Impact of atrial fibrillation on 1-year outcome in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator: results from the German DEVICE Registry.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac arrhythmia frequently documented in patients requiring implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D). Patients with diagnosed AF at the point of ICD or CRT-D implantation may have an impaired follow-up outcome. Methods: The German DEVICE I-II registry is a nationwide prospective multicentre database of patients implanted with ICD and CRT-D with clinical follow-up data. We analysed a 1-year follow up of implanted patients with AF and with sinus rhythm (SR). Results: A total of 4,929 ICD/CRT patients are included in the present analysis: 946 (19.2%) were in AF and 3,983 (80.8%) were SR at time of device implantation. AF patients had a significantly more comorbid profile including older age {72 [interquartile range (IQR), 66-77] vs. 66 (IQR, 56-73) years; P<0.001}, and higher rate of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (68.2% vs. 61.0%; P<0.001), peripheral artery disease (4.5% vs. 2.7%; P=0.002), diabetes (33.6% vs. 25.5%; P<0.001), hypertension (58.4% vs. 51.1%; P<0.001) and renal failure (22.6% vs. 15.3%; P<0.001). The intra-hospital complication rate was 4.3% in the AF and 3.6% in the SR group (P=0.38). In 1-year follow-up AF patients experienced a significantly higher rate of defibrillator shocks (25% vs. 15.3%; P<0.001). One-year estimated mortality was 10.8% in the AF and 5.9% in the SR group (P<0.001), while estimated 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate was 11.2% vs. 7.0% (P<0.001). The effects of AF on electrical shocks and mortality persisted after adjusting for age, sex, advanced New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic renal failure (CRF), QRS duration, and type of indication for electronic device implantation. Conclusions: Our clinical data on an extended cohort of contemporary patients confirm the significant impact of AF, and its associated comorbidities, upon mortality and major adverse events after implantation of ICD/CRT.

Global Alliance for the Promotion of Physical Activity: the Hamburg Declaration.

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dementia, depression and cancers, are on the rise worldwide and are often associated with a lack of physical activity (PA). Globally, the levels of PA among individuals are below WHO recommendations. A lack of PA can increase morbidity and mortality, worsen the quality of life and increase the economic burden on individuals and society. In response to this trend, numerous organisations came together under one umbrella in Hamburg, Germany, in April 2021 and signed the 'Hamburg Declaration'. This represented an international commitment to take all necessary actions to increase PA and improve the health of individuals to entire communities. Individuals and organisations are working together as the 'Global Alliance for the Promotion of Physical Activity' to drive long-term individual and population-wide behaviour change by collaborating with all stakeholders in the community: active hospitals, physical activity specialists, community services and healthcare providers, all achieving sustainable health goals for their patients/clients. The 'Hamburg Declaration' calls on national and international policymakers to take concrete action to promote daily PA and exercise at a population level and in healthcare settings.

Electrophysiology lab efficiency comparison between cryoballoon and point-by-point radiofrequency ablation: a German sub-analysis of the FREEZE Cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recommended to treat paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This analysis aimed to assess the hospital efficiency of single-shot cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and point-by-point radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: The discrete event simulation used PVI procedure times from the FREEZE Cohort study to establish the electrophysiology (EP) lab occupancy time. 1000 EP lab days were simulated according to an illustrative German hospital, including 3 PVI cases per day using CBA at one site and RFA at the other. RESULTS: The analysis included 1560 CBA patients and 1344 RFA patients from the FREEZE Cohort. Some baseline patients' characteristics were different between groups (age, AF type, and some concomitant diseases), without being statistically associated to ablation procedure time. Mean procedure time was 122.2 ± 39.4 min for CBA and 160.3 ± 53.5 min for RFA (p < 0.0001). RFA was associated with a more than five-fold increase of cumulative overtime compared to CBA over the simulated period (1285 h with RFA and 253 h with CBA). 70.7% of RFA lab days included overtime versus 25.7% for CBA. CBA was associated with more days with an additional hour at the end of the EP lab shift compared to RFA (47.8% vs 11.5% days with one hour left, respectively). CONCLUSION: CBA is faster and more predictable than point-by-point RFA, and enables improvements in EP lab efficiency, including: fewer cumulative overtime hours, more days where overtime is avoided and more days with remaining time for the staff or for any EP lab usage. Clinical trial registration NCT01360008 (first registration 25/05/2011).

