Is atrial fibrillation in HFpEF a distinct phenotype? Insights from multiparametric MRI and circulating biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently co-exist. There is a limited understanding on whether this coexistence is associated with distinct alterations in myocardial remodelling and mechanics. We aimed to determine if patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent a distinct phenotype. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of adults with HFpEF (NCT03050593), participants were comprehensively phenotyped with stress cardiac MRI, echocardiography and plasma fibroinflammatory biomarkers, and were followed for the composite endpoint (HF hospitalisation or death) at a median of 8.5 years. Those with AF were compared to sinus rhythm (SR) and unsupervised cluster analysis was performed to explore possible phenotypes. RESULTS: 136 subjects were included (SR = 75, AF = 61). The AF group was older (76 ± 8 vs. 70 ± 10 years) with less diabetes (36% vs. 61%) compared to the SR group and had higher left atrial (LA) volumes (61 ± 30 vs. 39 ± 15 mL/m2, p < 0.001), lower LA ejection fraction (EF) (31 ± 15 vs. 51 ± 12%, p < 0.001), worse left ventricular (LV) systolic function (LVEF 63 ± 8 vs. 68 ± 8%, p = 0.002; global longitudinal strain 13.6 ± 2.9 vs. 14.7 ± 2.4%, p = 0.003) but higher LV peak early diastolic strain rates (0.73 ± 0.28 vs. 0.53 ± 0.17 1/s, p < 0.001). The AF group had higher levels of syndecan-1, matrix metalloproteinase-2, proBNP, angiopoietin-2 and pentraxin-3, but lower level of interleukin-8. No difference in clinical outcomes was observed between the groups. Three distinct clusters were identified with the poorest outcomes (Log-rank p = 0.029) in cluster 2 (hypertensive and fibroinflammatory) which had equal representation of SR and AF. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of AF in HFpEF is associated with cardiac structural and functional changes together with altered expression of several fibro-inflammatory biomarkers. Distinct phenotypes exist in HFpEF which may have differing clinical outcomes.

Ethnic differences in cardiac structure and function assessed by MRI in healthy South Asian and White European people: A UK Biobank Study.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic studies indicate South Asian people have smaller ventricular volumes, lower mass and more concentric remodelling than White European people, but there are no data using cardiac MRI (CMR). We aimed to compare CMR quantified cardiac structure and function in White European and South Asian people. METHODS: Healthy White European and South Asian participants in the UK Biobank Imaging CMR sub-study were identified by excluding those with a history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, obesity or diabetes. Ethnic groups were matched by age and sex. Cardiac volumes, mass and feature tracking strain were compared. RESULTS: 121 matched pairs (77 male/44 female, mean age 58 ± 8 years) of South Asian and White European participants were included. South Asian males and females had smaller absolute but not indexed left ventricular (LV) volumes, and smaller absolute and indexed right ventricular volumes, with lower absolute and indexed LV mass and lower LV mass:volume than White European participants. Although there were no differences in ventricular or atrial ejection fractions, LV global longitudinal strain was higher in South Asian females than White European females but not males, and global circumferential strain was higher in both male and South Asian females than White European females. Peak early diastolic strain rates were higher in South Asian versus White European males, but not different between South Asian and White European females. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to echocardiographic studies, South Asian participants in the UK Biobank study had less concentric remodelling and higher global circumferential strain than White European subjects. These findings emphasise the importance of sex- and ethnic- specific normal ranges for cardiac volumes and function.

Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pathophysiology, Assessment, Prevalence and Prognosis.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) currently accounts for approximately half of all new heart failure cases in the community. HFpEF is closely associated with chronic lifestyle-related diseases, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, and clinical outcomes are worse in those with than without comorbidities. HFpEF is pathophysiologically distinct from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, which may explain, in part, the disparity of treatment options available between the two heart failure phenotypes. The mechanisms underlying HFpEF are complex, with coronary microvascular dysfunction (MVD) being proposed as a potential key driver in its pathophysiology. In this review, the authors highlight the evidence implicating MVD in HFpEF pathophysiology, the diagnostic approaches for identifying MVD (both invasive and non-invasive) and the prevalence and prognostic significance of MVD.

