Impaired esophagogastric junction relaxation and lung transplantation outcomes.

The implications of impaired esophagogastric junction relaxation (i.e. esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and achalasia) in lung transplants recipients (LTRs) are unclear. Thus, we examined the prevalence and clinical outcomes of LTRs with an abnormally elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on high-resolution manometry before lung transplantation (LTx). After IRB approval, we reviewed data on LTRs who underwent LTx between January 2019 and August 2022 with a preoperative median IRP >15 mmHg. Differences in overall survival and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival between LTRs with a normalized median IRP after LTx (N-IRP) and those with persistently high IRP (PH-IRP) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. During the study period, 352 LTx procedures were performed; 44 (12.5%) LTRs had an elevated IRP before LTx, and 37 (84.1%) completed a postoperative manometry assessment (24 [70.6%] males; mean age, 65.2 ± 9.1 years). The median IRP before and after LTx was 18.7 ± 3.8 mmHg and 12 ± 5.6 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001); the median IRP normalized after LTx in 24 (64.9%) patients. Two-year overall survival trended lower in the N-IRP group than the PH-IRP group (77.2% vs. 92.3%, P = 0.086), but CLAD-free survival (P = 0.592) and rates of primary graft dysfunction (P = 0.502) and acute cellular rejection (P = 0.408) were similar. An abnormally elevated IRP was common in LTx candidates; however, it normalized in roughly two-thirds of patients after LTx. Two-year survival trended higher in the PH-IRP group, despite similar rates of primary graft dysfunction and acute cellular rejection as well as similar CLAD-free survival between the groups.

Evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung transplant recipients: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the disease course has changed as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have mutated. We compared COVID-19-related clinical outcomes in LTRs at different stages of the pandemic. We also identified risk factors for developing severe COVID-19 independent of the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study of LTRs with COVID-19 used Cox regression analyses and bootstrapping to identify factors affecting COVID-19 severity. RESULTS: Between March 2020 and August 2022, 195 LTRs were diagnosed with COVID-19, almost half (89 [45.6%]) during the Omicron period. A total of 113 (58.5%) LTRs were hospitalized and 47 (24.1%) died. Age >65 years increased the risk of hospitalization and death. Although infection with the Omicron variant was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization, the median length of hospital stay (10 days, [interquartile range, 5-19]) was similar between the variants. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death were more common with the Delta variant but comparable between the original, Alpha, and Omicron variants. Remdesivir and molnupiravir reduced the risk of hospitalization, and monoclonal antibody therapy reduced the risk of ICU admission, intubation, and death. Vaccination and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab-cilgavimab did not significantly reduce COVID-19-related ICU admission, intubation, or mortality among LTRs. CONCLUSIONS: LTRs with COVID-19 continue to have high hospitalization rates and prolonged hospital stays, despite the reduced virulence of the Omicron variant. More effective PrEP and therapeutic interventions for COVID-19 among vulnerable patient groups are needed.

Apixaban for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism After Lung Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend the use of direct oral anticoagulation therapy over warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation. However, there is uncertainty and a lack of data supporting the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy in lung transplant recipients. Additionally, there are unique considerations for this population, such as labile renal function and drug interactions. PROJECT AIMS: The objective of this program evaluation was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban therapy for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients. DESIGN: Medical records of all adult lung transplant recipients who received apixaban for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism treatment between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of bleeding. Efficacy was evaluated by the recurrence of blood clots or the incidence of stroke. RESULTS: A total of 134 recipients were included in the review. Thromboembolisms occurred in 14 recipients (10%), and none experienced a stroke. Bleeding occurred in 12 recipients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this evaluation were similar to those seen in smaller studies of the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients, especially in recipients taking interacting azole antifungals. Prospective, comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings.

A Rare Case of Orthostasis, Dizziness, and Non-O1, Non-O139 Vibrio cholerae Infection in a Lung Transplant Recipient.

Non-O1, non-O139 Vibrio cholerae are rare strains that are generally nonpathogenic in immunocompetent hosts. However, this pathogen has been shown to cause gastroenteritis, wound infections, or bacteremia in immunocompromised patients and is associated with significant mortality in these hosts. Herein, we describe a case of hemorrhagic enterocolitis in a lung transplant recipient with an atypical presentation of non-O1, non-O139 V. cholerae and ongoing orthostasis. The patient reported recent seafood consumption and was managed appropriately with antibiotic therapy before necessitating esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for further objective testing.

Incidentally Detected Malignancies in Lung Explants.

