Predictors of long term survival after hepatic resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective study of 5-year survivors.

AIM: To determine predictors of long term survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) by comparing patients surviving > 5 years with those who survived < 5 years. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with pathologically proven HC who underwent surgical resection at the Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Egypt between January 2002 and April 2013. All data of the patients were collected from the medical records. Patients were divided into two groups according to their survival: Patients surviving less than 5 years and those who survived > 5 years. RESULTS: There were 34 (14%) long term survivors (5 year survivors) among the 243 patients. Five-year survivors were younger at diagnosis than those surviving less than 5 years (mean age, 50.47 ± 4.45 vs 54.59 ± 4.98, P = 0.001). Gender, clinical presentation, preoperative drainage, preoperative serum bilirubin, albumin and serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase were similar between the two groups. The level of CA 19-9 was significantly higher in patients surviving < 5 years (395.71 ± 31.43 vs 254.06 ± 42.19, P = 0.0001). Univariate analysis demonstrated nine variables to be significantly associated with survival > 5 year, including young age (P = 0.001), serum CA19-9 (P = 0.0001), non-cirrhotic liver (P = 0.02), major hepatic resection (P = 0.001), caudate lobe resection (P = 0.006), well differentiated tumour (P = 0.03), lymph node status (0.008), R0 resection margin (P = 0.0001) and early postoperative liver cell failure (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Liver status, resection of caudate lobe, lymph node status, R0 resection and CA19-9 were demonstrated to be independent risk factors for long term survival.

Long term outcomes of choledochoduodenostomy for common bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopy and endoscopy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) has been reported as an effective treatment of Common bile duct stones (CBDS). This study was designed to analyze short term and long term outcomes of CDD for CBDS. METHODOLOGY: Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were collected. The long term assessment was done in a prospective manner included clinical examination, liver function, abdominal ultrasound, MRCP, upper GIT endoscopy and assessment of quality of life using Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). RESULTS: A total of 388 consecutive patients underwent CDD, the mean age was 57.92±13.25 years. The mean CBD diameter was 18.22±4.01 mm. The mean operative time was 81.21±20.23 minutes. Two patients had recurrent stone (0.06%) and managed successfully by endoscope. Gastritis was observed in 16.9% patients. No patient developed sump syndrome, deterioration in liver function or cholangiocarcinoma. Total and subgroup scores on the GIQLI before and after CDD differed significantly at follow-up (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: CDD is a safe and effective method of drainage of CBD after clearance of CBDS. Long term outcomes are acceptable with good quality of life. Sump syndrome is extremely rare; CDD may be associated with mild to moderate gastritis. CDD doesn't lead to development of cholangiocarcioma.

Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, predictors of severity and outcome. A single center experience of 588 cases.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study was designed to evaluate perioperative risk variables for DGE after PD and analyze the factors that predict its severity. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected. RESULTS: A total of 588 consecutive patients underwent PD. One hundred and five patients (17.9 %) developed DGE of any type. Forty-three patients (7.3 %) had a type A, 53 patients (9.01 %) had DGE type B, and the remaining nine patients (1.5 %) had DGE type C. BMI > 25, diabetes mellitus (DM), preoperative biliary drainage, retrocolic reconstruction, type of pancreatic reconstruction, presence of complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), and bile leaks were significantly associated with a higher incidence of DGE. Thirty-three (31.4 %) patients were diagnosed as primary DGE, while 72 (68.5 %) patients had DGE secondary to concomitant complications. Type B and C DGE were significantly noticed in secondary DGE (P = 0.04). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in primary DGE. CONCLUSION: Retrocolic GJ, DM, presence of complications, type of pancreatic reconstruction, and severity of POPF were independent significant risk factors for development of DGE. Type B and C DGE were significantly more in secondary DGE.

Comparative study between duct to mucosa and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The ideal technical pancreatic reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still debated. The aim of the study was to assess the surgical outcomes of duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) (G1) and invagination PJ (G2) after PD. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated by PD at our center were randomized into either group. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF); secondary outcomes included; operative time, day to resume oral feeding, postoperative morbidity and mortality, exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions. RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients treated by PD were randomized. The median operative time for reconstruction was significantly longer in G1 (34 vs. 30 min, P=0.002). POPF developed in 11/53 patients in G1 and 8/54 patients in G 2, P=0.46 (6 vs. 2 patients had a POPF type B or C, P=0.4). Steatorrhea after one year was 21/50 in G1 and 11/50 in G2, respectively (P=0.04). Serum albumin level after one year was 3.4 gm% in G1 and 3.6 gm in G2 (P=0.03). There was no statistically significant difference regarding the incidence of DM preoperatively and one year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Invagination PJ is easier to perform than duct to mucosa especially in small pancreatic duct. The soft friable pancreatic tissue can be problematic for invagination PJ due to parenchymal laceration. Invagination PJ was not associated with a lower rate of POPF, but it was associated with decreased severity of POPF and incidence of postoperative steatorrhea. CLINICAL TRIALS. GOV ID: NCT02142517.

