Two new RHD alleles with deletions spanning multiple exons.

BACKGROUND: The most common large-deletion RHD allele (RHD*01N.01) includes the entire coding sequence, intervening regions and untranslated regions. The rest of large-deletion RHD alleles reported to-date consist of single-exon deletions, such as RHD*01N.67 which includes exon 1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples from two donors with RhD-negative serology yielded unclear or inconclusive results when subject to confirmatory testing on RHD genotyping arrays. To determine their RHD genotypes, genomic DNA was analyzed with a combination of allele-specific PCR, long-range PCR, Sanger sequencing, and next-generation sequencing assays. RESULTS: Allele-specific PCR failed to detect products for RHD exons 1 to 3 in one sample and RHD exons 1 to 5 in the other. A quantitative next-generation sequencing assay confirmed deletion of exons 1 to 3 and 1 to 5 respectively, and detected the absence of an RHD gene in trans in both samples. Long-range PCR and Sanger sequencing enabled identification of the breakpoints for both alleles. Both deletions start within the 5' Rhesus box (upstream of the identity region for the 1-to-3 deletion, downstream of it for the 1-to-5 deletion), and end within introns. CONCLUSIONS: Resolution of unclear or inconclusive results from targeted genotyping arrays often leads to the discovery of new alleles. The 5' Rhesus box may be a hot spot for genetic recombination events, such as the large deletions described in this report.

RH genotyping by nonspecific quantitative next-generation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Conventional sequencing uses gene-specific primers to determine the location of RH variants and permits a qualitative assessment of zygosity. Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing determine the genetic location of variants and enable a quantitative assessment of zygosity. Nonspecific sequencing uses RH-consensus primers to detect variants and sequencing-read ratios to quantify their copy number. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy eight samples with diverse genotypes were analyzed by next-generation sequencing with RH- consensus primers. Custom-developed data analysis software was used to detect individual variants and infer the RH genotype. The method was evaluated for its quantitative nature, its ability to discriminate similar genotypes, its accuracy to detect variants, and its accuracy to assign them to RHD or RHCE. RESULTS: As a measure of balanced amplification of RHD and RHCE sequences, observed ratio medians deviate from expected ratios by 3% or less of the ratio range. As a measure of discriminatory power, contiguous RHCE / [RHD + RHCE] ratio averages are separated by 4 or more standard deviations of the mean. Variants are detected with a sensitivity and specificity greater than 99%, and variants at consensus positions are correctly assigned to RHD vs RHCE with a sensitivity greater than 72% and a specificity greater than 99%. The method is successful in the identification of genotypes with large conversion events and in the detection of copy number variation. CONCLUSION: Nonspecific sequencing of homologous gene sets combines detection and quantification of genetic variation in a single assay. Evidence is provided for the quantitative nature of the method, its sensitivity and specificity, and its ability to identify complex RH genotypes.

Performance evaluation study of ID RHD XT, a new genotyping assay for the detection of high-prevalence RhD negative and weak D types.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Routine serologic D typing does not distinguish between weak D subtypes and partial D phenotypes. The goal of this study was to validate the performance of the ID RHD XT genotyping assay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Previously serotyped samples for D antigen (n = 1000; 16% weak D serotyped donors) were analysed. The reference methods used for comparison were licensed serology tests for D antigen phenotype, and bidirectional sequencing (BDS) for weak D type confirmation and HPA-1 phenotype prediction. Discrepancies were solved with BDS and BLOODchip® Reference. RESULTS: There were no system failure, a 100% call rate and no inconclusive results. ID RHD XT correctly called all (88/88) weak D types 1, 2 and 3. Review of other 87 apparent discrepancies identified a small number of serology errors and showed that ID RHD XT correctly signalled the presence of other RHD variants which were further confirmed by BDS and BLOODchip® Reference. The predicted HPA-1 phenotype by ID RHD XT was 100% concordant with BDS. CONCLUSION: ID RHD XT genotype predictions for high-prevalence RhD negative and weak D types 1, 2 and 3 as well as for HPA-1a/HPA-1b antigens were accurate, which is of clinical significance in guiding transfusion needs.

Performance evaluation study of ID CORE XT, a high throughput blood group genotyping platform.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, red blood cell antigens have been identified using serological methods, but recent advances in molecular biology have made the implementation of methods for genetic testing of most blood group antigens possible. The goal of this study was to validate the performance of the ID CORE XT blood group typing assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand independent samples from donors, patients and neonates were collected from three research institutes in Spain and the Netherlands. DNA was extracted from EDTA-anticoagulated blood. The data were processed with the ID CORE XT to obtain the genotypes and the predicted blood group phenotypes, and results were compared to those obtained with well-established serological and molecular methods. All 1,000 samples were typed for major blood group antigens (C, c, E, e, K) and 371-830 samples were typed for other antigens depending on the rarity and availability of serology comparators. RESULTS: The incorrect call rate was 0%. Four "no calls" (rate: 0.014%) were resolved after repetition. The sensitivity of ID CORE XT for all phenotypes was 100% regarding serology. There was one discrepancy in E- antigen and 33 discrepancies in Fyb- antigen. After bidirectional sequencing, all discrepancies were resolved in favour of ID CORE XT (100% specificity). ID CORE XT detected infrequent antigens of Caucasians in the sample as well as rare allelic variants. DISCUSSION: In this evaluation performed in an extensive sample following the European Directive, the ID CORE XT blood genotyping assay performed as a reliable and accurate method for correctly predicting the genotype and phenotype of clinically relevant blood group antigens.