Point-Of-Care Ultrasonography for Identification of Skin and Soft Tissue Abscess in Adult and Pediatric Patients; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Differentiating the soft tissue abscess from other types of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) poses a particular challenge because they have similar physical evaluation findings, but each disease has a different course, outcome, and treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosis of soft tissue abscess in the emergency departments. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar, from inception to January 2023, was conducted to identify relevant studies investigating the diagnostic performance of point-of-care ultrasonography for identification of abscess. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). Results: The pooled estimates of diagnostic parameters of ultrasonography for diagnosis of abscess were as follows: sensitivity, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.94); specificity, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85-0.89), and the area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC), 0.95. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the SROC of studies in adult patients were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92-1), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95), and 0.99, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the SROC of studies in pediatric patients were 0.9 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.82), and 0.91, respectively. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the point-of-care ultrasonography has excellent diagnostic value for the abscess in the emergency department. Furthermore, we found that the diagnostic performance of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosis of abscess was higher for adult cases than for pediatric patients.

Comparing the Effects of Atorvastatin With Sodium Valproate (Divalproex) on Frequency and Intensity of Frequent Migraine Headaches: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prophylactic effects of atorvastatin on frequency, intensity, and duration of migraine attacks compared with sodium valproate. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, single-center controlled trial, patients with 6 to 15 migraine attacks per month, which were candidates of preventive treatment, were recruited. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The first group (A) received atorvastatin 40 mg daily, and the second group (B) received sodium valproate 500 mg daily. All patients were visited each month and followed up for 3 months. The characteristics of migraine headaches including frequency, intensity, and duration of attacks were recorded, as well as the number of analgesics taken per each attack and probable adverse effects. RESULTS: From 100 patients enrolled in the study, 18 cases were excluded owing to adverse effects (2 cases) or lost to follow-up (16 cases). From 82 patients who completed the trial, 46 and 36 were in group A (atorvastatin) and group B (sodium valproate), respectively. Mean age of the patients was not significantly different in the 2 arms of the study (33.56 ± 8.51 in group A and 33.25 ± 9.91 years in group B, P = 0.877). Number, duration, and intensity of attacks and number of analgesics taken during attacks decreased significantly in both groups in monthly follow-ups. However, there was no statistically significant difference between 2 arms of the study in terms of attenuation in the characteristics of migraine attacks. On the other hand, patients in group A suffered fewer adverse effects compared with group B. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that atorvastatin could be an alternative for sodium valproate in migraine prophylaxis with comparable efficacy and fewer adverse effects. Multicenter studies with larger sample size are recommended.