO and calprotectin at the top of the list. In conclusion, SARS-COV-2 induce the expression of oxidative stress genes via both immune as well as lung structural cells. The observed correlation between oxidative stress genes dysregulation and COVID-19 disease severity deserve more attention. Mechanistical studies are required to confirm the correlation between oxidative stress gene dysregulation, COVID-19 severity, and the net oxidative stress balance.