Frontline Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has tremendously evolved in the last decades, thanks to the introduction of more effective therapies. SUMMARY: Frontline therapy for patients with CLL includes chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and pathway inhibitors (PIs) (i.e., bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and BCL2 inhibitors); the latter has proved to be more effective than CIT mainly in patients with high-risk features (e.g., TP53 aberrations and unmutated IGHV) with acceptable toxicity. Combinations of PIs are playing the protagonist role as frontline therapy for CLL. KEY MESSAGES: In this article, the management of treatment-naïve patients with CLL is discussed.

Evolution in the frontline treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: experience from one European center.

Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has dramatically evolved over the last decades thanks to the introduction of targeted therapies. We aimed to describe retrospectively the evolution in the frontline prescription in the CLL patients from our institution. As a secondary objective, the impact of frontline therapy on the time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS). After a median of 6.4 years (0.1-36.4) of follow-up from diagnosis, 323 of 780 CLL patients (41.4%) required therapy. Alkylating agents in monotherapy (chlorambucil) were the most used until 2012, and from then, chemoimmunotherapy. Since 2018, targeted therapies were the most common therapeutic strategy (74.1%). Patients who received targeted therapies had significantly longer TTNT compared to other regimens. In the multivariable analyses, mutated IGHV genes targeted therapies and chemoimmunotherapy regimens were related to longer TTNT, and sex female, age younger than 65, and mutated IGHV genes were associated with better OS.

Sequence matters: Total body irradiation (TBI)-based myeloablative conditioning with post-transplant cyclophosphamide may reduce the early nonrelapse mortality compared with pretransplant cyclophosphamide plus TBI.

OBJECTIVES: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is considered a cornerstone of myeloablative conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We retrospectively compared the main outcomes of an HLA matched or 1-allele mismatched related or unrelated allo-SCT in adult patients affected by acute leukemia (AL) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). METHODS: Fifty-nine patients received cyclophosphamide (Cy)-TBI (13.5 Gy) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with a calcineurin-inhibitor plus methrotrexate (CyTBI group) and 28 patients received fludarabine-TBI (8.8-13.5 Gy) and GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy and tacrolimus (FluTBI-PTCy group). RESULTS: Median follow-up for survivors was 82 and 22 months. The 12-month probability of overall survival and progression-free survival were similar (p = .18, p = .7). The incidence of Grades 2-4 and 3-4 acute GVHD, and the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were higher in the CyTBI group (p = .02, p < .01and p = .03). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 12 months posttransplant was higher in the CyTBI group (p = 0.05), while the incidence of relapse was similar in both groups (p = 0.7). The number of GVHD-free and relapse-free patients without systemic immunosuppression (GRFS) at 1-year posttransplant was higher in the FluTBI-PTCy group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the safety and efficacy of a novel FluTBI-PTCy platform with reduced incidence of severe acute and chronic GVHD, and early improvement of NRM.

Successful Outcome in Patients with Myelofibrosis Undergoing Allogeneic Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Reduced Doses of Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide: Challenges and Review of the Literature.

Engraftment and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) depend greatly on the transplantation platform in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We report outcomes of 14 consecutive MF patients who received reduced doses of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy; 60 mg/kg total dose) and tacrolimus as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis as part of a new standardized allo-HCT protocol. The median patient age at allo-HCT was 59 years (range, 41 to 67 years), and the median interval from diagnosis to HCT was 19 months (range, 2 to 114 months). All patients received ruxolitinib before HCT, and 71% had no response. Most patients (78%) had symptomatic splenomegaly at HCT. Eighty-six percent received reduced-intensity conditioning, and 64% underwent allo-HCT from an unrelated donor. There were no graft failures, and neutrophil and platelet recovery occurred at a median of 21 days and 31 days, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 28.6%, and that of grade III-IV acute GVHD was 7%. The 2-year incidence of overall and moderate-severe chronic GVHD was 36% and 14%, respectively. Only 1 patient relapsed after transplantation, and NRM was 7% at 100 days and 14% at 2 years. The GVHD-free/relapse-free and immunosuppression-free incidence at 1 year was 41%. With a median follow-up for survivors of 28 months (range, 8 to 55 months), the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 86% and 69%, respectively. Reduced doses of PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis for high-risk MF patients showed promising results by reducing the incidence of GVHD without any cases of graft failure.

The road to chemotherapy-free treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has tremendously evolved in the last decades, from chemo to chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and, eventually, to pathway inhibitors that target critical pathways for leukaemic cells survival. Also, treatment goals are moving towards achieving undetectable minimal residual disease with little toxicity. RECENT FINDINGS: We performed a thorough review of the history of treatment approvals by both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This review especially focuses on therapies that are currently approved by both agencies. The indications and particular characteristics of each drug are examined. SUMMARY: Currently available treatment approaches for CLL offer the opportunity to individualize therapy for every single patient with CLL. Inhibitors of B-cell receptor (BCR) signalling pathways and antiapoptotic proteins are nowadays the treatment of choice for most CLL patients, but CIT can be an option for younger and fit patients with low-risk disease [mutated IGHV, no del(11q) or del(17p)/TP53 mutations].