RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There has been significant interest in global health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) among individuals living in high-income countries (HICs) over the past 30 years. Much of the literature on global health engagements (GHEs) has been presented from the perspective of individuals from high-income countries. Local stakeholders such as health care workers and health care administrators represent critical constituencies for global health activities, yet their perspectives are underrepresented in the literature. The purpose of this study is to examine the experiences of local health care workers and administrators with GHEs in Kenya. We will explore the perceived role GHEs play in preparing the health system to address a public health crisis, as well as their role in pandemic recovery and its aftermath. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are to (1) examine how Kenyan health care workers and administrators interpret experiences with GHEs as having advantaged or hindered them and the local health system to provide care during an acute public health crisis and (2) to explore recommendations to reimagine GHEs in a postpandemic Kenya. METHODS: This study will be conducted at a large teaching and referral hospital in western Kenya with a long history of hosting GHEs in support of its tripartite mission of providing care, training, and research. This qualitative study will be conducted in 3 phases. In phase 1, in-depth interviews will be conducted to capture participants' lived experience in relation to their unique understandings of the pandemic, GHEs, and the local health system. In phase 2, group discussions using nominal group techniques will be conducted to determine potential priority areas to reimagine future GHEs. In phase 3, in-depth interviews will be conducted to explore these priority areas in greater detail to explore recommendations for potential strategies, policies, and other actions that might be used to achieve the priorities determined to be of highest importance. RESULTS: The study activities commenced in late summer 2022, with findings to be published in 2023. It is anticipated that the findings from this study will provide insight into the role GHEs play in a local health system in Kenya and provide critical stakeholder and partner input from persons hitherto ignored in the design, implementation, and management of GHEs. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study will examine the perspectives of GHEs in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic among Kenyan health care workers and health care administrators in western Kenya using a multistage protocol. Using a combination of in-depth interviews and nominal group techniques, this study aims to shed light on the roles global health activities are perceived to play in preparing health care professionals and the health system to address an acute public health crisis. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/41836.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To support governments' efforts at neonatal mortality reduction, UNICEF and the American Academy of Pediatrics launched a telementoring project in Kenya, Pakistan and Tanzania. METHODS: In Fall 2019, an individualised 12-session telementoring curriculum was created for East Africa and Pakistan after site visits that included care assessment, patient data review and discussion with faculty and staff. After the programme, participants, administrators and UNICEF staff were surveyed and participated in focus group discussions. RESULTS: Participants felt the programme improved knowledge and newborn care. Qualitative analysis found three common themes of successful telementoring: local buy-in, use of existing training or clinical improvement structures, and consideration of technology needs. CONCLUSIONS: Telementoring has potential as a powerful tool in newborn education. It offers more flexibility and easier access than in-person sessions. This project has the potential for scale-up, particularly when physical distancing and travel restrictions are the norm.
Assuntos
Mortalidade Infantil , Criança , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Quênia , Paquistão , TanzâniaRESUMO
Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) addresses a major cause of newborn mortality by teaching basic steps of neonatal resuscitation and improving survival rates of infants affected by intrapartum-related events or asphyxia. Addressing the additional top causes of mortality (infection and prematurity) requires more comprehensive education, including content on thermal and nutritional support, breastfeeding, and alternative feeding strategies, as well as recognition and treatment of infection. Essential Care for Every Baby (ECEB) and Essential Care for Small Babies (ECSB) use educational principles developed with HBB as a model for teaching basic newborn care. These programs complement the content provided with HBB, further integrate counseling of families, and advance the agenda of providing quality care to all infants at birth. ECEB and ECSB have further demonstrated that engagement of individuals through active participation in their education empowers providers at all levels. With added experience teaching and implementing ECEB and ECSB, the next generation of newborn educational programs will likely incorporate bedside teaching and clinical exposure, multimedia platforms for demonstrating clinical content, and added efforts toward quality improvement. Through ECEB and ECSB, the attention brought to the newborn health agenda with HBB has only grown. Although current global health issues pose new challenges in implementing this agenda, these programs together provide a critical framework to both educate and advocate for optimal care of every newborn.