Correlation of Walking Activity and Cardiac Hospitalizations in Coronary Patients for 1 Year Post Cardiac Rehabilitation: The More Steps, the Better!

Problem: Reducing risk by improving fitness is one of the main objectives of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). To estimate how the number of steps/day post-CR affects coronary patients' prognosis, we analyzed its correlation with the occurrence of death, hospitalizations, and heart complaints, and if and how other variables (ejection fraction (EF), gender, age) relate to those. Methods: One hundred eleven patients (male = 91, female = 20; average age ± standard deviation (SD): 61 ± 11 years) who had been in CR due to recent coronary revascularization or chronic coronary syndrome could be enrolled. Patients were advised to document their steps (daily), blood pressure (daily), weight (weekly) and occurrences of a cardiac event in a diary for 1 year post-CR. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the influence of steps/day, EF, gender, and age until the occurrence of an event. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare patients' profiles. Results: Average steps/day of patients post-CR were 7333 (SD 4426). Increased walking activity reduced risk for cardiac hospitalization (constant steps/day: 5000 vs 7500, hazard rate (HR) reduction of 0.43; 10 000 vs 12 500, HR reduction of 0.20) and risk was higher in patients with an EF < 55% versus EF ⩾ 55% (HR increase of 2.88). Median follow-up time post-CR was 218 days. No patient died, 25 were hospitalized. Discussion: Monitoring the number of steps of coronary patients post CR could be valuable for estimating patients' prognosis.

Outcomes in patients experiencing complications associated with atrial fibrillation ablation: Data from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to report on the clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with moderate or severe complications. METHODS: The prospective, multicentre German Ablation Registry of patients undergoing catheter ablation was studied to compare outcomes of patients with moderate or severe complications (group I) and patients without or minor complications (group II). RESULTS: A total of 3865 patients (group I = 158, group II = 3707) were included in this analysis. Procedural success (92.4% vs 96.1%, p = 0.019) was lower and arrhythmia recurrence before discharge significantly higher in group I (15.8% vs 6.5%, p < 0.001). Hospital stays were longer in in group I (6 days vs 3 days, p < 0.001). The in-hospital rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke was 6.4% in group I. Age was an independent predictor of in-hospital complications (HR1.43, 95% CI 1.18-1.72). In the 1-year follow-up, the composite outcome of death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding (8.5% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in group I. The majority of patients were still feeling safe during treatment regardless of occurred complications (88.4% vs 94.0%, p = 0.14) and would choose the same centre again in most cases (90.7% vs 92.9%, p = 0.59). Patients reported no or improved symptoms in both cohorts (77.3% vs 78.6%) without significant differences. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular events in patients with severe complications are more common but patient satisfaction and symptomatic relief are high and comparable to those without complications.

Selection and outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy: Comparison of 4384 patients from the German Device Registry to randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Registry data add important information to randomized controlled trials (RCT) on real-life aspects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients with and without cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D). This analysis of the prospectively conducted German Device Registry aims at comparing mortality rates, comorbidities, complication rates to results from RCT. METHODS: The German Device registry (DEVICE) prospectively collected data on ICD and CRT-D first implantations from 50 German centres. Demographic data, details on cardiac disease, electrocardiogram (ECG), medication, and data about procedure, complications, and hospital stay were stored in electronic case report forms. One year after device implantation patients were contacted for follow-up. RESULTS: DEVICE included n = 4384 first ICD/CRT-D implantations (29.3% CRT-D devices). We found a strong adherence to guidelines with over 90% of patients being on ß-blocker and ACE-inhibitor medication and adequate QRS width in the majority of CRT-D patients. Patients receiving a CRT-D were older (67.6 ± 11.0 years vs. 63.9 ± 13.4 years, p < .001) and had lower ejection fractions (mean 25% vs. 30%, p < .001) compared to ICD patients. Dilated cardiomyopathy was the predominant underlying heart disease in CRT-D (53.3%), coronary artery disease in ICD patients (64.7%). Compared to RCT our DEVICE patients had more comorbidities (17.9% chronic kidney disease [CKD]) and higher 1-year mortality rates (10.7% ICD group, 12.3% CRT group). In multivariate analysis, CKD patients had an almost 2-fold higher risk of 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite relevant limitations of registry data, DEVICE highlights important differences between RCT and real-world registry data and the impact of comorbidities on mortality of ICD and CRT-D recipients.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation-Insights from the German Ablation Registry.

