Lung cancer patients' illness perceptions: Prognostic for psychological and physical health trajectories.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with the highest burden of mental and physical symptoms. Across illnesses, patients' subjective illness beliefs (i.e., illness perceptions [IPs]) correlate with psychological and physical health status. Despite this, IPs in NSCLC patients are understudied. To address this gap, previous research identified three profiles characterizing IPs of newly diagnosed NSCLC patients: "coping" (those more positive perceptions of NSCLC); "coping but concerned" (similar positive perceptions but high concern); and "struggling" (uniformly negative perceptions; Valentine et al., 2022). This extension seeks to determine if IPs are predictive. Would patients' psychological and physical health trajectories differ by IP profile? METHOD: Patients with Stage IV NSCLC (N = 186) from a prospective cohort (2017-2019; NCT03199651) enrolled at diagnosis participated and completed an IP measure and anxiety, depression, physical symptom, and health status outcome measures monthly for 8 months. Linear mixed models tested profile membership (see above) as predictive of outcome trajectories, with those "struggling" having the poorest outcomes. RESULTS: Eight-month trajectories for anxiety and some physical symptoms showed significant improvement, whereas depression, dyspnea, pain, and self-rated health did not. As anticipated, profile membership was predictive: "struggling" profile patients reported significantly worse anxiety and depression symptoms, physical symptoms, and health compared to "coping" patients. There were no interactions between profile and time. Generalization to samples from U.S. states with greater racial/ethnic diversity is unknown. CONCLUSION: Novel data show "struggling" profile patients to have uniformly negative outcomes and specify IP content relevant for inclusion in cognitive behavioral therapies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Functional resilience and overall survival in adults treated for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: As more treatments emerge for advanced, stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oncologists have difficulty predicting functional resiliency versus functional decline throughout cancer treatment. Our study evaluates functional resilience among patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Functional status was evaluated through 12 months of follow-up based on disability score using the modified EQ-5D-5L (mEQ-5D-5L) survey. Participants were classified into 4 groups: functional maintenance, decline, resilient, or variable. Characteristics of 207 participants with newly diagnosed NSCLC included demographics, comorbidities, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), mEQ-5D-5L scores, psychological symptoms, and lung cancer-specific symptoms. Treatment toxicity and grade were recorded. Resilience was defined as improvement from baseline disability scores. A 1-point increase in functional status score represents a 0.5 standard deviation change on the mEQ-5D-5L. Differences between the 4 groups were determined through Fisher's exact test or ANOVA. Kaplan-Meier curves describe overall survival (baseline through 18 months) stratified by baseline mEQ-5D-5L scores. RESULTS: Among participants, 42.0 % maintained functional status, 37.7 % experienced functional decline, 10.6 % were resilient, and 9.7 % had variable functional status. Participants with the best baseline function (score of 0) had the longest overall survival and participants with the worst baseline function (score of 5 + ) had the shortest overall survival. Among the healthiest patients, early score increases indicated shorter overall survival. Baseline ECOG PS was not associated with overall survival (p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Baseline functional status may help better predict functional resiliency and overall survival than ECOG PS among patients receiving treatment for advanced NSCLC.

Resiliency among older adults receiving lung cancer treatment (ROAR-LCT): A novel supportive care intervention for older adults with advanced lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Novel supportive care interventions designed for an aging population with lung cancer are urgently needed. We aimed to determine the feasibility of a novel supportive care physical therapy (PT) plus progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) intervention delivered to older adults with advanced lung cancer in the United States (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This clinical trial, Resiliency Among Older Adults Receiving Lung Cancer Treatment (ROAR-LCT: NCT04229381), recruited adults aged ≥60 years with unresectable stage III/IV non-small cell (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving cancer treatment at The James Thoracic Oncology Center (planned enrollment, N = 20). There were no exclusion criteria pertaining to performance status, laboratory values, prior cancer diagnoses, comorbidities, or brain metastases. Participants were evaluated by PT and psychology and given an exercise pedaler, resistance bands, a relaxation voice recording, and instructions at study initiation. Participants were evaluated in-person by PTs and psychologists at the start and end of the 12-session intervention, with the intervening sessions conducted via virtual health. Participants completed self-reported measures of functional status, symptoms, and mood longitudinally with the following instruments: EQ-5D-5L, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and General Anxiety Disorder-7. PT assessments included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the two-minute walk test. Feasibility was defined as at least 60% of participants completing at least 70% of all intervention sessions. Optional gut microbiome samples and activity monitoring data (ActiGraph®) were also collected. RESULTS: The ROAR-LCT study concluded after consenting 22 patients. Among the 22 consented, 18 (81.8%) started the intervention; 11 participants (61.1%) completed at least 70% of all study sessions. All participants with SCLC completed the intervention. Reasons for withdrawal included progression of disease or hospitalization. The majority (88.9%) of patients who started were able to complete at least one virtual health session. Participants' functional status, SPPB, depression, and anxiety scores were stable from pre- to post-intervention. Participants who withdrew had worse baseline scores across domains. Seven microbiome and six ActiGraph® samples were collected. DISCUSSION: This is one of the first PT + PMR supportive care interventions using virtual health among older adults with advanced lung cancer to achieve feasibility in the US.

