COVID-19 therapeutics and outcomes among solid organ transplant recipients during the Omicron BA.1 era.

Treatment outcomes associated with the use of novel COVID-19 therapeutics in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are not well described in the literature. The objective of this analysis was to characterize 30-day hospitalization and other key secondary endpoints experienced by outpatient SOTR with mild-moderate COVID-19 treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR), sotrovimab, or no SARS-CoV-2 specific treatment. This IRB-approved, retrospective study included 154 SOTR with a documented positive SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 16, 2021 and January 19, 2022 (a predominant Omicron BA.1 period in New York City). Patients who received NR (N = 28) or sotrovimab (N = 51) experienced a lower rate of 30-day hospitalization or death as compared to those who received no specific treatment (N = 75) (p = .009). A total of three deaths occurred, all among patients who initially received no specific treatment prior to hospitalization. These results suggest a role for SARS-CoV-2 specific agents in the treatment of SOTR with COVID-19, and that there does not appear to be any difference in effectiveness when comparing NR versus sotrovimab.

Immunosuppression considerations in simultaneous organ transplant.

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients in the end stage of heart, lung, kidney, and liver failure. For patients with more than one failing organ, simultaneous organ transplantation has emerged as a viable treatment option. Immunosuppression strategies and outcomes for simultaneous organ transplant recipients have been reported, but often involve limited populations. Transplanting dual organs poses challenges in terms of balancing immunosuppression with immunologic risk and allograft damage from surgical complications. Furthermore, transplanting certain organs can impose considerations on the management of immunosuppression. For example, liver allografts may confer immunologic privilege and lower rates of rejection of other allografts. This review article evaluates immunosuppression strategies for simultaneous kidney-pancreas, liver-kidney, heart-kidney, heart-liver, heart-lung, lung-liver, and lung-kidney transplants. To date, no comprehensive review exists to address immunosuppressive strategies in simultaneous organ transplant populations. Our review summarizes the available literature and provides evidence-based recommendations regarding immunosuppression strategies in simultaneous organ transplant recipients.

Acyclovir versus valganciclovir for preventing cytomegalovirus infection in intermediate-risk liver transplant recipients.

CONTEXT: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic infection that causes profound morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). The CMV immunoglobulin G serostatuses of donors and recipients are the main factors influencing risk for development of CMV infection after transplant. OBJECTIVE: To compare acyclovir and valganciclovir for preventing CMV infection after OLT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective assessment of adult OLT recipients at intermediate risk for CMV infection at New York Presbyterian Hospital. INTERVENTION: All patients received ganciclovir 5 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours or valganciclovir 900 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days after transplant. On postoperative day 8, patients received antiviral prophylaxis according to risk stratification: acyclovir 800 mg orally 3 times daily in donor seronegative/recipient seropositive (D-/R+) patients or valganciclovir 900 mg orally once daily in donor seropositive/recipient seropositive (D+/R+) patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Composite incidence of CMV infection, syndrome, or tissue-invasive disease. RESULTS: Of 275 OLT recipients, 89 were at intermediate risk for CMV infection (29 D-/R+, 60 D+/R+). CMV infection, syndrome, or tissue-invasive disease occurred in 1 patient (3%) in the D-/R+ group and 5 patients (8%) in the D+/R+ group (P=.66). One patient (3%) in the D-/R+ group had a CMV infection develop. Five D+/R+ recipients (8%) had CMV infection; 3 of them had CMV syndrome (5%), 1 had CMV hepatitis (1.6%), and the other had CMV esophagitis (1.6%); all events occurred after prophylaxis was discontinued. The rates of CMV infection were similar in D-/R+ patients treated with acyclovir and D+/R+ patients receiving valganciclovir. This risk-stratified approach to viral prophylaxis after OLT resulted in an acceptable rate of CMV infection in D-/R+ recipients and may avoid the costs and adverse effects associated with valganciclovir therapy.