Transcatheter versus surgical mitral valve repair in patients with mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of transcatheter and surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr) in primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and MR with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Nationwide Readmission Database to identify primary MR and MR with HFrEF patients who underwent transcatheter or SMVr from 2016 to 2019. A propensity score with 1:1 matching was applied. The primary outcome was a cumulative event rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, cardiac arrest and mitral valve replacement. Other important secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 2187 matched pairs were found in the primary MR cohort and 2178 matched pairs were found in the MR-HFrEF cohort. Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) had significantly higher medium-term MACE compared with SMVr in both cohorts (primary MR: hazard ratio: 1.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.33-2.26, P ≤ 0.001; MR-HFrEF: hazard ratio: 2.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.58-2.54, P ≤ 0.001). TMVr showed similar in-hospital mortality in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Although TMVr showed better short-term outcomes, it had significantly higher medium-term MACE than SMVr in both cohorts. Thus, shared decision-making should be performed for TMVr after discussing the benefits and risks in patients who can undergo SMVr.

Intravascular imaging guided versus coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the absolute treatment effects of intravascular imaging guided versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease, considering their baseline risk. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to 31 August 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials comparing intravascular imaging (intravascular ultrasonography or optical coherence tomography) guided versus coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention in adults with coronary artery disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Random effect meta-analysis and GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) were used to assess certainty of evidence. Data included rate ratios and absolute risks per 1000 people for cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and target lesion revascularization. Absolute risk differences were estimated using SYNTAX risk categories for baseline risks at five years, assuming constant rate ratios across different cardiovascular risk thresholds. RESULTS: In 20 randomized controlled trials (n=11 698), intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with a reduced risk of cardiac death (rate ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.72), myocardial infarction (0.81, 0.68 to 0.97), stent thrombosis (0.44, 0.27 to 0.72), target vessel revascularization (0.74, 0.61 to 0.89), and target lesion revascularization (0.71, 0.59 to 0.86) but not all cause death (0.81, 0.64 to 1.02). Using SYNTAX risk categories, high certainty evidence showed that from low risk to high risk, intravascular imaging was likely associated with 23 to 64 fewer cardiac deaths, 15 to 19 fewer myocardial infarctions, 9 to 13 fewer stent thrombosis events, 28 to 38 fewer target vessel revascularization events, and 35 to 48 fewer target lesion revascularization events per 1000 people. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention, intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with significantly reduced cardiac death and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. The estimated absolute effects of intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention showed a proportional relation with baseline risk, driven by the severity and complexity of coronary artery disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023433568.

Outcomes With Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography Guidance in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Intracoronary imaging has become an important tool in the treatment of complex lesions with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This retrospective cohort study identified 1,118,475 patients with PCI from the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2017 to 2019. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were identified with appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events. The secondary outcomes include net adverse clinical events (NACEs), all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) readmission, admission for stroke, and emergency revascularization. The multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was used to adjust for demographic and co-morbid confounders. Of 1,118,475 PCIs, 86,140 (7.7%) used IVUS guidance and 5,617 (0.5%) used OCT guidance. The median follow-up time was 184 days. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiac events was significantly lower for the IVUS (6.5% vs 7.6%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86 to 0.91, p <0.001) and OCT (4.4% vs 7.6%; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79, p <0.001) groups. IVUS was associated with significantly lower rates of NACEs (8.4% vs 9.4%; HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.94, p <0.001), all-cause mortality (3.5% vs 4.3%; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.88, p <0.001), readmission for MI (2.7% vs 3.0%; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.99, p = 0.012), and admission for stroke (0.5% vs 0.6%; HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.95, p = 0.002). OCT was associated with significantly lower rates of NACEs (6.6% vs 9.4%; HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.89, p <0.001) and all-cause mortality (1.8% vs 4.3%; HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.63, p <0.001). Emergency revascularization was not significantly different with IVUS guidance. Readmission for MI, stroke, and emergency revascularization were not significantly different with OCT guidance. A subgroup analysis of patients with ST-elevation MI and non-ST-elevation MI showed similar results. In conclusion, the use of IVUS and OCT guidance with PCI were associated with significantly lower rates of morbidity and mortality in real-world practice.

Prognostic Value of Pulmonary Artery Oxygen Saturation in Pulmonary Embolism Requiring Endovascular Intervention.

This retrospective study evaluates the prognostic value of pulmonary artery oxygen saturation (PA O2) among patients who undergo mechanical intervention for pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients who died within 90 days had less PA O2, and a greater percentage of patients with a PA O2 of <50 died within 90 days of intervention. Regression analysis revealed an association of PA O2 with mortality that held true despite accounting for Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score and type of endovascular intervention. Receiver operator curve testing revealed PA O2 <50% to be inferior to PESI score but superior to Bova score in predicting mortality after mechanical PE intervention, with the combination of PA O2 <50% and PESI outperforming PESI and PA O2 in predicting mortality. Our pilot evaluation suggests preintervention PA O2 <50% to be associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and may help identify patients at greatest risk of deterioration.

Efficacy of 3D-multidetector computed tomography and fluoroscopy fusion for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion procedures.

INTRODUCTION: We studied the impact of the use of three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography (3D-MDCT) and fluoroscopy fusion on percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures in relation to procedure time, contrast volume, fluoroscopy time, and total radiation. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, single-blinded, randomized control trial. Patients meeting criteria for LAAO were randomized to undergo LAAO with the WATCHMAN FLXTM device with and without 3D-MDCT-fluoroscopy fusion guidance using a prespecified protocol using computed tomography angiography for WATCHMAN FLXTM sizing, moderate sedation, and intracardiac echocardiography for procedural guidance. RESULTS: Overall, 59 participants were randomly assigned to the fusion (n = 33) or no fusion (n = 26) groups. The median (interquartile range) age was 79 (75-83) years, 24 (41%) were female, and 55 (93%) were Caucasian. The median CHA2 DS2 VASc and HASBLED scores were 5 (4-6) and 3 (3-4), respectively. At the time of the study, 51 (53%) patients were on a direct acting oral anticoagulant. There were no significant differences between the fusion and no fusion groups in procedure time (52.4 ± 15.4 vs. 56.8 ± 19.5 min, p = .36), mean contrast volume used (33.8 ± 12.0 vs. 29.6 ± 11.5 mls, p = .19), mean fluoroscopy time (31.3 ± 9.9 vs. 28.9 ± 8.7 min, p = .32), mean radiation dose (1177 ± 969 vs. 1091 ± 692 mGy, p = .70), and radiation dose product curve (23.9 ± 20.5 vs. 35.0 ± 49.1 Gy cm2 , p = .29). There was no periprosthetic leak in the two groups in the immediate 1-month postprocedure follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference with and without 3D-MDCT-fluoroscopy fusion in procedure time, contrast volume use, radiation dose, and radiation dose product.

Etiologies and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission in Heart Failure: An Updated Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Readmissions in heart failure (HF), historically reported as 20%, contribute to significant patient morbidity and high financial cost to the healthcare system. The changing population landscape and risk factor dynamics mandate periodic epidemiologic reassessment of HF readmissions. Methods: National Readmission Database (NRD, 2019) was used to identify HF-related hospitalizations and evaluated for demographic, admission characteristics, and comorbidity differences between patients readmitted vs. those not readmitted at 30-days. Causes of readmission and predictors of all-cause, HF-specific, and non-HF-related readmissions were analyzed. Results: Of 48,971 HF patients, the readmitted cohort was younger (mean 67.4 vs. 68.9 years, p≤0.001), had higher proportion of males (56.3% vs. 53.7%), lowest income quartiles (33.3% vs. 28.9%), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥3 (61.7% vs. 52.8%), resource utilization including large bed-size hospitalizations, Medicaid enrollees, mean length of stay (6.2 vs. 5.4 days), and disposition to other facilities (23.9% vs. 20%) than non-readmitted. Readmission (30-day) rate was 21.2% (10,370) with cardiovascular causes in 50.3% (HF being the most common: 39%), and non-cardiac in 49.7%. Independent predictors for readmission were male sex, lower socioeconomic status, nonelective admissions, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, anemia, and CCI ≥3. HF-specific readmissions were significantly associated with prior coronary artery disease and Medicaid enrollment. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed cardiac and noncardiac causes of readmission were equally common for 30-day readmissions in HF patients with HF itself being the most common etiology highlighting the importance of addressing the comorbidities, both cardiac and non-cardiac, to mitigate the risk of readmission.

Surgical and transcatheter left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased stroke risk in comparison to those with non-valvular AF not affected by HCM. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with HCM and AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified patients with HCM and AF using the National Readmission Dataset. Patients were stratified based on LAAC status. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, TIA, and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major bleeding and pericardial complications. Patients were matched using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Cox-proportional hazard regression was applied to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) on matched cohorts. We identified 71 980 patients with HCM and AF. 1351 (1.9%) patients underwent LAAC. Two hundred and eighty-seven (21.2%) underwent transcatheter LAAC. LAAC was associated with a lower risk of the primary efficacy outcome (2.5% vs. 5.4%, HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17-0.88; P = 0.024), the primary safety outcome (2.9% vs. 6.8%, HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.23-0.66, P = 0.001), and reduced major bleeding. The LAAC group trended towards a lower risk of ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Surgical and transcatheter LAAC was associated with a lower risk of haemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding.

Immunologic profiles in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia undergoing endovascular revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation and immune dysregulation have been associated with adverse outcomes in cardiovascular disease. There is limited understanding of the association of different profiles of white blood cell (WBC) subsets and red cell distribution width (RDW) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: Patients with CLTI undergoing endovascular revascularization in our single-center, tertiary care hospital from 2017 to 2019, who had a preceding complete blood count (CBC) with WBC differentials (n =213), were included in the analysis. Patient characteristics, laboratory values, and clinical outcomes were collected. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess for associations between all-cause mortality and leukocyte subset; multivariate analysis was used to account for confounders. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to depict survival censored at 1 year postrevascularization using baseline CBC indices. RESULTS: Adjusting for confounders, elevated RDW was associated with increased mortality (continuous per % increase, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.33, p < 0.001). Baseline lymphopenia was associated with mortality in univariate analysis. Other leukocyte subtypes were not associated with mortality outcomes in our population. Exploratory analysis showed negative deflections in ∆WBC from pre- to postprocedure day 1 were affiliated with increased mortality when adjusted for age, sex, race, chronic kidney disease, and baseline hemoglobin (∆WBC HR 1.16, p = 0.004). Further exploratory analysis showed an association between RDW and all-comers readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of a periprocedural WBC subset differential can be a useful adjunct to risk-stratify patients with CLTI undergoing endovascular revascularization. Further studies are needed to understand potential ways to modulate immune dysregulation so as to improve mortality outcomes.

One-year outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in young patients.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is relatively less frequent in younger patients (age < 50). Recently, studies have suggested that early restoration of sinus rhythm may lead to improved outcomes compared with rate control, however the efficacy of catheter ablation for AF in young is scarce. METHODS: We included all hospitalized patients between 18 and 50 years with a diagnosis of AF from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2016-2017 from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Demographic and comorbidity data were collected and analyzed. Outcomes assessed included one-year AF readmission rates, all-cause readmission, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed for all demographic and comorbidity variables. RESULTS: Overall, 52,598 patients (medium age 44, interquartile range 38-48, female 25.7%) were included in the study, including 2,146 (4.0%) who underwent catheter ablation for AF. Patients who underwent catheter ablation had a significantly lower rate of readmission for AF or any cause at one year (adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-0.63] and HR of 0.81 [95% CI: 0.72-0.89], respectively). There was no difference in 1-year readmission for stroke or all-cause mortality between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed a consistent reduction in the risk of AF readmission among major demographic and comorbidity subgroups. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation in young patients with AF was associated with a reduction in 1-year AF related and all-cause readmissions. These data merit further prospective investigation for validation, through dedicated registries and multicenter collaborations to include young AF from diverse population.

