Efficacy and Safety of Anakinra Plus Standard of Care for Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Phase 2/3 Clinical Trial.

Importance: COVID-19 pneumonia is often associated with hyperinflammation. The efficacy and safety of anakinra in treating patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation are still unclear. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of anakinra vs standard of care alone for patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Clinical Trial of the Use of Anakinra in Cytokine Storm Syndrome Secondary to COVID-19 (ANA-COVID-GEAS) was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-group, phase 2/3 clinical trial conducted at 12 hospitals in Spain between May 8, 2020, and March 1, 2021, with a follow-up of 1 month. Participants were adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation. Hyperinflammation was defined as interleukin-6 greater than 40 pg/mL, ferritin greater than 500 ng/mL, C-reactive protein greater than 3 mg/dL (rationale, ≥5 upper normal limit), and/or lactate dehydrogenase greater than 300 U/L. Severe pneumonia was considered if at least 1 of the following conditions was met: ambient air oxygen saturation 94% or less measured with a pulse oximeter, ratio of partial pressure O2 to fraction of inspired O2 of 300 or less, and/or a ratio of O2 saturation measured with pulse oximeter to fraction of inspired O2 of 350 or less. Data analysis was performed from April to October 2021. Interventions: Usual standard of care plus anakinra (anakinra group) or usual standard of care alone (SoC group). Anakinra was given at a dose of 100 mg 4 times a day intravenously. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients not requiring mechanical ventilation up to 15 days after treatment initiation, assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: A total of 179 patients (123 men [69.9%]; mean [SD] age, 60.5 [11.5] years) were randomly assigned to the anakinra group (92 patients) or to the SoC group (87 patients). The proportion of patients not requiring mechanical ventilation up to day 15 was not significantly different between groups (64 of 83 patients [77.1%] in the anakinra group vs 67 of 78 patients [85.9%] in the SoC group; risk ratio [RR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.04; P = .16). Anakinra did not result in any difference in time to mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.82-3.62; P = .14). There was no significant difference between groups in the proportion of patients not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation up to day 15 (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.88-1.11; P > .99). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, anakinra did not prevent the need for mechanical ventilation or reduce mortality risk compared with standard of care alone among hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04443881.

Efecto de la pandemia en la cirugía radical del cáncer vesical / Effect of the pandemic on radical surgery for bladder cancer

Objetivo: El advenimiento de la pandemia de síndrome respiratorio agudo por coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ha tenido un impacto en el manejo del resto de las patologías por la elevada presión asistencial generada. Por su historia natural, el cáncer vesical susceptible de cistectomía radical (CR) requiere especial atención. Nuestro objetivo es comparar los resultados perioperatorios y oncológicos de estos pacientes durante el estado de alarma respecto a la era pre-COVID en un centro de tercer nivel. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo observacional descriptivo y analítico. Pacientes intervenidos de cistectomía radical por neoplasia entre abril de 2019 y marzo de 2021 divididos en dos grupos, abril 2019-marzo 2020 (n = 42) y abril 2020-marzo 2021 (n = 43). Resultados: Ambos grupos resultaron ser homogéneos. La mediana de espera desde la resección transuretral de vejiga hasta la realización de la CR no aumentó (82,5 vs. 83 días, p = = 0,860). No se observan tampoco diferencias en la estadificación TNM de las piezas quirúrgicas. Los tumores localmente avanzados no aumentaron significativamente (18 vs. 21, p = 0,580). La presencia de afectación ganglionar tampoco presentó diferencias significativas (10 vs. 13, p = 0,675). La estancia media disminuyó en un valor cercano a significación (mediana en días: 11 vs. 8, p = 0,056) sin que ello asociase un mayor número de complicaciones o de reingresos a los 30 días. Conclusión:: En nuestra serie no hemos constatado diferencias significativas en los resultados perioperatorios y oncológicos de pacientes tratados mediante CR durante la pandemia de COVID-19.

Introduction: The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic (caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2] has had an impact on the management of other pathologies due to the high healthcare pressure generated. Due to its natural history, bladder cancer amenable to radical cystectomy requires special attention. We aim to compare the perioperative and oncological results of these patients during the alarm state with respect to the pre-COVID era in a tertiary care center. Material and methods: Observational descriptive and analytical retrospective research. Patients who underwent radical cistectomy because of bladder cancer between April 2019 to March 2021, divided in two groups, April 2019-March 2020 (n = 42) and April 2020-March 2021 (n = 43). Results: Both groups turned out to be homogeneous. The median wait time from transurethral resection of the bladder to radical cystectomy did not increase (82.5 vs. 83 days, p = 0.860). No differences were observed in the TNM staging of the surgical specimens. Locally advanced tumors did not increase significantly (18 vs. 21, p = 0.580). The presence of lymph node involvement did not present significant differences either (10 vs. 13, p = 0.675). The average stay decreased by a value close to significance (median in days 11 vs. 8, p = 0.056) without being associated with a greater number of complications or readmissions at 30 days. Conclusion: In our series, we have not found significant differences in the perioperative and oncological results of patients treated by radical cystectomy during the COVID-19 pandem

Standardized incidence ratios and risk factors for cancer in patients with systemic sclerosis: Data from the Spanish Scleroderma Registry (RESCLE).

