Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Int Med Res ; 51(7): 3000605231187939, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37523491

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The exact etiology of Parsonage-Turner syndrome is unknown, but it is known to be preceded by infection, vaccination, or surgical intervention. In this review, we describe associations of Parsonage-Turner syndrome with COVID-19 infection and vaccination. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Microsoft Excel was used for data extraction and statistical analysis. The quality of case reports and case series was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: We selected 44 case reports and 10 case series, including 68 patients (32 post-vaccination and 36 with post-COVID-19 infection Parsonage-Turner syndrome). Middle-aged males were predominantly affected in both groups. The most frequently administered vaccine was Comirnaty (Pfizer) (53%). The mean latency was 11.7 days in the post-vaccination group and 20.3 days in the post-infection group. The most affected nerves in both groups were the axillary, suprascapular, and musculocutaneous nerves; and 78.1% and 38.9% of patients showed partial amelioration of their symptoms in the post-vaccination and post-infection groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Post-vaccination Parsonage-Turner syndrome presents earlier than post-infection disease. Pain and sensorimotor deficits of the upper limb are common in both situations. Complete or partial recovery occurs in most cases.


Assuntos
Neurite do Plexo Braquial , COVID-19 , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Humanos , Neurite do Plexo Braquial/etiologia , Neurite do Plexo Braquial/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Dor , Extremidade Superior , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
3.
J Neurol Sci ; 445: 120537, 2023 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36630803

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies on tenecteplase have been yielding mixed results for several important outcomes at different doses, thus hampering objective guideline recommendations in acute ischemic stroke management. This meta-analysis stratifies doses in order to refine our interpretation of outcomes and quantify the benefits and harms of tenecteplase at different doses. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and reference lists of the included articles were systematically searched. Several efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled and reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Network meta-analysis was used to find the optimal dose of tenecteplase. Meta-regression was run to investigate the impact of baseline NIHSS scores on functional outcomes and mortality. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials with a total of 4140 patients were included. 2166 (52.32%) patients were enrolled in the tenecteplase group and 1974 (47.68%) in the alteplase group. Tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg dose demonstrated significant improvement in excellent functional outcome at 3 months (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.26), and early neurological improvement (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.03-2.26). There was no statistically significant difference between tenecteplase and alteplase in terms of good functional outcome, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality at any dose. Meta-regression demonstrated superior tenecteplase efficacy with increasing stroke severity, however, the results were statistically nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg dose is more efficacious and at least as safe as alteplase for stroke thrombolysis. Newer analyses need to focus on direct comparison of tenecteplase doses and whether tenecteplase is efficacious at longer needle times.


Assuntos
AVC Isquêmico , Tenecteplase , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tecidual , Humanos , Hemorragia Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , AVC Isquêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Metanálise em Rede , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tenecteplase/efeitos adversos , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tecidual/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Thyroid Res ; 15(1): 22, 2022 Dec 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36464691

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The debate on whether or not there is a difference in the incidence of thyroid cancer between the patients with Solitary thyroid Nodule (STN) and Multinodular Goiter (MNG) has been constantly present for the last few decades. With newer studies yielding mixed results, it was imperative to systematically compile all available literature on the topic. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, GoogleScholar, International Clinical Trials registry, and reference lists of the included articles were systematically searched for article retrieval. No filter was applied in terms of time, study design, language or country of publication. Rigorous screening as per PRISMA guidelines was undertaken by 2 independent reviewers in order to identify the articles that were most relevant to the topic. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies spanning from 1992 to 2018 were included in this analysis and encompassed 50,321 patients, 44.2% of which belonged to the STN subgroup and 55.37% to the MNG subgroup. MNG was found to be associated with a significantly lower risk of thyroid cancer (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) when compared with STN. Papillary carcinoma was the most frequently occurring carcinoma across both groups, followed by follicular and medullary carcinomas. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of the two most commonly employed diagnostic tools i.e. surgery and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), however it yielded nonsignificant results, indicating a comparable usefulness of the two. Another subgroup analysis run on the basis of the presumed iodine status of the participants also yielded nonsignificant results. CONCLUSION: There is a higher incidence of thyroid cancer among patients of STN, however, given the low quality of existing evidence on the topic, it is crucial to conduct larger studies that can establish association with a greater precision.

5.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 72: 103080, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34840779

RESUMO

The rise in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases is revealing its unique neurological manifestations. In light of the emerging evidence, a possible association with Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) is being consistently reported. We conducted a systematic literature search on four databases namely Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. After rigorous screening as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a total of 34 articles describing 56 cases were selected as a part of this review. The mean age of the patients was 56.6 ± 15.3 years. The most common clinical presentation of PRES was altered mental status (58.9%) followed by seizures (46.4%) and visual disturbances (23.2%) while hypertension and diabetes mellitus were the most commonly reported comorbidities. 91.1% of the cases reported Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT) findings suggestive of PRES in the brain. Symptomatic management was employed in most of the cases to control seizures and blood pressure, and 44 patients (78.5%) fully or partially recovered. The most likely underlying mechanism involves COVID-19 mediated cytokine storm syndrome that leads to endothelial damage and increased permeability of the cerebral vessels, thus causing the characteristic edema of PRES. High neuronal and glial cell expression of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme-2 (ACE-2) receptors also suggests the possibility of direct viral damage. Since timely diagnosis and treatment reports a good prognosis, it is vital for physicians and neurologists to be well-versed with this association.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA