Laser treatment for lipoatrophy in children with diabetes type 1.

Introduction: Lipoatrophy (LA) is one of the complications of insulin treatment. It has become rare thanks to insulin analogues but it can still be observed in patients with diabetes type 1(T1DM). No effective treatment exists. Herein, we report for the first time two children with T1DM and LA successfully treated with laser treatment. Clinical cases: A 6-year-old child with T1DM presented with LA 4 months post-diagnosis. He was on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). LA presented on body sites where insulin catheter was never inserted. He underwent different treatment options with no positive effect. Laser treatment was tried with impressive improvement. The second 9-year-old child presented with LA 5 years postdiagnosis. He changed the insulin type, the site of insulin injection, and tried topical use of sodium chromoglycate cream with partial improvement. Laser treatment was finally used with remarkable outcome. Conclusion: Insulin-induced LA is now a rare skin complication with no effective treatment up to now. Laser treatment seems to be an effective treatment option.

Lipoatrophy, a rare complication of diabetes: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Lipoatrophy (LA), a rare skin complication in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), has decreased dramatically over the past decades due to the use of human purified insulin preparations. METHODS: We collected data from the records of T1D patients with LA. Types of insulin and insulin regimen, presence of eosinophilia, anti-insulin (IAA), anti-GAD, anti-IA2 autoantibodies, other autoimmune disorders, site of atrophy and its relationship to catheter, HbA1c at LA onset and after resolution, and different treatment modalities (i.e., change of insulin type or site, sodium cromoglycate (SCG) cream, cortisone cream or percutaneous injections, and laser treatment) were recorded. RESULTS: Thirteen out of 1200 T1D subjects (1%) presented with LA. The majority were on insulin pump using rapid-acting analogs. Twelve out of 13 patients had changed the type of insulin, and most of them had switched injection sites. Ten out of 13 patients used SCG cream and 7/10 showed complete/partial improvement. One patient used dexamethasone injection with improvement. Five patients showed self-improvement. In 3/7 patients who were receiving SCG, treatment was combined with change of insulin type (glulisine); however, in 1/3, the result should be attributed to concomitant laser treatment. In 4/7 patients, there was a clear, beneficial effect of SCG. In 1/4 with partial resolution of LA, laser treatment was used after SCG, which further improved the result. CONCLUSIONS: LA is a rare skin complication seen even today with the use of insulin analogs. SCG alone or combined with change of insulin type seems to be the most effective treatment. Laser treatment is a promising new therapy.