Practicality and Safety of Electrical Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Left Atrial Appendage Ligation in Lung Transplant Recipients With Pretransplant Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: Lung transplant surgery creates surgical pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as a routine part of the procedure. However, many patients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation continue to have atrial fibrillation at 1 y. We hypothesized that the addition of electrical PVI and left atrial appendage isolation/ligation (LAL) to the lung transplant procedure restores sinus rhythm at 1 y in patients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all adult lung transplant recipients at the University of California Los Angeles from April 2006 to August 2021. All patients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation underwent concomitant PVI/LAL and were compared with lung transplant recipients without preoperative atrial fibrillation. In-hospital outcomes; 1-y survival; and the incidence of stroke, cardiac readmissions, repeat ablations, and sinus rhythm (composite endpoint) were examined at 1 y for the PVI/LAL cohort. Results: Sixty-one lung transplant recipients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation underwent concomitant PVI/LAL. No patient in the PVI/LAL cohort required cardiac-related readmission or catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation within 1 y of transplantation. Freedom from the composite endpoint of death, stroke, cardiac readmission, and repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation at 1 y was 85% (95% confidence interval, 73%-92%) for lung transplant recipients treated with PVI/LAL. Conclusions: The addition of PVI/LAI to the lung transplant operation in patients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation was safe and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm and baseline risk of stroke at 1 y.

Characteristics and outcomes of lung transplants performed with ex-situ lung perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Ex-situ lung perfusion (ESLP) can be used to assess and rehabilitate donor lungs, potentially expanding the donor pool. We examined the characteristics and outcomes of lung transplants performed with ESLP in the United States. METHODS: Retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing registry of primary adult lung transplant recipients from February 28, 2018, to June 30, 2021, was performed, comparing baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and 1-year survival of ESLP vs no ESLP lung transplants. RESULTS: Of 8204 lung transplants, 426 (5.2%) were performed with ESLP. ESLP donors were older, more donation after circulatory death (DCD), and had lower PaO2:FiO2 (P:F) ratios. Recipients had lower lung allocation scores. ESLP lungs traveled further, had longer preservation times, and were more likely double lung transplants. Reintubation rates, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, and hospital length of stay were greater in the ESLP group. On multivariable analysis, ESLP was not an independent predictor of 1-year survival. However, further analysis showed that DCD lungs managed on ESLP had worse 1-year survival compared to DCD lungs preserved with standard cold storage or with donation after brain death donor lungs. CONCLUSIONS: ESLP is used in a small percentage of lung transplants in the US and is not independently associated with 1-year survival. ESLP combined with DCD lungs, however, is associated with worse 1-year survival and warrants further investigation.

Lung Transplantation from hepatitis C+ donor lungs: Reassuring midterm outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The development of modern antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has allowed for the transplantation of HCV nucleic acid amplification testing-positive (NAT+) donor lungs with acceptable short-term outcomes. We sought to evaluate trends and midterm outcomes of lung transplant recipients of HCV NAT+ donor allografts. METHODS: All adults undergoing isolated lung transplantation in the United Network for Organ Sharing database from January 2016 to December 2022 were included in the study. Lung transplant recipients were stratified based on donor HCV status (HCV NAT+ vs NAT-). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences between groups. Several outcomes, including acute rejection by 1 year, early (30-day and in-hospital) mortality, and both 1- and 3-year survival, were compared between matched groups. RESULTS: A total of 16,725 patients underwent lung transplantation during the study period, with 489 (3%) receiving HCV NAT+ donor lungs. Regions 1 (18%) and 6/8 (both 0%) had the highest and lowest proportions, respectively, of HCV NAT+ donor transplants. Utilization of HCV NAT+ donors increased throughout the study period from 2 (0.1%) in 2016 to a peak of 117 (5%) in 2019. Donors who were HCV NAT+ were younger (34 vs 36 years, p < 0.001), more often female (44% vs 39%, p < 0.01), and more commonly died due to drug intoxication (56% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Recipients of HCV NAT+ donor lungs were similar in age (62 vs 62 years, p = 0.69) and female gender (43% vs 39%, p = 0.15) but had lower lung allocation scores (38 vs 41, p < 0.001) compared to others. Rates of acute rejection (13% vs 17%, p = 0.09), early mortality (30-day: 2% vs 1%, p = 0.59, in-hospital: 3% vs 4%, p = 0.38), as well as 1-year (90% vs 92%, p = 0.29) and 3-year survival (69% vs 75%, p = 0.13) were not significantly different between matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplant recipients of HCV NAT+ donor allografts experience similar rates of acute rejection, early mortality, and 3-year survival compared to all other lung recipients. Increased use of HCV NAT+ donor allografts may help to expand the donor pool and alleviate donor shortages.