Plasma P-selectin is a predictor of mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the association of P-selectin with outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prospective, observational study of 130 HFpEF patients who underwent clinical profiling, blood sampling, 6 min walk testing, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire evaluation, echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, calculation of the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk scores, and blinded plasma P-selectin measurement. Patients were followed up for the endpoint of all-cause mortality. The HFpEF subgroup with higher P-selectin levels [overall median 26 372, inter-quartile range (19 360-34 889) pg/mL] was associated with lower age, higher heart rate, less prevalent atrial fibrillation, more frequent current smoking status, and lower right ventricular end-diastolic volumes. During follow-up (median 1428 days), there were 38 deaths. Following maximal sensitivity and specificity receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, P-selectin levels above 35 506 pg/mL were associated with greater risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.700; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.416-5.146; log-rank P = 0.002]. Following multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and when added to MAGGIC scores, only P-selectin (adjusted HR 1.707; 95% CI 1.099-2.650; P < 0.017) and myocardial infarction detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (HR 2.377; 95% CI 1.114-5.075; P < 0.025) remained significant predictors. In a final model comprising all three parameters, only P-selectin (HR 1.447; 95% CI 1.130-1.853; P < 0.003) and MAGGIC scores (HR 1.555; 95% CI 1.136-2.129; P < 0.006) remained independent predictors of death. Adding P-selectin (0.618, P = 0.035) improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for mortality prediction for MAGGIC scores (0.647, P = 0.009) to 0.710, P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma P-selectin is an independent predictor of mortality and provides incremental prognostic information beyond MAGGIC scores in HFpEF.

Prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction and prognostic significance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

There is a paucity of data characterizing right ventricular performance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using the gold standard of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We aimed to assess the proportion of right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVD) in HFpEF and the relation to clinical outcomes. As part of a single-centre, prospective, observational study, 183 subjects (135 HFpEF, and 48 age- and sex-matched controls) underwent extensive characterization with CMR. transthoracic echocardiography, blood sampling and six-minute walk testing. Patients were followed for the composite endpoint of death or HF hospitalization. RVD (defined as right ventricular ejection fraction < 47%) controls was present in 19% of HFpEF. Patients with RVD presented more frequently with lower systolic blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, radiographic evidence of pulmonary congestion and raised cardiothoracic ratio and larger right ventricular volumes. During median follow-up of 1429 days, 47% (n = 64) of HFpEF subjects experienced the composite endpoint of death (n = 22) or HF hospitalization (n = 42). RVD was associated with an increased risk of composite events (Log-Rank p = 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, RVD was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (adjusted Hazard Ratio [HR] 3.946, 95% CI 1.878-8.290, p = 0.0001) along with indexed extracellular volume (HR 1.742, CI 1.176-2.579, p = 0.006) and E/E' (HR 1.745, CI 1.230-2.477, p = 0.002). RVD as assessed by CMR is prevalent in nearly one-fifth of HFpEF patients and is independently associated with death and/or hospitalization with HF.The trial was registered retrospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03050593). The date of registration was February 06, 2017.

Rationale and design of the Medical Research Council's Precision Medicine with Zibotentan in Microvascular Angina (PRIZE) trial.

