Teaching Residents Patient-Centered Communication: A Call for Standardized Programming.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical residency Program Directors (PDs) use the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones to measure general surgery competencies including interpersonal communication skills and professionalism. These programs face myriad barriers implementing communication training, including competing educational priorities and insufficient local expertise. The goal of this work is to generate hypotheses regarding barriers and facilitators to successful communication, leadership, and professionalism training (CLPT) in surgical residency programs. DESIGN AND SETTING: We implemented a qualitative study using semi structured 30-minute interviews; grounded theory guided our systematic data collection, coding, and analysis to enable us to identify patterns and relationships within the available dataset. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were surgical educators known to provide or interested in providing communication training or were surgical trainees focused on education and/or CLPT. Surgeon participants (N=18) included 4 communication researcher/content experts, 9 Program Director (PD) or former PD faculty, 4 Associate PDs, 1 fellow, and 2 residents. RESULTS: Themes abstracted from interview data include 1) the importance of providing formal CLPT, 2) readiness of residency programs to include CLPT, 3) challenges and barriers to implementing CLPT, and 4) recommendations for implementation. Barriers included the "crowded educational schedule," lack of local expertise, absence of programmatic guidance nationally, and paucity of standardized materials. Facilitators to implementation included the nature of CLPT curricula such as content, approach, and ease of implementation, and suggestions to achieve learner and leadership support. The availability of expert guidance and standardized materials would ease the incorporation of sustainable CLPT into a residency program that could become increasingly engaged and skilled in communication. CONCLUSIONS: This research serves as a call for direction from ACGME regarding CLPT educational priorities and urges surgical educators to continue to test and develop CLPT content and assessment materials for wide distribution along with providing guidance on implementation.

Surgical and procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical ICU: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document.

The use of prophylactic measures, including perioperative antibiotics, for the prevention of surgical site infections is a standard of care across surgical specialties. Unfortunately, the routine guidelines used for routine procedures do not always account for many of the factors encountered with urgent/emergent operations and critically ill or high-risk patients. This clinical consensus document created by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee is one of a three-part series and reviews surgical and procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical intensive care unit. The purpose of this clinical consensus document is to provide practical recommendations, based on expert opinion, to assist intensive care providers with decision-making for surgical prophylaxis. We specifically evaluate the current state of periprocedural antibiotic management of external ventricular drains, orthopedic operations (closed and open fractures, silver dressings, local, antimicrobial adjuncts, spine surgery, subfascial drains), abdominal operations (bowel injury and open abdomen), and bedside procedures (thoracostomy tube, gastrostomy tube, tracheostomy).

Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document.

The evaluation and workup of fever and the use of antibiotics to treat infections is part of daily practice in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Fever can be infectious or non-infectious; it is important to distinguish between the two entities wherever possible. The evidence is growing for shortening the duration of antibiotic treatment of common infections. The purpose of this clinical consensus document, created by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee, is to synthesize the available evidence, and to provide practical recommendations. We discuss the evaluation of fever, the indications to obtain cultures including urine, blood, and respiratory specimens for diagnosis of infections, the use of procalcitonin, and the decision to initiate empiric antibiotics. We then describe the treatment of common infections, specifically ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-associated urinary infection, catheter-related bloodstream infection, bacteremia, surgical site infection, intra-abdominal infection, ventriculitis, and necrotizing soft tissue infection.

Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma system wellness white paper: An evaluation of wellness from a systems perspective.

ABSTRACT: Providers are charged with responsibility to maintain their own health and wellness; however, well-being is multifactorial and the construct lacks clarity. In the current state of health care, burnout is on the rise with increasing demands for clinical productivity and strained system resources. The health care industry has recognized wellness's patient safety and financial impact, recently applying research and resources to identify sustainable solutions. We reviewed the wellness literature with a focus on systems to provide a framework for consensus building for a quality acute care surgery system. Our review revealed several areas within system wellness for consideration: (1) provider wellness, (2) culture of safety, (3) learning health systems, and (4) organizational perspectives. We provide specific system recommendations for the acute care surgery practice to preserve our workforce by creating a system that works for its providers.

Teamwork matters: The association between nontechnical skills and cardiac arrest in trauma patients presenting with hypotension.