Allostatic load as a predictor of postoperative complications in patients with breast cancer.

Allostatic load (AL) is a biological measure of cumulative exposure to socioenvironmental stressors (e.g., poverty). This study aims to examine the association between allostatic load (AL) and postoperative complications (POC) among patients with breast cancer. Females ages 18+ with stage I-III breast cancer who received surgical management between 01/01/2012-12/31/2020 were identified in the Ohio State Cancer registry. The composite AL measure included biomarkers from the cardiovascular, metabolic, immune, and renal systems. High AL was defined as composite scores greater than the cohort's median (2.0). POC within 30 days of surgery were examined. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis examined the association between AL and POC. Among 4459 patients, 8.2% had POC. A higher percentage of patients with POC were unpartnered (POC 44.7% vs no POC 35.5%), government-insured (POC 48.2% vs no POC 38.3%) and had multiple comorbidities (POC 32% vs no POC 20%). Patients who developed POC were more likely to have undergone sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by axillary lymph node dissection (POC 51.2% vs no POC 44.6%). High AL was associated with 29% higher odds of POC (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.01-1.63). A one-point increase in AL was associated with 8% higher odds of POC (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.16) and a quartile increase in AL was associated with 13% increased odds of POC (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26). Among patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, increased exposure to adverse socioenvironmental stressors, operationalized as AL, was associated with higher odds of postoperative complications.

Association Between Neighborhood Opportunity, Allostatic Load, and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Adverse neighborhood contextual factors may affect breast cancer outcomes through environmental, psychosocial, and biological pathways. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between allostatic load (AL), neighborhood opportunity, and all-cause mortality among patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Women age 18 years and older with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer who received surgical treatment between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020, at a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center were identified. Neighborhood opportunity was operationalized using the 2014-2018 Ohio Opportunity Index (OOI), a composite measure derived from neighborhood level transportation, education, employment, health, housing, crime, and environment. Logistic and Cox regression models tested associations between the OOI, AL, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort included 4,089 patients. Residence in neighborhoods with low OOI was associated with high AL (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.40]). On adjusted analysis, low OOI was associated with greater risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.45 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.89]). Relative to the highest (99th percentile) level of opportunity, risk of all-cause mortality steeply increased up to the 70th percentile, at which point the rate of increase plateaued. There was no interaction between the composite OOI and AL on all-cause mortality (P = .12). However, there was a higher mortality risk among patients with high AL residing in lower-opportunity environments (aHR, 1.96), but not in higher-opportunity environments (aHR, 1.02; P interaction = .02). CONCLUSION: Lower neighborhood opportunity was associated with higher AL and greater risk of all-cause mortality among patients with breast cancer. Additionally, environmental factors and AL interacted to influence all-cause mortality. Future studies should focus on interventions at the neighborhood and individual level to address socioeconomically based disparities in breast cancer.

