5-year follow-up at an accredited community bariatric practice: what is an acceptable follow-up rate?

BACKGROUND: Adequate long-term follow-up after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) remains a challenge. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if type of insurance correlated with differences in the 5-year follow-up and outcomes of a cohort of bariatric surgery patients in a community-based accredited center. SETTING: Accredited private practice bariatric center in the United States. METHODS: We studied bariatric surgery patients that underwent MBS in 2015 by a single surgeon in an accredited, community practice. Electronic medical records were utilized to evaluate 5-year follow-up and outcomes data. This included demographics, type of insurance, number of follow-up visits, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), postbariatric procedures, and postbariatric emergency department (ED) utilization. RESULTS: There were 89 patients. The follow-up rate decreased over time, with 1% of patients at 5 years. There was a slightly higher follow-up rate in patients with commercial versus public insurance. The average BMI of patients that followed up decreased by 13.6 kg/m2 over the first postoperative year. The average number of ED visits was 1.46 (standard deviation: 2.38) overall; however, of the 89 total patients, 35 patients (39.3%) had no documented ED visits, with the remaining 61 patients (63.5%) ranging from 1-15 visits (median = 1). CONCLUSION: Overall follow-up rates were low with 4-year follow-up being 14% and 5-year follow-up being <1%. Publicly insured patients had a higher rate of follow-up. Despite low follow-up rates with the actual bariatric surgery practice, 63.5% of patients had an ED visit during the follow-up period.

New Onset Cardiac Arrhythmias after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been shown to improve medical problems; however, there are known arrhythmias that can occur after MBS (i.e., sick sinus syndrome [SSS] and sinus bradyarrhythmias). While the literature in this area contains case reports, there is a lack of published data on a state or national level. We used a large state administrative database to evaluate the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias after MBS. METHODS: We studied the years 2016 to 2018 using the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File. Inclusion criteria were patients who had a pacemaker installed and were ≥ 18 years. Quantitative variables were described using mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables were described using frequency and proportion. The student's t-test and chi-squared test were used to assess the differences across pacemaker installation. RESULTS: There were a total of 79,807 (10.2%) who had a history of MBS and 31,072 (4%) patients who underwent pacemaker insertion, respectively. After excluding all patients < 18 years, the prevalence of pacemakers installed in patients with prior bariatric surgery was 0.8% (n = 257/30,823) or about 8 in every 1000 patients. Of note, bariatric patients who had a pacemaker placed were younger than non-bariatric patients (P < 0.001). The most common reason for pacemaker placement was SSS (51.5%), followed by atrioventricular block (13.1%), and then bradycardia at 8.5%. The most common arrhythmia overall was bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS: Eight out of every 1000 patients with a pacemaker installed in the study period had a history of MBS. The most common arrhythmia was bradycardia and the most common reason for pacemaker placement was sick sinus syndrome. These results do not indicate causality but may demonstrate an association between MBS and arrhythmias. Bariatric patients undergo pacemaker placement at a younger age. The relationship between bariatric surgery and cardiac arrhythmias warrants further study.