Impact of obesity on surgical outcomes post-pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing worldwide epidemic. There is association between obesity and pancreatic cancer risk. However, the impact of obesity on the outcome of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is controversial. The aim of this study was to elucidate effect of obesity on surgical outcomes of PD. STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study. PATIENT AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent PD in our center between January 2000 and June 2012. Patients were divided into two groups; Group A (patients with BMI <25) and Group B (patients with BMI > 25). Preoperative demographic data, intraoperative data, and postoperative details were collected. RESULTS: Only 112/471 patients (25.9%) had BMI > 25. The median intraoperative blood loss was more in overweight patients (P = 0.06). The median surgical time in group B was significantly longer than that in group A (P = 0.003). The overall incidence of complications was higher in the overweight group (P = 0.001). The severity of complications was also higher in the overweight group (P = 0.0001). Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (P = 0.0001) and hospital mortality (P = 0.001) were significantly higher in overweight patients. Oral intake was significantly delayed in overweight patients in comparison to normal weight group (P = 0.02). Postoperative stay was significantly longer in overweight patients (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: PD is associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity in overweight patient. Overweight patients must not be precluded from undergoing PD. However, operative techniques and pharmacological prophylaxis to decrease POPF should be considered in overweight patients.

Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal strategy for the reconstruction of the pancreas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy (IRPJ) with those of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) after PD. METHODS: Consecutive patients submitted to PD were randomized to either method of reconstruction. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Secondary outcomes included operative time, day to resumption of oral feeding, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions. RESULTS: Ninety patients treated by PD were included in the study. The median total operative time was significantly longer in the IRPJ group (320 min versus 300 min; P = 0.047). Postoperative pancreatic fistula developed in nine of 45 patients in the IRPJ group and 10 of 45 patients in the PG group (P = 0.796). Seven IRPJ patients and four PG patients had POPF of type B or C (P = 0.710). Time to resumption of oral feeding was shorter in the IRPJ group (P = 0.03). Steatorrhea at 1 year was reported in nine of 42 IRPJ patients and 18 of 41 PG patients (P = 0.029). Albumin levels at 1 year were 3.6 g/dl in the IRPJ group and 3.3 g/dl in the PG group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated Roux loop PJ was not associated with a lower rate of POPF, but was associated with a decrease in the incidence of postoperative steatorrhea. The technique allowed for early oral feeding and the maintenance of oral feeding even if POPF developed.

Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience).

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains a challenge even at high-volume centers. METHODS: This study was designed to analyze perioperative risk factors for POPF after PD and evaluate the factors that predict the extent and severity of leak. Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected. RESULTS: A total of 471 consecutive patients underwent PD in our center. Fifty-seven patients (12.1 %) developed a POPF of any type; 21 patients (4.5 %) had a fistula type A, 22 patients (4.7 %) had a fistula type B, and the remaining 14 patients (3 %) had a POPF type C. Cirrhotic liver (P = 0.05), BMI > 25 kg/m(2) (P = 0.0001), soft pancreas (P = 0.04), pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm (0.0001), pancreatic duct located <3 mm from the posterior border (P = 0.02) were significantly associated with POPF. With the multivariate analysis, both BMI and pancreatic duct diameter were demonstrated to be independent factors. The hospital mortality in this series was 11 patients (2.3 %), and the development of POPF type C was associated with a significantly increased mortality (7/14 patients). The following factors were predictors of clinically evident POPF: a postoperative day (POD) 1 and 5 drain amylase level >4,000 IU/L, WBC, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, and pancreatic texture. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhotic liver, BMI, soft pancreas, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, pancreatic duct near the posterior border are risk factors for development of POPF. In addition a drain amylase level >4,000 IU/L on POD 1 and 5, WBC, pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic texture may be predictors of POPF B, C.