Integrative action of axonal membrane explored by trains of subthreshold stimuli applied to the peripheral nerve.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide evidence on the integrative action of axonal membrane in humans and its ability to integrate multipulse subthreshold stimuli and generate action potential. METHODS: The median nerve was stimulated at the wrist in six healthy subjects and 17 patients who underwent low spine surgery by means of percutaneous electrodes, with trains of one to nine near-threshold constant-current stimuli of 500-µs duration. The interstimulus interval between stimuli was 2 or 4 ms. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle using subcutaneous needle electrodes in patients and surface electrodes in healthy subjects. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) without a muscle relaxant was used in all patients, and measurements were performed at the end of surgery. RESULT: A single near-threshold stimulus did not generate CMAP either in the healthy subjects or in the patients. However, when the number of near-threshold stimuli was increased to two to nine stimuli, and packed into a short train with interstimulus intervals of 2 or 4 ms, a CMAP of varying amplitude from 100 to 200 µV was successfully elicited. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the described phenomenon might be explained by the integrative action of the axonal membrane, which is able to summate the trains of subthreshold stimuli, increasing the resting potential to the firing level, and consequently generating CMAP. This is because the subthreshold stimuli make the axonal membrane hyperexcitable. SIGNIFICANCE: This phenomenon is not very well explored in clinical neurophysiology, and it needs to be studied further. This can explain some neurophysiologic phenomena during intraoperative monitoring.

Intraoperative monitoring of carotid endarterectomy by transcranial motor evoked potential: a multicenter study of 600 patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study was to investigate the utility of motor evoked potential monitoring elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation (tcMEP) during CEA in addition to the established median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (mSSEPs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 600 patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia with monitoring of mSSEPs and tcMEPs in a multicenter study. MSSEP and tcMEP parameters were recorded during internal carotid artery (ICA) cross clamping and compared with the postoperative motor outcome, demographic and patient history data. RESULTS: The intraoperative monitoring of tcMEPs was successful in 594 of the patients (99%) and selective shunt was performed in 29 of them (4.83%). Nine of the patients showed a transient contralateral loss of tcMEPs, without changes in mSSEPs and required intervention (1.5% "false-negative"). Three of them showed postoperative motor deficits. The time period from tcMEP loss to intervention was significantly longer (p = 0.01) in this group compared to the patients without postoperative motor deficit. CONCLUSION: TcMEPs during CEA may be an adjunct to mSSEP monitoring to avoid "false-negative" mSSEP results, as mSSEPs seem to lack specificity for detecting isolated ischemia of corticospinal pathway. SIGNIFICANCE: TcMEPs seem to improve postoperative outcome, especially in case of a timely correction of cerebral ischemia.