AIM: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are at increased risk of cancer, a growing cause of non-SSc-related death among these patients. We analyzed the increased cancer risk among Spanish patients with SSc using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and identified independent cancer risk factors in this population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Spanish Scleroderma Registry data were analyzed to determine the demographic characteristics of patients with SSc, and logistic regression was used to identify cancer risk factors. SIRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) relative to the general Spanish population were calculated. RESULTS: Of 1930 patients with SSc, 206 had cancer, most commonly breast, lung, hematological, and colorectal cancers. Patients with SSc had increased risks of overall cancer (SIR 1.48, 95% CI 1.36-1.60; P < 0.001), and of lung (SIR 2.22, 95% CI 1.77-2.73; P < 0.001), breast (SIR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.54; P = 0.003), and hematological (SIR 2.03, 95% CI 1.52-2.62; P < 0.001) cancers. Cancer was associated with older age at SSc onset (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001), the presence of primary biliary cholangitis (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.18-4.68; P = 0.015) and forced vital capacity <70% (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.24-2.70; P = 0.002). The presence of anticentromere antibodies lowered the risk of cancer (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97; P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Spanish patients with SSc had an increased cancer risk compared with the general population. Some characteristics, including specific autoantibodies, may be related to this increased risk.

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in systemic sclerosis: Clinical, immunological and survival differences in the Spanish RESCLE registry.

OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) remains poorly studied in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). To determine the prevalence and to define factors associated with LVDD and survival in a large cohort of patients with SSc. METHODS: An observational study was conducted with data from the multicentre Spanish Scleroderma Registry (RESCLE) to identify factors associated with LVDD and estimate survival. RESULTS: Out of 1517 patients, 319 (21.0%) had LVDD. The subset of sine scleroderma SSc was associated to LVDD (14.7% vs. 10.6%, p =0.048), whilst diffuse cutaneous SSc was more prevalent in non-LVDD (16.0 % vs. 21.2%, p =0.041). Multivariable analysis identified that LVDD was associated with older age at diagnosis of SSc (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.06), longer time from diagnosis (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06), presence of telangiectasia (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.88), treatment with calcium channel blockers (CCB) (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.96), and inversely related to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) use (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.80). SSc patients with LVDD had increased mortality (23.8 vs. 17.4%, p =0.010) and shortened survival from the first SSc symptom (p =0.040), even though it was not found to be an independent risk factor for death. CONCLUSIONS: LVDD is relatively common in SSc patients, and it is associated with worst prognosis, older age, longer time from diagnosis of SSc, presence of telangiectasia and vasodilator treatment.

Impact of interstitial lung disease on the survival of systemic sclerosis with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

To assess severity markers and outcomes of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) with or without pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH-SSc/non-PAH-SSc), and the impact of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on PAH-SSc. Non-PAH-SSc patients from the Spanish SSc registry and PAH-SSc patients from the Spanish PAH registry were included. A total of 364 PAH-SSc and 1589 non-PAH-SSc patients were included. PAH-SSc patients had worse NYHA-functional class (NYHA-FC), worse forced vital capacity (FVC) (81.2 ± 20.6% vs 93.6 ± 20.6%, P < 0.001), worse tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (17.4 ± 5.2 mm vs 19.9 ± 6.7 mm, P < 0.001), higher incidence of pericardial effusion (30% vs 5.2%, P < 0.001) and similar prevalence of ILD (41.8% vs. 44.9%). In individuals with PAH-SSc, ILD was associated with worse hemodynamics and pulmonary function tests (PFT). Up-front combination therapy was used in 59.8% and 61.7% of patients with and without ILD, respectively. Five-year transplant-free survival rate was 41.1% in PAH-SSc patients and 93.9% in non-PAH-SSc patients (P < 0.001). Global survival of PAH-SSc patients was not affected by ILD regardless its severity. The multivariate survival analysis in PAH-SSc patients confirmed age at diagnosis, worse NYHA-FC, increased PVR, reduced DLCO, and lower management with up-front combination therapy as major risk factors. In conclusion, in PAH-SSc cohort risk of death was greatly increased by clinical, PFT, and hemodynamic factors, whereas it was decreased by up-front combination therapy. Concomitant ILD worsened hemodynamics and PFT in PAH-SSc but not survival regardless of FVC impairment.

