Adjuvant radiotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma: A retrospective assessment of treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to understand the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and prognostic factors for patients diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 31 patients receiving adjuvant RT between the dates of September 2003-January 2013 in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Surgery was performed in 27 (87%) patients as staging laparotomy, for 4 patients as total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was 4500-5040 cGy in 25-28 fractions. In addition, 23 patients received brachytherapy following EBRT, 12 patients received adjuvant, and 1 patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT). RESULTS: The median age was 63 (between 30 and 78). The stage distribution of the patients was as follows: Stage I, 20 (64%); Stage II, 7 (23%), and Stage III, 4 (13%) patients. Five-year locoregional control (LRC) rate was 100%, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 65.5% and 66.2%, respectively. Stage I or II patients have a tendency for better 5-year OS and DFS rates than Stage III patients (73.1% vs. 42.9% and 72.7% vs. 42.9%; P = 0.065 and 0.051). Regarding lymph node dissection was performed or not, 5-year OS (64.7% vs. 75.0%) was not statistically different between groups (P = 0.77). Five-year OS and DFS rates were 69.2% and 61.5% for patients receiving CT (adjuvant or neoadjuvant) versus 63.7% and 68.8% for patients not receiving CT; P = 0.63 and P = 0.89, respectively. Based on the analysis of peritoneal washings, 5-year OS was 0% for patients with malignant or suspicious cytology whereas 89% for patients with benign cytology (P = 0.000). A negative correlation was observed between mitotic count of sarcomatous component and DFS time (rs = -0.812 and P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery and adjuvant RT seem beneficial for excellent LRC rate. However, survival rates are low due to distant metastases. Thus, there is a great need for better systemic therapies.

The interaction between antioxidant status and cervical cancer: a case control study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To compare the antioxidant status of cervical cancer patients with healthy controls and to assess the antioxidant levels before and after radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Antioxidant levels (glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and malondialdehyde) were measured in 35 patients with cervical cancer and 35 age-matched healthy controls. Blood samples were collected twice (before and after treatment) from cervical cancer patients and once from healthy control subjects. RESULTS: In the patient group, pre-radiotherapy glutathione and glutathione peroxidase levels were significantly lower (P <0.01 and P <0.0001, respectively) than the control group. Pre-radiotherapy levels of superoxide dismutase were significantly higher in cancer patients (P <0.01). In general, no difference was observed between pre- and post-radiotherapy antioxidant levels in cancer patients. However, when post-radiotherapy glutathione levels were analyzed, patients who did not respond to treatment had significantly higher levels than those who did respond (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of antioxidants significantly differed between the patients with cervical cancer and the controls, and no change in antioxidant levels was observed after treatment. Moreover, further studies evaluating the predictive value of glutathione levels on treatment response are warranted.