RESUMO
Introduction: Adrenal cavernous hemangiomas are rare benign vascular tumors that pose significant diagnostic challenges. Despite their benign nature, features overlapping with malignancies often complicate management decisions. Case presentation: A 64-year-old male presented with a 4.4â cm necrotic left adrenal mass discovered incidentally on imaging. His medical history included papillary thyroid carcinoma, with subsequent thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine ablation. Evaluations for hiccups revealed multiple lung nodules, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and anemia. Given the patient's previous cancer history, elevated aldosterone/renin ratio, and mass size, our multidisciplinary tumor board decided to proceed with a left adrenalectomy. Post-surgical pathology confirmed a diagnosis of adrenal cavernous hemangioma. Conclusion: The occurrence of ambiguous adrenal mass with other pathologies, such as our patient's papillary thyroid carcinoma, complicates the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape. As demonstrated in our case, opting for surgery remains a viable solution for adrenal cavernous hemangiomas, especially for masses greater than 4â cm. Interdisciplinary collaboration, exemplified by our tumor board's decision-making process, is crucial for optimal management. This case underscores the need for a multifaceted approach when confronting adrenal masses with such diagnostic ambiguity.
RESUMO
Sotorasib is a KRAS G12C inhibitor that recently received approval for use in locally advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC. CodeBreaK100, the phase 2 clinical trial leading to the approval of sotorasib, excluded patients with untreated brain metastases; there have been no reports describing efficacy of sotorasib on untreated brain metastases. We present a case of a patient with active untreated brain metastases with resulting disorientation and weakness who has radiographic response and complete resolution of neurologic symptoms with sotorasib. Our case illustrates the intracranial activity of sotorasib, but additional studies are needed to characterize the intracranial response rate and duration of response in these patients.
RESUMO
Patients who have undergone mastectomy, with or without reconstruction, are not universally screened with mammography or US. Therefore, clinical breast examination by the physician and patient-detected palpable abnormalities are crucial for detecting breast cancer or recurrence. Diagnostic US is the first-line modality for evaluation of postmastectomy palpable masses, with occasional adjunct use of diagnostic mammography for confirming certain benign masses. In the setting of a negative initial imaging evaluation with continued clinical concern, diagnostic MRI may aid in improving sensitivity. Knowledge of the typical multimodality imaging appearances and locations of malignant palpable abnormalities-such as invasive carcinoma recurrence, cancer in residual breast tissue, radiation-induced sarcoma, and metastatic disease-is crucial in diagnosis and treatment of these entities. In addition, familiarity with the range of benign palpable postmastectomy processes-including fat necrosis, fat graft, seroma, granuloma, neuroma, fibrosis, and infection-may help avoid unnecessary biopsies and reassure patients. The authors review common and rare benign and malignant palpable masses in mastectomy patients, describe multimodality diagnostic imaging evaluation of each entity, review radiologic and pathologic correlation, and acquaint the radiologist with management when these findings are encountered. ©RSNA, 2021.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Necrose Gordurosa , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia , Mastectomia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Ultrassonografia MamáriaRESUMO
Background: Despite the profound effect that checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors have had on survival in patients with metastatic melanoma, treatment options remain limited for those who demonstrate poor response or develop resistance to these modalities. The prospect of tumor sensitization to these treatments is therefore an attractive one. Results: We describe the case of a patient who developed a sustained response to trametinib and pembrolizumab, despite prior resistance to both these therapies, after receiving treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Discussion: We further outline the preclinical data supporting a possible role for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in tumor sensitization to immunotherapy.