Anatomical Gynecological Anomalies in Girls Born with Anorectal Malformations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 128 Patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In girls born with an anorectal malformation (ARM), anatomical gynecological anomalies (GA) may be present and might need treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide an overview of GA in girls born with ARM in our cohort. Additionally, diagnostic timing and methods for GA were assessed. METHODS: A retrospective mono-center study was performed from January 2000 to December 2022. All patients assigned female at birth were eligible for inclusion. GA were classified according to ESHRE/ESGE classification. Outcomes were the number of girls with GA with subsequent screening methods, factors associated with GA, and GA requiring treatment. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the association between baseline characteristics and the presence of GA. RESULTS: In total, 128 girls were included, of whom 30 (24.1%) had additional GA, with vaginal anomalies being present most often (n = 17). Fifty-six patients (43.8%) underwent full screening, and this number improved over time (37.7% before 2018 vs 72.7% after 2018; P = .003). Thirteen of 30 patients (43.3%) required surgical treatment for their GA, without the occurrence of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Additional GA were present in almost a quarter of the girls born with an ARM, with vaginal anomalies most often identified. Despite GA being most often found in patients with cloacal malformations, these anomalies were also identified in patients with other ARM types. Surgical treatment was required in almost half of the girls with GA. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of screening for GA in patients with an ARM, regardless of the ARM type.

Potential benefits of routine cystoscopy and vaginoscopy prior to reconstructive surgery in patients with an anorectal malformation.

PURPOSE: First, to assess the number of patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) in whom additional urological and/or gynecological anomalies were identified through routine screening with cysto- or vaginoscopy prior to reconstructive surgery. Second, to assess potential procedure-related complications. METHODS: Retrospective mono-center cohort study, including all ARM patients born between January 2019 and December 2022. Routine screening consisted of cystoscopy for male patients, with the addition of vaginoscopy for female patients. Chi-square was used to compare the screening percentages over time. RESULTS: In total, 38 patients were included, of whom 27 (71.1%) underwent cystoscopy ± vaginoscopy, without the occurrence of complications. Nine of 13 females (69.2%) underwent cysto- and vaginoscopy and 18 of 25 males (72.0%) underwent a cystoscopy. The percentage of patients that underwent these procedures improved over the 2 time periods (50.0% in 2019-2020 vs 90.0% in 2021-2022, p = 0.011). In 15 of 27 patients (55.6%) that underwent cystoscopy ± vaginoscopy, additional anomalies were found that were not identified through physical examination or US-kidney. CONCLUSIONS: In 56% of the patients that underwent cysto- ± vaginoscopy, additional anomalies were identified that were not with imaging studies or physical examination. This study emphasizes the potential benefit of routine cysto- and vaginoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of children with ARM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.