BACKGROUND: The impact of trauma team dynamics on outcomes in injured patients is not completely understood. We sought to evaluate the association between trauma team function, as measured by a modified Trauma Non-Technical Skills assessment, and cardiac arrest in hypotensive trauma patients. We hypothesized that better team function is associated with a decreased probability of developing cardiac arrest. METHODS: Trauma video review was used to collect data from resuscitations of adult hypotensive trauma patients at 19 centers. Hypotension at emergency department presentation was defined as an initial systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or an initial systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg followed by a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg within the first 5 minutes. Team dynamics were scored using a modified Trauma Non-Technical Skills assessment composed of 5 domains with combined scores ranging from 5 (best) to 15 (worst). Scores were compared between cardiac arrest/noncardiac arrest cases in the trauma bay. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent association between the Trauma Non-Technical Skills assessment and cardiac arrest. RESULTS: A total of 430 patients were included (median age 43 years [interquartile range: 29-61]; 71.8% male; 36% penetrating mechanism; median Injury Severity Score 20 [10-33]; 11% experienced cardiac arrest in trauma bay). The median total Trauma Non-Technical Skills assessment score was 7 (6-9), higher in patients who experienced cardiac arrest in the trauma bay (9 [6-10] vs 7 [6-9]; P = .016). This association persisted after controlling for age, sex, mechanism, injury severity, initial systolic blood pressure, and initial Glasgow Coma Scale score (adjusted odds ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval:1.11-1.48; P < .001), indicating a ∼3% higher predicted probability of cardiac arrest per Trauma Non-Technical Skills point. CONCLUSION: Better team function is independently associated with a decreased probability of cardiac arrest in trauma patients presenting with hypotension. This suggests that trauma team training may improve outcomes in peri-arrest patients.

Handoffs and transitions of care: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission reports that at least half of communication breakdowns occur during handovers or transitions of care. There is no consensus on how best to approach the transfer of care within acute care surgery (ACS). We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current data on handoffs and transitions of care in ACS patients and evaluate the impact of standardization and formalized communication processes. METHODS: Clinically relevant questions regarding handoffs and transitions of care with clearly defined patient Population(s), Intervention(s), Comparison(s), and appropriately selected Outcomes were determined. These centered around specific transitions of care within the setting of ACS, specifically perioperative interactions, emergency medical services and trauma team interactions, and intra/interfloor and intensive care unit (ICU) interactions. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were identified for analysis. These included 5,113 patients in the standardized handoff group and 5,293 in the current process group. Standardized handoffs reduced handover errors for perioperative interactions and preventable adverse events for intra/interfloor and ICU interactions. There were insufficient data to evaluate outcomes of clinical complications and medical errors. CONCLUSION: We conditionally recommend a standardized handoff in the field of ACS, including perioperative interactions, emergency medical services and trauma team interactions, and intra/interfloor and ICU interactions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.

Community of trauma care partnering with stakeholders to improve injury outcomes: focus group analysis.

Introduction: Engaging trauma survivors/caregivers results in research findings that are more relevant to patients' needs and priorities. Although their perspectives increase research significance, there is a lack of understanding about how best to incorporate their insights. We aimed to capture stakeholder perspectives to ensure research is meaningful, respectful, and relevant to the injured patient and their caregivers. Methods: A multiphase, inductive exploratory qualitative study was performed, the first phase of which is described here. Virtual focus groups to elicit stakeholder perspectives and preferences were conducted across 19 trauma centers in the USA during 2022. Discussion topics were chosen to identify patients' motivation to join research studies, preferences regarding consent, suggestions for increasing diversity and access, and feelings regarding outcomes, efficacy, and exception from informed consent. The focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed to identify the range of perspectives expressed and any common themes that emerged. Results: Ten 90-minute focus groups included patients/caregiver (n=21/1) and researchers (n=14). Data analysis identified common themes emerging across groups. The importance of trust and preexisting relationships with the clinical care team were the most common themes across all groups. Conclusion: Our findings reveal common themes in preferences, motivations, and best practices to increase patient/caregiver participation in trauma research. The project's next phases are distribution of a vignette-based survey to establish broad stakeholder consensus; education and dissemination activities to share strategies that increase research engagement and relevance for patients; and the formation of a panel of patients to support future research endeavors. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Getting out of the bay faster: Assessing trauma team performance using trauma video review.

