Effective and Successful Control of Symptomatic Vertebral Hemangiomas With Epidural Extension Using Stereotactic Spine Radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We present our experience in the management of symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas with epidural extension (SVHEE) using spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS). METHODS: An Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of all SVHEE patients treated with SSRS at our institution (2007-2022) was performed. Baseline patient demographics, clinical presentation, lesion volume, and Bilsky grade (to directly evaluate the epidural component) were determined. Clinical and radiographic response and treatment outcomes were subsequently evaluated at first (∼6 months) and final follow-up. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with SVHEE underwent SSRS (16-18 Gy/1-fraction); the mean follow-up was 24 months. The median lesion volume (cc) was 36.9 (range: 7.02-94.1), 31.5 (range: 6.53-69.7), and 25.15 (range: 6.01-52.5) at pre-SSRS, first, and final follow-up, respectively. Overall volume reduction was seen in the last follow-up in all 14 patients, median 29.01% (range: 6.58%-71.58%). Bilsky score was stable or improved in all patients at the last follow-up when compared with pre-SSRS score. Patients who underwent both surgical decompression and SSRS (n = 9): 8 had improved myelopathic symptoms and pain and 1 had stable radiculopathy postintervention. In the 5 patients treated with SSRS monotherapy, 2 had stable radicular pain and the other 3 improved pain and numbness. No patients experienced adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this represents the largest series of SVHEE patients treated with SSRS, either as monotherapy or part of a multimodal/separation surgery treatment approach. We demonstrate that SSRS represents a potentially safe and effective treatment option in these patients. However, larger prospective studies and longer follow-ups are necessary to further assess the role, durability, and toxicity of SSRS in the management of these patients.

Phase I trial of dose escalation for preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with large brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Single session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical resection alone for brain metastases larger than 2 cm results in unsatisfactory local control. We conducted a phase I trial for brain metastases(>2cm) to determine the safety of preoperative SRS at escalating doses. METHODS: Radiosurgery dose was escalated at 3 Gy increments for 3 cohorts based on maximum tumor dimension starting at: 18 Gy for >2-3 cm, 15 Gy for >3-4 cm, and 12 Gy for >4-6 cm. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade III or greater acute toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients/36 lesions were enrolled. For tumor size >2-3 cm, patients were enrolled up to the second dose level (21 Gy); for >3-4 cm and >4-6 cm cohorts the third dose level (21 Gy and 18 Gy, respectively) was reached. There were 2 DLTs in the >3-4 cm arm at 21Gy. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SRS for >2-3 cm was not reached; and was 18 Gy for both >3-4 cm arm and >4-6 cm arm. With a median follow-up of 64.0 months, the 6- and 12-month local control rates were 85.9% and 76.6%, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 radiation necrosis at 5 months. The 2-year rate of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was 0%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative SRS with dose escalation followed by surgical resection for brain metastases greater than 2 cm in size demonstrates acceptable acute toxicity. The phase II portion of the trial will be conducted at the maximum tolerated SRS doses.

Clinical presentation and extent of resection impacts progression-free survival in spinal ependymomas.

PURPOSE: Primary treatment of spinal ependymomas involves surgical resection, however recurrence ranges between 50 and 70%. While the association of survival outcomes with lesion extent of resection (EOR) has been studied, existing analyses are limited by small samples and archaic data resulting in an inhomogeneous population. We investigated the relationship between EOR and survival outcomes, chiefly overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), in a large contemporary cohort of spinal ependymoma patients. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with a spinal ependymoma from 2006 to 2021 were identified from an institutional registry. Patients undergoing primary surgical resection at our institution, ≥ 1 routine follow-up MRI, and pathologic diagnosis of ependymoma were included. Records were reviewed for demographic information, EOR, lesion characteristics, and pre-/post-operative neurologic symptoms. EOR was divided into 2 classifications: gross total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR). Log-rank test was used to compare OS and PFS between patient groups. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients satisfied inclusion criteria, with 79.7% benefitting from GTR. The population was 56.2% male with average age of 45.7 years, and median follow-up duration of 58 months. Cox multivariate model demonstrated significant improvement in PFS when a GTR was attained (p <.001). Independently ambulatory patients prior to surgery had superior PFS (p <.001) and OS (p =.05). In univariate analyses, patients with a syrinx had improved PFS (p =.03) and were more likely to benefit from GTR (p =.01). Alternatively, OS was not affected by EOR (p =.78). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, contemporary series of adult spinal ependymoma patients, we demonstrated improvements in PFS when GTR was achieved.