Underutilization of Drug-Eluting Stents in Infrapopliteal Intervention for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

PURPOSE: Multiple randomized clinical trials have shown superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare-metal stents (BMS) for infrapopliteal disease. However, real-world data on DES utilization and outcomes in infrapopliteal chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized the Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2017 to extract patients undergoing infrapopliteal intervention with stents (BMS and DES) for CLTI using appropriate ICD-10 codes. Multilevel logistic regression with hospital ID as random effect was used to assess DES utilization. Primary outcome was the composite of target limb major amputation (TLmajA) and target limb revascularization (TLR). Multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Our study included a total of 1817 patients. Of these patients, 1056 patients (58.1%) received DES; DES utilization was stable (relative change: +2.5%, p-trend: 0.867) between 2016 and 2017 and was higher in teaching hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.03-1.61, p=0.029] and medium (aOR = 3.13, 95% CI = 2.17-4.55, p≤0.001) and large (aOR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.14-2.17, p=0.005) bed-sized hospitals. Inter-class correlation was 0.44 suggesting ~44% variation in DES utilization between any 2 random hospitals; DES was associated with lower rate of the primary composite outcome (aHR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62-0.92, p=0.004) compared with BMS. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing infrapopliteal intervention for CLTI, DES demonstrated significant underutilization despite supportive evidence of their superiority compared with BMS; DES was associated with improvement in the primary composite outcome compared with BMS.

Assessment of Repeat Revascularization in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trials as a Surrogate for Mortality: A Meta-Regression Analysis.

The association of repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with mortality is uncertain. To assess the association of repeat revascularization after PCI with mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We identified randomized controlled trials comparing PCI with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) using electronic databases through January 1, 2022. We performed a random-effects meta-regression between repeat revascularization rates after PCI (absolute risk difference [%] between PCI and CABG or OMT) with the relative risks (RR) of mortality. We assessed surrogacy of repeat revascularization for mortality using the coefficient of determination (R2), with threshold of 0.80. In 33 trials (21,735 patients), at median follow-up of 4 (2-7) years, repeat revascularization was higher after PCI than CABG [RR: 2.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.99-3.03)], but lower vs OMT [RR: 0.64 (0.46-0.88)]. Overall, meta-regression showed that repeat revascularization rates after PCI had no significant association with all-cause mortality [RR: 1.01 (0.99-1.02); R2=0.10) or cardiovascular mortality [RR: 1.01 (CI: 0.99-1.03); R2=0.09]. In PCI vs CABG (R2=0.0) or PCI vs OMT trials (R2=0.28), repeat revascularization did not meet the threshold for surrogacy for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (R2=0.0). We observed concordant results for subgroup analyses (enrollment time, follow-up, sample size, risk of bias, stent types, and coronary artery disease), and multivariable analysis adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, risk of bias, MI, and follow-up duration. In summary, this meta-regression did not establish repeat revascularization after PCI as a surrogate for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality.

Comparison of Large-Bore Thrombectomy With Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism.

Background: There is significant debate on whether large-bore thrombectomy (LBT) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is superior for the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) while employing an early invasive strategy through endovascular therapies. Methods: Between 2018 and 2021, 147 patients who presented to our institution with acute intermediate- or high-risk PE and had undergone PE Response Team-guided endovascular intervention with either LBT (Inari FlowTriever) or CDT (EKOSonic) were retrospectively reviewed. Data on the patients' clinical characteristics, comorbidities, serum biomarkers, hemodynamics, and imaging characteristics were obtained. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; the secondary outcomes were all-cause readmission, readmission for PE, and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. The safety outcome of procedure-related bleeding was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the cumulative event rate. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression and inverse propensity weighting were used to adjust for confounders. Results: The median age of the patients was 63 (IQR, 53-73) years, and 48.3% of the patients were women. Patients in the LBT group had a higher PE Severity Index score (LBT vs CDT: median, 132 vs 108; P = .015) and greater prevalence of malignancy (LBT vs CDT: median, 22.7% vs 6%; P = .011). After propensity matching for baseline characteristics, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (LBT vs CDT: median, 15.8% vs 9.1%; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.21-1.98; P = .442) for up to 1 year. The secondary outcomes or safety end points were also similar between the 2 interventions. An exploratory analysis showed elevated PE Severity Index scores, lower systolic blood pressures, and higher lactic acid levels to be associated with an increased risk of early death at 30 days. Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study, there was no significant difference in the cumulative event rate of all-cause mortality between LBT and CDT. Further studies are needed to evaluate the use of LBT versus CDT versus noninvasive therapy to understand outcomes and appropriate patient selection among those with intermediate- and high-risk PE.