Microvascular angina is caused by cardiac small vessel disease, and dysregulation of the endothelin system is implicated. The minor G allele of the non-coding single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9349379 enhances expression of the endothelin 1 gene in human vascular cells, increasing circulating concentrations of ET-1. The prevalence of this allele is higher in patients with ischemic heart disease. Zibotentan is a potent, selective inhibitor of the ETA receptor. We have identified zibotentan as a potential disease-modifying therapy for patients with microvascular angina. METHODS: We will assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive treatment with oral zibotentan (10 mg daily) in patients with microvascular angina and assess whether rs9349379 (minor G allele; population prevalence ~36%) acts as a theragnostic biomarker of the response to treatment with zibotentan. The PRIZE trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential cross-over trial. The study population will be enriched to ensure a G-allele frequency of 50% for the rs9349379 SNP. The participants will receive a single-blind placebo run-in followed by treatment with either 10 mg of zibotentan daily for 12 weeks then placebo for 12 weeks, or vice versa, in random order. The primary outcome is treadmill exercise duration using the Bruce protocol. The primary analysis will assess the within-subject difference in exercise duration following treatment with zibotentan versus placebo. CONCLUSION: PRIZE invokes precision medicine in microvascular angina. Should our hypotheses be confirmed, this developmental trial will inform the rationale and design for undertaking a larger multicenter trial.

Fibroblast-growth-factor-23 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: relation to exercise capacity and outcomes.

AIMS: This study aimed to assess plasma fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and its relation to inflammation, renal function, clinical and imaging characteristics, exercise capacity, and prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prospective, observational study of 172 age-matched and sex-matched subjects (HFpEF n = 130; controls n = 42, age 73 ± 9, female 50%) who underwent plasma biomarker sampling, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and 6 min walk testing (6MWT). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization. FGF23 was higher in HFpEF compared with controls (62 [42-105] vs. 34 [22-41] pg/mL, P < 0.0001). In HFpEF, FGF23 correlated with greater symptom burden (New York Heart Association class: r = 0.308), poorer exercise capacity (6MWT distance: r = -0.345), and plasma biomarkers reflecting inflammation (highly sensitive C-reactive protein: r = 0.207, myeloperoxidase: r = 0.311), bone metabolism (osteoprotegerin: r = 0.446), renal dysfunction (urea: r = 0.267, creatinine: r = 0.351, estimated glomerular filtration rate: r = -0.367), and echocardiographic E/e' (r = 0.298); P < 0.05. Following multivariable linear regression modelling, FGF23 remained independently associated with shorter 6MWT distance (P = 0.012) in addition to age, body mass index, and lower haemoglobin. During follow-up (median 1428 days), there were 61 composite events (21 deaths, 40 HF hospitalizations) in patients with HFpEF. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, FGF23 [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.665; 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.284-2.160; P < 0.0001)], B-type natriuretic peptide (HR 1.433; CI 1.053-1.951; P = 0.022), and prior HF hospitalization (HR 2.058; CI 1.074-3.942; P = 0.030) were independent predictors of the composite endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma FGF23 is higher in HFpEF compared with age-matched and sex-matched controls and is strongly associated with exercise incapacity and prognosis. FGF23 correlates with plasma markers of inflammation and renal impairment.

Plasma Tenascin-C: a prognostic biomarker in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

INTRODUCTION: Tenascin-C is a marker of interstitial fibrosis. We assessed whether plasma Tenascin-C differed between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and asymptomatic controls and related to clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, observational study of 172 age- and sex-matched subjects (HFpEF n = 130; controls n = 42, age 73 ± 9, males 50%) who underwent phenotyping with 20 plasma biomarkers, echocardiography, cardiac MRI and 6-minute-walk-testing. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death/HF hospitalisation. RESULTS: Tenascin-C was higher in HFpEF compared to controls (13.7 [10.8-17.3] vs (11.1 [8.9-12.9] ng/ml, p < 0.0001). Tenascin-C correlated positively with markers of clinical severity (NYHA, E/E', BNP) and plasma biomarkers reflecting interstitial fibrosis (ST-2, Galectin-3, GDF-15, TIMP-1, TIMP-4, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-7, MMP-8), cardiomyocyte stress (BNP, NTpro-ANP), inflammation (MPO, hs-CRP, TNFR-1, IL6) and renal dysfunction (urea, cystatin-C, NGAL); p < 0.05 for all. During follow-up (median 1428 days), there were 61 composite events (21 deaths, 40 HF hospitalizations). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, Tenascin-C (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.755, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.305-2.360; p < 0.0001) and indexed extracellular volume (HR 1.465, CI 1.019-2.106; p = 0.039) were independently associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In HFpEF, plasma Tenascin-C is higher compared to age- and sex-matched controls and a strong predictor of adverse outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03050593.