Oncology mental health providers' adaptation of an evidence-based intervention: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Adaptations are intentional modifications maximizing the fit of an evidence-based intervention (EBI) in new context. Little is known about EBI adaptation within psychosocial oncology. Guided by the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME), this mixed-methods study describes oncology mental health providers' planned adaptations to a psychosocial oncology EBI and examines the relationship between planned adaptations and longitudinal EBI usage. METHODS: Providers (N = 128) were social workers (47%) and psychologists (40%) practicing in community settings (44%) or academic medical centers (41%). They attended a 3-day training on a multicomponent psychosocial oncology EBI, the Biobehavioral Intervention (BBI). During training, providers prepared an "adaptation plan" describing necessary adaptations to BBI and rationales for change. Qualitative data from adaptation plans were analyzed using directed content analysis. Linear mixed models examined the relationship between adaptation characteristics (number, similarity to the manualized BBI) and EBI usage across 12 months post-training. RESULTS: Three sets of qualitative themes reflecting FRAME elements emerged: (1) content modifications (e.g., shortening/condensing, selecting elements, adding/removing elements); (2) contextual changes (e.g., alternative group formats); and (3) reasons for adaptations (e.g., organization/setting, provider, and recipient factors). Neither number of adaptations nor adaptation similarity were associated with BBI usage across 12 months post-training. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first to characterize oncology mental health providers' planned adaptations to a psychosocial oncology EBI. Planned adaptations did not increase usage, but importantly they did not decrease usage. The adaptation process enabled providers to make thoughtful adaptation choices, with implementation successful irrespective of setting constraints.

COVID-19 or Cancer Stress? Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Of all cancer patients, those with lung cancer are among the highest risk for infection, pneumonia, hospitalization, and early death from COVID-19. As cancer stress is ubiquitous, this exploratory study examines patients' COVID-19 stress and cancer stress in relation to their depressive and anxiety symptoms. METHOD: Newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer patients (N = 76) completed measures of cancer stress, COVID-19 illness perceptions and stress, and depressive and anxiety symptoms at a single monthly follow-up early in the pandemic (May 2020 to July 2020; Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03199651). Hierarchical linear multiple regression analysis was used to identify the relationship of stressor variables to depressive and anxiety symptoms in this cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Hierarchical linear models revealed cancer stress was a significant predictor of both depressive symptoms (F(14,30) = 5.327, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.71, adjusted R2 = 0.58) and anxiety symptoms (F(14,30) = 4.513, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.68, adjusted R2 = 0.53) for patients at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. By contrast, COVID-19 stress was not a significant predictor of depressive (F(13,31) = 1.415 p = .21, R2 = .37, adjusted R2 = .11) or anxiety symptoms (F(13,31) = 1.23, p = .30, R2 = .34, adjusted R2 = - .07). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced lung cancer patients during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic reported cancer stress as more important than COVID-19 stress in relation to their mental health. Empirically supported biobehavioral and cognitive behavioral treatments remain important to reducing psychological symptoms and enhancing patients' quality of life.

Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer: from Detection to Treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Update on current racial disparities in the detection and treatment of breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death among Black and Hispanic women. Mammography rates among Black and Hispanic women have surpassed those among White women, with studies now advocating for earlier initiation of breast cancer screening in Black women. Black, Hispanic, Asian, and American Indian and Alaskan Native women continue to experience delays in diagnosis and time to treatment. Further, racial discrepancies in receipt of guideline-concordant care, access to genetic testing and surgical reconstruction persist. Disparities in the initiation, completion, toxicity, and efficacy of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted drug therapy remain for racially marginalized women. Efforts to evaluate the impact of race and ethnicity across the breast cancer spectrum are increasing, but knowledge gaps remain and further research is necessary to reduce the disparity gap.

The Implications of Racialized Economic Segregation and Allostatic Load on Mortality in Patients with Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the association between racialized economic segregation, allostatic load (AL), and all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women aged 18+ years with stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2020 were identified in the Ohio State University cancer registry. Racialized economic segregation was measured at the census tract level using the index of concentration at the extremes (ICE). AL was calculated with biomarkers from the cardiac, metabolic, immune, and renal systems. High AL was defined as AL greater than the median. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses using restricted cubic splines examined the association between racialized economic segregation, AL, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among 4296 patients, patients residing in neighborhoods with the highest racialized economic segregation (Q1 versus Q4) were more likely to be Black (25% versus 2.1%, p < 0.001) and have triple-negative breast cancer (18.2% versus 11.6%, p < 0.001). High versus low racialized economic segregation was associated with high AL [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.61] and worse all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.08-1.83]. In dose-response analyses, patients in lower segregated neighborhoods (relative to the 95th percentile) had lower odds of high AL, whereas patients in more segregated neighborhoods had a non-linear increase in the odds of high AL. DISCUSSION: Racialized economic segregation is associated with high AL and a greater risk of all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the causal pathways and mechanisms linking AL, neighborhood factors, and patient outcomes.

