Characterizing Negative Online Reviews of Spine Surgeons.

DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: Characterize negative reviews of spine surgeons in the United States. SUMMARY: Physician rating websites significantly influence the selection of doctors by other patients. Negative experiences are impacted by various factors, both clinical and nonclinical, geography, and practice structure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and categorize negative reviews of spine surgeons in the United States, with a focus on surgical versus nonsurgical reviewers. METHODS: Spine surgeons were selected from available online professional society membership directories. A search for reviews was performed on Healthgrades.com, Vitals.com, and RateMDs.com for the past 10 years. Free response reviews were coded by complaint, and qualitative analysis was performed. χ 2 and Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, and multiple comparisons were adjusted with Benjamini-Hochberg correction. A binary logistic regression model was performed for the top three most mentioned nonclinical and clinical complaint labels. A P -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 16,695 online reviews were evaluated, including 1690 one-star reviews (10.1%). Among one-star reviews, 64.7% were written by nonsurgical patients and 35.3% by surgical patients. Nonclinical and clinical comments constituted 54.9% and 45.1% of reviews, respectively. Surgeons in the South had more "bedside manner" comments (43.3%, P <0.0001), while Northeast surgeons had more "poor surgical outcome" remarks compared with all other geographic regions (14.4%, P <0.001). Practicing in the South and Northeast were independent predictors of having complaints about "bedside manner" and "poor surgical outcome," respectively. CONCLUSION: Most one-star reviews of spine surgeons were attributed to nonsurgical patients, who tended to be unsatisfied with nonclinical factors, especially "bedside manner." However, there was substantial geographic variation. These results suggest that spine surgeons could benefit from focusing on nonclinical factors (bedside manner), especially among nonoperative patients, and that regional nuances should be considered in delivering spine care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level- 5.

Does a Preoperative Mental Health Diagnosis Affect Pain Management in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are typically treated surgically with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) when the curve continues to progress beyond 45 to 50 degrees. In adult patients, studies have shown that preoperative psychiatric diagnoses are associated with poorer clinical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. This study aims to address whether a preoperative mental health disorder affects outcomes in pediatric patients with AIS treated with PSF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients with a history of AIS requiring operative treatment with PSF at a single center with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. These patients were split into 2 groups: a subset that had a mental health disorder (MHD), and a control group. The MHD subset included patients with anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, manic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and stress disorder. The 2 groups were compared using independent student t -test and χ 2 analysis. RESULTS: A total of 417 patients were included in the study. Ninety-three patients were included in the MHD group, and 324 patients were included in the control group. The mean pain score for the MHD group was greater (3.93) compared with the control group (3.34). The PCA demands during inpatient stay for the MHD group were also greater (236.7) compared with the control group (140.0). There was no significant difference in the length of stay in the hospital between the MHD group (4.7 days) and the control group (4.6 days). There was a greater number of patients in the MHD cohort (25.8%) still using narcotic pain medication at first follow-up compared with the control group (12.0%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients with AIS with a preoperative mental health disorder undergoing PSF experience more pain after surgery and require more pain medication during their recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. This is a retrospective review of pediatric patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and a preoperative mental health diagnosis and their pain management requirements during the recovery period from posterior spinal fusion.

Diagnosis and Management of a 4-Year-Old Male with Ulnar Artery Pseudoaneurysm.

Background: Pseudoaneurysms are a rare vascular phenomenon caused by an intimal tear leading to hemorrhaging into surrounding tissue. Upper extremity pseudoaneurysms are well documented in adult patients and are attributed to repetitive trauma. Pediatric pseudoaneurysms are rare and are frequently misdiagnosed, which could lead to serious complications. Methods: This report presents the case of a 4-year-old male patient with an ulnar pseudoaneurysm of the right upper extremity. The pseudoaneurysm was diagnosed by ultrasound and computed tomography angiography and subsequently resected. The ulnar artery was reconstructed with an arterial graft using the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. Patency of the end-to-end anastomosis was confirmed by strip testing and Allen's test. Conclusions: The aim of this report is to provide a background of upper extremity pseudoaneurysms and describe their rare occurrence in pediatric patients and potential for complications upon misdiagnosis. Additionally, this report aims to highlight an alternative approach to management of pediatric pseudoaneurysms and advocate for reconstruction of the affected artery regardless of collateral flow being established.