Effects of Ending the Use of Seclusion and Mechanical Restraint in the Pennsylvania State Hospital System, 2011-2020.

The Pennsylvania State Hospital System's use of containment procedures has been studied for >30 years. This prospective study assessed the effects of ending the use of seclusion and mechanical restraint in the system's six civil hospitals and two forensic centers from 2011 to 2020. The study examined the effect of this change on key safety measures: physical restraint, assaults, aggression, and self-injurious behavior. In total, 68,153 incidents, including 9,518 episodes of physical restraint involving 1,811 individuals, were entered into a database along with patients' demographic and diagnostic information. All data were calculated per 1,000 days to control for census changes. During the study, mechanical restraint was used 128 times and seclusion four times. Physical restraint use decreased from a high of 2.62 uses per 1,000 days in 2013 to 2.02 in 2020. The average length of time a person was held in physical restraint was reduced by 64%, from 6.6 minutes in 2011 to 2.4 minutes in 2020 (p<0.001). All safety measures improved or were unchanged. Use of unscheduled medication did not change. The hospital system safely ended the use of mechanical restraint and seclusion by using a recovery approach and by following the six core strategies for seclusion and restraint reduction.

Relationship Between Seclusion and Restraint Reduction and Assaults in Pennsylvania's Forensic Services Centers: 2001-2010.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective study assessed the use of seclusion and restraint in Pennsylvania forensic centers from 2001 through 2010. It also examined the correlation between declining use of containment procedures and patient-to-patient and patient-to-staff assaults. METHODS: The 2,741 episodes of restraint or seclusion involving 801 unique individuals served in state forensic centers during the study period were entered into a uniform database. Included in this data set were demographic and diagnostic data as well as the causes and injuries associated with each use of these procedures. These data were correlated with rates of patient-to-patient and patient-to-staff assaults with any injury for each month of this study. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2010, the rate of use of mechanical restraint significantly declined from 1.63 to .04 episodes per 1,000 days (p<.001), and the rate of use of seclusion significantly declined from .89 to .04 episodes per 1,000 days (p<.001). There was a nonsignificant decline in the use of physical restraint during this span. During this decade, the rate of patient-to-staff assaults declined, and the rate of patient-to-patient assaults was unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the use of containment procedures had a positive effect on reducing assaults. Leadership, data transparency, use of clinical alerts, workforce development, policy changes, and discontinuation of psychiatric use of PRN orders were all contributing factors. A philosophical change toward a recovery model of psychiatric care and services was the driving force behind this transformation.

Psychiatric use of unscheduled medications in the Pennsylvania state hospital system: effects of discontinuing the use of P.R.N. orders.

The objective of this prospective study was to assess patient exposure to the psychiatric use of unscheduled medications at all nine Pennsylvania state hospitals and to unify practice guidelines in this regard. In August 2004, a decision was made to discontinue the use of p.r.n. orders for psychiatric indications. All unscheduled medications, (p.r.n. and STAT physician's order) administered for psychiatric indications were entered into a uniform database. A total of 46,913 unscheduled medications were administered to people served in the hospital system throughout this 15 month study. During March 2004, 87.7 unscheduled medications per 1,000 days-of-care were administered in the hospital system. During the last month of this study, May 2005, this rate had decreased to 17 per 1,000 days-of-care. Many hospital safety measures significantly improved as a result of this change. Cessation of p.r.n. medication use for psychiatric indications has significantly decreased patient exposure to unnecessary psychotropic medications and has resulted in a safer hospital system.

Pennsylvania State Hospital system's seclusion and restraint reduction program.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the use of seclusion and mechanical restraint from 1990 to 2000 and the rate of staff injuries from patient assaults from 1998 to 2000 in a state hospital system. METHODS: Records of patients older than 18 years who were civilly committed to one of the nine state hospitals in Pennsylvania were included in the analyses. Two databases were used in each of the nine hospitals: one identified date, time, duration, and justification for each episode of seclusion or restraint and the other identified when a patient was hospitalized and the demographic characteristics and the diagnosis of the patient. Rate and duration of seclusion and restraint were calculated. Reports from compensation claims were used to determine staff injuries from patient assaults. RESULTS: The rate and duration of seclusion and mechanical restraint decreased dramatically during this period. From 1990 to 2000, the rate of seclusion decreased from 4.2 to .3 episodes per 1,000 patient-days. The average duration of seclusion decreased from 10.8 to 1.3 hours. The rate of restraint decreased from 3.5 to 1.2 episodes per 1,000 patient-days. The average duration of restraint decreased from 11.9 to 1.9 hours. Patients from racial or ethnic minority groups had a higher rate and longer duration of seclusion than whites. Seclusion tended to be less likely, but longer, during the night shift. Patients were restrained less often during the night shift, but for a longer duration. The rate of restraint was higher during the week than during weekends and holidays. Younger patients were more likely to be secluded and restrained, but older patients remained secluded and restrained longer. No significant changes were seen in rates of staff injuries from 1998 to 2000. CONCLUSIONS: Many factors contributed to the success of this effort, including advocacy efforts, state policy change, improved patient-staff ratios, response teams, and second-generation antipsychotics.