Reported Pericardial Toxicities Associated with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Treatments: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA Adverse Reporting Database.

Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is one of the most common leukemias experienced in adults and conveys significant morbidity and mortality. While the traditional anthracycline based treatments of AML involves cytarabine, developments in alternatives (liposomal cytarabine, fludarabine, cladribine, azacitidine, decitabine), and targeted agents (midostaurin, gilteritinib, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and venetoclax) exist. Multiple cardiovascular adverse events, notably pericardial toxicity, have been observed in small studies; however, to date little is known about the comparative pericardial toxicity among these newer regimens. Due to the paucity of data, we sought to investigate the reported pericardial events and mortality associated with treatments for AML. Utilizing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), we identified all adverse events associated with FDA approved treatments for AML (2002-2022). Pericardial events were defined as pericarditis, pericardial effusion and tamponade. We excluded any individuals with age <18 years old. Logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with pericardial events. Out of 94,262 reported adverse events, 675 pericardial toxicities were included (243 pericarditis, 479 tamponade). Pericardial events occurred less often in Cladribine (0.3%, P < 0.001), fludarabine (0.4%, P < 0.001), Venetoclax (0.3%, P < 0.001), enasidenib (0.3%, P value < 0.001), and ivosidenib (0.3%, P < 0.001) compared to Cytarabine (0.9%). Tamponade events occurred significantly less often in cladribine (0.1%, P < 0.001), fludarabine (0.4%, P = 0.001), enasidenib (0.1%, P = 0.006), ivosidenib (0.1%, P = 0.01), and venetoclax (0.1%, P < 0.001) compared to cytarabine 0.7%. After adjusting for age and sex, Cladribine (reporting odds ratio [ROR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.18-0.68], P = 0.008) and Fludarabine (ROR 0.65 [0.45-0.92], P = 0.03), venetoclax (ROR 0.57 [0.41-0.79], P < 0.001) remained significantly associated with lower incidence of reported pericardial events. While cytarabine has been the routinely used and/or drug of choice for induction chemotherapy for AML, alternatives like cladribine may have a greater safety profile regarding pericardial toxicities. Future studies should be directed at further investigating cardiovascular safety profiles of AML induction therapy.

Timing of Repair in Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Defect.

The optimal timing of postinfarction ventricular septal defect (PI-VSD) repair is subject to debate. Patients with ventricular septal defect (VSD) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were queried using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision Clinical Modification codes from the National Inpatient Sample (2003 to 2018). VSD repair was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision Procedure Coding System codes. Data were stepwise stratified by cardiogenic shock (CS) and time of repair from admission to create 6 clinically relevant groups: shock 1 (CS; 0 to 7 days), shock 2 (CS; 8 to 14 days), and shock 3 (CS; >14 days). Nonshock groups were classified similarly. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multilevel hierarchical logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders for each group. We identified 10,902 patients with PI-VSD. In shock 1 (n = 5,794), VSD repair was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86, p <0.001) compared to no VSD repair. In shock 2 (n=1,009) mortality was numerically lower in those who received VSD repair, but not statistically different. In shock 3 (n=483), mortality was numerically higher in those who received VSD repair, but not statistically different. In nonshock 1 (n=5,108), VSD repair was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33 to 1.90; p <0.001). In nonshock 2 (n = 1,265), mortality was numerically higher in patients with VSD repair, although not statistically different. In nonshock 3 (n = 472), mortality was numerically lower in patients with VSD repair, although not statistically different. Mechanical circulatory support use increased over the 16 years (relative change + 18%, p <0.001), with no significant change in mortality among patients with PI-VSD. In conclusion, in patients with CS, early PI-VSD repair was associated with lower mortality. However, in patients without CS, early PI-VSD repair was associated with higher mortality.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis.