Characterizing heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: An imaging and plasma biomarker approach.

INTRODUCTION: The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains incompletely defined. We aimed to characterize HFpEF compared to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and asymptomatic hypertensive or non-hypertensive controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, observational study of 234 subjects (HFpEF n = 140; HFrEF n = 46, controls n = 48, age 73±8, males 49%) who underwent echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), plasma biomarker analysis (panel of 22) and 6-minute walk testing (6MWT). The primary end-point was the composite of all-cause mortality and/or HF hospitalization. RESULTS: Compared to controls both HF groups had lower exercise capacity, lower left ventricular (LV) EF, higher LV filling pressures (E/E', B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP], left atrial [LA] volumes), more right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction, more focal and diffuse fibrosis and higher levels of all plasma markers. LV remodeling (mass/volume) was different between HFpEF (concentric, 0.68±0.16) and HFrEF (eccentric, 0.47±0.15); p<0.0001. Compared to controls, HFpEF was characterized by (mild) reductions in LVEF, more myocardial fibrosis, LA remodeling/dysfunction and RV dysfunction. HFrEF patients had lower LVEF, increased LV volumes, greater burden of focal and diffuse fibrosis, more RV remodeling, lower LAEF and higher LA volumes compared to HFpEF. Inflammatory/fibrotic/renal dysfunction plasma markers were similarly elevated in both HF groups but markers of cardiomyocyte stretch/damage (BNP, pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and troponin-I) were higher in HFrEF compared to HFpEF; p<0.0001. Focal fibrosis was associated with galectin3, GDF-15, MMP-3, MMP-7, MMP-8, BNP, pro-BNP and NTproANP; p<0.05. Diffuse fibrosis was associated with GDF-15, Tenascin-C, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-7, BNP, proBNP and NTproANP; p<0.05. Composite event rates (median 1446 days follow-up) did not differ between HFpEF and HFrEF (Log-Rank p = 0.784). CONCLUSIONS: HFpEF is a distinct pathophysiological entity compared to age- and sex-matched HFrEF and controls. HFpEF and HFrEF are associated with similar adverse outcomes. Inflammation is common in both HF phenotypes but cardiomyocyte stretch/stress is greater in HFrEF.

Inter-study repeatability of circumferential strain and diastolic strain rate by CMR tagging, feature tracking and tissue tracking in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Strain assessment allows accurate evaluation of myocardial function and mechanics in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Strain using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has traditionally been assessed with tagging but limitations of this technique have led to more widespread use of alternative methods, which may be more robust. We compared the inter-study repeatability of circumferential global peak-systolic strain (Ecc) and peak-early diastolic strain rate (PEDSR) derived by tagging with values obtained using novel cine-based software: Feature Tracking (FT) (TomTec, Germany) and Tissue Tracking (TT) (Circle cvi42, Canada) in patients following STEMI. Twenty male patients (mean age 56 ± 10 years, mean infarct size 13.7 ± 7.1% of left ventricular mass) were randomised to undergo CMR 1-5 days post-STEMI at 1.5 T or 3.0 T, repeated after ten minutes at the same field strength. Ecc and PEDSR were assessed using tagging, FT and TT. Inter-study repeatability was evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses, coefficients of variation (CoV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Ecc (%) was significantly lower with tagging than with FT or TT at 1.5 T (- 9.5 ± 3.3 vs. - 17.5 ± 3.8 vs. -15.5 ± 5.2, respectively, p < 0.001) and 3.0 T (- 13.1 ± 1.8 vs. - 19.4 ± 2.9 vs. - 17.3 ± 2.1, respectively, p = 0.001). This was similar for PEDSR (.s-1): 1.5 T (0.6 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4 vs. 1.0 ± 0.4, for tagging, FT and TT respectively, p < 0.001) and 3.0 T (0.6 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.3 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3, respectively, p < 0.001). Inter-study repeatability for Ecc at 1.5 T was good for tagging and excellent for FT and TT: CoV 16.7%, 6.38%, and 8.65%, respectively. Repeatability for Ecc at 3.0 T was good for all three techniques: CoV 14.4%, 11.2%, and 13.0%, respectively. However, repeatability of PEDSR was generally lower than that for Ecc at 1.5 T (CoV 15.1%, 13.1%, and 34.0% for tagging, FT and TT, respectively) and 3.0 T (CoV 23.0%, 18.6%, and 26.2%, respectively). Following STEMI, Ecc and PEDSR are higher when measured with FT and TT than with tagging. Inter-study repeatability of Ecc is good for tagging, excellent for FT and TT at 1.5 T, and good for all three methods at 3.0 T. The repeatability of PEDSR is good to moderate at 1.5 T and moderate at 3.0 T. Cine-based methods to assess Ecc following STEMI may be preferable to tagging.