Data on the optimal treatment strategy for antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are inconsistent. The present study investigates whether postinterventional AAD leads to an improved long-term outcome. Patients from the prospective German Ablation Registry (n = 3275) discharged with or without AAD after catheter ablation for AF were compared regarding the rates of recurrences, reablations and cardiovascular events as well as patient reported outcomes during 12 months follow-up. In patients with paroxysmal AF (n = 2138) the recurrence rate did not differ when discharged with (n = 1051) or without (n = 1087) AAD (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.95-1.35]). The reablation rate was higher and reduced treatment satisfaction was reported more often in those discharged with AAD (reablation: OR 1.30, 95% CI [1.05-1.61]; reduced treatment satisfaction: OR 1.76, 95% CI [1.20-2.58]). Similar rates of recurrences, reablations and treatment satisfaction were found in patients with persistent AF (n = 1137) discharged with (n = 641) or without (n = 496) AAD (recurrence: OR 1.22, 95% CI [0.95-1.56]; reablation: OR 1.21, 95% CI [0.91-1.61]; treatment satisfaction: OR 1.24, 95% CI [0.74-2.08]). The incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality did not differ at follow-up in patients discharged with or without AAD. In conclusion, the rates of recurrences, cardiovascular events and mortality did not differ between patients discharged with or without AAD after AF catheter ablation. However, AAD should be considered carefully in patients with paroxysmal AF, in whom it was associated with a higher reablation rate and reduced treatment satisfaction. Clinical trial registration: The trial has been registered under the number NCT01197638.

Cardiac glycosides are not associated with increased mortality or hospitalization rates in ICD and CRT-ICD patients after adjustment for baseline-characteristics at one-year follow-up: Results from the German DEVICE registry.

AIMS: Despite lacking supporting randomized trials, cardiac glycosides (CGs) are widely used in heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation. Moreover, several pro- and retrospective studies and registry-data have recently raised serious concerns in terms of efficacy and safety of CGs in this field. We have therefore examined the association between CGs and clinical outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization (CRT-ICD) patients of the large German DEVICE registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2014, 3782 ICD and 1529 CRT-ICD patients were enrolled in the German DEVICE registry. Those two groups were analyzed independently according to medication with or without CGs. After adjustment for patient characteristics, CGs were not significantly associated with increased one-year mortality (HR 1.27, 95%-CI 0.91-1.76, p = 0.162), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR 1.36, 95%-CI 0.98-1.89, p = 0.063), ICD-shocks (OR 1.29, 95%-CI 0.95-1.74, p = 0.104) or the need for rehospitalization in ICD patients at one-year-follow-up. Similar findings were obtained in CRT-ICD patients. Regarding possible determinants for glycoside treatment, atrial fibrillation at enrollment was found to be most strongly associated with the prescription of glycosides in ICD (adjusted OR 3.25, 95%-CI 2.63-4.02) and CRT-ICD patients (adjusted OR 3.17, 95%-CI 2.39-4.19). CONCLUSION: Overall harmful effects of CGs in ICD- and CRT-ICD patients could not be confirmed in DEVICE. Further large and randomized-controlled trials that investigate dose-dependent effects of CGs in addition to contemporary therapy of heart failure and atrial fibrillation are needed.