Introduction: Incidentally detected malignancies in lung explants portend risk of early cancer recurrence and metastases with posttransplant immunosuppression. We present a series of lung transplant recipients with previously unverified malignancies in native lung explants. Design: We reviewed the histopathology, radiographic imaging, and management of lung explant malignancies at our institution over 10 years (2011-2020). Endpoints were survival and allograft rejection. Results: An explant malignancy was found in 1.3% (11/855) of lung transplant recipients (6 [55%] men; median age 68 years; 6 [55%] ex-smokers [median pack-years, 25]). Nine (82%) were adenocarcinoma, 1 (9%) was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 1 (9%) was follicular lymphoma. Three patients (27%) had multifocal involvement (≥3 lobes), 4 (36%) had nodal involvement, and the median (range) tumor size was 2.7 (0.4-19) cm. The median interval between last imaging and transplant was 58 (29-144) days. Mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued or reduced in all; everolimus was used in 2 patients, and cisplatin-pemetrexed chemotherapy was used in 2 patients. The prevalence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection was 27% and 9%, respectively. Lung recipients with cancer had significantly lower survival than those without (36.4% vs 67.3%, p = 0.002); median survival was 27 (17, 65) months in 4 recipients who were alive and cancer-free at the end of the study period. Conclusions: Unidentified malignancies, commonly adenocarcinoma, can be detected in explanted native lungs. Pneumonectomy may be curative in SCC, lymphoproliferative disorders, and stage I adenocarcinoma. Modulating immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection and tumor proliferation is warranted.

Management of the Potential Lung Donor.

The use of donor management protocols has significantly improved recovery rates; however, the inherent instability of lungs after death results in low utilization rates of potential donor lungs. Donor lungs are susceptible to direct trauma, aspiration, neurogenic edema, ventilator-associated barotrauma, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. After irreversible brain injury and determination of futility of care, the goal of medical management of the donor shifts to maintaining hemodynamic stability and maximizing the likelihood of successful organ recovery.

Orthostatic Hypotension and Concurrent Autonomic Dysfunction: A Novel Complication of Lung Transplantation.

Background: Persistent orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a lesser-known complication of lung transplantation (LTx). In this retrospective case series, we describe the clinical manifestations, complications, and treatment of persistent OH in 13 LTx recipients. Methods: We identified LTx recipients who underwent transplantation between March 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020, with persistent symptomatic OH and retrospectively queried the records for clinical information. Results: Thirteen patients were included in the analysis, 9 (69%) had underlying pulmonary fibrosis, and 12 (92%) were male. The median age, height, and body mass index at LTx were 68 years, 70 inches, and 27 kg/m2, respectively. Six (46%) patients were deceased at the time of chart abstraction with a median (IQR) posttransplant survival of 12.6 months (6, 21); the 7 remaining living patients were a median of 19.6 months (18, 32) posttransplant. Signs and symptoms of OH developed a median of 60 (7, 75) days after transplant. Patients were treated with pharmacological agents and underwent extensive physical therapy. Most patients required inpatient rehabilitation (n = 10, 77%), and patients commonly developed comorbid conditions including weight loss, renal insufficiency with eGFR <50 (n = 13, 100%), gastroparesis (n = 7, 54%), and tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (n = 2, 15%). Falls were common (n = 10, 77%). The incidence of OH in LTx recipients at our center during the study period was 5.6% (13/234). Conclusions: Persistent OH is a lesser-known complication of LTx that impacts posttransplant rehabilitation and may lead to comorbidities and shortened survival. In addition, most LTx recipients with OH at our center were tall, thin men with underlying pulmonary fibrosis, which may offer an opportunity to instate pretransplant OH screening of at-risk patients.

Outcomes after lung transplantation in recipients aged 70 years or older.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of lung transplant (LTx) recipients older than 70 years is increasing, thus we assessed long-term survival after LTx in this cohort relative to younger counterparts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent LTx between 2012 and 2016 at our center and divided patients by age: group A (<65 years), B (65-69 years), and C (≥70 years). Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. RESULTS: The study included 375 LTx recipients: 221 (58.9%) in group A, 109 (29.1%) in group B, and 45 (12.0%) in group C. Group C was mostly men (37/45 [82.2%]; P = 0.003) and had the highest mean serum creatinine at listing (P = 0.02). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant in group A (93.2%, 70.1%, 58.8%) was significantly higher than group B (83.5%, 59.6%, 44.0%; P = 0.005, 0.028, 0.006, log-rank test) and was similar to group C (86.7%, 64.4%, 57.8%), although trended higher at 1 year (P = 0.139, 0.274, 0.489, log-rank test). Groups B and C had comparable survival at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Although survival decreased after age 65, long-term survival was comparable between LTx recipients aged 65-69 years and recipients ≥70 years.