Outcomes of heart transplant recipients bridged with percutaneous versus durable left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: The new United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation policy prioritizes temporary percutaneous over durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) as bridge to transplant. We sought to examine 1-year outcomes of heart transplant recipients bridged with Impella versus durable LVADs. METHODS: All primary adult orthotopic heart transplant recipients registered in UNOS between January 2016 and June 2021 were analyzed. Recipients were identified as being bridged with isolated durable or percutaneous LVAD at the time of transplant. Baseline characteristics were compared and 1-year survival was examined using the Kaplan Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: During our study period, heart transplant recipients bridged with LVADs were divided between 5422(94%) durable and 324(6%) percutaneous options. Impella-bridged recipients were more likely to be status 1A under the old allocation system (98% vs. 70%, p < .01) and status 2 or higher under the new allocation system (99% vs. 24%, p < .01). Impella-bridged recipients were less likely to be obese (27% vs. 42%, p < .01), have ischemic cardiomyopathy (27% vs. 34%, p < .01), and were more likely to be on inotropic agents at the time of transplant (68% vs. 6%, p < .01). One-year post-transplant survival was not significantly different between the two groups on univariable (HR .87, 95% CI .56-1.37) or multivariable analysis (aHR .63, 95% CI .37-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Following the UNOS allocation policy change, Impella utilization has increased with no significant difference in 1-year survival compared to bridge with durable LVADs. Impella may be a reasonable alternative to durable LVADs in select patients.

Safety and efficacy of delaying lung transplant surgery to a morning start.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of delaying lung transplantation until morning for donors with cross-clamp times occurring after 1:30 am. Methods: All consented adult lung transplant recipients between March 2018 and May 2022 with donor cross-clamp times between 1:30 am and 5 am were enrolled prospectively in this study. Skin incision for enrolled recipients was delayed until 6:30 am (Night group). The control group was identified using a 1:2 logistic propensity score method and included recipients of donors with cross-clamp times occurring at any other time of day (Day group). Short- and medium-term outcomes were examined between groups. The primary endpoint was early mortality (30-day and in-hospital). Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled in the Night group, along with 68 well-matched patients in the Day group. As expected, donors in the Night group had longer cold ischemia times compared to the Day group (344 minutes vs 285 minutes; P < .01). Thirty-day mortality (3% vs 3%; P = .99), grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (8% vs 4%; P = .40), postoperative complications (26% vs 38%; P = .28), and hospital length of stay (15 days vs 14 days; P = .91) were similar in the 2 groups. No significant differences were noted between groups in 3-year survival (70% vs 77%; P = .30) or freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (91% vs 95%; P = .75) at 3 years post-transplantation. The median follow-up was 752.5 days (interquartile range, 487-1048 days). Conclusions: Lung transplant recipients with donor cross-clamp times scheduled after 1:30 am may safely have their operations delayed until 6:30 am with acceptable outcomes. Adoption of such a policy in clinically appropriate settings may lead to an alternative workflow and improved team well-being.

NKG2D receptor activation drives primary graft dysfunction severity and poor lung transplantation outcomes.

Clinical outcomes after lung transplantation, a life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage lung diseases, are limited by primary graft dysfunction (PGD). PGD is an early form of acute lung injury with no specific pharmacologic therapies. Here, we present a large multicenter study of plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples collected on the first posttransplant day, a critical time for investigations of immune pathways related to PGD. We demonstrated that ligands for NKG2D receptors were increased in the BAL from participants who developed severe PGD and were associated with increased time to extubation, prolonged intensive care unit length of stay, and poor peak lung function. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) were increased in PGD and correlated with BAL TNF-α and IFN-γ cytokines. Mechanistically, we found that airway epithelial cell NKG2D ligands were increased following hypoxic challenge. NK cell killing of hypoxic airway epithelial cells was abrogated with NKG2D receptor blockade, and TNF-α and IFN-γ provoked neutrophils to release NETs in culture. These data support an aberrant NK cell/neutrophil axis in human PGD pathogenesis. Early measurement of stress ligands and blockade of the NKG2D receptor hold promise for risk stratification and management of PGD.

