RESUMO
Introduction: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) originated as keloid sarcoma, gaining its current designation in 1925. DFSP exhibits slow growth, categorizing it as a low- to intermediate-grade malignant sarcoma. Initially presenting as a small, firm, irregular skin nodule, it undergoes sudden, rapid growth, forming a prominent mass. While locally aggressive, distant metastasis is rare. DFSP affects mainly the torso then proximal extremities. Case Presentation: In this case study, we described a 57-year-old male individual who presented with a chest midline swelling that was progressing in size. A punch biopsy showed inconclusive results. Thus, a wide local excision was carried out along with sending the initial biopsy slides to Mayo Clinic for second opinion. A diagnosis of DFSP was confirmed, which is an uncommon and locally aggressive tumor affecting soft tissues. The primary histological diagnosis relies on immunohistochemical stains, enabling the distinction between DFSP and other fibrous tumors. Conclusion: Diagnosing DFSP is challenging due to its similarity to other skin lesions. A multidisciplinary approach is vital for accurate diagnosis and management.
RESUMO
Congenital nasal masses are very rare presentations. Among these masses is a mucous cyst, which might be considered either a congenital or an acquired mass. Our report presents a case of recurrent dorsal nasal swelling that was initially managed with an open rhinoplasty. However, 1 year after the surgery, the swelling started to grow rapidly, and the patient presented with a disfigured nose. We scheduled the patient for the excision of the dorsal nasal swelling and reconstruction using the dorsal nasal flap approach. Several surgical techniques have been performed and published in the literature; however, this is the first time the dorsal nasal flap technique is being reported as a surgical approach to dorsal nasal mucous cysts. While mucous cyst formation might be congenital, the majority occur after rhinoplasty surgery. However, they can be prevented by minimizing unnecessary trauma during the surgery and ensuring the thorough removal of all epithelial tissue and foreign bodies.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The open and closed techniques are the main surgical techniques to perform septorhinoplasty. Although the open technique offers a better view of the pertinent anatomy and facilitates surgical access, it creates an external scar that could affect patients' satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). This study aims to compare the open and closed techniques using the SCAR-Q patient-reported outcome measure. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we have included patients who had their nasal surgery one year ago, in the period between April 2020 and April 2021. The SCAR-Q assessment tool to study patients' satisfaction with appearance, symptoms, and psychological impact of open and closed septorhinoplasty techniques. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included in this analysis. Of these, 39 (50.6%) patients underwent a closed septorhinoplasty, and 38 (49.4%) patients underwent an open approach. The mean (SD) age was 29.6 (8.1) years, and most patients were females (59.7%). The overall SCAR-Q questionnaire responses were very positive across all scales in our cohort, the median (IQR) scores were 91.0 (73.0-100.0) for the appearance scale, 89.0 (70.0-100.0) for the symptoms scale, and 100.0 (87.0-100.0) for the psychological impact scale. However, we have found no differences in SCAR-Q scores regarding appearance, symptoms, and psychological impact between open and closed septorhinoplasty. CONCLUSION: We have found no significant differences in QoL between open and closed techniques of septorhinoplasty. Larger studies are needed to further validate this finding.