Assuntos
Asfixia Neonatal/terapia , Ressuscitação/normas , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Helping Babies Survive (HBS) suite of programs was launched in 2010 as an evidence-based educational package to train health care workers in low- and middle-income countries in neonatal resuscitation, immediate newborn care, and complications of prematurity. To date, there has been no purposeful examination of lessons learned from HBS trainers. Our intent with this study is to gather that data from the field. METHODS: To estimate the total global reach of the HBS program, we obtained equipment distribution data from Laerdal and HBS material download data from the HBS Web site as of March 2020. To understand the lessons learned from HBS trainers, we examined comments from trainers who recorded their trainings on the HBS Web site, and other first-hand accounts. RESULTS: More than 1 million pieces of equipment (simulators, flip charts, provider guides, and action plans) have been distributed worldwide. HBS materials have been downloaded from the Web site >130 000 times and have now been translated into 27 languages. HBS equipment and training has reached an estimated 850 000 providers in 158 countries. Qualitative analysis revealed 3 major themes critical to building successful and sustainable HBS programs: support, planning and local context, and subthemes for each. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned from experienced trainers represent a vital distillation of first-hand experience into widely applicable knowledge to be used to reduce potential failures and achieve desired outcomes. Findings from this study offer further guidance on best practices for implementing and sustaining HBS programs and provide insight into challenges and successes experienced by HBS trainers.
Assuntos
Asfixia Neonatal/terapia , Ressuscitação/educação , Saúde Global , Humanos , Recém-NascidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Helping Babies Breathe (HBB), a skills-based program in neonatal resuscitation for birth attendants in resource-limited settings, has been implemented in over 80 countries since 2010. Implementation studies of HBB incorporating low-dose high-frequency practice and quality improvement show substantial reductions in fresh stillbirth and first-day neonatal mortality. Revision of the program aimed to further augment provider and facilitator skills and address gaps in implementation with the goal of improving neonatal survival. METHODS: The Utstein Formula for Survival-Medical Science X Educational Efficiency X Local Implementation = Survival-provided a framework for the revisions. The 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation informed scientific updates, which were harmonized with the 2012 World Health Organization Basic Newborn Resuscitation Guidelines. Published literature and program reports, consensus guidelines on reprocessing equipment, systematic collection of suggestions from frontline users, and responses to a semistructured online questionnaire informed educational/implementation revisions. Links to maternal care were added. Draft materials underwent Delphi review and field testing in India and Sierra Leone. An Utstein-style meeting of stakeholders identified key actions for successful implementation. RESULTS: Scientific revisions included expectant management of infants with meconium-stained amniotic fluid, limitation of suctioning, and initiating and continuing effective ventilation until spontaneous respirations. Frontline users (N=102) suggested augmented simulation methods to build confidence and competence and additional guidance for facilitators on implementation. Users identified a need for sufficient practice during the workshop, systematized ongoing practice, and enough simulators for participants. Field trials refined approaches to self-reflection, feedback and debriefing, and quality improvement. Utstein meeting stakeholders validated the importance of quality improvement and use of data to improve outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The second edition of HBB provides a newer paradigm of learning for providers that incorporates workshop practice, self-reflection, and feedback and debriefing to reinforce learning as well as the promotion of mentorship and development of facilitators, systems for low-dose high-frequency practice in facilities, and quality improvement related to neonatal resuscitation.