The Impact of Transitioning From In-Person to Virtual Heart Transplantation Selection Committee Meetings: Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant selection committee meetings have transitioned from in-person to remote video meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, but how this impacts committee members and patient outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the perceived impact of remote video transplant selection meetings on usability and patient care and to measure patient selection outcomes during the transition period from in-person to virtual meetings. METHODS: A 35-item anonymous survey was developed and distributed electronically to the heart transplant selection committee. We reviewed medical records to compare the outcomes of patients presented at in-person meetings (January-March 2020) to those presented during video meetings (March-June 2020). RESULTS: Among 83 committee members queried, 50 were regular attendees. Of the 50 regular attendees, 24 (48%) were physicians and 26 (52%) were nonphysicians, including nurses, social workers, and coordinators; 46 responses were received, 23 (50%) from physicians and 23 (50%) from nonphysicians, with 41 responses fully completed. Overall, respondents were satisfied with the videoconference format and felt that video meetings did not impact patient care and were an acceptable alternative to in-person meetings. However, 54% (22/41) preferred in-person meetings, with 71% (15/21) of nonphysicians preferring in-person meetings compared to only 35% (7/20) of physicians (P=.02). Of the 46 new patient evaluations presented, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward fewer patients initially declined at video meetings compared with in-person meetings (6/24, 25% compared to 10/22, 45%; P=.32). CONCLUSIONS: The transition from in-person to video heart transplant selection committee meetings was well-received and did not appear to affect committee members' perceived ability to deliver patient care. Patient selection outcomes were similar between meeting modalities.

The allograft injury marker CXCL9 determines prognosis of anti-HLA antibodies after lung transplantation.

Despite the common detection of non-donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (non-DSAs) after lung transplantation, their clinical significance remains unclear. In this retrospective single-center cohort study of 325 lung transplant recipients, we evaluated the association between donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) and non-DSAs with subsequent CLAD development. DSAs were detected in 30% of recipients and were associated with increased CLAD risk, with higher HRs for both de novo and high MFI (>5000) DSAs. Non-DSAs were detected in 56% of recipients, and 85% of DSA positive tests had concurrent non-DSAs. In general, non-DSAs did not increase CLAD risk in multivariable models accounting for DSAs. However, non-DSAs in conjunction with high BAL CXCL9 levels were associated with increased CLAD risk. Multivariable proportional hazards models demonstrate the importance of the HLA antibody-CXCL9 interaction: CLAD risk increases when HLA antibodies (both DSAs and non-DSAs) are detected in conjunction with high CXCL9. Conversely, CLAD risk is not increased when HLA antibodies are detected with low CXCL9. This study supports the potential utility of BAL CXCL9 measurement as a biomarker to risk stratify HLA antibodies for future CLAD. The ability to discriminate between high versus low-risk HLA antibodies may improve management by allowing for guided treatment decisions.

Benefits of both physical assessment and electronic health record review to assess frailty prior to heart transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty status affects outcomes after heart transplantation, but the optimal way to assess frailty prior to transplant remains unknown. METHODS: This single-center, observational study assessed 44 heart transplant candidates for frailty using three methods. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) were used as two physical assessments of frailty. The Frailty Risk Score (FRS) was used as a chart-review based assessment measuring 20 different biopsychosocial and functional components, including biomarkers, depression, cognitive impairment, and sleep. RESULTS: We determined the correlation between FRS, SPPB, and FFP and how each correlated with clinical outcomes. Of 44 participants, mean age was 60 years. FRS correlated with SPPB and FFP (P = .043, P < .001, respectively). Higher frailty as measured by SPPB and FRS was significantly associated with lack of achieving waitlist status (P = .022; P = .002) and not being transplanted (P = .026; P = .008). Higher frailty by SPPB and FFP was also associated with mortality (P = .010; P = .025). CONCLUSION: SPPB and chart-review FRS showed potential for predicting waitlist and transplant status of heart transplant candidates, while SPPB and FFP were associated with mortality. Additional studies may serve to validate these observations.

