Establishing benchmarks and metrics for disruptive technologies, inappropriate and obsolete tests in the clinical laboratory.

Benchmarks and metrics related to laboratory test utilization are based on evidence-based medical literature that may suffer from a positive publication bias. Guidelines are only as good as the data reviewed to create them. Disruptive technologies require time for appropriate use to be established before utilization review will be meaningful. Metrics include monitoring the use of obsolete tests and the inappropriate use of lab tests. Test utilization by clients in a hospital outreach program can be used to monitor the impact of new clients on lab workload. A multi-disciplinary laboratory utilization committee is the most effective tool for modifying bad habits, and reviewing and approving new tests for the lab formulary or by sending them out to a reference lab.

Multicenter evaluation of the LightCycler MRSA advanced test, the Xpert MRSA Assay, and MRSASelect directly plated culture with simulated workflow comparison for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nasal swabs.

Rapid detection of nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) followed by appropriate infection control procedures reduces MRSA infection and transmission. We compared the performance and workflow of two Food and Drug Administration-approved nucleic acid amplification assays, the LightCycler MRSA Advanced Test and the Xpert MRSA test, with those of directly plated culture (MRSASelect) using 1202 nasal swabs collected at three U.S. sites. The sensitivity of the LightCycler test (95.2%; 95% CI, 89.1% to 98.4%) and Xpert assay (99%; 95% CI, 94.8% to 100%) did not differ compared with that of culture; the specificity of the two assays was identical (95.5%; 95% CI, 94.1% to 96.7%) compared with culture. However, sequencing performed on 71 samples with discordant results among the three methods confirmed the presence of MRSA in 40% of samples that were positive by both molecular methods but negative by culture. Workflow analysis from all sites including batch runs revealed average hands-on sample preparation times of 1.40, 2.35, and 1.44 minutes per sample for the LightCycler, Xpert, and MRSASelect methods, respectively. Discrete event simulation analysis of workflow efficiencies revealed that the LightCycler test used less hands-on time for the assay when greater than eight batched samples were run. The high sensitivity and specificity, low hands-on time, and efficiency gains using batching capabilities make the LightCycler test suitable for rapid batch screening of MRSA colonization.

A real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Pneumocystis from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.

Pneumocystis jiroveci is an important cause of pneumonia in immunocompromised individuals. This organism cannot be cultured, and therefore, diagnosis relies on microscopic identification of the organism using stains or antibodies. Although simple, these tests are insensitive and require expertise for accurate interpretation. We developed a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that provides sensitive and objective detection of Pneumocystis from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Primers and fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes were developed that target the cdc2 gene of P. jiroveci. Assay sensitivity is 6 copies of target per microliter of sample. No cross-reactivity occurs with other pathogens, and the PCR assay has a 21% increase in clinical sensitivity as compared with Calcofluor white staining. The real-time PCR assay provides a sensitive, rapid, and objective method for the detection of Pneumocystis from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.