The impact of basic atrial rhythm during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on clinical outcomes: Lessons from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: The impact of basic atrial rhythm (sinus rhythm [SR] vs. atrial fibrillation [AF]) during AF ablation on efficacy and safety is unknown. METHODS: About 3375 patients from the German Ablation Registry undergoing first-time AF ablation were divided according to the type of AF and the basic atrial rhythm during the ablation procedure: paroxysmal AF (PAF) and SR [group Ia], PAF and AF [group Ib]), persistent AF and SR (IIa), and persistent AF and AF (IIb). RESULTS: Patients in SR (n = 2312 [67%]) underwent cryoballoon ablation more often (Ia vs. Ib p = .002 and IIa vs. IIb p = .010, whereas in patients in AF (n = 1063 [33%]) radiofrequency (RF)-based ablation (Ia vs. Ib p = .006 and IIa vs. IIb p = .014) including left and/or right atrial substrate modification was more frequently performed. Depending on the basic rhythm there was no difference regarding arrhythmia recurrence during long-term follow-up. For patients suffering from persistent AF acute procedure-related complications were more often documented when ablated in AF (9.1% vs. 4.6%, p = .012). which was mainly driven by the higher occurrence of pericardial effusion/tamponade. For patients suffering from persistent AF, favorable results were found regarding 366-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence of MACCE (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke; p = .011) and the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding (p = .006), when ablated in SR. CONCLUSION: Basic atrial rhythm at the time of AF ablation did not affect long-term rhythm outcome. For patients suffering from persistent AF a more favorable acute and long-term safety profile was observed when ablated in SR.

Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: The CASTLE-AF Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This subanalysis of the CASTLE-AF (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF) trial aimed to address the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, AF burden, and hard clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with AF. BACKGROUND: The CASTLE-AF trial demonstrated the benefit of CA compared to pharmacological treatment in decreasing mortality and CV hospitalizations in patients with AF and HFrEF. However, the impact of AF recurrence and AF burden after ablation on long-term treatment benefit remains unknown. METHODS: The CASTLE-AF protocol randomized 363 patients with coexisting HF and AF in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to catheter ablation (n = 179) versus pharmacological therapy (n = 184). Two hundred eighty patients were included in this subanalysis (as-treated), 128 of them underwent ablation and 152 received pharmacological treatment. All patients had implanted dual chamber or biventricular implantable defibrillators with activated home monitoring capabilities. The individual AF burden was calculated as the percentage of the atrial arrhythmia time per day. RESULTS: AF burden at baseline was not predictive of the primary endpoint (p = 0.473) or all-cause mortality (p = 0.446). AF recurrence (defined as any episode >30 s) did not show any relationship with the primary endpoints of mortality and occurrence of HF, irrespective of the treatment arm. An AF burden below 50% after 6 months of catheter ablation, was associated with a significant decrease in primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15 to 0.71; p = 0.014) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.71; p = 0.031). The risk of the primary endpoint or mortality was directly related to a low (<50%) or high (≥50%) AF burden at 6 months post-ablation. CONCLUSIONS: AF burden at 6 months was predictive of hard clinical outcomes in HF patients with AF. The first recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia episode >30 s after ablation was not associated with improvement in mortality and hospitalization for HF. (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF [CASTLE-AF]; NCT00643188).

Efficacy and complications of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation in patients with and without structural heart disease: results from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: The impact of structural heart disease (SHD) on safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (AFLU) is unclear. In addition, recent data suggest a higher complication rate of AFLU ablation compared to the more complex atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within our prospective multicenter registry, 3526 consecutive patients underwent AFLU ablation at 49 German electrophysiological centers from 2007 to 2010. For the present analysis, the patients were divided into a group with SHD (n = 2164 [61.4%]; median age 69 years; 78.5% male) and a group without SHD (n = 1362 [38.6%]; 65 years; 70.3% male). In our study, SHD mainly encompasses coronary artery disease (52.6%), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 50% (47.6%), and hypertensive heart disease (28.0%). The primary ablation success (97%) and the incidence of major (0.2%) or moderate (1.2%) complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 1.0 and 0.87, respectively). Vascular access site complications (0.6%), AV block III° (0.2%), and bleeding (≥ BARC II: 0.2%) were most common. After a median 562 days of follow-up, we observed a 2.92-fold higher one-year mortality (P < 0.0001) in patients with SHD. Patients' satisfaction with the ablation therapy (72.0% satisfied) was close to the overall subjective tachyarrhythmia-free rate (70.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis demonstrates that ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent AFLU in patients with SHD has a comparable, excellent risk-benefit profile in our large "real-world" registry. Mortality rates expectedly are higher in patients with SHD and AFLU compared to patients without SHD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01197638, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01197638.

Outcomes of ablation in Wolff-Parkinson-White-syndrome: Data from the German Ablation Registry.