BACKGROUND: Minutes matter for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock. How trauma team function impacts time to the next phase of care has not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized better team performance scores to be associated with decreased time to the next phase of trauma care. METHODS: This retrospective secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study included hypotensive trauma patients at 19 centers. Using trauma video review, we analyzed team performance with the validated Non-Technical Skills for Trauma scale: leadership, cooperation and resource management, communication, assessment/decision making, and situational awareness. The primary outcome was minutes from patient arrival to next phase of care; deaths in the bay were excluded. Secondary outcomes included time to initiation and completion of first unit of blood and inpatient mortality. Associations between team dynamics and outcomes were assessed with a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for Injury Severity Score, mechanism, initial blood pressure and heart rate, number of team members, and trauma team lead training level and sex. RESULTS: A total of 441 patients were included. The median Injury Severity Score was 22 (interquartile range, 10-34), and most (61%) sustained blunt trauma. The median time to next phase of care was 23.5 minutes (interquartile range, 17-35 minutes). Better leadership, communication, assessment/decision making, and situational awareness scores were associated with faster times to next phase of care (all p < 0.05). Each 1-point worsening in the Non-Technical Skills for Trauma scale score (scale, 5-15) was associated with 1.6 minutes more in the bay. The median resuscitation team size was 12 (interquartile range, 10-15), and larger teams were slower ( p < 0.05). Better situational awareness was associated with faster completion of first unit of blood by 4 to 5 minutes ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Better team performance is associated with faster transitions to next phase of care in hypotensive trauma patients, and larger teams are slower. Trauma team training should focus on optimizing team performance to facilitate faster hemorrhage control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

The COST of liver disease: The Cirrhosis Outcomes Score in Trauma Study.

BACKGROUND: Cirrhosis in trauma patients is an indicator of poor prognosis, but current trauma injury grading systems do not take into account liver dysfunction as a risk factor. Our objective was to construct a simple clinical mortality prediction model in cirrhotic trauma patients: Cirrhosis Outcomes Score in Trauma (COST). METHODS: Trauma patients with pre-existing cirrhosis or liver dysfunction who were admitted to our ACS Level I trauma center between 2013 and 2021 were reviewed. Patients with significant acute liver trauma (AAST Grade ≥ 3) or those that developed acute liver dysfunction while admitted were excluded. Demographics as well as ISS, MELD, complications, and mortality were evaluated. COST was defined as the sum of age, ISS, and MELD. Univariate and multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of mortality. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess the ability of COST to predict mortality. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients were analyzed of which the majority were males 214 (67.3%) who suffered blunt trauma 305 (95.9%). Mortality at 30-days, 60-days, and 90-days was 20.4%, 23.6%, and 25.5%, respectively. COST was associated with inpatient, 30-day, and 90-day mortality on regression analyses and the AUROC for COST predicting mortality at these respective time points was 0.810, 0.801, and 0.813. CONCLUSION: Current trauma injury grading systems do not take into account liver dysfunction as a risk factor. COST is highly predictive of mortality in cirrhotic trauma patients. The simplicity of the score makes it useful in guiding clinical care and in optimizing goals of care discussions. Future studies to validate this prediction model are required prior to clinical use.

ENDOTHELIAL GLYCOCALYX SHEDDING IN INTRA-ABDOMINAL SEPSIS: A FEASIBILITY STUDY.

ABSTRACT: Background: The endothelial glycocalyx layer (EGL) is a complex meshwork of glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans that protect the vascular endothelium. Cleavage or shedding of EGL-specific biomarkers, such as hyaluronic acid (HA) and syndecan-1 (SDC-1, CD138) in plasma, have been shown to be associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, it is unclear whether levels of circulating EGL biomarkers are representative of the EGL injury within the tissues. The objective of the present feasibility study was to describe a pathway for plasma and tissue procurement to quantify EGL components in a cohort of surgical patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. We sought to compare differences between tissue and plasma EGL biomarkers and to determine whether EGL shedding within the circulation and/or tissues correlated with clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a prospective, observational, single-center feasibility study of adult patients (N = 15) with intra-abdominal sepsis, conducted under an approved institutional review boards. Blood and resected tissue (pathologic specimen and unaffected peritoneum) samples were collected from consented subjects at the time of operation and 24-48 hours after surgery. Endothelial glycocalyx layer biomarkers (i.e., HA and SDC-1) were quantified in both tissue and plasma samples using a CD138 stain and ELISA kit, respectively. Pairwise comparisons were made between plasma and tissue levels. In addition, we tested the relationships between measured EGL biomarkers and clinical status and patient outcomes. Results: Fifteen patients with intra-abdominal sepsis were enrolled in the study. Elevations in EGL-specific circulating biomarkers (HA, SDC-1) were positively correlated with postoperative SOFA scores and weakly associated with resuscitative volumes at 24 hours. Syndecan-1 levels from resected pathologic tissue significantly correlated with SOFA scores at all time points ( R = 0.69 and P < 0.0001) and positively correlated with resuscitation volumes at 24 hours ( R = 0.41 and P = 0.15 for t = 24 hours). Tissue and circulating HA and SDC-1 positively correlated with SOFA >6. Conclusions: Elevations in both circulating and tissue EGL biomarkers were positively correlated with postoperative SOFA scores at 24 hours, with resected pathologic tissue EGL levels displaying significant correlations with SOFA scores at all time points. Tissue and circulating EGL biomarkers were positively correlated at higher SOFA scores (SOFA > 6) and could be used as indicators of resuscitative needs within 24 hours of surgery. The present study demonstrates the feasibility of tissue and plasma procurement in the operating room, although larger studies are needed to evaluate the predictive value of these EGL biomarkers for patients with intra-abdominal sepsis.