Restrictive allograft syndrome vs bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: Immunological and molecular characterization of circulating exosomes.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients (LTxRs) has 2 phenotypes: obstructive bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). Our goal was to define distinct immunologic markers of exosomes from LTxRs with BOS or RAS. METHODS: Plasma was collected from LTxRs with BOS (n = 18), RAS (n = 13), and from stable LTxRs (n = 5). Antibodies to lung self-antigens (SAgs) were determined by ELISA. Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifugation. Donor specific antibodies to HLA were quantified using Luminex. Exosomes were characterized for lung SAgs, transcription factors, 20S proteasome, HLA class I and II, and polymeric immunoglobulin receptor protein using western blot. Exosome miRNA was analyzed using NanoString. The exosome-induced immune response was determined in mice. RESULTS: LTxRs with RAS, but not BOS, had donor specific antibodies at diagnosis. CIITA, NFkB, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor protein, 20S proteasome, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DR were significantly higher in RAS exosomes than in BOS exosomes. RAS plasma had high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and distinct exosomal miRNA. Immunization of C57BL/6 mice with RAS exosomes showed severe inflammation and peribronchial fibrosis, whereas BOS exosomes induced patchy inflammation and fibrosis. CONCLUSION: LTxRs with BOS or RAS had exosomes with distinct molecular and immunologic profiles. RAS samples had a higher concentration of proinflammatory factors, HLA class II, lung SAgs, and antibodies to HLA class II molecules, indicating severe allograft injury. Mice immunized with RAS exosomes developed lesions in airways, pleura, interlobular septum, and alveoli, whereas BOS exosomes induced mild to patchy inflammation with lung fibrosis.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Sponge Effect in a Redo Lung Transplant Recipient.

Long-term survival after lung transplant remains severely limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Antibody-mediated rejection of lung transplant allografts is usually caused by donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) directed toward donor human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). Typically, patients with antibody-mediated rejection have significantly higher circulating DSAs and increased mean fluorescence intensity than those without antibody-mediated rejection. However, some patients with antibody-mediated rejection have low mean fluorescence intensities, partly due to the "sponge effect" related to DSAs binding to HLA molecules within the lung. Herein, we report the case of an 18-year-old, female lung transplant recipient who required retransplantation and developed circulating DSAs directed toward the first allograft but detected in circulation only after retransplantation. The present case draws attention to a rare finding of sponge effect in a patient with antibody-mediated rejection leading to allograft failure.

Early outcomes after lung transplantation for severe COVID-19: a series of the first consecutive cases from four countries.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage lung disease; however, it is infrequently considered for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) attributable to infectious causes. We aimed to describe the course of disease and early post-transplantation outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 who failed to show lung recovery despite optimal medical management and were deemed to be at imminent risk of dying due to pulmonary complications. METHODS: We established a multi-institutional case series that included the first consecutive transplants for severe COVID-19-associated ARDS known to us in the USA, Italy, Austria, and India. De-identified data from participating centres-including information relating to patient demographics and pre-COVID-19 characteristics, pretransplantation disease course, perioperative challenges, pathology of explanted lungs, and post-transplantation outcomes-were collected by Northwestern University (Chicago, IL, USA) and analysed. FINDINGS: Between May 1 and Sept 30, 2020, 12 patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS underwent bilateral lung transplantation at six high-volume transplant centres in the USA (eight recipients at three centres), Italy (two recipients at one centre), Austria (one recipient), and India (one recipient). The median age of recipients was 48 years (IQR 41-51); three of the 12 patients were female. Chest imaging before transplantation showed severe lung damage that did not improve despite prolonged mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The lung transplant procedure was technically challenging, with severe pleural adhesions, hilar lymphadenopathy, and increased intraoperative transfusion requirements. Pathology of the explanted lungs showed extensive, ongoing acute lung injury with features of lung fibrosis. There was no recurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in the allografts. All patients with COVID-19 could be weaned off extracorporeal support and showed short-term survival similar to that of transplant recipients without COVID-19. INTERPRETATION: The findings from our report show that lung transplantation is the only option for survival in some patients with severe, unresolving COVID-19-associated ARDS, and that the procedure can be done successfully, with good early post-transplantation outcomes, in carefully selected patients. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Current trends in candidate selection, contraindications, and indications for lung transplantation.

