Chronic Pelvic Pain: Neurogenic or Non-Neurogenic? Warm Detection Threshold Testing Supports a Diagnosis of Pudendal Neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in men is rarely considered to have a neurogenic (neuropathic) basis. Separation of neurogenic from non-neurogenic pain is possible using clinical examination and neurophysiologic tests. A definite diagnosis of neuropathic pain can be made. OBJECTIVES: We aim to demonstrate that definite pudendal neuropathic abnormalities can be supported by a quantitative sensory test (QST) called the warm temperature threshold detection (WDT) test in men with CPP. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of 25 consecutive, unrecruited men evaluated in a private clinical practice beginning on January 1, 2010. The techniques of examination and neurophysiological testing have been standard since 2003. SETTING: A private practice that is a referral center because of its focus on CPP of a neuropathic basis. METHODS: Pinprick sensation was evaluated at 6 sites in the pudendal nerve territory (3 branches on each side). A WDT was performed at each nerve branch using a Physitemp NTE-2C Thermoprobe and Controller. This used a stepping algorithm from a neutral baseline of 31.5°C. Quantitative and subjective "qualitative responses" were recorded. Our preferred symptom score to evaluate pain level at consultation is the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). The results become the benchmark for comparison of responses following future treatments (not discussed). When possible, microscopy was used to evaluate prostate secretions for inflammatory prostatitis except in 2 men with CPP who had undergone previous radical prostatectomy for cancer. Observations were made of the skin in the pudendal territory. Our specific evaluation for neuropathy also sought evidence of multiple additional neuropathic pelvic pain generators. RESULTS: The WDT was abnormal in all men (88% quantitative), and pinprick sensation was abnormal in 92% of the men. The combination of tests provided a diagnosis of pudendal neuropathy in all patients, resulting in an accurate and timely explanation of the neurogenic basis of their CPP symptoms. The NIH-CPSI scores ranged from 10 to 35 (median 25). Four of 15 men had inflammatory prostatitis in addition to pudendal neuropathy. LIMITATIONS: There is selection bias because the men were either self-referred, suspecting their diagnosis from internet searches, or were referred by physicians who were aware of the focus of this clinical practice. The warm temperature testing used established normal values for the men. The NIH-CPSI does not evaluate sexual or bowel symptoms. Sensitivity or specificity values for the tests could not be obtained. CONCLUSIONS: A possible neuropathic basis for CPP in men can be suspected from symptoms and history of activities. A probable diagnosis of neuropathy can be determined using a pinprick sensory evaluation in the pudendal territory. A definite diagnosis of pudendal neuropathy can be made using WDT. The combination of these 2 examinations demonstrated pudendal neuropathy in 100% of this cohort.The institutional review board deemed this study met criteria for exemption. KEY WORDS: Chronic pelvic pain, pudendal neuropathy, quantitative sensory testing, warm temperature detection threshold test, neuropathic pelvic pain, definite diagnosis of neuropathy, chronic prostatitis.

Measuring the Quality of Pudendal Nerve Perineural Injections.

BACKGROUND: Pudendal neuropathy is a tunnel syndrome characterized by pelvic pain and may include bowel, bladder, or sexual dysfunction or a combination of these. One treatment method, pudendal nerve perineural injections (PNPIs), uses infiltration of bupivacaine and corticosteroid around the nerve to provide symptom relief. Bupivacaine also anesthetizes the skin in the receptive field of the nerve that is injected. Bupivacaine offers rapid pain relief for several hours while corticosteroid provides delayed pain control often lasting 3 to 5 weeks. Not all pudendal nerve blocks may provide complete pain relief but long-term pain control from the steroid appears to be associated with immediate response to bupivacaine. We offer a method of evaluating the quality of a pudendal block on the day it is performed using pinprick sensation evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that pinprick sensory changes provide a simple and rapid method of measuring response to local anesthetic and pain reduction provided by a PNPI on the day it is performed. This response defines the quality of each PNPI. STUDY DESIGN: This is a case series based on retrospective review of a private practice database that is maintained by HealthEast hospitals in Minnesota. Database information includes standard physical examination, recording techniques, and treatment processes that had been in place for several years. SETTING: Private practice in United States. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of pudendal neuropathy are treated with PNPIs. Two hours after each block, 2 endpoints are measured: response to a sensory pinprick examination of the pudendal territory and difference in patient-reported pain level before and after nerve block. Fifty-three men from a private practice treating only pelvic pain received the treatment in 2005. Reported pain level was not recorded for 2 patients. RESULTS: Bupivacaine in perineural injections produces varying degrees of analgesia or hypalgesia to pinprick. Normal pinprick response suggests pudendal nerves were not penetrated by bupivacaine. Patient responses varied from complete, i.e. all 6 branches anesthetized to none. Most men had 2 - 5 nerve branches anesthetized. One man had a single nerve branch that responded to bupivacaine. Three men failed to respond to local anesthetic.Changes in pre-PNPI to post-PNPI pain scores were significantly decreased (n = 51, P-value < 0.0001), indicating that bupivacaine in the PNPI reduced pain. Forty-one patients (80.4%) indicated less pain after the procedure and only 2 patients (4.0%) indicated more pain. The number of nerve branches successfully anesthetized was also significantly correlated with change in score. On average, an additional successful nerve branch anesthetized corresponded to a drop of about 0.66 in the change score (n = 51, P - value = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: PNPIs relieve pain. Anesthesia affected all 6 pudendal nerve branches in only 13.2% of patients. Complete pain relief occurred in 39.2%. This argues against use of perineural pudendal blockade as a diagnostic test. Pain relief after PNPI is associated with number of nerve branches that are anesthetized. At 2 hours after a PNPI its quality (the number of the 6 nerve branches with reduced response to pinprick from the perineural local anesthetic) is associated with subjective reduction of pain. KEY WORDS: Pudendal neuralgia, chronic perineal pain, pudendal nerve block, sensory examination, neurologic examination, pain management, chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Therapeutic pudendal nerve blocks using corticosteroids cure pelvic pain after failure of sacral neuromodulation.