The incidence rate of pulmonary arterial hypertension and scleroderma renal crisis in systemic sclerosis patients with digital ulcers on endothelin antagonist receptors (ERAs) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i).

INTRODUCTION: Endothelin antagonist receptors (ERAs) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are beneficial in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and digital ulcers (DU) and prevent from DU recurrences. Our study aimed to determine the difference in the incidence rate of PAH and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) in patients with SSc and DU (SSc-DU) under ERAs/PDE5i or without treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including SSc-DU patients from the Spanish Scleroderma Registry (RESCLE). The primary outcome was the incidence rate of PAH and SRC in patients under ERAs/PDE5i or not. RESULTS: Some 544 patients out of 1817 (29.9%) in the RESCLE database had DU, 221 (40.6%) under ERAs/PDE5i and 323 (59.4%) not. The incidence rate (95% CI) difference between patients under treatment or not under did not reach statistical significance in PAH [-0.1 (-4.8, 4.69), P = 0.988] or in SRC [0.7 (-2.2, 3.7), P = 0.620]. However, the time from the first DU to the diagnosis of SRC was delayed in treated patients [mean (s.d.) 7.6 (5.8) years vs 2.9 (5.3); P = 0.021]. The dcSSc subset was more prevalent in the treatment group (36 vs 26%; P = 0.018), along with anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (34 vs 18%; P < 0.001) and tendon friction rubs (12 vs 6%; P = 0.038), whereas the lcSSc subset was more prevalent in the no-treatment group (57 vs 66%; P = 0.031) along with ACA (37 vs 46%; P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the incidence rate of PAH and SRC between groups. However, treatment with ERAs and/or PDE5i appeared to delay the occurrence of SRC.

Spanish scleroderma risk score (RESCLESCORE) to predict 15-year all-cause mortality in scleroderma patients at the time of diagnosis based on the RESCLE cohort: Derivation and internal validation.

A few scores predicting the short-term risk of mortality in Systemic sclerosis (SSc) have been reported to date. Our study aimed to create a predictive 15-year all-cause mortality score at the time of the diagnosis of SSc. The study was based on the Spanish Scleroderma Registry (RESCLE). The cohort was split up in derivation (DC) and validation cohort (VC). A multivariate analysis to detect variables related to all-cause mortality within the first 15 years from SSc diagnosis was performed, assigning points to the rounded beta values to create the score (RESCLESCORE). 1935 SSc patients were included. The variables in the final model were as follows: age at diagnosis (+2 points > 65 years-old), male gender (+1 point), lcSSc subset (-1 point), mode of onset other than Raynaud's (+1 point), cancer (+1 point) and visceral involvement, such as ILD (+1 point), PAH (+1 point), heart (+1 point) and renal involvement (+2 points). Autoantibodies did not achieve statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. The 3 categories of risk to predict 15-year all-cause mortality at the time of diagnosis were as follows: low risk (5% vs. 7%, p = .189), intermediate risk (26.5% vs. 25.5%, p = .911) and high risk (47.8% vs. 59%, p = .316). The AUC was 0.799 (DC) vs. 0.778 (VC) (p = .530). In conclusion, the RESCLESCORE demonstrated an excellent ability to categorize SSc patients at the time of diagnosis in separate 15-year all-cause mortality risk strata at the time of diagnosis.

[Influence of age on the clinical manifestations of invasive pneumococcal disease and antibiotic resistance rates]. / Influencia de la edad en la enfermedad neumocócica invasiva y en la resistencia a antimicrobianos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) shows different epidemiological characteristics depending on age and pneumococcus serotype. The aims of the work were to analyze the clinical manifestations and mortality associated with IPD, the serotype isolated and the antibiotic resistance rates in different age groups. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Retrospectively, 141 patients with IPD diagnosed between 2002 and 2008 were studied. Patients were classified in 4 age groups: ≤ 2 year-old, 3-14 year-old, 15-64 year-old and ≥ 65 year-old. RESULTS: Pneumonia was the most common manifestation in all age groups (71%). Pneumococcal meningitis was more prevalent in patients ≤ 2 year-old (28 vs. 9%, P=.054) and empyema was more frequent in those between 3-14 year-old (31 vs. 5%, P<.001). Mortality was associated with age ≥ 65 year-old (odds ratio [OR] 7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.9-28.9), primary bacteremia (OR 7, 95% CI 1.9-28.9) and orotracheal intubation (OR 9, 95% CI 1.9-41.1). The more prevalent serotypes among patients ≤ 2 year-old were 14, 19A and 19F. The serotype 1 was most common in patients between 3-14 year-old and serotype 3 in those ≥ 65 year-old. A higher rate of non-susceptible penicillin strains was observed in pediatric population (42 vs. 19%, P=.007). CONCLUSIONS: Age was related to the clinical manifestations, mortality and antibiotic resistance rates. Primary bacteremia was one of the risk factors of mortality.