Short-term and long-term financial toxicity from breast cancer treatment: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: The rising cost of breast cancer treatment has increased patients' financial burden, intensifying an already stressful treatment process. Although researchers increasingly recognize the harmful impact of medical and nonmedical costs associated with cancer treatment, understanding patients' perspectives of financial toxicity is limited. We aimed to explore the topic of financial toxicity through the lived experiences of patients with breast cancer from groups at risk of social and economic marginalization. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 50 women with breast cancer from four specific groups: Black women, Medicaid enrollees, rural residents, and women age ≤ 40. We transcribed, coded, and analyzed the data using deductive and inductive approaches. RESULTS: Two overarching themes captured patients' experiences of financial toxicity: short-term and long-term impacts. Short-term stressors included direct medical (e.g., co-pays, premiums), nonmedical (e.g., transportation, lodging), and indirect (e.g., job loss, reduced work hours) costs. Early in their treatments, patients' focus on survival took precedence over financial concerns. However, as the treatment course progressed, fear of consequences from compounding costs of care and financial distress negatively impacted patients' lifestyles and outlooks for the future. CONCLUSION: Programs addressing financial toxicity that look beyond early-phase interventions are needed. Specifically, patients struggling with the accumulation of treatment costs and the resultant stress require ongoing support. Long-term support is especially needed for groups vulnerable to financial instability and social marginalization.

Low Hospital Volume Is Associated with Higher All-Cause Mortality in Black Women with Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the association between hospital volume and all-cause mortality in Black women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received surgery and chemotherapy. METHODS: Black women ages 18+ with stage I-III TNBC who received both surgery and chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Hospital volume was determined using the number of annual breast cancer cases divided by the number of years the hospital participated in the NCDB. Hospital annual volume quartiles ranged from Q1 (lowest) to Q4 (highest). Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling with restricted cubic splines examined the effect of hospital volume on all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Sixteen thousand five hundred fifty-six patients met the study criteria. All-cause mortality incidence was lower at higher volume compared to lower volume hospitals Q1 24.1% (95% CI: 22.8 to 25.4), Q2 21.8% (95% CI: 20.5 to 23.1), Q3 20.9% (95% CI: 19.6 to 22.1), Q4 19.0% (95% CI: 17.7 to 20.1), p<0.001. On multivariable analysis, treatment at the highest hospital volume quartile was associated with a 21% reduction in the odds of death compared to the lowest quartile [Q4 Vs. Q1, OR=0.79 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.92)]. For every 100-patient increase in annual volume, all-cause mortality was reduced by 4% [OR=0.96 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.98)]. There was a significant linear dose-dependent relationship between increasing hospital volume and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Black women treated at high-volume hospitals have lower all-cause mortality than those at low-volume hospitals. Future studies should examine the characteristics of high-volume hospitals associated with improved outcomes.

A cognitive-behavioral model of dyspnea: Qualitative interviews with individuals with advanced lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Shortness of breath, or dyspnea, is the subjective experience of breathing discomfort and is a common, distressing, and debilitating symptom of lung cancer. There are no efficacious pharmacological treatments, but there is suggestive evidence that cognitive-behavioral treatments could relieve dyspnea. For this, understanding the psychological, behavioral, and social factors that may affect dyspnea severity is critical. To this end, patients with dyspnea were interviewed with questions framed by the cognitive-behavioral model-emphasizing thoughts, emotions, and behaviors as contributors and outcomes of dyspnea. METHODS: Two trained individuals conducted semi-structured interviews with lung cancer patients (N = 15) reporting current dyspnea. Interviews assessed patients' cognitive-behavioral experiences with dyspnea. Study personnel used a grounded theory approach for qualitative analysis to code the interviews. Inter-rater reliability of codes was high (κ = 0.90). RESULTS: Thoughts: Most common were patients' catastrophic thoughts about their health and receiving enough oxygen when breathless. Emotions: Anxiety about dyspnea was the most common, followed by anger, sadness, and shame related to dyspnea. Behaviors: Patients rested and took deep breaths to relieve acute episodes of dyspnea. To reduce the likelihood of dyspnea, patients planned their daily activity or reduced their physical activity at the expense of engagement in hobbies and functional activities. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Patients identified cognitive-behavioral factors (thoughts, emotions, and behaviors) that coalesce with dyspnea. The data provide meaningful insights into potential cognitive-behavioral interventions that could target contributors to dyspnea.

