RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Critical thinking and accurate case analysis is difficult to quantify even within the context of routine morbidity and mortality reporting. We designed and implemented a HIPAA-compliant adverse outcome reporting system that collects weekly resident assessments of clinical care across multiple domains (case summary, complications, error analysis, Clavien-Dindo Harm, cognitive bias, standard of care, and ACGME core competencies). We hypothesized that incorporation of this system into the residency program's core curriculum would allow for identification of areas of cognitive weakness or strength and provide a longitudinal evaluation of critical thinking development. DESIGN: A validated, password-protected electronic platform linked to our electronic medical record was used to collect cases weekly in which surgical adverse events occurred. General surgery residents critiqued 1932 cases over a 4-year period from 3 major medical centers within our system. These data were reviewed by teaching faculty, corrected for accuracy and graded utilizing the software's critique algorithm. Grades were emailed to the residents at the time of the review, collected prospectively, stratified, and analyzed by post-graduate year (PGY). Evaluation of the resident scores for each domain and the resultant composite scores allowed for comparison of critical thinking skills across post-graduate year (PGY) over time. SETTING: Data was collected from 3 independently ACGME-accredited surgery residency programs over 3 tertiary hospitals within our health system. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents in clinical PGY 1-5. RESULTS: Residents scored highest in properly identifying ACGME core competencies and determining Clavien-Dindo scores (p < 0.006) with no improvement in providing accurate and concise clinical summaries. However, residents improved in recording data sufficient to identify error (p < 0.00001). A positive linear trend in median scores for all remaining domains except for cognitive bias was demonstrated (p < 0.001). Senior residents scored significantly higher than junior residents in all domains. Scores > 90% were never achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an electronic standardized critique algorithm in the evaluation and assessment of adverse surgical case outcomes enabled the measure of residents' critical thinking skills. Feedback in the form of teaching faculty-facilitated discussion and emailed grades enhanced adult learning with a steady improvement in performance over PGY. Although residents improved with PGY, the data suggest that further improvement in all categories is possible. Implementing this standardized critique algorithm across PGY allows for evaluation of areas of individual resident weakness vs. strength, progression over time, and comparisons to peers. These data suggest that routine complication reporting may be enhanced as a critical thinking assessment tool and that improvement in critical thinking can be quantified. Incorporation of this platform into M&M conference has the potential to augment executive function and professional identity development.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Cirurgia Geral , Internato e Residência , Pensamento , Internato e Residência/métodos , Humanos , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Adulto , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Currículo , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Avaliação Educacional/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: With increased social isolation due to COVID-19, social media has been increasingly adopted for communication, education, and entertainment. We sought to understand the frequency and characteristics of social media usage among general surgery trainees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: General surgery trainees in 15 American training programs were invited to participate in an anonymous electronic survey. The survey included questions about demographics, frequency of social media usage, and perceptions of risks and benefits of social media. Univariate analysis was performed to identify differences between high users of social media (4-7 h per week on at least one platform) and low users (0-3 h or less on all platforms). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven of 591 (26.6%) trainees completed the survey. Most respondents were PGY3 or lower (75%) and high users of social media (74.5%). Among high users, the most popular platforms were Instagram (85.7%), YouTube (85.1%), and Facebook (83.6%). YouTube and Twitter were popular for surgical education (77.3% and 68.2%, respectively). The most reported benefits of social media were improving patient education and professional networking (85.0%), where high users agreed more strongly about these benefits (P = 0.002). The most reported risks were seeing other residents (42%) or attendings (17%) with unprofessional behavior. High users disagreed more strongly about risks, including observing attendings with unprofessional behavior (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents were high users of social media, particularly Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook. High users incorporated social media into their surgical education while perceiving more benefits and fewer risks of social media.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Mídias Sociais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Comunicação , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Burnout affects surgical residents' well-being. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify factors associated with burnout among surgery residents. METHODS: An electronic/anonymous survey was sent to surgical residents at 18 programs, consisting of demographic/programmatic questions and validated scales for burnout, depression, perceived stress, self-efficacy, and social support. Residents were grouped into quartiles based off burnout, and predictors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: 42% of residents surveyed completed it. Burnout was associated with depression, higher perceived stress/debt, fewer weekends off, less programmatic social events, and residents were less likely to reconsider surgery if given the chance. Low burnout was associated with lower depression/stress, higher social support/self-efficacy, more weekends off per month, program mentorship, lower debt, and residents being more likely to choose surgery again if given the chance. On multivariate analysis, higher depression/perceived stress were associated with burnout, and lower burnout scores were associated with lower stress/higher self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Burnout in surgery residents is associated with higher levels of depression and perceived stress. The addition of programmatic social events, limiting weekend work, and formal mentoring programs may decrease burnout.