Intra-study and inter-technique validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging derived left atrial ejection fraction as a prognostic biomarker in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The aim of this study was to assess the agreements of both biplane and short-axis Simpson's (SAX) methods for left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) calculation utilising cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and evaluate their relation to clinical outcomes. One hundred and thirty six subjects (HFpEF n = 97, controls n = 39) underwent CMR, six-minute walk tests and blood sampling in our prospective, observational, single-centre study. Overall, LAEF (%) was lower in HFpEF patients compared to controls (SAX 34 ± 13 vs 47 ± 8, biplane 34 ± 16 vs 51 ± 11; p < 0.0001 for both). Atrial fibrillation (AF) was present in 24% of HFpEF and was associated with higher LA volumes and lower LAEF compared to sinus rhythm (p < 0.0001) with both methods. Biplane LAEF correlated strongly with SAX measurements (overall Pearson's r = 0.851, sinus rhythm r = 0.651, AF r = 0.882; p < 0.0001). Biplane LAEF did not differ significantly compared to SAX LAEF (overall 34 ± 16 vs 34 ± 13%; p = 0.307) except in AF subjects in whom biplane LAEF was lower (mean difference 2 ± 4%, p = 0.013). There were 44 composite events (25 deaths, 19 HF hospitalizations) in HFpEF during median follow-up of 1429 days. LAEF below the median was associated with increased risk of composite endpoints (Log-Rank biplane p < 0.0001; SAX p = 0.009). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, both biplane LAEF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.604; 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.406-0.900); p = 0.013) and SAX LAEF (HR 0.636; CI 0.441-0.918; p = 0.016) remained independent predictors along with indexed extracellular volume. CMR LAEF, derived from either the short-axis or biplane method is lower in HFpEF compared to healthy controls and remains a strong marker of prognosis.

Chronic infarct size after spontaneous coronary artery dissection: implications for pathophysiology and clinical management.

AIMS: To report the extent and distribution of myocardial injury and its impact on left ventricular systolic function with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) following spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) and to investigate predictors of myocardial injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight angiographically confirmed SCAD-survivors (98% female) were phenotyped by CMR and compared in a case-control study with 59 (97% female) healthy controls (44.5 ± 8.4 vs. 45.0 ± 9.1 years). Spontaneous coronary artery dissection presentation was with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in 95 (60.3%), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in 52 (32.7%), and cardiac arrest in 11 (6.9%). Left ventricular function in SCAD-survivors was generally well preserved with small reductions in ejection fraction (57 ± 7.2% vs. 60 ± 4.9%, P < 0.01) and increases in left ventricular dimensions (end-diastolic volume: 85 ± 14 mL/m2 vs. 80 ± 11 mL/m2, P < 0.05; end-systolic volume: 37 ± 11 mL/m2 vs. 32 ± 7 mL/m2, P <0.01) compared to healthy controls. Infarcts were small with few large infarcts (median 4.06%; range 0-30.9%) and 39% having no detectable late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Female SCAD patients presenting with STEMI had similar sized infarcts to female Type-1 STEMI patients age <75 years. Multivariate modelling demonstrated STEMI at presentation, initial TIMI 0/1 flow, multivessel SCAD, and a Beighton score >4 were associated with larger infarcts [>10% left ventricular (LV) mass]. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients presenting with SCAD have no or small infarctions and preserved ejection fraction. Patients presenting with STEMI, TIMI 0/1 flow, multivessel SCAD and those with features of connective tissue disorders are more likely to have larger infarcts.