Lung transplantation is an established treatment option that can improve quality of life and prolong survival for select patients diagnosed with end-stage lung disease. Given the gaps in organ donation and failures to make effective use of available organs, careful selection of candidates for lung transplant remains one of the most important considerations of the transplant community. Toward this end, we briefly reviewed recent trends in pretransplant evaluation, candidate selection, organ allocation, and organ preservation techniques. Since the latest consensus statement regarding appropriate selection of lung transplant candidates, many advances in the science and practice of lung transplantation have emerged and influenced our perspective of 'contraindications' to transplant. These advances have made it increasingly possible to pursue lung transplant in patients with risk factors for decreased survival-namely, older recipient age, increased body mass index, previous chest surgery, poorer nutritional status, and presence of chronic infection, cardiovascular disease, or extrapulmonary comorbid conditions. Therefore, we reviewed the updated evidence demonstrating the prognostic impact of these risk factors in lung transplant recipients. Lastly, we reviewed the salient evidence for current trends in disease-specific indications for lung transplantation, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, emphysema due to alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, and pulmonary arterial hypertension, among other less common end-stage diseases. Overall, lung transplant remains an exciting field with considerable hope for patients as they experience remarkable improvements in quality of life and survival in the modern era.

An update on current treatment strategies for managing bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a subtype of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, is quite common, with up to half of all lung recipients developing BOS within 5 years of transplantation. Preventive efforts are aimed at alleviating known risk factors of BOS development, while the primary goal of treatment is to delay the irreversible, fibrotic airway changes, and progressive loss of lung function. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review will briefly discuss the updated definition, clinical presentation, pathogenesis, risk factors, and survival after BOS while paying particular attention to the salient evidence for optimal preventive strategies and treatments based on investigations in the modern era. EXPERT OPINION: Future translational research focused on further characterizing the complex interplay between immune and nonimmune mechanisms mediating chronic lung rejection is the first step toward mitigating risk of allograft injury, improving early disease detection with noninvasive biomarkers, and ultimately, developing an effective, targeted therapy that can extend the life of the lung allograft.

COVID-19 in a lung transplant recipient: Exploring the diagnostic role of circulating exosomes and the clinical impact of advanced immunosuppression.

Exosomes isolated from plasma of lung transplant recipients with allograft injury contain donor-derived lung self-antigens (collagen V and Kα1 tubulin) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules. We present a case of a 76-year-old, female lung transplant recipient treated for acute cellular rejection with methylprednisolone and anti-thymocyte globulin, who subsequently contracted SARS-CoV-2 and developed a sharp increase in the mean fluorescent intensity of anti-HLA antibodies. Analysis of circulating exosomes during rejection, but before SARS-CoV-2 infection, revealed the presence of lung self-antigens and HLA class II molecules. After the patient contracted SARS-CoV-2, exosomes with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were also found. After resolution of infectious symptoms, exosomes with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were no longer detected; however, exosomes with lung self-antigens and HLA class II molecules persisted, which coincided with a progressive decline in spirometric flows, suggesting chronic lung allograft dysfunction. We propose that the analysis of circulating exosomes may be used to detect allograft injury mediated by both rejection and infection. Furthermore, the detection of exosomes containing viral proteins may be helpful in identifying allograft injury driven by viral pathogens.

Circulating exosomes with lung self-antigens as a biomarker for chronic lung allograft dysfunction: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Exosomes isolated from plasma of lung transplant recipients (LTxRs) with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) contain human leukocyte antigens and lung self-antigens (SAgs), K-alpha 1 tubulin (Kα1T) and collagen type V (Col-V). The aim was to determine the use of circulating exosomes with lung SAgs as a biomarker for BOS. METHODS: Circulating exosomes were isolated retrospectively from plasma from LTxRs at diagnosis of BOS and at 6 and 12 months before the diagnosis (n = 41) and from stable time-matched controls (n = 30) at 2 transplant centers by ultracentrifugation. Exosomes were validated using Nanosight, and lung SAgs (Kα1T and Col-V) were detected by immunoblot and semiquantitated using ImageJ software. RESULTS: Circulating exosomes from BOS and stable LTxRs demonstrated 61- to 181-nm vesicles with markers Alix and CD9. Exosomes from LTxRs with BOS (n = 21) showed increased levels of lung SAgs compared with stable (n = 10). A validation study using 2 separate cohorts of LTxRs with BOS and stable time-matched controls from 2 centers also demonstrated significantly increased lung SAgs-containing exosomes at 6 and 12 months before BOS. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating exosomes isolated from LTxRs with BOS demonstrated increased levels of lung SAgs (Kα1T and Col-V) 12 months before the diagnosis (100% specificity and 90% sensitivity), indicating that circulating exosomes with lung SAgs can be used as a non-invasive biomarker for identifying LTxRs at risk for BOS.