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Esgotamento Profissional/complicações , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Depressão/complicações , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência , Estresse Ocupacional/complicações , Estresse Ocupacional/psicologia , Autoeficácia , Apoio Social , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is used by programs to evaluate the knowledge and readiness of trainees to sit for the general surgery qualifying examination. It is often used as a tool for resident promotion and may be used by fellowship programs to evaluate candidates. Burnout has been associated with job performance and satisfaction; however, its presence and effects on surgical trainees' performance are not well studied. We sought to understand factors including burnout and study habits that may contribute to performance on the ABSITE examination. METHODS: Anonymous electronic surveys were distributed to all residents at 10 surgical residency programs (n = 326). Questions included demographics as well as study habits, career interests, residency characteristics, and burnout scores using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, which assesses burnout because of both exhaustion and disengagement. These surveys were then linked to the individual's 2016 ABSITE and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 and 2 scores provided by the programs to determine factors associated with successful ABSITE performance. RESULTS: In total, 48% (n = 157) of the residents completed the survey. Of those completing the survey, 48 (31%) scored in the highest ABSITE quartile (≥75th percentile) and 109 (69%) scored less than the 75th percentile. In univariate analyses, those in the highest ABSITE quartile had significantly higher USMLE step 1 and step 2 scores (P < 0.001), significantly lower burnout scores (disengagement, P < 0.01; exhaustion, P < 0.04), and held opinions that the ABSITE was important for improving their surgical knowledge (P < 0.01). They also read more frequently to prepare for the ABSITE (P < 0.001), had more disciplined study habits (P < 0.001), were more likely to study at the hospital or other public settings (e.g., library, coffee shop compared with at home; P < 0.04), and used active rather than passive study strategies (P < 0.04). Gender, marital status, having children, and debt burden had no correlation with examination success. Backward stepwise multiple regression analysis identified the following independent predictors of ABSITE scores: study location (P < 0.0001), frequency of reading (P = 0.0001), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory exhaustion (P = 0.02), and USMLE step 1 and 2 scores (P = 0.007 and 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Residents who perform higher on the ABSITE have a regular study schedule throughout the year, report less burnout because of exhaustion, study away from home, and have shown success in prior standardized tests. Further study is needed to determine the effects of burnout on clinical duties, career advancement, and satisfaction.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Avaliação Educacional , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Habilidades para Realização de Testes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The process of taking a research project from conception to publication is one way to encourage surgeons to communicate hypothesis, critically assess literature and data, and defend research conclusions to a broad audience. The goal of this study was to define surgery resident publishing epidemiology and identify characteristics of residents and residency programs that might predict increased publication productivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was administered to eight general surgery residency programs to collect residency and resident variables from 1993-2013. The primary endpoint was the number of first-author publications produced per resident. Secondary endpoints included clinical setting at which the former resident was practicing, fellowship pursued, and manuscript quality. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 2013, 676 residents graduated, median age was 33 years (range: 29-43 years) and 182 (27%) were female. Three hundred and sixty-six (54%) residents produced 1229 first-author publications. Of these, 112 (31%) residents produced one manuscript, 125 (34%) produced two-three manuscripts, 107 (29%) produced four-nine manuscripts, and 22 (6%) produced 10 or more manuscripts. Publishing ≥1 manuscript in residency was associated with a 1.5 (P = 0.01) increased odds of having attended a top-tier research institution for medical school and a 2.3 (P < 0.001) increased odds of having dedicated research years incorporated into residency. Surgeons practicing at academic centers had 1.7 (P = 0.003) greater odds of having attended top-tier medical schools, and 1.5 (P = 0.02) greater odds of publishing during residency. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research directed at identifying interventions promoting resident publishing and scholastic achievement should benefit all surgery training programs looking to cultivate the next generation of critically thinking surgeons.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência , Editoração/tendências , Adulto , Autoria , Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Editoração/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Pruritus ani is a common condition with many different potential causes. Because of this, it can be difficult to treat. It is important to identify and eliminate any inciting factors, which are often unintentional consequences of the patient's attempts to alleviate symptoms. If no reversible cause is found, simple measures with diet modification and perianal hygiene are tried before using topical medications or procedures.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: We have previously shown that plasma from open, but not laparoscopic-assisted, surgery patients has increased mitogenic activity for colon cancer cells. Decreased insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 levels, most likely the result of an open surgery-induced proteolytic activity, may account for this finding. Plasma proteases are activated by interleukin-6. This study was designed to investigate plasma insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 and interleukin-6 levels after major open or laparoscopic-assisted surgery. METHODS: EDTA plasma was obtained from 24 patients undergoing resection for colonic adenocarcinoma. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 was detected by Western blot analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Interleukin-6 levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The effect of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 on tumor growth was tested using HCT116 cells. RESULTS: In patients undergoing open surgery, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay revealed a significant decrease in total insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 levels on postoperative Day 1 (915.6 +/- 378.5 ng/ml) compared with preoperative levels (1267.5 +/- 407.9 ng/ml; P < 0.001). Western blots revealed a decrease in the levels of intact insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3. In patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted surgery, levels of total and intact insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 before surgery (1088.9 +/- 232.5 ng/ml) and on postoperative Day 1 (1,202.3 +/- 285.6 ng/ml) were comparable with no significant changes in Western blot analysis. Interleukin-6 levels were undetectable preoperatively. On postoperative Day 1, interleukin-6 concentration was higher in open surgery group (434.8 +/- 506.6 pg/ml) compared with laparoscopic-assisted surgery group (100.9 +/- 60.2 pg/ml; P < 0.0001), and correlated significantly with a decrease in plasma insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 after open surgery (r = 0.81; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A significant decrease in both total and free insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 occurs after open but not laparoscopic colectomy. There is an associated increase in the levels of interleukin-6. It remains to be proven that the interleukin-6 elevations are responsible for the low insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 level seen after open surgery.