Background: Though the co-prevalence of aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is increasingly recognized, the role of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with CA remains unclear. Methods: The National Readmission Dataset (2016-18) and ICD-10 codes were used to identify those with CA and AS, in conjunction with TAVR status. The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure (HF) readmissions and all-cause mortality. All outcomes were followed up to 1-year with a median follow up time 172-days. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate cox-proportional hazard regression were used for time-to-event analysis. Results: Of 1,127 CA patients, 92 (8.2%) had undergone TAVR. Patients with CA who received TAVR were younger and more commonly had coronary artery disease (67.3% vs 44.2%). Teaching (93.6% vs 81.1%) and large hospitals (77.7% vs 59.3%) performed more TAVRs. In multivariate analysis, TAVR was associated with an improved primary outcome (8.9% vs 24.4%, HR:0.32; 95% CI 0.14-0.71, p = 0.007) and with reduced HF readmissions (3.8% vs 19.4%, HR:0.22; 95% CI 0.07-0.68, p = 0.008). All-cause mortality was numerically lower in TAVR patients with CA but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: CA patients who receive TAVR are younger, and the procedure is more commonly performed at large, teaching hospitals. TAVR was associated with a lower primary composite outcome of HF readmissions and all-cause mortality.

The utility of geriatric nutritional risk index to predict outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). BACKGROUND: The prevalence of CLTI continues to rise, with major amputation and mortality remaining prominent. Frailty is a vital risk factor for adverse outcomes in cardiovascular care. The GNRI is a nutrition-based surrogate for frailty that has been utilized in Southeast Asia to predict adverse events in CLTI. It has not yet been evaluated in a primarily Western population, nor in the context of wound healing. METHODS: Between 8August 2017 and April 2019, we identified patients undergoing endovascular interventions for CLTI at our institution, categorized into low GNRI (≤ 94, frail) versus normal GNRI (> 94, reference). We analyzed the risks of major adverse limb events (MALE), its individual components [mortality, major amputation, and target vessel revascularization (TVR)], amputation free survival (AFS), and wound healing using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate cox-proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients were included in the analysis, with follow up of 14 ± 9.1 months. Lower GNRI was associated with higher cumulative event rates for MALE (71.0% vs. 43.3%, p < 0.001), mortality (34.3% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001), major amputation (31.2% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.002), and freedom from AFS (56.0% vs. 28.2%, p < 0.001). There was a trend toward lower TVR and higher wound healing with higher GNRI score. CONCLUSIONS: Our single-center, retrospective evaluation of GNRI (as a surrogate for frailty) correlated with increased risks of MALE, mortality, and major amputation. Future directions should focus not only on the recognition of these patients, but risk-factor modification to optimize long-term outcomes.

Safety and feasibility of robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard percutaneous coronary intervention- a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Robotically assisted PCI offers a great alternative to S-PCI. This has gained even more relevance during the COVID-19 pandemic era however safety of R-PCI compared to S-PCI has not been studied well. This study explores the safety and efficacy of robotically assisted PCI (R-PCI) compared to standard PCI (S-PCI) for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and Google scholar databases were searched for studies comparing R-PCI to S-PCI. Outcomes included clinical success, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast use and radiation exposure. RESULTS: Theauthors included 5 studies comprising 1555 patients in this meta-analysis. Clinical success was comparable in both arms (p = 0.91). Procedure time was significantly longer in R-PCI group (risk ratio: 5.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.85 to 9.91, p = 0.003). Compared to S-PCI, patients in R-PCI group had lower contrast use (meandifference: -19.88, 95% confidence interval: -21.43 to -18.33, p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (mean difference:-1.82, 95% confidence interval: -3.64 to -0.00, p = 0.05) and radiation exposure (mean difference:-457.8, 95% confidence interval: -707.14 to -208.14, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: R-PCI can achieve similar success as S-PCI at the expense of longer procedural times. However, radiation exposure and contrast exposure were lower in the R-PCI arm.