Venoarterial Versus Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation As Bridge to Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used as a bridge to lung transplantation with acceptable outcomes. We hypothesized that venoarterial (VA) ECMO, as part of a multidisciplinary ECMO program, yields similar outcomes as VV ECMO as a bridge in lung transplantation. METHODS: Records of all patients who had undergone ECMO with the intention to bridge to lung transplantation at University of California, Los Angeles, from January 1, 2012, to March 31, 2020, were reviewed. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, long-term survival, and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome were assessed. RESULTS: During this interval, 58 patients were placed on ECMO with the intention to bridge to lung transplantation: 27 on VV ECMO, and 31 on VA ECMO, with a median duration of 7 and 17 days of support, respectively (P = .01). Successful bridge to lung transplantation occurred in 21 VV patients (78%) and in 26 VA patients (84%). Incidence of primary graft dysfunction III at 72 hours in the VV and the VA cohorts was 0% and 4%, respectively (P = .99). In-hospital and 90-day survival of the VV and VA groups was 100% and 96%, respectively (P = .99). Survival of the 2 groups at 3 years was not significantly different from a contemporary cohort of lung transplant recipients not bridged with ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: VA and VV ECMO can both be used as a bridge to lung transplantation with high success, with short and medium-term survival similar to non-bridged lung transplant recipients. Both modes should be considered effective at bridging select candidates to lung transplantation.

Left main coronary artery compression in pulmonary hypertension.

Extrinsic compression of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) by a dilated pulmonary artery (PA) in the setting of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is an increasingly recognized disease entity. LMCA compression has been associated with angina, arrhythmia, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death in patients with PAH. Recent studies suggest that at least 6% of patients with PAH have significant LMCA compression. Screening for LMCA compression can be achieved with computed coronary tomography angiography, with a particular emphasis on assessment of PA size and any associated downward displacement and reduced takeoff angle of the LMCA. Indeed, evidence of a dilated PA (>40 mm), a reduced LMCA takeoff angle (<60°), and/or LMCA stenosis on CCTA imaging should prompt further diagnostic evaluation. Coronary angiography in conjunction with intravascular imaging has proven effective in diagnosing LMCA compression and guiding subsequent treatment. While optimal medical therapy and surgical correction remain in the clinician's arsenal, percutaneous coronary intervention has emerged as an effective treatment for LMCA compression. Given the prevalence of LMCA compression, its associated morbidity, and mortality, and the wide array of successful treatment strategies, maintaining a high degree of suspicion for this condition, and understanding the potential treatment strategies is critical.

Plasma Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Levels Are Increased During Acute Cellular Rejection After Lung Transplant: Pilot Data.

Telehealth platforms with remote phlebotomy and biomarker implementation represent a novel paradigm for surveillance after lung transplantation (LT). In a pilot study, we investigated donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in plasma using a clinical-grade "next-generation sequencing" assay. METHODS: dd-cfDNA levels determined in biorepository venous plasma samples obtained during the lung allograft rejection gene expression observation study, implementing a clinical-grade next-generation sequencing assay. Sixty-nine unique LT patients encompassing 9 LT centers, with associated clinical-histopathologic diagnoses, were examined-allograft infection (n = 26), normal histopathology without infection (n = 30), and acute cellular rejection (ACR; n = 13). RESULTS: dd-cfDNA in ACR patients were significantly elevated (1.52%; interquartile range [IQR], 0.520-2.2550) compared with the normal stable patients (0.485%; IQR, 0.220-0.790) (P = 0.026). During allograft infection, dd-cfDNA values were not different (0.595; IQR, 0.270-1.170) from normal (P = 0.282) and ACR (P = 0.100). AUC-receiver operator characteristics curve analysis for allograft ACR was 0.717 (95% confidence interval, 0.547-0.887; P = 0.025). At a 0.87% threshold dd-cfDNA-sensitivity = 73.1%, specificity = 52.9%, positive predictive value = 34.1%, and negative predictive value = 85.5%. CONCLUSIONS: dd-cfDNA assessment holds promise as a noninvasive biomarker of "allograft injury" with acute rejection following LT while prospective, multicenter studies should further refine utility across the spectrum of allograft rejection and infection.