AIMS: Catheter ablation is recommended for symptomatic WPW-syndrome. Commonly perceived low recurrence rates were challenged recently. We sought to identify patient strata at increased risk. METHOD: Of 12,566 patients enrolled at 52 German Ablation Registry sites from 2007 to 2010, 789 were treated for WPW-syndrome. Patients were included for symptomatic palpitations and tachycardia documentation. Follow-up duration was one year. Overall complications were defined as serious, access-related, and ablation-related. We adjudicated WPW-recurrence for re-ablation during follow-up. Risk strata included: admission for repeat ablation at registry entry; accessory pathway localization; antiarrhythmic medical treatment before the ablation. RESULTS: WPW-syndrome patients were 42.8 ± 16.2 years on average; 39.9% were women. A majority of 95.9% was symptomatic; in 84.4%, a tachycardia was documented. Seventy-six (9.6%) patients presented for repeat procedures. Accessory pathways were located in the left atrium (71.4%), right atrium (21.1%), septum (4.4%), or coronary sinus diverticula (2.1%). Prior antiarrhythmic medication was used in 43.7% of patients. No serious events occurred. The overall complication rate was 2.5% (ablation related 1.2%, access-related 1.3%). Major determinants for complications were presentation for re-ablation as registry index procedure (6.9% vs 2.2%; p = 0.016) and septal pathway location (left 2.0% vs septal 9.1%, p = 0.014). The overall re-ablation rate was 9.7%. Usage of prior antiarrhythmic medication was associated with higher recurrence rates (12.2% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at higher complication risk may be identified by repeat procedure and septal pathway location. Prior antiarrhythmic medication was associated with higher recurrence rates. Our findings may help improving peri-procedural patient management and information.

Distribution and impact of age in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators regarding early complications and 1-year clinical outcome: results from the German Device Registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving implantable-cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in clinical practice are often older or younger than in clinical trials. Whether older patients benefit from ICD-therapy in a similar way as younger patients is under debate. The objective of this study was to provide real-world data regarding outcomes with respect to age in a large cohort in the German Device Registry. METHODS: Within the registry data from 50 German centers were collected between January 2007 and February 2014. RESULTS: Our analysis included 3239 ICD patients representing a group of young (28%; group I: < 58 years), intermediate aged (50%; group II: 58-74 years), and elderly patients (22%; group III: 75-92 years). Intergroup comparison of all groups was performed followed by individual comparison vs. group II serving as age-reference group. Procedure-related complications did not differ between all groups. Analysis of the primary endpoint, 1-year all-cause mortality, revealed an increased mortality in the elderly and a decreased mortality in the young cohort vs. the reference group II (group I 2.1%, group II 6.2%, group III 13.2%; p < 0.001). While all-cause rehospitalizations did not differ, we observed a difference in reported device revisions showing more device revisions required in younger patients (group I 8.9%, group II 6.8%, group III 4.0%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One-year mortality was doubled in elderly ICD patients probably due to non-cardiac causes. These results further underpin the need for re-evaluating the primary prevention ICD indication in octo- and nonagenarians. Young patients show lower mortality rates but seem to bear higher risk of device-related complications, which highlights the need for improved measures to reduce device-related complications in the young.

Safety and patient-reported outcomes in index ablation versus repeat ablation in atrial fibrillation: insights from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation is an established strategy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in a significant number of patients, a repeat procedure is mandatory due to arrhythmia recurrence. In this study, we report safety data and procedural details of patients undergoing index ablation versus repeat ablation in a registry-based real-life setting. METHODS: Patients from the German Ablation Registry, a prospective, multicentre registry of patients undergoing ablation between January 2007 and January 2010 were included. RESULTS: A total of 4155 patients were enrolled in the study. Group I (index ablation) consisted of 3377/4155 (82.1%) and group II (repeat ablation) of 738/4155 (17.9%). Patients in group I had a significantly higher ratio of paroxysmal AF (69.3% vs 61.9%, p < 0.001) and significantly less persistent AF (30.7% vs 38.1%, p < 0.001). The repeat group showed significantly lower mean RF application duration (2580 s. vs 1960, p < 0.001), less fluoroscopy time (29 min. vs. 27 min., p < 0.001), less mean dose area product (DAP) (3744 cGy × cm2 vs 3325 cGy × cm2, p = 0.001), and shorter study duration (181.2 min. vs 163.6 min., p < 0.001). No statistical difference between the groups was found in terms of mortality (0.3% vs 0.1%, p = 0.39), MACE (0.4% vs 0.3%, p = 0.58), MACCE (0.8% vs 0.6%, p = 0.47), composite safety endpoint (1.5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.76), and arrhythmia recurrence (43.8% vs 41.9%, p = 0.37) during 1-year follow-up. Both groups reported to have improved or no symptoms (80.4% vs 77.8%, p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Repeat catheter ablation is safe and provides a symptomatic relief comparable to index ablation. Repeat procedures are significantly shorter and use less fluoroscopy.

