Quality of Life After Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results From the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence from thrombolysis trials indicates the noninferiority of intravenous tenecteplase to intravenous alteplase with respect to good functional outcomes in patients with acute stroke. We examined whether the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with acute stroke differs by the type of thrombolysis treatment received. In addition, we examined the association between the modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 and HRQOL and patient-reported return to prebaseline stroke functioning at 90 days. METHODS: Data were from all patients included in the AcT trial (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase), a pragmatic, registry-linked randomized trial comparing tenecteplase with alteplase. HRQOL at 90-day post-randomization was assessed using the 5-item EuroQOL questionnaire (EQ5D), which consists of 5 items and a visual analog scale (VAS). EQ5D index values were estimated from the EQ5D items using the time tradeoff approach based on Canadian norms. Tobit regression and quantile regression models were used to evaluate the adjusted effect of tenecteplase versus alteplase treatment on the EQ5D index values and VAS score, respectively. The association between return to prebaseline stroke functioning and the modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 and HRQOL was quantified using correlation coefficient (r) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Of 1577 included in the intention-to-treat analysis patients, 1503 (95.3%) had complete data on the EQ5D. Of this, 769 (51.2%) were administered tenecteplase and 717 (47.7%) were female. The mean EQ5D VAS score and EQ5D index values were not significantly higher for those who received intravenous tenecteplase compared with those who received intravenous alteplase (P=0.10). Older age (P<0.01), more severe stroke assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (P<0.01), and longer stroke onset-to-needle time (P=0.004) were associated with lower EQ5D index and VAS scores. There was a strong association (r, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.81-0.89]) between patient-reported return to prebaseline functioning and modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 Similarly, there was a moderate association between return to prebaseline functioning and EQ5D index (r, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.40-0.49]) and EQ5D VAS scores (r, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.37-0.46]). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no differential effect of thrombolysis type on patient-reported global HRQOL and EQ 5D-5L index values in patients with acute stroke, sex- and age-related differences in HRQOL were noted in this study. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03889249.

Rates of 30-day revisit to the emergency department among older adults living with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Older adults visit emergency departments (EDs) at higher rates than their younger counterparts. However, less is known about the rate at which older adults living with dementia visit and revisit EDs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the revisit rate to the ED among older adults living with a dementia diagnosis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, as well as gray literature, to identify observational studies reporting on older adults living with dementia that revisited an ED within 30 days of a prior ED visit. We calculated pooled rates of 30-day revisit as percentages using random effects models, and conducted stratified analyses by study data source, study population, and study period. We assessed between-studies heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and considered [Formula: see text] > 50% to indicate substantial heterogeneity. All analyses were performed in R software. RESULTS: We identified six articles for inclusion. Percentages of 30-day ED revisit among older adults living with dementia ranged widely from 16.1% to 58.0%. The overall revisit rate of 28.6% showed significant heterogeneity. Between-studies heterogeneity across all stratified analyses was also high. By data source, 30-day revisit percentages were 52.3% (public hospitals) and 20.0% (administrative databases); by study population, revisit percentages were 33.5% (dementia as main population) and 19.8% (dementia as a subgroup). By study period, revisit percentages were 41.2% (5 years or greater) and 18.9% (5 years or less). CONCLUSION: Existing literature on ED revisits among older adults living with dementia highlights the medical complexities and challenges surrounding discharge and follow-up care that may cause these patients to seek ED care at an increased rate. ED personnel may play an important role in connecting patients and caregivers to more appropriate medical and social resources in order to deliver an efficient and more rounded approach to care.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Les personnes âgées se rendent aux services d'urgence (SU) à des taux plus élevés que leurs homologues plus jeunes. Cependant, on sait moins à quelle fréquence les personnes âgées vivant avec une démence se rendent et retournent aux SU. Nous avons mené une revue systématique et une méta-analyse pour quantifier le taux de retour aux SU chez les personnes âgées vivant avec un diagnostic de démence. MéTHODES: Nous avons effectué une recherche dans MEDLINE, Embase et CINAHL, ainsi que dans la littérature grise, pour identifier les études observationnelles rapportant sur les personnes âgées vivant avec une démence qui sont retournées aux SU dans les 30 jours suivant une visite antérieure aux SU. Nous avons calculé les taux de retour à 30 jours en pourcentage en utilisant des modèles à effets aléatoires, et nous avons effectué des analyses stratifiées selon la source des données de l'étude, la population de l'étude et la période de l'étude. Nous avons évalué l'hétérogénéité entre les études à l'aide de la statistique I2 et avons considéré I