Above the Clavicle: A Simplified Screening Method for Asymptomatic Blunt Cerebral Vascular Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is an increasingly detected pattern in trauma with significant morbidity, putting patients at risk for subsequent stoke. Complex screening protocols exist to determine who should undergo CT angiography of the neck (CTAN) to evaluate for BCVI. Once identified, stroke incidence may be reduced with appropriate treatment across grades. We hypothesize that an expanded and simplified method for identifying patients with clinical suspicion for BCVI based upon injury above the clavicle (ATC) will illustrate a previously undiagnosed cohort of patients. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of adult (age ≥18 years) blunt trauma patients with BCVI from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019 was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients undergoing CTAN were divided into 2 groups based upon qualification by either the expanded Denver criteria or clinical evidence of any injury ATC. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were diagnosed with BCVI (25 566 blunt trauma admissions, .9% incidence). Seventeen patients (8%) who did not satisfy expanded Denver were diagnosed with BCVI by ATC, most commonly undergoing CTAN due to facial trauma (n = 8). There were no differences in distribution of carotid artery injuries (CAI) and vertebral artery injuries (VAI) in the expanded Denver criteria group compared to the ATC group. CONCLUSIONS: CTAN for blunt trauma with any injury ATC is an easy-to-use screening tool and may be seamlessly included with initial whole-body imaging.

Successful Non-Operative Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: Is it Really a Success?

BACKGROUND: In adhesive small bowel obstructions (ASBOs), literature has shown that passage of a water-soluble contrast challenge at either 8 hours or 24 hours is predictive of successful non-operative management (NOM) for an ASBO, but the long-term outcomes between these two groups are unknown. We hypothesized that patients who require longer transit times to the colon have a higher one-year recidivism of ASBO. METHODS: This was a 4-year review of patients with presumed ASBO undergoing successful NOM. Those requiring operation or those with an SBO due to something other than adhesions were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups (8 hour and 24 hour) based on when contrast reached their right colon. Patients were followed for one year to determine ASBO recurrence. RESULTS: 137 patients underwent NOM; 112 in the 8-hour group and 25 in the 24-hour group. One-year recurrence rate was 21.4% in the 8-hour group and 40% in the 24-hour group (P = 0.05). The median time to recurrence was 113 days in the 8-hour group and 13 days in the 24-hour group (P = 0.02). Of those who recurred in the 24-hour group, 60% recurred within 30 days (P = 0.01). On univariable analysis, first-time ASBO and 24-hour transit time were risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Adhesive small bowel obstruction patients undergoing NOM in the 24-hour group had a recurrence rate nearly twice that of patients in the 8-hour group and may benefit from an operative exploration during the index hospitalization at the 8-hour mark of a water-soluble contrast challenge, especially if experiencing a first-time ASBO.