A patient with bladder frequency and urgency associated with pelvic pain had no control of symptoms by previous bladder distention, hysterectomy, or sacral nerve root stimulator. A clinical and neurophysiological diagnosis of pudendal neuropathy was made. Treatment with a nerve protection program and pudendal nerve perineural injections of local anesthetics and corticosteroids has provided total symptomatic relief that is durable.

Irrigation and drainage properties of three-way urethral catheters.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in an in vitro study the irrigation and drainage capabilities of a variety of available catheters. Three-way Foley catheters are used when irrigation of the bladder is anticipated to prevent or manage blood clots in the bladder. METHODS: Six operators applied maximal one-handed pressure irrigation with a catheter-tip syringe through the irrigation and drainage ports of the Bardex and Dover three-way catheters (16F to 26F). Maximal manual irrigation flow was recorded using a flowmeter. Continuous gravity irrigation and drainage flows were measured by suspending a 2-L irrigation bag 80 cm above the catheters and fastening an artificial bladder to the drainage tip of each Foley catheter with the catheter balloon inflated to 30 mL. RESULTS: The Bardex 22F and 24F catheters had superior manual irrigation using the irrigation port (maximal urinary flow rate 8.9 +/- 1.3 mL/s and 9.5 +/- 1.5 mL/s, respectively, P < 0.000001) compared with the Dover 22F and 24F catheters. The Bardex and Dover 22F catheters (maximal urinary flow rate 29.0 +/- 1.9 mL/s and 29.3 +/- 1.9 mL/s, respectively, P = 0.66) and 24F catheters (maximal urinary flow rate 30.5 +/- 2.0 mL/s and 30.6 +/- 1.2 mL/s, respectively, P = 0.83) performed equally in manual irrigation using the drainage port. The Bardex 22F (average flow rate 1.6 +/- 0.1 mL/s, P < 0.00001) and 24F (average flow rate 1.7 +/- 0.0 mL/s, P < 0.000001) catheters exhibited better continuous irrigation and flow than the Dover 22F and 24F catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Three-way catheters are placed in situations in which efficient bladder irrigation is essential for patient safety. The Bardex 22F to 26F catheters optimized continuous bladder irrigation of the catheters tested.

Percutaneous nephrostomy catheters: drainage flow and retention strength.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of percutaneous nephrostomy catheter configuration on drainage flow and retention strength. METHODS: The Cook nephrostomy 16F (symmetric balloon), Bardex Council 16F (eccentric balloon), Microvasive Flexima 14F (pigtail), and Bardex Malecot 16F (flange) nephrostomy catheters were attached to an artificial renal pelvis (12-in.-round latex balloon). The balloon was subsequently filled with either 60 mL of water or orange juice with pulp, and gravity drainage of this fluid was recorded as flow into a flowmeter. Using a Force Five Model FDV-100 force gauge, the retention strength was tested by measuring the force required to pull the nephrostomy catheter through an 8-mm hole in a 35-mm-thick biologic tissue specimen (bologna). RESULTS: The maximal flow rate using both orange juice and saline was significantly greater for the Cook nephrostomy than for the Microvasive Flexima, Bardex Malecot, and Bardex Council catheters (P < or = 0.016). The average flow rate using saline for the Cook nephrostomy catheter was significantly greater than for all other catheters (P < or = 0.02) and was significantly greater than for the Microvasive Flexima and the Bardex Council catheters (P < or = 0.036) using orange juice. The retention strength was strongest for the Cook nephrostomy catheter (3.41 +/- 0.14 lb) compared with the Bardex Council (1.75 +/- 0.1), Microvasive Flexima (1.35 +/- 0.3), and Bardex Malecot (0.29 +/- 0.03) catheters. In addition, the Microvasive Flexima catheter resulted in greater maceration of the biologic tissue after forceful dislodgement. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have demonstrated that the Cook nephrostomy catheter combines strong drainage flow and strong retention strength during in vitro testing. Clinical evaluations of the ease of use and patient comfort are warranted.