Harmonizing Biopredictive Methodologies Through the Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) Part I: Biopredictive Dissolution of Ibuprofen and Dipyridamole Tablets.

Assessing in vivo performance to inform formulation selection and development decisions is an important aspect of drug development. Biopredictive dissolution methodologies for oral dosage forms have been developed to understand in vivo performance, assist in formulation development/optimization, and forecast the outcome of bioequivalence studies by combining them with simulation tools to predict plasma profiles in humans. However, unlike compendial dissolution methodologies, the various biopredictive methodologies have not yet been harmonized or standardized. This manuscript presents the initial phases of an effort to develop best practices and move toward standardization of the biopredictive methodologies through the Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI, https://pqri.org ) entitled "The standardization of in vitro predictive dissolution methodologies and in silico bioequivalence study Working Group." This Working Group (WG) is comprised of participants from 10 pharmaceutical companies and academic institutes. The project will be accomplished in a total of five phases including assessing the performance of dissolution protocols designed by the individual WG members, and then building "best practice" protocols based on the initial dissolution profiles. After refining the "best practice" protocols to produce equivalent dissolution profiles, those will be combined with physiologically based biopharmaceutics models (PBBM) to predict plasma profiles. In this manuscript, the first two of the five phases are reported, namely generating biopredictive dissolution profiles for ibuprofen and dipyridamole and using those dissolution profiles with PBBM to match the clinical plasma profiles. Key experimental parameters are identified, and this knowledge will be applied to build the "best practice" protocol in the next phase.

Biorelevant dissolution testing of a weak base: Interlaboratory reproducibility and investigation of parameters controlling in vitro precipitation.

Following a previous study which aimed to determine the interlaboratory reproducibility of biorelevant dissolution testing in the USP 2 apparatus for commercial formulations of two weak acids (ibuprofen and zafirlukast), this study attempts to determine the interlaboratory reproducibility using a similar protocol for a commercially available formulation of a weak base, indinavir. Fourteen partners including twelve industrial and two academic partners participated in this study. To ensure uniformity, all partners were provided with a standardized protocol to perform (i) a single medium dissolution test in fasted state simulated gastric and intestinal fluids (FaSSGF and FaSSIF, respectively) and (ii) a two-stage dissolution experiment simulating gastrointestinal transfer. Optionally, partners could run a single-stage dissolution test in fed state simulated intestinal fluid (FeSSIF). For each dissolution test, one Crixivan® capsule (containing 400 mg indinavir as its sulfate salt) was added as dose of interest. For the single medium dissolution test in FaSSIF, all partners observed rapid release of indinavir resulting in supersaturated concentrations, followed by precipitation to equilibrium solubility. The degree and period of supersaturation varied among the participating laboratories. Average dissolution profiles in FeSSIF appeared to be highly reproducible with dissolved concentrations remaining lower than the thermodynamic solubility of indinavir in FeSSIF. For the two-stage dissolution test, most partners observed supersaturated concentrations in the intestinal compartment; two partners observed no supersaturation due to immediate precipitation. Given the fact that a high interlaboratory but low intralaboratory variability was observed when supersaturation/precipitation occurred, an undefined factor was hypothesized as a potential cause of the variability in precipitation. Hence, the impact of several experimental factors on the supersaturation and precipitation behavior of indinavir was investigated in a next step. The investigation indicated that variability is likely attributable to a combination of factors, especially, the time elapsed between sampling and dilution of the sample with the mobile phase. Therefore, when designing a test in which supersaturation and precipitation is anticipated, stringent control of the test methodology, especially regarding sampling and dilution, is needed.

Validation of Dissolution Testing with Biorelevant Media: An OrBiTo Study.

Dissolution testing with biorelevant media has become widespread in the pharmaceutical industry as a means of better understanding how drugs and formulations behave in the gastrointestinal tract. Until now, however, there have been few attempts to gauge the reproducibility of results obtained with these methods. The aim of this study was to determine the interlaboratory reproducibility of biorelevant dissolution testing, using the paddle apparatus (USP 2). Thirteen industrial and three academic laboratories participated in this study. All laboratories were provided with standard protocols for running the tests: dissolution in FaSSGF to simulate release in the stomach, dissolution in a single intestinal medium, FaSSIF, to simulate release in the small intestine, and a "transfer" (two-stage) protocol to simulate the concentration profile when conditions are changed from the gastric to the intestinal environment. The test products chosen were commercially available ibuprofen tablets and zafirlukast tablets. The biorelevant dissolution tests showed a high degree of reproducibility among the participating laboratories, even though several different batches of the commercially available medium preparation powder were used. Likewise, results were almost identicalbetween the commercial biorelevant media and those produced in-house. Comparing results to previous ring studies, including those performed with USP calibrator tablets or commercially available pharmaceutical products in a single medium, the results for the biorelevant studies were highly reproducible on an interlaboratory basis. Interlaboratory reproducibility with the two-stage test was also acceptable, although the variability was somewhat greater than with the single medium tests. Biorelevant dissolution testing is highly reproducible among laboratories and can be relied upon for cross-laboratory comparisons.

An investigation into the utility of a multi-compartmental, dynamic, system of the upper gastrointestinal tract to support formulation development and establish bioequivalence of poorly soluble drugs.

In recent years mechanical systems have been developed that more closely mimic the full dynamic, physical and biochemical complexity of the GI Tract. The development of these complex systems raises the possibility that they could be used to support formulation development of poorly soluble compounds and importantly may be able to replace clinical BE studies in certain circumstances. The ability of the TNO Simulated Gastro-Intestinal Tract Model 1 (TIM-1) Dynamic Artificial Gastrointestinal System in the 'lipid membrane' configuration to support the development of Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class 2 compounds was investigated by assessing the performance of various AZD8055 drug forms and formulations in the TIM-1 system under standard fasting and achlorhydric physiological conditions. The performance data were compared with exposure data from the phase 1 clinical study. Analysis of the AZD8055 plasma concentrations after tablet administration supported the conclusions drawn from the TIM-1 experiments and confirmed that these complex systems can effectively support the product development of poorly soluble drugs. Particularly, the TIM-1 system was able to show that AZD8055 exposure would increase in an approximately dose proportional manner and not be limited by the solubility or dissolution. Additionally, the investigations also showed that the exposure produced by a solution and a tablet would be the same. Specific instances when the TIM-1 system may not be predictive of clinical product performance have also been identified.