Does treatment delay for blunt cerebrovascular injury affect stroke rate?: An EAST multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze injury characteristics and stroke rates between blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) with delayed vs non-delayed medical therapy. We hypothesized there would be increased stroke formation with delayed medical therapy. METHODS: This is a sub-analysis of a 16 center, prospective, observational trial on BCVI. Delayed medial therapy was defined as initiation >24 hours after admission. BCVI which did not receive medical therapy were excluded. Subgroups for injury presence were created using Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score >0 for AIS categories. RESULTS: 636 BCVI were included. Median time to first medical therapy was 62 hours in the delayed group and 11 hours in the non-delayed group (p < 0.001). The injury severity score (ISS) was greater in the delayed group (24.0 vs the non-delayed group 22.0, p <  0.001) as was the median AIS head score (2.0 vs 1.0, p <  0.001). The overall stroke rate was not different between the delayed vs non-delayed groups respectively (9.7% vs 9.5%, p = 1.00). Further evaluation of carotid vs vertebral artery injury showed no difference in stroke rate, 13.6% and 13.2%, p = 1.00 vs 7.3% and 6.5%, p = 0.84. Additionally, within all AIS categories there was no difference in stroke rate between delayed and non-delayed medical therapy (all N.S.), with AIS head >0 13.8% vs 9.2%, p = 0.20 and AIS spine >0 11.0% vs 9.3%, p = 0.63 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Modern BCVI therapy is administered early. BCVI with delayed therapy were more severely injured. However, a higher stroke rate was not seen with delayed therapy, even for BCVI with head or spine injuries. This data suggests with competing injuries or other clinical concerns there is not an increased stroke rate with necessary delays of medical treatment for BCVI.

Improving the Culture of Safety: A Prospective Handoff Initiative from the Operating Room to the Trauma Intensive Care Unit.

A recent EAST publication emphasized the importance of handoffs to ensure safe and effective care for trauma patients. In this work, we evaluated our existing handoffs from the operating room (OR) to the trauma intensive care unit (TICU) and implemented a formal process at our level 1 trauma center. Pre and post-intervention surveys were offered to the stakeholders. Responses were recorded in a Likert scaled format and results were compared using Student's t-test with statistical significance was set to .05. 57 surveys were completed (30 pre, 27 post) and 139 handoffs occurred. There was significant improvement in "overall satisfaction" and "understanding of information expected." Standardizing an OR to intensive care unit handoff clarifies expectations and improves care team satisfaction. While future studies are needed to evaluate the impact of structured handoffs on patient outcomes, provider satisfaction likely serves as an indicator for culture shift towards safer transitions of care for injured patients.

Penetrating brain injury with hypopituitarism.

A 34-year-old healthy male presented as a trauma activation after sustaining a gunshot wound to his face. CT head imaging was suggestive of a ballistic fragment adjacent to a posterior wall sphenoid sinus fracture with likely a small volume of adjacent blood products. He was ultimately diagnosed with hypopituitarism which included central diabetes insipidus, central hypothyroid, and adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency secondary to cortisol deficiency. This case illustrates the spectrum of endocrine dysfunction that can occur with skull base injuries, and the appropriate pituitary-function screening and treatment that should be performed if there is clinical concern. Early recognition and prompt treatment of pituitary insufficiency can facilitate overall rehabilitation after TBI.

Implementation of a skills-based virtual communication curriculum for medical students interested in surgery.

Background: Communication skills are essential to providing patient-centered care. The need for standardized communication skills training is at the forefront of medical school and residency education. We aimed to design and implement a curriculum teaching virtual communications skills to medical students. The purpose of this report is to describe our experience and to offer guidance for training programs developing similar curricula in the future. Methods: The curriculum was presented in weekly modules over 5 weeks using Zoom technology. We focused on proven strategies for interacting with patients and other providers, adapted to a virtual platform. Skill levels during role-play were assessed by the Simulated Participants and students observing the simulation using the 14-item, physician specific Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). The primary outcome of the CAT is the percentage of "excellent" for each item ranked both years. Participants provided feedback on what worked well or how the module could be improved in open-ended responses. Results: Twenty-eight and 25 students registered for the course in Year 1 and Year 2, respectively. Students' post-session confidence in their ability to perform target skills was statistically higher than their pre-session scores in most sessions. Modules with the lowest pre-session confidence for both years were "Disclosing a Medical Error" and "Responding to Patient Bias." The mean percentage of students receiving "excellent" scores on individual CAT items ranged from 5 to 73% over the course of both years. Verbal and written feedback in Year 1 provided direction for the curriculum developers to improve the course in Year 2. Conclusions: Developing and implementing a new education curriculum is a complex process. We describe an intensive curriculum for medical students as we strive to allow students extra "clinical" time during COVID-related restriction. We believe continued focus on patient and family communication skills will enhance patient care. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00054-9.