Association of Allostatic Load With All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Importance: Elevated allostatic load (AL) has been associated with adverse socioenvironmental stressors and tumor characteristics that convey poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Currently, the association between AL and all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer is unknown. Objective: To examine the association between AL and all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from an institutional electronic medical record and cancer registry at the National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center. Participants were patients with breast cancer diagnoses (stage I-III) between January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed from April 2022 through November 2022. Exposure: AL was expressed as a summary score calculated by assigning 1 point for biomarkers in the worst sample quartile. High AL was defined as AL greater than the median. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional hazard models with robust variance tested the association between AL and all-cause mortality. Results: There were 4459 patients (median [IQR] age, 59 [49-67] years) with an ethnoracial distribution of 3 Hispanic Black patients (0.1%), 381 non-Hispanic Black patients (8.5%), 23 Hispanic White patients (0.5%), 3861 non-Hispanic White patients (86.6%), 27 Hispanic patients with other race (0.6%), and 164 non-Hispanic patients with other race (3.7%). The mean (SD) AL was 2.6 (1.7). Black patients (adjusted relative ratio [aRR], those with 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18), single marital status (aRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.12), and those with government-supplied insured (Medicaid aRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.21; Medicare aRR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19) had a higher adjusted mean AL than those who were White, married/living as married, or privately insured, respectively. Adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment factors, high AL was associated with a 46% increase in mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.11-1.93) over low AL. Similarly, compared with patients in the first AL quartile, those in the third quartile (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.18) and the fourth quartile (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.16-2.75) had significantly increased risks of mortality. There was a significant dose-dependent association between increased AL and a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Furthermore, AL remained significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality after adjusting for the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest increased AL is reflective of socioeconomic marginalization and associated with all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer.

Risk Factors for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Toxicity Among Older Adults with Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (IO) is revolutionizing cancer care but can lead to significant toxicity. This study seeks to describe potential risk factors for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) specifically among older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study at a single academic comprehensive cancer center based on chart review data abstracted by physicians. For patients aged ≥70 years, frequency, type, and grade of irAEs and their association with baseline patient demographics, comorbidities, mobility, and functional status were characterized using bivariate analysis. Based on those results, multivariable logistic regressions were constructed to model the association between these characteristics with any grade and grade 3 or higher irAEs. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 238 patients aged ≥70 years who received IO for mostly (≥90%) advanced cancer between 2011 and 2018. Thirty-nine percent of older adults experienced an irAE and 13% experienced one that was grade 3 or higher. In the multivariable analysis, depression was associated with an increased incidence of any grade irAE, while decreased life-space mobility was associated with an increased incidence of grade ≥3 irAEs. CONCLUSION: Most characteristics of special interest among older adults, include fall risk, weight loss, cognitive limitations, and hearing loss, were not associated with irAEs in our study. However, decreased life-space mobility and depression are potential risk factors for IO toxicity among older adults with advanced cancer. Interventions designed to evaluate and mitigate modifiable risk factors for treatment-related toxicity are needed, and the results of this study may be useful for guiding those efforts.

Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.

