RESUMO
The percutaneous treatment of structural, valvular, and non-valvular heart disease (SHD) is rapidly evolving. The Core Curriculum (CC) proposed by the EAPCI describes the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that define competency levels required by newly trained SHD interventional cardiologists (IC) and provides guidance for training centres. SHD ICs are cardiologists who have received complete interventional cardiology training. They are multidisciplinary team specialists who manage adult SHD patients from diagnosis to follow-up and perform percutaneous procedures in this area. They are competent in interpreting advanced imaging techniques and master planning software. The SHD ICs are expected to be proficient in the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid areas. They may have selective skills in either the aortic area or mitral/tricuspid areas. In this case, they must still have common transversal competencies in the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid areas. Additional SHD domain competencies are optional. Completing dedicated SHD training, aiming for full aortic, mitral, and tricuspid competencies, requires at least 18 months. For full training in the aortic area, with basic competencies in mitral/tricuspid areas, the training can be reduced to 1 year. The same is true for training in the mitral/tricuspid area, with competencies in the aortic area. The SHD IC CC promotes excellence and homogeneous training across Europe and is the cornerstone of future certifications and patient protection. It may be a reference for future CC for national associations and other SHD specialities, including imaging and cardiac surgery.
RESUMO
The percutaneous treatment of structural, valvular, and non-valvular heart disease (SHD) is rapidly evolving. The Core Curriculum (CC) proposed by the EAPCI describes the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that define competency levels required by newly trained SHD interventional cardiologists (IC) and provides guidance for training centres. SHD ICs are cardiologists who have received complete interventional cardiology training. They are multidisciplinary team specialists who manage adult SHD patients from diagnosis to follow-up and perform percutaneous procedures in this area. They are competent in interpreting advanced imaging techniques and master planning software. The SHD ICs are expected to be proficient in the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid areas. They may have selective skills in either the aortic area or mitral/tricuspid areas. In this case, they must still have common transversal competencies in the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid areas. Additional SHD domain competencies are optional. Completing dedicated SHD training, aiming for full aortic, mitral, and tricuspid competencies, requires at least 18 months. For full training in the aortic area, with basic competencies in mitral/tricuspid areas, the training can be reduced to 1 year. The same is true for training in the mitral/tricuspid area, with competencies in the aortic area. The SHD IC CC promotes excellence and homogeneous training across Europe and is the cornerstone of future certifications and patient protection. It may be a reference for future CC for national associations and other SHD specialities, including imaging and cardiac surgery.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the usefulness of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the preprocedural evaluation and follow-up of patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins and the impact of the MDCT findings on the approach to treatment. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 92 consecutive MDCT studies done in 80 patients between January 2011 and June 2013; 70 (76%) studies were done before a first ablation procedure and 22 (24%) were done in patients who had undergone an ablation procedure. RESULTS: Findings were useful in 34% of the patients who underwent MDCT before the first ablation procedure and in 68% of the studies done after a procedure. The incidence of stroke associated with the ablation procedure was 3%, similar to the incidence recorded in our center before we started to use MDCT to evaluate the anatomy of the left atrium. All symptomatic patients had some pulmonary vein stenosis, and 80% had significant stenosis. Furthermore, the stenoses progressed very rapidly; treatment with balloon angioplasty was associated with early restenosis. Stenting was an alternative in cases of failed angioplasty. CONCLUSION: In the preprocedural evaluation and postprocedural follow-up of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation, MDCT is useful for guiding treatment and detecting complications.