Left atrial ejection fraction and outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The aim of this study was to determine whether left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) quantified with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was different between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and controls, and its relation to prognosis. As part of our single-centre, prospective, observational study, 188 subjects (HFpEF n = 140, controls n = 48) underwent phenotyping with contrast-enhanced CMR, transthoracic echocardiography, blood sampling and six-minute walk testing. LAEF was calculated using the biplane method. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was present in 43 (31%) of HFpEF subjects. Overall, LAEF (%) was lower in HFpEF patients inclusive of AF (32 ± 16) or those in sinus rhythm alone (41 ± 12) compared to controls (51 ± 11), p < 0.0001. LAEF correlated inversely with maximal and minimal left atrial volumes indexed (r = - 0.602, r = - 0.762), and plasma N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (r = - 0.367); p < 0.0001. During median follow-up (1429 days), there were 67 composite events of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure (22 deaths, 45 HF hospitalizations) in HFpEF. Lower LAEF (below median) was associated with an increased risk of composite endpoints (Log-Rank: all p = 0.028; sinus p = 0.036). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, LAEF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.767, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.591-0.996; p = 0.047) and indexed extracellular volume (HR 1.422, CI 1.015-1.992; p = 0.041) were the only parameters that remained significant when added to a base prognostic model comprising age, prior HF hospitalization, diastolic blood pressure, lung disease, NYHA, six-minute-walk-test-distance, haemoglobin, creatinine and B-type natriuretic peptide. CMR-derived LAEF is lower in HFpEF compared to healthy controls and is a strong prognostic biomarker.

Differential left ventricular and left atrial remodelling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients with and without diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Attempts to characterize cardiac structure in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have yielded inconsistent findings. We aimed to determine whether patients with HFpEF and T2D have a distinct pattern of cardiac remodelling compared with those without diabetes and whether remodelling was related to circulating markers of inflammation and fibrosis and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We recruited 140 patients with HFpEF (75 with T2D and 65 without). Participants underwent comprehensive cardiovascular phenotyping, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and plasma biomarker profiling. RESULTS: Patients with T2D were younger (age 70 ± 9 versus 75 ± 9y, p = 0.002), with evidence of more left ventricular (LV) concentric remodelling (LV mass/volume ratio 0.72 ± 0.15 versus 0.62 ± 0.16, p = 0.024) and smaller indexed left atrial (LA) volumes (maximal LA volume index 48 ± 20 versus 59 ± 29 ml/m2, p = 0.004) than those without diabetes. Plasma biomarkers of inflammation and extracellular matrix remodelling were elevated in those with T2D. Overall, there were 45 hospitalizations for HF and 22 deaths over a median follow-up period of 47 months [interquartile range (IQR) 38-54]. There was no difference in the primary composite endpoint of hospitalization for HF and mortality between groups. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, age, prior HF hospitalization, history of pulmonary disease and LV mass/volume were independent predictors of the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFpEF and T2D have increased concentric LV remodelling, smaller LA volumes and evidence of increased systemic inflammation compared with those without diabetes. This suggests the underlying pathophysiology for the development of HFpEF is different in patients with and without T2D. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03050593.