Prognosis of heart transplant patients in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

INTRODUCTION: Heart transplant is the ultimate treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure. AIM: To assess 50 heart transplant patients for underlying diseases, transplantation outcome and mortality rate during a 5-year follow-up program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty heart transplant patients who underwent heart transplantation from 2012 to 2017 were assessed for underlying diseases, organ rejection, duration of hospitalization, extubation time, cardiac output and survival. Biopsy samples were obtained after surgery for evaluation of rejection. RESULTS: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) were the most common underlying diseases with prevalence of 56% and 12%, respectively. Significant improvement in ejection fraction was observed following heart transplant. Minimum and maximum extubation and hospitalization times were 3-408 hours and 1-51 days, respectively. Organ rejection evaluation 10 days after heart transplantation revealed that 50% of patients did not show any rejection while 10% had severe rejection. At 30 days post-operatively the number of patients with grade III rejection decreased to 2% while 56% of patients had no sign of rejection. The 5-year survival rate was 66% while infection and arrhythmia were the most common causes of death. CONCLUSIONS: DCM and ICM are considered the most prevalent underlying diseases in heart transplant candidates. Ejection fraction reached normal ranges following transplant, which provides good quality of life. Low incidence of severe acute rejection demonstrates the effectiveness of our immunosuppressive therapy. In the cases of increased rejection, the patient's immunosuppressive regimen was re-assessed accordingly.

Heart transplantation in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: A single-center case series.

The infectious disease coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on solid organ transplantations, including heart transplantation, is currently unclear. Many transplant programs have been forced to swiftly re-evaluate and adapt their practices, leading to a marked decrease in transplants performed. This trend has been due to various factors, including increased donor COVID-19 screening scrutiny and recipient waiting list management in anticipation of COVID-19 critical care surge capacity planning. In the face of these unknown variables, determining when and how to proceed with transplantation in our population of patients with end-stage cardiomyopathies is challenging. Here, we describe our center's experience with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in one of the country's pandemic epicenters, where we performed eight OHTs in the first 2 months after community spread began in late February 2020.

Current status of normothermic ex-vivo perfusion of cardiac allografts.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ex-vivo perfusion has emerged in recent years as an alternative to cold static preservation of organs harvested for transplant. Normothermic ex-vivo perfusion, the subject of this review, maintains the donor heart in a near physiologic state, and allows the transplant team to monitor and control perfusion to the organ prior to implantation. A growing body of evidence has established the safety and viability of this technique, which may improve on current standards of donor management. RECENT FINDINGS: Following initial single-arm studies over a decade ago, ex-vivo perfusion has been studied in a prospective, randomized fashion in standard donor hearts (PROCEED II trial). The short and intermediate-term results demonstrated similar outcomes compared with cold storage with significantly shorter cold ischemic time. Since then, ex-vivo perfusion has been studied in extended-criteria donor hearts, first in observational studies, and currently in randomized, prospective fashion in the recently completed EXPAND-Heart trial, which is anticipated to be reported in 2020. SUMMARY: Normothermic ex-vivo perfusion has an established literature base and holds promise for changing current practices of heart preservation. Results of forthcoming pivotal studies will help determine its role in more widespread clinical adoption.

Discovery of non-HLA antibodies associated with cardiac allograft rejection and development and validation of a non-HLA antigen multiplex panel: From bench to bedside.

We analyzed humoral immune responses to nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) after cardiac transplantation to identify antibodies associated with allograft rejection. Protein microarray identified 366 non-HLA antibodies (>1.5 fold, P < .5) from a discovery cohort of HLA antibody-negative, endothelial cell crossmatch-positive sera obtained from 12 cardiac allograft recipients at the time of biopsy-proven rejection. From these, 19 plasma membrane proteins and 10 autoantigens identified from gene ontology analysis were combined with 48 proteins identified through literature search to generate a multiplex bead array. Longitudinal sera from a multicenter cohort of adult cardiac allograft recipients (samples: n = 477 no rejection; n = 69 rejection) identified 18 non-HLA antibodies associated with rejection (P < .1) including 4 newly identified non-HLA antigenic targets (DEXI, EMCN, LPHN1, and SSB). CART analysis showed 5/18 non-HLA antibodies distinguished rejection vs nonrejection. Antibodies to 4/18 non-HLA antigens synergize with HLA donor-specific antibodies and significantly increase the odds of rejection (P < .1). The non-HLA panel was validated using an independent adult cardiac transplant cohort (n = 21 no rejection; n = 42 rejection, >1R) with an area under the curve of 0.87 (P < .05) with 92.86% sensitivity and 66.67% specificity. We conclude that multiplex bead array assessment of non-HLA antibodies identifies cardiac transplant recipients at risk of rejection.