The clinicopathological impact of tumor-associated macrophages in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are an immune component of the cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) microenvironment and affect tumor growth. TAMs can polarize into different phenotypes, that is, proinflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. However, the role of the macrophage phenotype in CMM remains unclear. METHODS: We examined 88 patients with CMM. Tissue microarrays were constructed, and the density of M1 and M2 macrophages was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Immune cells coexpressing CD68 and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (pSTAT1) were considered M1 macrophages, whereas those coexpressing CD68 and c-macrophage activating factor (c-Maf) were defined as M2 macrophages. These TAMs were counted, and the relationships between the density of M1 and M2 macrophages and clinicopathological factors including prognosis were investigated. RESULTS: The CD68/c-Maf score ranged from 0 to 34 (median: 5.5). The patients were divided based on the median score into the CD68/c-Maf high (≥5.5) and low (<5.5) expression groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that CD68/c-Maf expression was an independent predictive factor for progression-free survival and an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. CD68/pSTAT1 expression was found in only two patients. CONCLUSION: We suggest that CD68/pSTAT1 coexpression is rarely observed in patients with CMM, and high CD68/c-Maf expression is a predictor of worse prognosis in these patients.

Prognostic and predictive value of CD163 expression and the CD163/CD68 expression ratio for response to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with surgically resected lung squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Macrophages infiltrating the tumor microenvironment are defined as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). TAMs can be polarized into different phenotypes, that is, proinflammatory M1 macrophages or anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. Particularly, M2 macrophages promote angiogenesis, wound healing, and tumor growth. This study aimed to evaluate whether M2 TAMs can serve as a useful marker to predict prognosis and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with surgically resected lung squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). METHODS: We examined 104 patients with SCC. Tissue microarrays were constructed, and the density of TAMs was analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of CD68 and CD163. The relationship between CD68 and CD163 expression and the CD163/CD68 expression rate and clinicopathological characteristics including patient outcomes were investigated. In addition, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to test the hypothesis that these cells significantly influenced chemotherapy responses. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that pathological stage, CD163 expression, and the CD163/CD68 expression ratio were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis showed that these factors were all independent prognostic factors. Thirty-four pairs were determined by using PSM analysis. Patients with a low CD163/CD68 expression ratio benefited more from adjuvant chemotherapy than those with a high ratio. CONCLUSION: We suggest that M2 TAMs may be a useful marker to predict prognosis and differential benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with surgically resected lung SCCs.