PURPOSE: To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer survivors. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert panel convened to update the guideline. A systematic review of evidence published from 2013-2021 was conducted. RESULTS: The evidence base consisted of 17 systematic reviews ± meta analyses (nine for psychosocial interventions, four for physical exercise, three for mindfulness-based stress reduction [MBSR], and one for pharmacologic interventions), and an additional 44 randomized controlled trials. Psychological, educational, and psychosocial interventions led to improvements in depression and anxiety. Evidence for pharmacologic management of depression and anxiety in cancer survivors was inconsistent. The lack of inclusion of survivors from minoritized groups was noted and identified as an important consideration to provide high-quality care for ethnic minority populations. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended to use a stepped-care model, that is, provide the most effective and least resource-intensive intervention based on symptom severity. All oncology patients should be offered education regarding depression and anxiety. For patients with moderate symptoms of depression, clinicians should offer cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), behavioral activation (BA), MBSR, structured physical activity, or empirically supported psychosocial interventions. For patients with moderate symptoms of anxiety, clinicians should offer CBT, BA, structured physical activity, acceptance and commitment therapy, or psychosocial interventions. For patients with severe symptoms of depression or anxiety, clinicians should offer cognitive therapy, BA, CBT, MBSR, or interpersonal therapy. Treating clinicians may offer a pharmacologic regimen for depression or anxiety for patients who do not have access to first-line treatment, prefer pharmacotherapy, have previously responded well to pharmacotherapy, or have not improved following first-line psychological or behavioral management.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.

Depression in association with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte, and advanced lung cancer inflammation index biomarkers predicting lung cancer survival.

Lung cancer is a product of inflammation and a dysfunctional immune system, and depression has similar dysregulation. Depression disproportionately affects lung cancer patients, having the highest rates of all cancers. Systemic inflammation and depression are both predictive of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival, but the existence and extent of any co-occurrence is unknown. Studied is the association between systemic inflammation ratio (SIR) biomarker levels and patients' depressive symptoms, with the hypothesis that depression severity would be significantly associated with prognostically poor inflammation. Newly diagnosed stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; N = 186) patients were enrolled (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03199651) and blood draws and depression self-reports (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) were obtained. For SIRs, cell counts of neutrophils (N), lymphocytes (L), and platelets (P) were abstracted for ratio (R) calculations for NLR, PLR, and the Advanced Lung cancer Inflammation Index (ALI). Patients were followed and biomarkers were tested as predictors of 2-year overall survival (OS) to confirm their relevance. Next, multivariate linear regressions tested associations of depression with NLR, PLR, and ALI. Overall 2-year mortality was 61% (113/186). Cox model analyses confirmed higher NLR [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.91; p = 0.001] and PLR (HR = 2.08; p<0.001), along with lower ALI (HR = 0.53; p = 0.005), to be predictive of worse OS. Adjusting for covariates, depression was reliably associated with biomarker levels (p ≤ 0.02). Patients with moderate/severe depressive symptoms were 2 to 3 times more likely to have prognostically poor biomarker levels. Novel data show patients' depressive symptoms were reliably associated with lung-relevant systemic inflammation biomarkers, all assessed at diagnosis/pretreatment. The same SIRs were found prognostic for patients' 2-year OS. Intensive study of depression, combined with measures of cell biology and inflammation is needed to extend these findings to discover mechanisms of depression toxicity for NSCLC patients' treatment responses and survival.

Association of Allostatic Load With Overall Mortality Among Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: Adverse social determinants of health (SDHs) (eg, poverty) are associated with poor oncologic outcomes among patients with lung cancer. However, no studies have evaluated biological correlates of adverse SDHs, operationalized as allostatic load (AL), with mortality due to lung cancer. Objective: To examine the association among AL, SDHs, and mortality among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of an observational cohort was performed at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center with data accrued from June 1, 2017, to August 31, 2019. Patients with metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC enrolled at diagnosis into a prospective observational cohort study were included in the present analysis if they had all the biomarkers to calculate an AL score (N = 143). Follow-up was completed on August 31, 2021, and data were analyzed from July 1 to September 30, 2021. Exposures: Social determinants of health. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall mortality and AL. Results: A total of 143 patients met the study criteria with a median age of 63 (IQR, 55-71) years (89 men [62.2%] and 54 women [37.8%]). In terms of race and ethnicity, 1 patient (0.7%) was Asian, 7 (4.9%) were Black, 117 (81.8%) were White, 17 (11.9%) were of multiple races, and 1 (0.7%) was of other race or ethnicity. The mean (SD) AL was 2.90 (1.37). Elevated AL covaried with lower educational level (r = -0.26; P = .002), male sex (r = 0.19; P = .02), limited mobility (r = 0.19; P = .04), worsening self-care (r = 0.30; P < .001), problems engaging in usual activities (r = 0.21; P = .01), depressive symptoms (r = 0.23; P = .005), and a high number of stressful life events (r = 0.30; P < .001). Multivariable analysis found only increasing difficulty with mobility (r = 0.37 [95% CI, 0.13-0.60]; P = .002) and male sex (r = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.19-1.08]; P = .005) associated with higher AL. On adjusted analysis, elevated AL (hazard ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.16-1.79]; P = .001) and low educational level (hazard ratio, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.03-4.34]; P = .04) were associated with worse overall mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that higher AL was associated with adverse SDHs and worse overall mortality among patients with advanced NSCLC. These results provide a framework for replication and further studies of AL as a biological correlate for SDH and future prognostic marker.

