Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Salivary Gland Endothelial Cells.

Vascular endothelial cells have important tissue-specific functions in fibrosis and regeneration. In the salivary gland, endothelial cells are required for proper development, but their roles within adult glands are largely unknown. To identify ligand-receptor interactions between endothelial cells and other cell types that may be important during fibrosis and regeneration, we used a reversible ductal ligation injury. To induce injury, a clip was applied to the primary ducts for 14 d, and to induce a regenerative response, the clip was subsequently removed for 5 d. To identify endothelial cell-produced factors, we used single-cell RNA sequencing of stromal-enriched cells from adult female submandibular and sublingual salivary glands. Transcriptional profiles of homeostatic salivary gland endothelial cells were compared to endothelial cells of other organs. Salivary gland endothelial cells expressed many unique genes and displayed the highest overlap in gene expression with other fenestrated endothelial cells from the colon, small intestine, and kidney. Comparison of the 14-d ligated, mock-ligated, and 5-d deligated stromal-enriched transcripts and lineage tracing revealed that endothelial cells retain their identity following ligation and recovery from injury. CellChat and NATMI were used to predict changes in ligand-receptor interactions from endothelial cells to other cells in response to ligation and deligation. CellChat and NATMI predicted that after ligation, interactions with fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and glial cells were increased, and following deligation, interactions with pericyte, glia, fibroblasts, and immune cells were increased. Some of the highest-ranked interactions predicted in ligated compared to mock endothelial cells were between glial cells via Col4a2-Cd93 and Jag2-Notch1, as well as epithelial cells via Pecam1-Cd38, while in deligated compared to ligated endothelial cells, the top interactions were between fibroblasts via Ntf3-Ntrk2, glial cells via Hspg2-Itgb1, and pericytes via Jam2-F11r. Understanding salivary gland endothelial cell signaling will inform future endothelial cell-based regenerative therapies.

Regional Differences following Partial Salivary Gland Resection.

Regenerative medicine aims to repair, replace, or restore function to tissues damaged by aging, disease, or injury. Partial organ resection is not only a common clinical approach in cancer therapy but also an experimental injury model used to examine mechanisms of regeneration and repair in organs. We performed a partial resection, or partial sialoadenectomy, in the female murine submandibular salivary gland (SMG) to establish a model for investigation of repair mechanisms in salivary glands (SGs). After partial sialoadenectomy, we performed whole-gland measurements over a period of 56 d and found that the gland increased slightly in size. We used microarray analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to examine messenger RNA and protein changes in glands over time. Microarray analysis identified dynamic changes in the transcriptome 3 d after injury that were largely resolved by day 14. At the 3-d time point, we detected gene signatures for cell cycle regulation, inflammatory/repair response, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling in the partially resected glands. Using quantitative IHC, we identified a transient proliferative response throughout the gland. Both secretory epithelial and stromal cells expressed Ki67 that was detectable at day 3 and largely resolved by day 14. IHC also revealed that while most of the gland underwent a wound-healing response that resolved by day 14, a small region of the gland showed an aberrant sustained fibrotic response characterized by increased levels of ECM deposition, sustained Ki67 levels in stromal cells, and a persistent M2 macrophage response through day 56. The partial submandibular salivary gland resection model provides an opportunity to examine a normal healing response and an aberrant fibrotic response within the same gland to uncover mechanisms that prevent wound healing and regeneration in mammals. Understanding regional differences in the wound-healing responses may ultimately affect regenerative therapies for patients.