Self-management of a musculoskeletal condition for people from harder to reach groups: a qualitative patient interview study.

Background: This study recorded the functional health literacy levels of people with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions from harder to reach groups and explored their experiences in engaging with health care professionals to self-manage their MSK condition.Methods: We recruited participants, identified by key health and social care contacts as likely to have lower health literacy levels, and used semi-structured interviews to collect data. Thematic analysis was used to identify the main key themes arising from the transcribed interviews.Results: Eighteen participants were identified and recruited from harder to reach community populations, 10 were scored as having inadequate functional health literacy on the Short Form Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy Measure. Three themes were identified in relation to participants' experiences of MSK self-management approaches: engaging with health care services; interpreting the health care providers' message; and facilitating participation in MSK self-management.Conclusions: Our findings indicate that people with a MSK condition, from harder to reach groups, experience multi-morbidity, find health care systems complicated and hear from health care professionals that their MSK condition cannot be cured. People interpreted that a lack of cure meant that nothing could be done to help their MSK pain. Engaging with self-management strategies was not seen as a priority for our participants. Strategies to simplify health communication, more time to process health information and supportive social networks helped our participants to understand and manage their MSK health on a day-to-day basis. Implications for RehabilitationMSK conditions are long term and prevalent in the UK with substantial impact on people's daily life.Currently self-management strategies for MSK conditions are poorly communicated and many patients believe that nothing can be done to help their MSK pain.Good clinician communication that supports self-management is needed so that key messages can be effectively understood and used by patients with a range of literacy skills.Health services need to be even more accessible to help all individuals from a range of backgrounds better self-manage their MSK conditions.

The effectiveness of a real life dose reduction strategy for tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine feasibility of TNF inhibitor (TNFi) dose reduction for severe AS and PsA patients. METHODS: A retrospective study in a real-world setting. Criteria for dose reduction of TNFi included BASDAI < 4 for ⩾6 months in AS; or DAS28-ESR ⩽ 3.2 for ⩾6 months in PsA. TNFi dose was reduced by one-third. Patients who flared (BASDAI > 4 in AS or DAS28-ESR > 3.2 in PsA) were re-escalated to standard treatment dose. RESULTS: Twenty-six per cent (33/125) of AS and 18% (15/83) of PsA patients fulfilled criteria and underwent TNFi dose reduction. Fifty-eight per cent (19/33) of AS and 60% (9/15) of PsA patients maintained TNFi dose reduction for mean (s.d) of 1.0 (0.8) years. Reinstating standard dose of TNFi recaptured low disease activity in all patients who failed dose reduction within 24 weeks, with no statistically significant difference in mean BASDAI compared with those maintaining TNFi dose reduction in AS at 24 weeks [mean (s.d) BASDAI 2.4 (1.1) vs 1.9 (1.5), respectively (P = 0.229)]; however in PsA, those who failed dose reduction had higher disease activity compared with patients maintained on TNFi dose reduction at 24 weeks [mean (s.d) DAS28-ESR 2.7 (0.6) vs 1.3 (0.5), respectively (P ⩽ 0.001)]. In PsA, a lower DAS28-ESR prior to dose reduction of TNFi was associated with more successful dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, 60% of individuals with severe AS and PsA who achieve low disease activity can successfully reduce the dose of TNFi therapy by a third for a mean of 1 year.

Does combined clinical and ultrasound assessment allow selection of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis for sustained reduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a strategy combining clinical and ultrasound (US) assessment can select individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for sustained dose reduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies. METHODS: As part of a real-world approach, patients with RA receiving anti-TNF therapies were reviewed in a dedicated biologic therapy clinic. Patients not taking oral corticosteroids with both Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) remission (≤2.6) and absent synovitis on power Doppler US (PDUS 0) for >6 months were invited to reduce their anti-TNF therapy dose by one-third. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and February 2014, a total of 70 patients underwent anti-TNF dose reduction. Combined DAS28 and PDUS remission was maintained by 96% of patients at 3 months followup, 63% at 6 months, 37% at 9 months, and 34% at 18 months followup. However, 88% of patients maintained at least low disease activity (LDA) with DAS28 <3.2 and PDUS ≤1 at 6 months. The addition of PDUS identified 8 patients (25% of those that flared) in DAS28 remission, with subclinically active disease. Those who maintained dose reduction were more likely to be rheumatoid factor (RF) negative (46% versus 17%; P = 0.03) and have lower DAS28 scores at biologic therapy initiation (5.58 versus 5.96; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Combined clinical and US assessment identifies individuals in remission who may be suitable for anti-TNF dose reduction and enhances safe monitoring for subclinical disease flares. Despite longstanding severe RA, a subset of our cohort sustained prolonged DAS28 and PDUS remission. LDA at biologic therapy initiation and RF status appeared predictive of sustained remission.

Effectiveness of musculoskeletal education interventions in people with low literacy levels: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of patient education interventions delivered or directed by health professionals for people with musculoskeletal conditions who also have lower levels of literacy. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from 1946 to May 2012. Randomized controlled trials with primary interventions designed specifically for individuals with musculoskeletal conditions and lower levels of literacy were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the study was determined by assessing method of randomization, allocation concealment, creation and maintenance of comparable groups, blinding of patients and providers, control of confounding, and the validity and reliability of outcome measures. RESULTS: Of the 2,440 studies located using the search strategy, 6 studies met the inclusion criteria. Three public health community studies and 3 rheumatology clinic-based studies delivered educational programs to people with musculoskeletal conditions who also had lower levels of literacy. Three moderate quality studies suggest that musculoskeletal educational interventions had a small short-term effect on knowledge and 2 moderate quality studies suggest musculoskeletal interventions had a small effect on self-efficacy (although results on self-efficacy were conflicting in 1 of these studies). Only 1 moderate quality study showed a small effect on anxiety and 1 on self-perceived health and well-being in people with lower literacy. CONCLUSION: High quality evidence is lacking on the effectiveness of musculoskeletal education interventions for people with lower literacy levels. Research programs that test the effectiveness of patient education interventions for arthritis must recruit and engage people with lower levels of literacy.

Musculoskeletal health professional use of internet resources for personal and patient education: results from an online national survey.

OBJECTIVES: To study the current practice of computer use in musculoskeletal health professionals for their education and that of their patients. METHODS: A survey questionnaire, designed by a working group including representatives from Arthritis Research UK and the British Society for Rheumatology, was made available on surveymonkey.com and the link distributed by email. RESULTS: 190 health professionals responded. Rheumatology professionals made up two thirds of the participants. The modal age group of responders was under 40 years (37%). 97% had spent some educational time on a computer. Females were younger and spent more time using the computer for education purposes. The preferred learning modality was interactive online content (71%). The most common methods of educating patients were the Consultant and Specialist nurse while the web is used by 40% of the health professionals. The most common barrier to education was 'Insufficient resources for education groups'. Rheumatologists were more likely to log Continuous Professional Development (CPD) online, complete online modules and have mandatory training online. UpToDate and Arthritis Research UK were the highest rated websites for health professional and patient education respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first national survey of E-learning in the musculoskeletal health profession, with a large proportion of Rheumatologists. Almost all use computer based learning. Use of the internet for patient education is low. Highly rated educational websites are available for both professionals and patients.