Impact of Left Ventricular Function and Heart Failure Symptoms on Outcomes Post Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: CASTLE-AF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent data demonstrate promising effects on left ventricular dysfunction and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement following ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure. We sought to study the relationship between LVEF, New York Heart Association class on presentation, and the end points of mortality and heart failure admissions in the CASTLE-AF study (Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure) population. Furthermore, predictors for LVEF improvement were examined. METHODS: The CASTLE-AF patients with coexisting heart failure and AF (n=363) were randomized in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to ablation (n=179) versus pharmacological therapy (n=184). Left ventricular function and New York Heart Association class were assessed at baseline (after randomization) and at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: In the ablation arm, a significantly higher number of patients experienced an improvement in their LVEF to >35% at the end of the study (odds ratio, 2.17; P<0.001). Compared with the pharmacological therapy arm, both ablation patient groups with severe (<20%) or moderate/severe (≥20% and <35%) baseline LVEF had a significantly lower number of composite end points (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; P=0.006), all-cause mortality (HR, 0.54; P=0.019), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (HR, 0.66; P=0.017). In the ablation group, New York Heart Association I/II patients at the time of treatment had the strongest improvement in clinical outcomes (primary end point: HR, 0.43; P<0.001; mortality: HR, 0.30; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with pharmacological treatment, AF ablation was associated with a significant improvement in LVEF, independent from the severity of left ventricular dysfunction. AF ablation should be performed at early stages of the patient's heart failure symptoms.

Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Hypertension-An Analysis from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN) constitutes a risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), as well as for thromboembolic and bleeding events. We analysed the outcome after catheter ablation of AF in HTN in a cohort from the prospective multicenter German Ablation Registry. METHODS: Between 03/2008 and 01/2010, 626 patients undergoing AF-ablation were analysed. Patients diagnosed with HTN (n = 386) were compared with patients without HTN (n = 240) with respect to baseline, procedural and long-term outcome parameters. RESULTS: Patients with HTN were older and more often presented with persistent forms of AF and cardiac comorbidities. Major and moderate in-hospital complications were low. At long-term follow-up, major cardiovascular events were rare in both groups. Rates of AF-recurrence, freedom from antiarrhythmic medication and repeat ablation were not statistically different between groups. Most patients reported improvement of symptoms and satisfaction with the treatment. However, patients with HTN more frequently complained of dyspnea of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ II and angina. They were more often rehospitalized, particularly when persistent AF had been diagnosed. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of AF is associated with low complication rates and favorable arrhythmia-related results in patients with HTN. Residual clinical symptoms may be due to cardiac comorbidities and require additional attention in this important subgroup of AF-patients.

Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome of patients with heart failure undergoing ICD and CRT procedures: results from the German Device Registry.