Functional Trajectories and Resilience Among Adults With Advanced Lung Cancer.

Introduction: To evaluate whether and the degree to which patients with advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) receiving lung cancer treatments will experience functional disability or have resilience and to identify characteristics associated with functional disability. Methods: We evaluated longitudinal data of patients with aNSCLC receiving treatment in the Beating Lung Cancer in Ohio prospective cohort study. Disability versus resilience in functional status (usual activities, mobility, and self-care) was measured monthly for 8 months using the EuroQol-5D-5L. Data captured included baseline demographics (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status), comorbidities, cancer and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale), and cancer stress (impact of events). Group-based latent class trajectory modeling was used to determine clinically distinct functional disability trajectories jointly with attrition probability (death or withdrawal) in the study period. Results: Among 207 participants, the mean age was 63.5 years (range: 34-92 y), 58.9% were male, 6.8% were African American or Black, 73.3% were former smokers, and 35% resided in rural areas. At baseline, participants had adenocarcinoma histological subtype (74.9%), 40.3% had brain metastases, and 46.1% had bone metastases. Participants received chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (46.9%), immunotherapy single agent (21.7%), targeted treatments (18.8%), or no treatment (12.6%). Three distinct functional trajectory groups were identified, as follows: none/mild (n = 79, 38.2%), moderate (n = 99, 47.8%), and severe disability (n = 29, 14.0%). Characteristics associated with severe disability included baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 1, worse dyspnea and pain, and higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale scores. At month 8, 95 participants (45.9%) displayed resilience, 11 (5.3%) experienced functional decline, and 69 (33.3%) were deceased. Conclusions: We identified three distinct functional trajectories among patients with aNSCLC. Risk stratification tools and targeted interventions designed to target these three groups are needed to improve functional resilience and prevent disability.

Illness perception profiles and psychological and physical symptoms in newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Of all cancers, advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with the highest burden on mental and physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients' subjective beliefs about their cancer (i.e., illness perceptions) may influence coping responses and treatment decisions and affect health. To identify cognitive and emotional perceptions and their association with patient characteristics and illness circumstances, the relationship between illness perception schemas and psychological and physical responses and symptoms were studied. METHOD: Patients newly diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC (N = 186) enrolled in a prospective cohort study (NCT03199651) completed measures of illness perceptions; anxiety, depression, and physical symptoms; and health status. Latent profile analysis identified illness perception profiles. Hierarchical linear regressions tested profile assignment as a correlate of responses and symptoms. RESULTS: A three-profile solution was optimal. Patients with a "struggling" profile (n = 83; 45%) reported the most negative perceptions; patients with a "coping" profile (n = 41; 22%) reported relatively positive perceptions; and patients with a "coping but concerned" profile (n = 62; 33%) endorsed high illness concern but relatively positive perceptions otherwise. Patients with a "struggling" profile reported the highest levels of anxiety and depression symptoms, overall physical symptoms, cough, dyspnea, and pain, and the poorest self-rated health. CONCLUSIONS: New data add to the clinical portrayal of patients coping with NSCLC since the availability of new therapies and survival improvements. Other disease groups have reported a predominance of positive perceptions, rather than ones of significant cognitive and emotional struggles found here. Illness perception data may provide content-rich resources for intervention tailoring. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).