Assuntos
Asfixia Neonatal/terapia , Currículo , Tocologia/educação , Modelos Educacionais , Ressuscitação/educação , Competência Clínica , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil/tendências , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Serra Leoa/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Condom-associated erection problems (CAEPs) are reported by a substantial number of young men and are associated with inconsistent and/or incomplete condom use. The underlying mechanisms of CAEP are not well understood, and research examining the possibility that men who report CAEP differ from other men in their sexual responsivity is lacking. AIM: This study used psychophysiological methods to examine whether men who report CAEP have a higher threshold for sexual arousal, a stronger need for tactile stimulation, and/or more easily lose their sexual arousal due to neutral distractors or performance-related demands. METHODS: A total of 142 young, heterosexual men (53% reporting CAEP) were presented with four 3-minute erotic film clips. Three film clips were combined with one of the following manipulations: (i) distraction; (ii) performance demand; or (iii) vibrotactile stimulation. One erotic film clip was presented with no further instructions or manipulations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average penile circumference changes during the first, second, and third minute (time) of the erotic film stimuli (condition) were submitted to a mixed-model analysis of variance with condition and time as within-subjects factors and group (CAEP/no-CAEP) as between-subjects factor. RESULTS: Significant main effects of condition and time and a significant interaction of group × time were found. No significant interactions involving condition were found. Men who reported CAEP had smaller erectile responses during the first minute, regardless of film condition, than men who reported no CAEP (F(1,141) = 8.64, P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that men with and without CAEP differ in the ease with which they become sexually aroused. Men reporting CAEP needed more time and/or more intense stimulation to become aroused. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use psychophysiological methods to assess sexual responsivity in men who report CAEP.
Assuntos
Nível de Alerta , Preservativos/efeitos adversos , Heterossexualidade , Ereção Peniana , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/fisiopatologia , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/psicologia , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/etiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Investigating the ways in which barrier methods such as condoms may affect penile sensory thresholds has potential relevance to the development of interventions in men who experience negative effects of condoms on sexual response and sensation. A quantitative, psychophysiological investigation examining the degree to which sensations are altered by condoms has, to date, not been conducted. AIM: The objective of this study was to examine penile vibrotactile sensitivity thresholds in both flaccid and erect penises with and without a condom while comparing men who do and those who do not report condom-associated erection problems (CAEP). METHODS: Penile vibrotactile sensitivity thresholds were assessed among a total of 141 young, heterosexual men using biothesiometry. An incremental two-step staircase method was used and repeated three times for each of four conditions. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for all vibratory assessments. Penile vibratory thresholds were compared using a mixed-model analysis of variance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Penile vibrotactile sensitivity thresholds with and without a condom, erectile function measured by International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire, and self-reported degree of erection. RESULTS: Significant main effects of condoms (yes/no) and erection (yes/no) were found. No main or interaction effects of CAEP were found. Condoms were associated with higher penile vibrotactile sensitivity thresholds (F[1,124] = 17.11, P < 0.001). Penile vibrotactile thresholds were higher with an erect penis than with a flaccid penis (F[1,124] = 4.21, P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates the feasibility of measuring penile vibratory thresholds with and without a condom in both erect and flaccid experimental conditions. As might be expected, condoms increased penile vibrotactile sensitivity thresholds. Interestingly, erections were associated with the highest thresholds. Thus, this study was the first to document that erect penises are less sensitive to vibrotactile stimulation than flaccid penises.
Assuntos
Preservativos , Pênis/fisiologia , Limiar Sensorial , Adolescente , Adulto , Heterossexualidade , Humanos , Masculino , Ereção Peniana/fisiologia , Sensação , Comportamento Sexual , Vibração , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Preservativos , Parceiros Sexuais , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop an abbreviated reliable tool for assessing the attitudes US college-aged men and women have about condoms and condom use. METHOD: An online questionnaire was constructed and completed by 674 participants incorporating modified items from the Attitudes Towards Condom Scale (1984) and the Multidimensional Condom Attitude Scale (1994), with the addition of gender-neutral worded and condom positive or erotic items. RESULTS: The original 40 items were reduced to 18 Likert-type items comprising the Brief Condom Attitude Scale (BCAS). Gender comparisons on a subset of 584 self-identified heterosexual participants indicated that women were significantly more likely to consider condoms as less protective, while men were significantly more likely to consider condoms as more interruptive. Additional analyses examining partnership indicated that monogamous participants were significantly more likely to view condoms as less interruptive, more erotic and less negative than non-monogamous participants. CONCLUSIONS: The BCAS appears to be a reliable measure for assessing US college-aged individuals' attitudes about condoms.