Stroke: Hospital Nursing Management Within the First 24 Hours.

Within the United States, someone will have a stroke approximately every 40 seconds. Eighty-five percent of strokes are ischemic, with 15% classified as either intracranial or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke care is complex, and nurses play a critical role in identification, assessment, management, and coordination throughout the stroke continuum of care. This article will explore the nursing care of the patient with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke during the first 24 hours.

Diagnosis, Workup, Risk Reduction of Transient Ischemic Attack in the Emergency Department Setting: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

At least 240 000 individuals experience a transient ischemic attack each year in the United States. Transient ischemic attack is a strong predictor of subsequent stroke. The 90-day stroke risk after transient ischemic attack can be as high as 17.8%, with almost half occurring within 2 days of the index event. Diagnosing transient ischemic attack can also be challenging given the transitory nature of symptoms, often reassuring neurological examination at the time of evaluation, and lack of confirmatory testing. Limited resources, such as imaging availability and access to specialists, can further exacerbate this challenge. This scientific statement focuses on the correct clinical diagnosis, risk assessment, and management decisions of patients with suspected transient ischemic attack. Identification of high-risk patients can be achieved through use of comprehensive protocols incorporating acute phase imaging of both the brain and cerebral vasculature, thoughtful use of risk stratification scales, and ancillary testing with the ultimate goal of determining who can be safely discharged home from the emergency department versus admitted to the hospital. We discuss various methods for rapid yet comprehensive evaluations, keeping resource-limited sites in mind. In addition, we discuss strategies for secondary prevention of future cerebrovascular events using maximal medical therapy and patient education.

Outcomes of a Stroke Response Team on the Emergent Management of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage results in high patient mortality or poor functional outcomes. Early access to specialty care allows for rapid implementation of evidence-based strategies that improve the patient's long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a dedicated stroke response team on timeliness of blood pressure control, administration of anticoagulation reversal agents, and emergency department arrival to a critical care bed. METHODS: A stroke response team was developed from the neuro intensive care unit that compliments the hospital's current rapid response team. Development of an algorithm guides the implementation of key interventions for intracerebral hemorrhages. Widespread education targeting care of patients with hemorrhagic stroke provided the stroke response team and emergency department staff with knowledge to implement the plan of care. RESULTS: Baseline time interval data were collected on 70 consecutive patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. After implementation of a dedicated stroke response team, time interval data on 70 consecutive patients with intracerebral hemorrhage were collected for comparison with the baseline measurement. A significant decrease was seen in the time to control the patient's systolic blood pressure (median of 130 to 56 minutes, P = .000) and emergency department arrival to a critical care bed (240 to 132 minutes, P = .000). Patient arrival to anticoagulation reversal agent administration decreased from a mean of 98 to 72 minutes (P = .32). DISCUSSION: Implementation of a stroke response team increased the knowledge of the care team, improved the timeliness of blood pressure control, and decreased the time for emergency department arrival to a critical care bed, and to anticoagulation reversal agent administration.

Care of the Patient With Acute Ischemic Stroke (Prehospital and Acute Phase of Care): Update to the 2009 Comprehensive Nursing Care Scientific Statement: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

The year 2020 was the year of the nurse, celebrating nurse scholarship, innovation, and leadership by promoting scientific nursing research, improving nursing practice, advancing nursing education, and providing leadership to influence health policy. As architects of stroke care, neuroscience nurses play a vital role in collaborating and coordinating care between multiple health professionals. Nurses improve accessibility and equity through telestroke, emergency medical services, and mobile stroke units and are integral to implementing education strategies by advocating and ensuring that patients and caregivers receive stroke education while safely transitioning through the health care system and to home. Stroke care is increasingly complex in the new reperfusion era, requiring nurses to participate in continuing education while attaining levels of competency in both the acute and recovery care process. Advanced practice nurses are taking the lead in many organizations, serving as prehospital providers on mobile stroke units, participating as members of the stroke response team, and directing stroke care protocols in the emergency department. This scientific statement is an update to the 2009 "Comprehensive Overview of Nursing and Interdisciplinary Care of the Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient." The aim is to provide a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence on nursing care in the prehospital and hyperacute emergency hospital setting, arming nurses with the necessary tools to provide evidenced-based high-quality care.

Interprofessional Clinical Rounding: Effects on Processes and Outcomes of Care.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Communication breakdown is viewed as a significant contributor to preventable patient harm. Interprofessional rounding (IPR) is one method of communication supporting the evidenced-based care delivery. The purpose of this paper is to explore the benefits of IPR for patients, clinicians, and the healthcare system. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: Interprofessional rounding supports collaboration, discussion, and timely intervention to prevent miscommunication leading to adverse patient events. Adherence to evidence-based care suggests a positive impact on patient, process, and financial outcomes. Statistically significant IPR-related improvements are seen in reducing mortality, lengths of stay, medication errors, and hospitalization costs as well as improved staff and patient satisfaction. EVIDENCE-BASED STRATEGIES: One IPR-related gap in the literature is integrative care delivery, a strategy that provides a unified plan to meet the complex needs of patients and produce optimal outcomes. Activation and standardization with active participation in IPR support a collaborative integration of care. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Embracing IPR and advocating for collaboration across the care continuum is a crucial process in preventing adverse events. Integrated care delivery through IPR provides a unified plan to meet the complex needs of patients, prevent harm, and produce best possible outcomes.