AIMS: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has a negative impact on prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The role impact of DM in HF patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices might differ and remains unclear. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of DM on periprocedural complications and clinical outcome in HF patients undergoing ICD or CRT implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within the German Device Registry, data from 50 German centres were collected between January 2007 and February 2014. A retrospective analysis of n = 5329 patients undergoing ICD implantation was conducted. Patients' characteristics, procedural data, periprocedural complications, and post-procedural clinical outcome, including a composite clinical endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MACCE), were analysed. Subgroup analysis were performed for ICD and CRT implantations. Median follow-up was 15.7 (12.9; 20.0) and 16.2 (12.8; 21.2) months in DM and non-DM patients. Of 5329 patients enrolled, n = 1448 (27.2%) had a diagnosis of DM. Within the cohort, 94% of DM and 90% of non-DM patients had a diagnosis of HF. Patients with DM were older, had higher body mass index, and higher rate of cardiovascular comorbidities compared with non-DM patients. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses revealed similar all-over intrahospital periprocedural complication rates in both groups (4.1% vs 3.9%). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed higher all-cause mortality after 1 year (9.0% vs 6.3%; log-rank P = 0.001) with higher MACCE rates (10.0% vs 7.3%; P < 0.001) in the DM group versus non-DM patients. After multivariable adjustment for relevant covariates, the association of DM to MACCE disappeared [HR 1.11 (0.89-1.38)]. Because chronic kidney disease (CKD) was clearly associated with increased 1 year MACCE after multivariate adjustment [odds ratio (OR) 2.11 (1.68-2.64)], a subgroup analysis was performed showing a strong trend towards more perioperative complications in DM patients with CKD [OR 2.16 (0.9-5.21)], while no effect of DM was observed in patients without CKD [OR 0.73 (0.42-1.28)]. CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of periprocedural complications and short-term (1 year) clinical outcome in patients with DM and HF undergoing ICD or CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation was not increased. In contrast, CKD was associated with an increased risk of 1 year MACCE in HF patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D implantation.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with electrical heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: data from the German device registry.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter- defibrillator (ICD) therapy is established for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in different entities. However, data from large patient cohorts with electrical heart disease are rare. Therefore, we investigated these patients as well as patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by analyzing registry data from a multi-center 'real-life' registry. METHODS: The German Device Registry (DEVICE) is a nationwide, prospective registry with one-year follow-up investigating 5450 patients receiving device implantations in 50 German centers. The present analysis of DEVICE focussed on patients with electrical heart disease or HCM who received an ICD for primary or secondary prevention. RESULTS: 174 patients with HCM and 112 patients with electrical heart disease (long-QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy) were compared with 5164 other ICD patients. Median follow-up was 17.0 months. Patients in the control group were significantly older. Of note, overall mortality after 1 year was 1.8% in HCM patients, 6.6% in patients with electrical heart disease and 7.3% in the control group. Patients in the control group presented significantly more severe comorbidities. In contrast to HCM patients and the control group where primary prevention was the major indication for ICD implantation, 77.5% of patients with electrical heart disease received an ICD for secondary prevention. The number of surgical revisions was higher in patients with electrical heart disease. CONCLUSION: Data from the present registry display a surprisingly high mortality in patients with electrical heart disease equivalent to the control group. A high proportion of patients who received an ICD for secondary prevention may be regarded as a major determinant for these results, while severe comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and renal failure are major determinants for mortality in the control cohort.

Symptomatic arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT): results from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: In atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), catheter ablation is considered as first-line therapy. Despite high success rates, some patients present with arrhythmia recurrence or develop other types of arrhythmias over time. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of symptomatic arrhythmias after initially successful AVNRT ablation and to analyze their clinical implications in a real-world cohort. METHODS: We included 2,795 patients from the German Ablation Registry undergoing first ablation of AVNRT between 01/2007 and 01/2010. In patients alive at long-term follow-up, patient-specific characteristics and long-term follow-up data were compared between patients with (group A) and without (group B) any symptomatic arrhythmia during follow-up. RESULTS: Symptomatic arrhythmias occurred in 17.2% of patients during a mean follow-up of 678 days after AVNRT ablation. The patients with symptomatic arrhythmias were more often female and suffered from structural heart disease. Arrhythmia occurrence was clinically relevant regarding symptoms and patient satisfaction. Serious adverse events including stroke, transient ischemic attack, pacemaker implantation, as well as continued use of antiarrhythmic medication occurred more often in group A. A second ablation procedure was performed in 26% of symptomatic patients to optimize the symptomatic outcome, whereas cardiovascular events or patient satisfaction were not further improved. CONCLUSION: During long-term follow-up, one out of six patients experienced symptomatic arrhythmias after AVNRT ablation, associated with an increase of serious adverse events. A subset of patients required medical or interventional antiarrhythmic therapy, possibly attributable to the co-existence of other arrhythmias. Screening for arrhythmic and cardiac co-morbidity before and after ablation may support comprehensive therapy planning and outcome.