Relationship Between Focal and Diffuse Fibrosis Assessed by CMR and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the presence and extent of focal and diffuse fibrosis in heart failure in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared to asymptomatic control subjects, and the relationship of fibrosis to clinical outcome. BACKGROUND: Myocardial fibrosis has been implicated in the pathophysiology of HFpEF. METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, 140 subjects of similar age and sex (HFpEF: n = 96; control subjects: n = 44; 73 ± 8 years of age; 49% males) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) imaging and T1 mapping to calculate myocardial extracellular volume indexed to body surface area (iECV) were used to assess fibrosis. RESULTS: Patients with HFpEF had more concentric remodeling and worse diastolic function. Focal fibrosis was more frequent in HFpEF subjects (overall: n = 49; infarction: n = 17; nonischemic cases: n = 36; mixed patterns: n = 4) than in control subjects (overall: n = 3). Diffuse fibrosis was also greater in HFpEF subjects than control subjects (iECV: 13.7 ± 4.4 ml/m2 versus 10.9 ± 2.8 ml/m2; p < 0.0001). During median follow-up (1,429 days), there were 42 composite events (14 deaths; 28 heart failure hospitalizations) in cases of HFpEF. Myocardial infarction revealed on LGE imaging was a predictor of outcomes on univariate analysis only. With multivariate analysis, iECV (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.689; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.141 to 2.501; p = 0.009) was an independent predictor of outcome along with mitral peak velocity of early filling (E)-to-early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') (E/E') ratio (HR: 1.716; 95% CI: 1.191 to 2.472; p = 0.004) and prior HF hospitalization (HR: 2.537; 95% CI: 1.090 to 5.902; p = 0.031). iECV was also significantly associated with ventricular/left atrial remodeling and renal dysfunction: right ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed (r = 0.456; p < 0.0001), left ventricular mass/volume (r = 0.348; p = 0.001), maximal left atrial volume indexed (r = 0. 269; p = 0.009), and creatinine (r = 0.271; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Both focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis are more prevalent in HFpEF subjects than in control subjects of similar age and sex. iECV significantly correlates with indices of ventricular/left atrial remodeling and renal dysfunction and is an independent predictor of adverse outcome in HFpEF. (Developing Imaging And plasMa biOmarkers iN Describing Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [DIAMONDHFpEF]; NCT03050593).

Correction to: does stress perfusion imaging improve the diagnostic accuracy of late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance for establishing the etiology of heart failure?

Following publication of the original article [1], the author reported his name has erroneously spelled as Abishek Shetye. The correct name is Abhishek Shetye.

Haemodynamic effects of pharmacologic stress with adenosine in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: In patients with heart failure, downregulation of adenosine receptor gene expression and impaired adenosine-related signal transduction may result in a diminished response to adenosine. This may have implications for cardiac stress testing. We evaluated the haemodynamic response to intravenous adenosine in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) undergoing stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively examined 497 consecutive patients referred for clinical stress CMR. Blood pressure and heart rate responses with intravenous adenosine were compared in patients with normal, mild-moderately impaired and severely impaired LV systolic function (ejection fraction [EF] > 55%, 36-55% and < 35%, respectively). Following 2 min of adenosine infusion, there was a significant difference between the groups in the heart rate change from baseline, with a diminished heart rate response in patients with LVSD (p < 0.001). An increase in the dose of adenosine (up to 210 µg/kg/min) was required to achieve a sufficient haemodynamic response in more patients with severe LVSD (41%) than those with mild-moderately impaired and normal LV systolic function (24% and 19%, respectively, p < 0.001). Even with increased doses of adenosine in subjects with severe LVSD, peak haemodynamic response remained blunted. With multivariate analysis age (p < 0.001) and LVEF (p = 0.031) were independent predictors of heart rate response to adenosine. CONCLUSION: Patients with reduced LVEF referred for stress CMR may have a blunted heart rate response to adenosine. Further study is warranted to determine whether this may be associated with reduced diagnostic accuracy and also the potential utility of further dose increases or alternative stressors.